4.15총선, 거짓의 둑 / 무너지기 시작하다 [공병호TV] https://youtu.be/4pjTd58o0yM 대선, 부정선거였다 [공병호TV] https://youtu.be/TNbYsYZK4qE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 조혜주와 파란집의 빅딜설, 권순일 영혼까지 털린 이유. 집단이냐 단독이냐? 시대정신 연구소 https://youtu.be/Ge5Lj_zvsCo ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 칼 막스: 사악한 인간의 초상 지난 10년 사이에 칼 막스를 심리학적으로 분석한 3권의 중요한 책이 출판되었는데, 각각의 저자는 베르너 블루멘베르크, 에른스트 쿡스, 아놀드 퀸즐리 등이다. 프로메테우스는 막스의 인생에서 가장 중요한 상징이다. 신들에 대한 반항, 기존의 모든 질서에 대한 반란은 막스의 핵심 아이디어이다. 막스는 유아기적 성향에서 벗어나지 못했고, 타인과의 관계에서 그는 전적으로 청소년적, 또는 유아적이었다. 막스의 기본 생각은 모든 압박, 압제, 통제에서 벗어나 자기중심적인 자아실현을 이루는 인간이었다. 그는 노동자들의 해방을 주장했지만, 노동자들의 정신 상태에 대한 지식이 없었고, 그들에 대한 애정도 없었다. 그가 노동자들에 알고 있던 건 통계 숫자일 뿐이었다. 막스를 만난 후 그를 혐오하게 된 하인리히 하이네는 막스를 “무신無身이면서 스스로가 신神”인 사람이라고 표현했다. 막스를 염탐했던 프러시아 정보원은 그가 씻지도, 머리를 빗지도, 속옷을 갈아입지도 않으며, 집시처럼 생활한다고 보고했다. 또 그는 기회가 되면 술을 마셨고, 남에는 자고 밤을 샜다. 자본론의 2 장을 쓰는 막스는 무려 14년을 소비했다. 자본론이 1권 밖에 출판되지 못한 것은 필연적이었다. 그가 남긴 원고를 정리해서 엥겔스가 출판했으므로, 막시즘은 사실은 엥겔시즘이라고 할 수 있다. 독일의 고전 시인 장 폴은 “모든 세기마다 하나님은 사악한 천재를 보내서 인간을 시험한다”고 했는데, 막스가 바로 그런 경우이다. Portrait of an Evil Man: Karl Marx Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn In the "German Democratic Republic" they tell the story about a weary old man who tries to gain entrance into the Red Paradise. A Communist Archangel holds him up at the gate and severely cross-questions him: "Where were you born?" "In an ancient bishopric." "What was your citizenship?" "Prussian." "Who was your father?" "A wealthy lawyer." "What was your faith?" "I converted to Christianity." "Not very good. Married? Who was your wife?" "The daughter of an aristocratic Prussian officer and the sister of a Royal Prussian Minister of the Interior who persecuted the Socialists." "Awful. And where did you live mostly?" "In London." "Hm, the colonialist capital of capitalism. Who was your best friend?" "A manufacturer from the Ruhr Valley." "Did you like workers?" "Not in the least. Kept them at arm’s length. Despised them." "What did you think about Jews?" "I called them a money-crazy race and hoped that they would vanish from the Earth." "And what about the Slavs?" "I despised the Russians." "You must be a fascist! You even dare to ask for admission to the Red Paradise — you must be crazy! By the way, what’s your name?" "Karl Marx." Man, indeed, is a very strange animal. This has been proved in many ways, but especially by the Marx-renaissance of recent decades. And yet the ideas of this odd and by no means constructive thinker are responsible all over the world for rivers of blood and oceans of tears. There can be no doubt that without the Communist challenge National Socialism, its competitor, would never have succeeded. Hitler boasted to Rauschning that he was the real executor of Marxism (though "minus its Jewish-Talmudic spirit"); thus the macabre death dance of our civilization in the past fifty years is due to that scurrilous, evil and unhappy man who spent half his life copying endless passages from books in the British Museum Library’s reading room. Yet, with the exception of numerous pamphlets and the first volume of a book, he left nothing but badly assembled, unpublishable manuscripts and a mountain of notes. It was his friend Friedrich Engels who, with the most laborious efforts, had to bring them into shape. New Interest from the Left This Marx-renaissance is due largely, but not solely, to the rise of the New Left which argues that the dear old man had been thoroughly misunderstood by the barbaric Russians. Also a number of men and women would be horrified to be called Socialists or Communists but still have a soft spot in their hearts for a man who "at least was filled with compassion for the poor and was an admirable father and a tender husband." Surely, Marx was a complex and contradictory person, and the renewed attention paid to him has produced a number of German books analyzing this most fatal figure of our times. Destructive ideas almost unavoidably derive from a destructive and — in this case — rather repulsive person. Karl Marx was born in Trier, of Jewish parents, in 1818. Only a few years earlier this Catholic bishopric was forcibly incorporated into the Kingdom of Prussia and Karl Marx’s father embraced the Lutheran faith of the Prussian occupants. The children and the rather reluctant mother were baptized by a Prussian army chaplain only at a later date. The deism of Enlightenment was the true faith of Heinrich Marx who, however, was a cultured man and a devoted father. Young Karl finished high school-college with flying colors at the age of seventeen and set out to study law which he shortly abandoned for philosophy, eyeing the possibility of an academic career. He first matriculated in Bonn, then in Berlin where he fell under the spell of the Hegelians. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Jena, but renounced the idea of becoming a professor. He also gave up writing his self-centered poetry and his dream of running a theatrical review. He then married into the Prussian nobility and established himself as a free-lance writer in Paris where he soon clashed with the more humanitarian French socialists. He moved to Cologne, then returned to Paris and, finally —expelled from Belgium as an enemy of the established order — he took a permanent abode in London where, with interruptions, he remained until his death in 1883. So much for the facts of his life. Within the last decade three books have been published in German analyzing Marx psychologically. These tomes are very different in scope but they hardly vary in their judgments. The authors belong to no "school" in particular, but all are serious students of our "hero’s" works and personal history. These books are Marx, by Werner Blumenberg, a small, but exceedingly readable paperback (1962), Karl Marx, Die Revolutionare Konf ession by Ernst Kux (1967) and Karl Marx, Eine Psychographie by Arnold Künzli (1966). The last two have not been published in the United States and whoever is acquainted with the tremendous difficulties encountered by translations of learned books in the United States will not be surprised. The reasons for this state of affairs are not solely of a financial nature. This article is partly based on the work of these authors. A Generation Gap Let us return to the personality of the founder of socialism and communism. Even as a young man Marx does not appear to have been attractive. As a student he is liberally provided with money by his affluent father, and spends his annuity of 700 Thalers — a nice middle class income would then be around 300 Thalers — in a manner still unexplained. In spite of his love for Jenny von Westphalen he is an unhappy, "torn" person and writes in these terms to his father. Heinrich Marx ticks him off: "To be quite frank, I hate this modern expression —’torn — used by weaklings if they are disgusted with life merely because they cannot get without effort beautifully furnished palaces, elegant carriages, and millions in the bank." And in another letter the old gentleman, knowing his son only too well, tells him that he suspects his heart not to have the same qualities as his mind. "If your heart is not pure and human, if it becomes alienated by an evil genius… my life’s great hope will be dashed." Karl Marx was impatient. In this connection it is worthwhile to have a look at his doctoral dissertation on Epicurus, the materialistic Greek philosopher who, as the founder of Epicureanism, made sensual pleasures the main purpose of life. Here Marx quoted several lines from Aeschylus in which Prometheus rants against the gods and ridicules the idea of being an obedient son to Father Zeus. The figure of Prometheus was, indeed, as Kux and Künzli demonstrate one of the guiding stars in Marx’s life. The revolt against God (and the gods), the rebellion against the entire existing order, all quite natural in youth, remained his leitmotiv until his death. Marx, as our authors insist, never really grew up. His entire relationship to other people continued to be juvenile, if not infantile. Marx’s basic vision was that of a humanity freed from all oppression, repression and controls and thus open to an egotistic "self-realization" — primarily of an artistic order. There was, as he believed, a Raphael, a Michelangelo, a Shakespeare, a Bach in every man. This great liberation, however, could only be achieved by the rule, the dictatorship of the poorest and most tyrannized people, the working class. These were the ones, he thought, who could be indoctrinated to destroy the existing order entirely — and then to build a new one. They were ordained "by history" to carry out his murderous dreams. The trouble was that he had no knowledge of the mind and mentality of the workers nor any affection for them. He only knew "statistically" about their situation, their living conditions; and these were humble, inevitably so, because at the beginning of any industrialization (be it capitalistic or socialistic) the purchasing power of the masses is still low and the costs of saving and investing (i.e. the buying of expensive machinery) are bound to be very high. In the period of early capitalism the manufacturers, contrary to a widespread legend, lived rather puritanically and were by no means bent on luxury. But none of this endeared the workers to Marx in any way. He had only words of contempt for them, except as they might be mobilized against the "bourgeois" society which Marx so hated. Glaring Inconsistencies Despite his entirely "bourgeois" background this is the way his lifelong opposition against his family, above all against his parents, took shape. Interestingly enough, Marx’s anti-middle-class complex was not accompanied by any marked loathing for the aristocracy to which his wife belonged. He probably preferred her father to his own. The young leader of the German Worker’s Movement directed his wife to have her calling cards printed: "Jenny Marx, née baronne de Westphalen." He also sported a most feudal-looking monocle and was a real snob. His two closest friends belonged to the hated grande bourgeoisie: Friedrich Engels, the Presbyterian textile manufacturer; and August Philips, a Dutch banker, a Calvinist of Jewish origin who was his maternal cousin. Apart from these two, Marx had no real friends. Budding friendships he destroyed almost automatically through his pettiness, his envy, his rancor and his urge to domineer. He was one of the greatest haters in modern history, and one of the reasons why he never really got ahead in his basic work was his endless hostile pamphleteering. If he felt slighted by anybody, if he saw in some writer a possible competitor, if an innocent author had written about a theme of interest to Marx but with conclusions differing from his, Marx immediately dropped every serious research object, sat down and wrote a vitriolic reply or an entire pamphlet. He had the most poisonous pen under the sun and used the most unfair personal arguments. Even as a scholar he never could refrain from going off on a tangent. He sometimes copied half a book which had nothing to do with his main subject; hence the mountains of undecipherable notes and casual remarks on small slips. A Vindictive Nature He was a brilliant talker who dominated conversations with his caustic remarks. A Prussian lieutenant named Techow, a convert to socialism, after visiting Marx said in a letter that he would be ready to sacrifice everything for him "if only his heart were remotely as good as his mind." Marx, needless to say, vilified almost everybody within his reach and despised especially the German refugees, the 48-ers, in whose company he had to live most of the time. (Significantly enough, he had hardly any contacts with genuine Englishmen who probably could not stand his manners and mannerisms.) Marx had nothing but contempt for women in general and never engaged in genuine conversations with his wife who was decidedly an intelligent and sensitive woman with a good educational background. Part of Marx’s worst ire was directed against the Jews. In this he was not in the least inhibited by his Jewish descent. His hatred for Jews had certain religious aspects but was primarily a racism of the most wicked sort. No, Marx certainly was not a "good man". In his memoirs, Carl Schurz, the German democratic revolutionary, who later became a U. S. Senator, has given us his impressions of Marx: "The stocky, heavily built man with his broad forehead, his pitch black hair and full beard, attracted general attention… What Marx said was indeed substantial, logical and clear. But never did I meet a man of such offensive arrogance in his demeanor. No opinion deviating in principle from his own would be given the slightest consideration. Anybody who contradicted him was treated with barely veiled contempt. Every argument which he happened to dislike was answered either with biting mockery about such pitiful display of ignorance, or with defamatory suspicions as to the motives of the interpellant. I still well remember the sneering tone with which he spat out the word bourgeoisie. And as bourgeois, that is to say as an example of a profound intellectual and moral depravity, he denounced everybody who dared to contradict his views." Arnold Ruge, a well-known German essayist, with whom Marx collaborated in Paris in a literary venture and who soon fell out with him, wrote to Fröbel (nephew of the famous educator of the same name) that "gnashing his teeth and with a grin Marx would slaughter all those who got in the way of this new Babeuf. He always thinks about this feast which he cannot celebrate." Heinrich Heine, who also quickly learned to dislike Karl Marx, called him a "godless self-god." Unkempt and Undisciplined Karl Marx was in no way an attractive man; he had no hidden charms. A Prussian detective, sent to London in order to find out what this intellectual wire-puller of Socialism was like, informed his government that Marx was leading "the true life of a gypsy. To wash, to comb his hair or to change his underwear are rare occurrences with him… if he can, he gets drunk… he might sleep during the day and stay up all night… he doesn’t care whether people come or leave… if you enter his home you have to get used to the smoke of tobacco and the coal in the open fireplace with the result that it takes some time until you can see properly the objects in the rooms." Gainful work was alien to him and when he landed a part-time job as the correspondent for the New York Tribune (under Charles A. Dana, an early American socialist), it was his friend Engels who had to write most of the articles during the first year. Marx could have earned money by giving language lessons, but he refused this and continued to sponge on Engels, who really made Marx. (Once Marx, as a true socialist, tried to gamble at the London Stock Exchange, but failed.) Engels was his "angel" from every imaginable point of view. A Most Unhappy Family The sufferings of the Marx family, and especially of poor faithful Jenny, are difficult to describe. Though they did have a housekeeper and though Friedrich Engels spent in the course of the years at least 4000 Pounds on Karl Marx, they lived in abject misery. The death of one child, a boy, is directly attributable to poverty and neglect. Family life must have been absolutely terrible, but Marx could be moved—neither by entreaties, nor by tears, nor by cries of despair. For two chapters of Das Kapital he needed fourteen years. No wonder that only the first volume was published during his lifetime and that it was Engels’ headache to assemble and to rewrite the rest, so that — as one author suggested — we should speak of Engelsism rather than of Marxism. Yet it would be a mistake to think that Marx suffered silently and proudly. By no means! In his letters and in his conversations he never failed to complain and to lament. He had a colossal amount not only of self-hatred, but also of self-pity, but no human feelings for others, least of all for his wife whose health he had ruined completely. Marx liked his daughters. These were — intellectually, linguistically, artistically — extremely gifted girls, but the spiritual background of the family had an adverse influence on them. Marx was a fanatical atheist, a disciple of Feuerbach who thus succinctly formulated his views: "Der Mensch ist, was er isst — Man is what he eats." And in an early poem Marx had declared: "And we are monkeys of an icy god." Jenny, too, had completely lost her childhood faith and her sufferings had made her practically despondent toward the end of her life. She was older than her husband and preceded him in death. The oldest of his daughters, also named Jenny, the most beloved by the father, died of cancer at the age of thirty-nine. Karl Marx survived her only by two months. Laura, for reasons unknown, committed suicide together with her husband later in their lives. The French Socialist Party was stunned; at their grave one of the speakers was a Russian refugee, Vladimir Ilyitch Ulyanov, better known under his pen-name: Lenin. Years later, each time he looked up from his desk in the Kremlin study (now transferred to the Lenin Museum in Moscow) he saw on his desk not a crucifix, an ikon or a picture of his wife, but the statuette of a reddish ape with an evil grin. "We monkeys of an icy god!” Eleanor, the third daughter, a quite hysterical child and later a passionate socialist and feminist, admitted that she "saw nothing worth living for." She also committed suicide. Still, in her farewell letter to her nephew Jean Longuet, she exhorted him, above all, to be worthy of his grandfather. Who can explain the influence of this queer and sinister man on the world? Undoubtedly he was talented in many ways, but there is nothing truly valuable about his extremely negative, nay, even absurd message. However, history is not reasonable. Mankind is not either. Surely, all the prophecies of Marx in the economic and historical field have proved wrong. His philosophical insights are totally obsolete. They are not even worth refutation except, maybe, as an exercise for high school students or college undergraduates. They are, above all, proved to be wrong empirically. But what does it matter? Material victories or publicity triumphs are one thing, truth or goodness very different ones. The Children of Darkness have always been more clever than the Children of Light. Socialism, moreover, has always been a "clear, but false idea." A free market economy, on the other hand, is far more complex and cannot be explained in a nutshell. In the political arena it competes poorly with the notion of collective ownership and central planning —until the latter’s bankruptcy is proved in practice. The ideas of the hate-swollen bookworm in the library reading room can only be shown up in life. Here the method of trial and error, however, has its terrible pitfalls. To experience Marxism entails a captivity from which, as we know, escape is not so simple. The poor East Europeans realize all this only too well. More than a hundred years ago the German classic poet and writer Jean Paul wrote that "In every century the Almighty sends us an evil genius in order to tempt us." In the case of Marx the temptation is still with us, but as far as the perceptive observer can see, in spite of the renewed interest in the "Red Prussian," it is now slowly, slowly subsiding. Originally published in The Freeman, September 1973, pp. 657–65. Author: Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn (1909-1999) was an Austrian nobleman and socio-political theorist who described himself as an enemy of all forms of totalitarianism and as an "extreme conservative arch-liberal" or "liberal of the extreme right." Described as "A Walking Book of Knowledge," Kuehnelt-Leddihn had an encyclopedic knowledge of the humanities and was a polyglot, able to speak eight languages and read seventeen others. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 이묘환으로 통풍, 무좀, 음낭습진, 항문 습진 등을 치료할 수 있다. 二妙丸及其新用、治痛风、甩掉脚气、治疗阴囊潮湿和肛周湿疹 二妙丸，是以炒制的苍术、黄柏按照1:1的比例粉碎后，按照传统水泛丸的工艺制成的中药成方制剂。二妙丸是中医用于燥湿清热的基础名方，广泛应用于湿热下注引起的炎症、红肿、渗出等症。临床中在各科都有应用，只要是辨证为湿热证，尤其是湿重于热证，均可使用。 二妙丸疗效显著的疾病 皮肤科：湿疹、脚气、阴囊湿疹、生殖器疱疹、带状疱疹、手癣、臁疮、脓疱疮、脚癣、下肢急慢性湿疹、皮炎、肛门瘙痒症、老年瘙痒症、酒糟鼻。 　　 妇科：白带异常（各种阴道炎导致）、急慢性泌尿系感染、月经不调、盆腔炎。 　　 内科：腹泻、细菌性痢疾、肠炎、黄疸、肝炎（急性传染性黄疸型肝炎）、胃炎和胃溃疡（湿热型）、失眠多梦（湿热证）。 　　 外科：足膝红肿热痛、风湿性关节炎（湿热症）、下肢静脉曲张兼湿热者、下肢溃疡、糖尿病足、下肢丹毒、坐骨神经痛（湿热证）、湿热腰痛。 　　 泌尿科：泌尿系感染。治疗急性肾小球肾炎。 　　 口腔科：口臭、口舌生疮、牙龈炎、牙周炎。 　　 耳鼻喉科：慢性咽炎、慢性鼻窦炎、慢性上颌窦炎等。 　　 男科：阳痿（湿热下注）、睾丸炎或附睾丸炎 　 　 湿热常常表现为一种体质，很难短时间去除，因此往往需要长期用药，多数燥湿清热的药物药性都很强，因此用药应加以注意。由于二妙丸组方简单，几乎无毒副作用，长期服用，非常安全。因此是燥湿清热的首选药物。 [用法用量]口服，一次6-9克，一日2次。 古代典籍中名“二妙散”方名的方剂还有不少。 ①《普济方》卷71《杨氏家藏方》中之二妙散由当归、熟干地黄各等分组成，主治目昏，视物不明，泪下。 ②《百一选方》卷18引柳正之方二妙散由蛇退1条，蚕纸1片（方5寸以上)组成，以麝香温酒调下，主治难产。 ③《朱氏集验方》卷1二妙散由当归、橘皮各等分组成，具理气血，去风作用。 ④《朱氏集验方》卷6二妙散由四君子汤，黄芪建中汤各一贴加白扁豆，缩砂仁组成，主治痔疾。 ⑤《朱氏集验方》卷10二妙散由平胃散、四君子汤各二贴组成，主治妇人血崩。 ⑥《普济方》卷204二妙散由半夏一两，干桑皮二两组成，主治五膈气，心胸痞塞。 ⑦《万病回春》卷7二妙散用蜣螂炭火烘干研末服，主治小儿大小便不通。 ⑧《证治准绳》疡医 卷5二妙散由马蹄香、香圆橘叶组成，主治马�，满身起堆。 ⑨《慈幼新书》卷1二妙散由文蛤一两，黄柏二钱组成，主治眼中翳膜血丝，煎水外洗。 ⑩《绛囊摄要》二妙散由蒲黄炒黑，海螵蛸各等分组成，主治舌肿出血，另一方由木瓜一两，干丝瓜络五钱组成，主治虚火牙龈肿痛。以二妙散为名的方剂在《仙拈集》、《外科全生集》等典籍中还有记载，但药物组成各不相同。 　　 另外，朱震亨认为在应用二妙散之前，“若痰热者，先以舟车丸，或导水丸，神芎丸下伐，后以趁痛散服之”。导水丸（见《丹溪心法》卷2 喘15）又名神芎导水丸，“大黄、黄芩二两，丑末、滑石四两，右为末，滴水丸，每四五十丸，温水下。”（见《丹溪心法》卷3 痢9）而《丹溪心法》卷3 发热47：“神芎丸，大黄、黄芩、滑石、牵牛，右为末，滴水为丸。”显然，导水丸即神芎丸，用于清热泻下。“趁痛散（《丹溪心法》卷4 痛风63）：乳香、没药、桃仁、红花、当归、地龙酒炒，牛膝酒浸，羌活、甘草、五灵脂酒淘，香附童便浸，或加酒芩，炒酒柏。右为末，酒调二钱服。”从舟车丸、导水丸、趁痛散诸方分析，主要是加强利水除湿、活血行气通经作用，达到强筋健骨的目的，这更利于二妙散发挥治疗作用。 二妙丸（散）新用途 来源：cm.39.net 二妙丸是一种常用中成药，来源于元代朱震亨的《丹溪心法》一书，本方由黄柏、苍术两味中药组成，具有清热燥湿之功效。适用于膝关节红肿热痛、腿膝疼痛、湿疮、带下等病症。现代研究表明，本药还具有解热、抑菌、镇静、解除胃肠痉挛等作用，有“中药抗生素”之美誉。 除传统用法以外，二妙丸在很多领域都有新的应用。现将临床上疗效较好的几则新用途介绍如下，患者酌情选用，可取得满意的效果。 　　规格　丸剂：每10粒1。2克，每瓶200克；散剂：每袋10克。 　　1．治疗急性细菌性痢疾 　　用二妙丸的水提取液进行体外抑菌实验显示，该药对多种细菌的生长具有抑制作用，用以治疗急性细菌性痢疾疗效满意。 　　具体用法是：口服二妙丸，每次6克，早、晚各服1次，温开水送服。一般服用2～4天可获治愈。在服用本药时，饮食宜清淡，忌油腻及生冷之食物。 　　2．治疗白带过多 　　有报道称，临床运用二妙丸治疗白带过多患者27例，经用药10天后治愈者达22例，占81％。用法为：取二妙散5克，用开水冲服，每日2次，5天为1个疗程，一般用药2～3个疗程后症状即可消失。 　　3．治疗口腔溃疡 　　将二妙散加入蜂蜜混合均匀(二妙散与蜂蜜的比例为1：5)，装入瓶中备用。用时将上述药膏涂于溃疡处，每日3次，含药15分钟后咽下。含药后1小时内不宜进食。此法治疗口腔溃疡，溃疡面多可在3～5日内消退。 　　4．治疗坐骨神经痛 　　坐骨神经痛的主要表现为臀部、大腿后外侧、小腿外侧疼痛，屈伸不利。用法：每日口服3次，每次8克，黄酒和白开水各半送服。7天为1个疗程。 　　5．治疗脓疱疮 　　用法：先将二妙丸和凡士林按1：5调和均匀，涂于患处，每日1次。内服每日3次，每次6克，温开水送服。一般在2～5天内可获治愈。 6. 治疗急性传染性黄疸型肝炎 口服二妙丸，每次8克，日服3次，10天为1个疗程。二妙丸与西药保肝药同时应用，能明显的提高疗效，缩短病程。 7. 治疗急性肾小球肾炎 内服二妙丸，每次6克，日服3次，温开水送服。7天为1个疗程。服药期间忌盐饮食，注意休息，预防感冒。在恢复期症状消失后，不得停药过早，应继续服用6天后停药。 8. 治疗慢性胆系感染内服二妙丸，每次6克，日服3次，温开水送服。5天为1个疗程。连续服至症状消失时为止。 二妙丸也能治痛风 来源：家庭保健报 为了帮痛风患者减轻痛苦，本报记者联系了黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院风湿科主任李泽光，据李主任介绍，他们医院治疗痛风多采用二妙丸或者四妙丸，效果也都很理想。之所以有“二、四”之分，是因为患者的体质不同，中医讲究辨证施治，所以加入的辅药也不同。 　　下面我们来看一下具体的药方： 　　二妙丸 　　药材：草黄柏、苍术各等分。 　　制法：将以上药材研成细末，用温开水冲服，每次5克，早饭前，晚饭后服用，能清热利湿，辅助治疗痛风。 　　禁忌：气血不足者慎用，如神疲乏力，少气懒言，心悸失眠，两目干涩的人就不宜服用。 　　四妙丸 　　药材：2份草黄柏、2份苍术、2份川牛膝、4份薏苡仁。 　　制法：按上述比例将药材研成细末，用适量蜂蜜调和，搓成丸，每天吃2～3次，每次5～10克。此方能治疗湿热下注、关节肿痛、痛风。也可以按比例取5克药末，用温开水冲服，早饭前喝一次，晚饭后喝一次。 　　禁忌：肝肾阴虚比较明显者慎用，如脾胃虚弱、气血不足、经常腹泻、面色萎黄的人就不适合用。 　　李主任提醒，以上两个方子用上一周就可以见效，如果一周内病情没有好转，可能是个体有差异，不对症，此时不要再继续服用，建议去中医院咨询。本报记者 刘佳 来源：http://epaper.hljnews.cn/jtbjb/html/2011-02/22/content_628429.htm 二妙丸帮你甩掉脚气 脚气，学名“足癣”，是由一种或多种真菌(皮癣菌)侵入皮肤表皮层而造成的足部感染，最常见的症状就是瘙痒难耐、皮肤脱屑。足癣还具有传染性，传染到手引起手癣，传染到指甲引起灰指甲，也可以传染给家人。我国属于脚气高发地区，全国平均发病率达1/3，在一些高发地区发病率高达60%。一些特殊人群中，如运动员、矿工、军人，足癣发病率可高达80%。南方发病率相对较高，这与当地闷热，潮湿的气候有关。在夏季尤为多见。脚气导致患部剧痒无比、足部脱皮等，有些人会起水泡，有些人脚很臭。此外，脚癣抓破后，化脓菌侵入造成皮肤感染，可发展为脓疱疮或丹毒，也可以引起淋巴管炎（俗称红线）和淋巴结发炎。严重者会引发败血症而危及生命。 为什么会有如此多的人患有脚气，主要有三个方面： 1．患者自身湿热体质导致病情迁延难愈。不注意清除体内湿热，单通过口服或外用抗真菌类药物，短时间内能取得了良好效果，再次进入潮湿环境或者穿透气性不好的鞋袜，又导致复发，前期辛苦治疗功亏一篑。 2．交叉感染。家庭成员如果都患有脚气，应同时治疗，不共穿鞋袜，不共用脚盆等。另外在公共浴室洗澡，应尽量避免使用公共拖鞋。 3．有一部分人不把脚气当病，任其“自生自灭”。现代生活节奏加快，一部分年轻人即使患有脚气，却根本无暇顾及。另有部分患者因病情较轻，也就不太在意，恰恰因此，而错失了治疗的最佳机会，没有及时将脚气扼杀在“襁褓”里。 脚气可分为三类： 1．鳞屑角化型：表现为足跖干燥脱屑，逐渐扩大，冬季加重可形成足跟部皲裂；夏季可能减轻。一般出现在足、脚跟侧边。 2．水泡型：主要表现为足部侧缘的成堆或脚掌散在分布的水泡，脚趾间也有较多分布。泡壁厚，可有痒感，夏季多见，水泡多自行干涸，继发脱屑，如处理不当可继发细菌感染，形成化脓性皮疹，患者感觉疼痛。 3．趾间糜烂型：也比较常见，而且常常为足癣的首发表现，表现为足趾间皮肤浸渍发白，继而剥脱，自觉瘙痒，常常导致搔抓，使表皮剥脱，露出其下新鲜红嫩薄皮肤，一般夏重冬轻 ，足汗较多者，冬季也可以发生。长期不愈的趾间糜烂往往会继发链球菌感染而形成丹毒，是下肢丹毒的常见病因。 一般人在遭遇脚气的时候往往立马想到涂XX软膏、XX平，其实清除体内湿热才是关键。 二妙散方名出自《丹溪心法》。苍术、黄柏所组成的二妙散一方，最早见于元代危亦林所著《世医得效方》卷9的“脚气”门中，名苍术散。原文为“苍术散治一切风寒湿热，令足膝痛或赤肿，脚骨间作热痛，虽一点，能令步履艰苦及腰膝臀髀大骨疼痛，令人痿頢，一切脚气，百用百效。苍术，米泔浸一日夜，盐炒。黄柏，去粗皮酒浸一日夜，炙焦各四两，右(上)锉散，每服四钱，水一盏，煎七分，温服，日进三、四服。”原来古人在治疗脚气上运用的就是清除体内湿热之论。湿热祛除，疾病的源头根除，再配用西药清除炎症、杀灭真菌，疾病自然痊愈了。 如果你刚刚和皮癣菌有了“亲密接触”，或者脚气已令你瘙痒难忍，或者脚部溃疡已经令你的美丽脚丫不能再穿上高跟凉鞋“招摇过市”的时候，不妨试用二妙丸，你会发现甩掉脚气，真的很简单！ 二妙丸治疗阴囊潮湿和肛周湿疹 阴囊潮湿和肛周湿疹，是临床中常见的、要不了命但却令人极不舒服的病症，很多人为其所苦但不知该如何治疗，更有患者碍于情面，不好意思诉说，暗自受罪。日前，我治疗一例病人，舌苔厚、黄。言阴囊潮湿和肛周湿疹久矣，且每每遇上火而症状加重。嘱用二妙丸一盒，以观疗效。 第一天中午，患者打来电话，告知服用一袋即有感觉。数日后，一盒用完，症状彻底消失。 鉴于患者的体质属阴虚火旺，嘱用知柏地黄丸一月善后。现感觉身体舒适，心情平和。 药理分析： 1、阴囊潮湿和肛周湿疹均为湿热下注，故以二妙丸清之。 2、知柏地黄丸滋肾阴降虚火，故善后。 两药前后分服，体现急则治标，缓则治本之原理，故愈。 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------