-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
완전 과학이네 ㄷㄷㄷ
결국 죽은 소장이 열쇠였네
이런뭐 개 씹 아놔
하루빨리 소환과 영장 청구가 시급하다 ㄷㄷㄷ
-추신-
어제 소장 죽고 애도쇼한거 역풍 불어서 자살골 됨
사람이 죽었는데 하루도 안돼서 어디서 그렁 문장이 갑자기 튀어나오냐
그렇잔어
사람이 죽으면 애도하느라 하루이상 걸리고 여기저기 슬픔에 잠겨있다가
며칠 지나서 애도글을 발표하는데
어덯게 죽은날 한시간도 안돼서
그렇게 긴문장이 나올수 있냐?
국민들이 그러더라
마치 준비하고 있던거를 글쓰고 읽은거 아니냐고 엄청나게 의혹이 더커짐 / 일베
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
천조국 우파 언론인들의 수난 시대
오늘 뉴욕타임지의 오피니언 페이지 편집장 '제임스 버넷"이란 사람이 사임을 했다.
동료기자들과 많은 구독자들의 항의로 인해 어쩔수 없이 그만 둔 것.
그 이유는 지난 수요일에 올라간 글 때문. 아칸소주의 연방상원의원인 '탐 카튼"이 오피니언 페이지에 글을 올린 것이 화근이 됬음. 글의 제목은 " 군대를 보내라". 상원의원은 약탈과 방화로 인하여 선의의 사람들이
피해를 입으니 빨리 군대를 보내서 난동을 제압하라는 내용이었지만, 요즘 미국좌빨들이 항의 데모하는 것을 완전히 "성역화' 하고 있기 때문에 이런 제목의 글이 엄청난 공격을 받았고, 결국 편집장으로써 책임을 지고 사임하게 된것.
또한 비슷한 일이 '필라델피아 인콰이어' 라는 신문사에서도 일어났는데, 고위 편집장 한명이 강제로 사임을 하게 됨. 이 신문사는 페이지의 헤드라인을 " Buildings matters too" 라고 만들었다고 비난을 받아서 사임당함. 내용인즉, 요새 블랙들이 말하는 "Black lives matter" 를 꼬집어 말한 것이라고 비난을 받음. 블랙라이프만 중요한것이 아니라
부서지고 불타고 약탈당한 건물들도 누군가에는 중요한 것이라는 의미로 "Buildings matter too" 를 말했다고 비난.
-세월호에 관한 어떤 것도 자갈 물리려는 한국 좌파들 하는 것같음.
/ 일베
--->30년 전에 미국이 이렇게 좌경화 될 줄 예상이나 했나? 또 30년 전에 한국이 이렇게 좌경화되고 나라가 망조에 들 줄을 예상이나 했나? 우파들은 좌파 프로파간다와 조직에 패했다.
이를 역전하려면 미제스와 하이에크, 로스바드 등의 자유주의자들의 사상을 전파하고 사회를 자유주의적 이념에 따라 개조해 나아가야 한다.
---------------------------------------------------------
지속적으로 발견되는 선거인수를 뛰어넘는 총투표수 나온 지역 /이미지=디시우한갤러리
출처 : 파이낸스투데이(http://www.fntoday.co.kr)
출처 : 파이낸스투데이(http://www.fntoday.co.kr)
-----------------------------------------------------
궈원구이 ‘신중국연방건국’ 선포/축구스타 하오하이동의 폭탄선언/당교 교수 “중국공산당은 정치강시”
5 가지 녹음 내용이 충격적이다. 한국도 시진핑 대신에 문죄인을 대입하면 거의 유사한 상황이다. 하지만 중국과 같은 용기 있고 식견있는 정치가들이 부족하다.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
중국과 북한 선거제를 선전하는 조해주 선관위. 문정권 권력 연장의 진정한 책사는 조해주?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
영국 존슨 총리, '차이나 머니' 막기 위해 나선다
입력 2020.06.08 16:09
코로나 바이러스 감염증 사태로 어려움을 겪는 영국 기업이 헐값에 해외로 넘어 가는 것을 막기 위해서다.
특히 중국 자본의 유입을 막기 위해서라고 영국 더타임스는 분석했다.
텍사스와 플로리다주에서 향후 2년동안 유전자 변형 모기를 방출한다고 합니다.
이 유전자 변형 모기의 원리는 이렇습니다.
사람의 피를 빨아먹는 모기는 암컷 모기인데
유전자 변형 수컷 모기 방출 → 수컷 모기랑 암컷이랑 교미 → 교미한 암컷은 사망
이 사이클을 반복하면 사람을 무는 암컷 모기는 점점 사라지게 되고 병에 걸리는 사람도 적어진다는것 입니다.
다만 아예 모기종이 멸종할 것을 대비해 지속적으로 개체수를 컨트롤 한다고 하네요.
이 프로젝트에 대해서 미 환경 보호국(EPA)은 이미 프로젝트를 승인했지만 일부 생물, 생태학자 그리고 생명윤리 단체들은
이 일이 생태계에 어떠한 위험을 미칠지, 그리고 우리가 앞으로 일어날 문제에 정확하게 컨트롤을 할 수 있을지에 대한 우려섞인 목소리가 나오고 있습니다. / 일베
Genetically modified mosquitoes could be released in Florida and Texas beginning this summer – silver bullet or jumping the gun?
----> 인간들이 신의 영역인 유전자를 갖고 장난질을 하다 우한 폐렴이 세상에 퍼져 무수한 생명이 사라지고 있고, 그 비극은 아직 끝나지도 않았다. 복잡계인 자연에 인간이 인위적으로 개입하면, 그 결과가 어떻게 나올지 예측하기 힘들다. 모기가 사라지고 더 큰 재앙이 올 가능성이 너무 크다. 인간은 유전자 조작을 멈추어야 한다.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why GDP Metrics Won't Tell Us Much about the Post-COVID Recovery
Alasdair Macleod
GDP can be increased through both government spending and printing new money. So, naturally, once lockdowns end we'll see a big rebound in GDP. But that doesn't tell us if the private sector is actually better off.
GDP는 정부 지출과 신권 발행으로도 증가될 수 있다. 따라서 록다운이 끝나면 지디피는 크게 증가해 있을 것이다. 하지만 그렇다고 해서 민간 부문이 더 좋아졌다는 뜻은 아니다.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
각국의 정부에 의해 세계 경제가 망가져버렸다. 이제 혁명이 시작될 것이다.
불황은 대립과 반란의 씨앗을 뿌린다.
미제스가 말했듯이, 지속적인 대량 실직은 사회 질서의 도덕적 기초를 파괴하고 만다. 그리고 실업으로 놀고 있는 젊은이들은 다가오는 혁명의 지원자들이 된다.
대부분의 사람은 자본주의에 의해 부익부빈익빈 현상과 경제, 재정적 위기가 형성된다고 믿는다. 하지만 미국과 유럽, 아시아 어디에서도 순수한 의미의 자본주의는 실행된 일이 없다. 현재 세계의 경제는 개입주의 정책의 결과일 뿐이다.
법정 화폐제도가 바로 독재적 정부를 만들어내는 묘수인 것이다.
사람들이 자본주의에서 점점 멀어질수록 그들의 평화와 번영은 위험에 빠지고, 미래 세대의 무수한 인간들의 존재 자체가 위기에 처하게 된다.
지금이 사회적 혁명의 시기라면, 그 혁명이 좌파 사상과 거대 정부를 끝내고, 그들 삶의 주인이 되는 혁명을 시작하기를 희망해본다.
Governments Have Crippled the World's Economies. Revolution May Soon Follow.
Thorsten Polleit
The world seems to be on fire. A couple of months ago, the economic upswing was still firmly established, production expanded, and unemployment was declining. It all changed with the advent of the coronavirus or, to be precise: things turned really sour with the politically dictated lockdowns. As a reaction to the spread of the virus, governments in many countries ordered shops and firms to shut down and people to stay home. The inevitable result was a close to complete breakdown of the economic system. Hundreds of millions of people were thrown into outright despair; in India alone 120 million workers lost their jobs in April 2020.
The economic collapse sent the unbacked paper money system into a tailspin. Borrowers were unable to service their debt, and banks unwilling to roll over maturing loans, let alone extend new funds to struggling debtors. The entire credit pyramid was about to come crashing down. To prevent this from happening, governments and their central banks went “all in,” providing huge amounts of money to pay for people's lost incomes and firms' evaporating profits. Of course, governments do not have the money that they have promised to spend.
Central banks have started running the electronic printing presses, issuing great amounts of newly created money into the banking and financial sector and also injecting new balances into people's accounts held with banks. In other words: as production contracts heavily, the quantity of money is rising strongly. This is, no doubt, an inflationary policy, for, if anything, inflation must be understood as an increase in the quantity of money. One possible outcome of a policy of increasing the quantity of money is price inflation: the increase in the money prices of goods and services.
Another result of a rise in the money stock is a redistribution of income and wealth among people. Not all people will get a share of the newly created money at the same time, as there will be early receivers and late receivers. The former can buy goods and services at unchanged prices. The latter, however, lose out: they can only purchase vendible items at already elevated prices. As a result, the early receivers of the new money get richer compared to the late receivers. The money injection, therefore, amounts to a redistribution of income and wealth.
The vast amounts of money that central banks are issuing to fend off the symptoms of the crisis will create winners and losers. It will make some richer, and it will make many others poorer. It does not create a win-win situation. Banks, the financial industry, big business, and governments, as well as their entourages and close beneficiaries, can be expected to be on the winning side. In contrast, medium and small business, the average employee, and pensioners can be expected to be on the losing end. If anything, the printing of ever greater amounts of money increases economic inequality.
It is no longer hard work, ingenuity, frugality, and consumer orientation on the part of the individual that determines his economic fate, but closeness to the central bank’s money printing press and meeting the requirements for receiving government favors. In times of economic expansion, opposition and protest against the social injustice that comes with money printing are subdued—most people see their slice of the cake increasing at least to some extent. A recession, however, changes that: it lays the foundation for outright opposition and rebellion.
As Ludwig von Mises (1881–1973) noted perceptively:
Permanent mass unemployment destroys the moral foundations of the social order. The young people who, having finished their training for work, are forced to remain idle, are the ferment out of which the most radical political movements are formed. In their ranks the soldiers of the coming revolutions are recruited.
Opposition and rebellion against what?
Most people these days blame the loss of jobs and the dire income situation on capitalism—the economic system in which the means of production are in private hands. They argue that capitalism makes the rich even richer and the poor even poorer and that capitalism is inherently unstable and causes recurring economic and financial crises. However, this is an entirely false interpretation. First and foremost, neither in the US, Europe, Asia, nor Latin America do we find capitalism in the pure sense of the word.
Economic systems around the world represent the interventionist system. Governments have greatly restricted the workings of the free market forces through taxes, directives, laws, and regulations. Wherever you look, what little is left of the capitalist order is under siege and gets eliminated further. A rather obvious point is the monetary system: money production has been monopolized by government-sponsored central banks, which hand out licences to privately held banks to participate in money creation that is not backed by any real savings.
Sound economic theory teaches us that such a monetary system causes great trouble: it is inflationary, causes boom and bust cycles, makes the economy run into overindebtedness, and allows the state to become ever greater, transforming itself into the deep state. Indeed, there should be little doubt that without an unbacked paper money system, today’s governments could not have become as big, encroaching, and suppressive as they are. The unbacked paper money system is, so to speak, the elixir for creating a tyrannical government.
Unfortunately, those blaming capitalism are barking up the wrong tree. For all their critique of inflationary money, economic hardship and rising inequality are the direct results of governments' successful war against capitalism, which has been replaced by a system of interventions. The free market system was replaced by a system of decrees and prohibitions, all of which are incompatible with capitalism in the true sense. Against this backdrop, the question arises: How come people put all the blame on capitalism rather than interventionism-socialism?
Of course, there is this thing called the "anticapitalist mentality." Many people do not like capitalism, because under capitalism, those who serve consumer demand best are economically rewarded: making a profit is the result of having produced something that others want to buy. Those who are less eager to serve their fellow man must settle for lower incomes. This inevitable truth is the breeding ground for resentment, envy, and malevolence. And these emotions can be instrumentalized quite easily by demagogues.
This is exactly where the socialist ideology comes in. It appeals and caters to people's resentments. Capitalism is declared the bad guy, the culprit of their dissatisfaction. In that sense, capitalism becomes a kind of "hate screen" against which people are encouraged to direct all their resentments. Most importantly, anticapitalist policies, the program of socialism, are praised and promoted as beneficial for the dissatisfied, to clamp down on the rich and to ensure a more even distribution of income and wealth.
No doubt the current income and wealth distribution has been brought about by interventionism-socialism rather than pure capitalism. One strategy to remedy it is to channel people's dissatisfaction in the right direction—to make it clear that calling for less interventionism, less socialist policies, and the deconstruction of the state (as we know it today) is the way forward, not pushing the free market system off the cliff and allowing the deep state to become even bigger. No doubt this amounts to a gigantic educational task.
Much depends on making progress on this issue, as it would be a recipe for disaster if capitalism continued to be held responsible for the economic, social, and political problems that are, in fact, caused by a system that can perhaps best be characterized as anticapitalism. By bidding farewell to capitalism people put peace and prosperity in severe danger, jeopardizing the existential future of the great majority of human lives around the globe. That said, safeguarding capitalism from its destructive enemies is of utmost importance.
This is not only a time of economic crisis. In hindsight, it may also appear as a standoff between those forces wanting to push further toward socialism and those trying move back toward capitalism, and perhaps also as a time of social revolution. Hopefully a revolution against the encroaching socialism in the form of ever bigger and even more powerful governments. Hopefully a revolution in which people seek to regain control over their lives, putting an end to left-leaning ideologies, be it political globalism, interventionism, or outright socialism.
----------------------------------------------------
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기