中医药局：一中药试点发现对新冠肺炎总有效率达90%
该方为疾病治疗方剂，不建议作为预防方使用。
新京报快讯（记者 许雯）据国家中医药管理局官网消息，中医药有效方剂筛选研究取得阶段性进展。据4省试点临床观察显示，清肺排毒汤治疗新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎患者总有效率可达90%以上。
据官网消息，1月27日，国家中医药局以临床急用实用效用为导向，紧急启动“防治新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎中医药有效方剂筛选研究”专项，在山西、河北、黑龙江、陕西四省试点开展清肺排毒汤救治新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎患者临床疗效观察，重点观察确诊患者乏力、发烧、咳嗽、咽痛、纳差等症状及影像学表现变化情况，旨在迅速找到针对本次疫病有良好疗效乃至特效的核心方药。
据统计，截至2月5日0时，4个试点省份运用清肺排毒汤救治确诊病例214例，3天为一个疗程，总有效率达90%以上，其中60%以上患者症状和影像学表现改善明显，30%患者症状平稳且无加重。
官网消息提到，据专家介绍，清肺排毒汤由汉代张仲景所著《伤寒杂病论》中的多个治疗由寒邪引起的外感热病的经典方剂优化组合而成，组方合理，性味平和，可用于治疗新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎轻型、普通型、重型患者，在危重症患者救治中也可结合患者实际情况合理使用。该方也可用于普通感冒和流感患者。但该方为疾病治疗方剂，不建议作为预防方使用。
中医药局：一中药试点发现对新冠肺炎总有效率达90%
该方为疾病治疗方剂，不建议作为预防方使用。
新京报快讯（记者 许雯）据国家中医药管理局官网消息，中医药有效方剂筛选研究取得阶段性进展。据4省试点临床观察显示，清肺排毒汤治疗新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎患者总有效率可达90%以上。
据官网消息，1月27日，国家中医药局以临床急用实用效用为导向，紧急启动“防治新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎中医药有效方剂筛选研究”专项，在山西、河北、黑龙江、陕西四省试点开展清肺排毒汤救治新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎患者临床疗效观察，重点观察确诊患者乏力、发烧、咳嗽、咽痛、纳差等症状及影像学表现变化情况，旨在迅速找到针对本次疫病有良好疗效乃至特效的核心方药。
据统计，截至2月5日0时，4个试点省份运用清肺排毒汤救治确诊病例214例，3天为一个疗程，总有效率达90%以上，其中60%以上患者症状和影像学表现改善明显，30%患者症状平稳且无加重。
官网消息提到，据专家介绍，清肺排毒汤由汉代张仲景所著《伤寒杂病论》中的多个治疗由寒邪引起的外感热病的经典方剂优化组合而成，组方合理，性味平和，可用于治疗新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎轻型、普通型、重型患者，在危重症患者救治中也可结合患者实际情况合理使用。该方也可用于普通感冒和流感患者。但该方为疾病治疗方剂，不建议作为预防方使用。
상한론의 몇 가지 방제를 혼합한 청폐배독탕清肺排毒汤이 이번 우한 폐렴에 좋은 효과를 보이고 있다는 소식. 청폐배독탕은 다음과 같다고 한다.
麻黄9g、炙甘草6g、杏仁9g、生石膏15~ 30g (先煎)、桂枝9g 、泽泻9g 、猪苓9g、白术9g、茯苓15g、柴胡16g、 黄芩6g 、姜半夏9g、生姜9g、紫菀9g 、冬花9g、 射干9g、细辛6g、山药12g、枳实6g 、陈皮6g、藿香9g。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left-Socialism-Brutalism
Right-Traditionalist-Classical
Polarizing.
좌파는 사회주의이자 야만주의
우파는 전통주의자이자 고전 애호가들
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
가라지-나훈아
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
경제는 공장이 아니다.
경제에서 중요한 것은 생산 과정이 시작하기 전에 일어나는 일이다.
경제에서 주요 문제는 생산의 관리가 아니다. 그 정도라면 레닌이나 시장 사회주의자들, 그리고 시카고 경제학파들이 해결할 수 있는 문제이다.
진정한 문제는 소비자의 미래 욕구를 보다 더 만족시키는 시장 상황을 창조하는 것이다.
The Economy Is Not a Factory—Nor Should We Try to Make It One
Per Bylund
A common issue with economists and political economists from left to right is that they misunderstand the market economy as simply being a set of production processes. We see this in Lenin’s statement that the Soviet Union should be run like one big factory. We see it in market socialists from Frederic Taylor to Oskar Lange attempting to respond to (and resolve) Mises’s argument that socialist economic calculation is impossible. And we see the same thing in the efficiency (and market failure) nonsense of Chicago school economists. The misconception is the same: that a working (and progressing) economy is about the management of existing production.
To be fair, if the economy is truly a matter of simply maintaining production processes, then it is certainly possible to rationally plan the whole thing. It may take more computing power than was possible in the 1920s and 1930s, but the data are all there. The problem is here only of a practical nature: to collect the data and to make sure the algorithms run smoothly enough to not cause delays in adjusting the central plan.
This is very far from how the economy actually works, however. It is quite the opposite: what is important in the economy is what happens before there are production processes in place. All the production efforts we see in the present economy are only the tip of the iceberg, if even that. The observable structure of production is but the result of the market process doing its work by consistently weeding out ineffective, improper, and unfit production.
It is thus a fundamental mistake to think that Misesian economic calculation is about the allocation of resources within and between production processes. The profit and loss system is not primarily about the adjustment of capital investment across industries and firms, but about the determination of which industries and types of production will exist—and who will be involved in this future production.
Clearly, it should be stretch to call the continuous tweaking and adjustment of production processes a “driving force” of the market. Incumbent firms’ responsiveness to price changes, whether day to day or quarter to quarter, is too passive to be labeled a driving force. Even for someone whose native language is not English. Such activities are neither much of a force to reckon with nor “driving” anything. It can appear dramatic on a micro level, but for the economic system it is barely a blip on the radar.
Mises had something else in mind when suggesting an explanation for economic calculation. As I elaborate in my essay “The Management Problem of Socialism: Cost at the Expense of Value,” the main issue in the economy is not production management. That is a comparatively simple problem that both Lenin, market socialists, and Chicago school economists can solve.
The real problem is how we can create a market situation that better meets consumers’ future wants. This cannot be planned, because consumers themselves rarely know the specifics of what they will want. It also cannot be planned, because that future must be imagined before it is created, and one mind or single committee cannot ever replace a “division of intellectual labor” between entrepreneurs who risk losing their own wealth.
Most of this process takes place before actual production commences. Only the most plausible and profitable ideas are invested in. Of those, only some see the light of day, and of them only very few actually succeed at generating revenue in excess of cost. This continuous process is carried out without hardly anyone noticing. It cannot be observed or measured: the idea that never gets invested in or that fails before it is completed is no data point.
But it is this preproduction selection process that determines what the market will provide consumers. And among those projects selected and tried, some will end up disrupting the status quo and thereby creatively destroying the production apparatus that non-Austrians believe they have the tools to properly manage.
-----------------------------------------------
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기