조선일보 공공기관 인건비 30조 첫 돌파… 文정부서 8조 급증 박근혜 정부 4년 증가액의 2배 일자리 창출에 동원, 몸집만 커져 jon1**** 나라 경영할 줄도 모르는 넘이 정권을 잡아 4년간 과거정권에서 한 일이라고 다 뒤집어놓고 나라를 기초부터 다 망쳐 놓았음. 탈원전한답시고 50년동안 공들여 이룩한 원전산업 하루 아침에 망가뜨리고 태양광 한답시구 30년된 나무들 다 베어내고 중국산 태양광패널 수입해서 깔고, 4대강사업 되돌린다구 멀쩡한 (세종)보 허물려 하고 또 돈들여 (세종)돌무덤보 만들고, 장마에 엉성한 돌무덤보 떠내려가니 또 돈들여 돌무덤보 만들고... 그게 니들이 하는 짓이야... cool**** 세금 먹는 공공일자리 늘리고...기업들 세금폭탄 날리고...기업들 세금부담에 해외로 이전하고...국내실업률 증가하고..실업률 증가하니 다시 공공일자리 늘리고...세금늘리고...진짜 이런 어의없는 악순환이....ㅋㅋ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 완전히 미쳐버린 민주당 근황 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ일본대학생 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11342394144 욱일기 사용시 최대 징역 10년 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 역사왜곡 처벌 ㅇㅈㄹ하면서 반일센뽕 아니면 감옥 보낸다고함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그와중에 김일성 자서전은 합법 출판되는 전두환 회고록은 출판금지됨 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이게 자유민주주의 아니면 공산주의 나라냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 헤럴드경제 트럼프, 돌아온다…“다음달 집회 재개” mylo**** 아리조나주 전체 210만장을 한장한장 수개표 및 투표자전화돌려 투표여부확인 재검표결과나옴 지난 대선발표때 아리조나주서 바이든이 210만장 중 1만여장 앞서 이겼다는 결과였는데 재검표에서 무려 95만표의 부정투표지 그니까 정식투표지가 아닌 가짜로 밖에서 만들어진 표가 식별기로 인해 발견 그 부정투표지들은 모조리 바이든를 찍고있었다 즉 95만가짜표를 들이부어 겨우 1만여표차를 앞서게 만들어 바이든승리를 이룬것이라는 결론이다 즉 트럼프앞승이였던것 지금 대대적인 재검표가 여러주에서 벌어지는중 이미 판세는 트럼프가 쥠 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 탈원전 文정부, 멀쩡한 산 밀어버렸다/ 조선일보 정부가 ‘탄소중립’을 위해 멀쩡한 숲을 대거 벌목(伐木)한 다음 어린 나무 30억 그루를 새로 심는 방안을 추진해 논란이 일고 있다. “수령(樹齡) 30년 이상 된 나무가 탄소 흡수 능력이 떨어진다”는 이유를 댔지만, 전문가들은 “오래된 숲의 탄소 저감 능력이 더 뛰어나다는 연구 결과도 많다”고 반박한다 ----> 이 정부의 인간들은 우선 정신 감정을 받을 필요가 있다. 정신병원을 탈출한 환자들이 대한민국의 운전대를 쥐고 있다. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 이럴수가!! 문재인, 퇴임대비해 이젠 실직자들 돈도 해외로 빼돌리냐? 바닥민심 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11342535707 이상직이 이스타항공에서 문재인사위가 있는 타이 이스타로 71억원 빼돌린 뒤 이 돈이 사라졌다는 기사를 보니 분노를 참을 수 없네요. 일개 증권사 직원이던 이상직이 문재인 만나 중소밴처기업진흥공단 이사장되자 문재인 사위가 근무하던 회사의 사장도 모르게 200억 정부보조금 퍼주고 ,이 돈이 사라지자 문재인 사위가족 타이 이스타 해외주재원 명목으로 이민. 이상직이 이스타항공직원들 퇴직금도 안 주고 타이 이스타에게 71억 줬는데 이 돈도 사라짐. 이 공로로 이상직 민주당 국회의원 공천받아 국회의원 되었음. 결과적으로 문재인이 이상직에 감투 주고, 이상직은 이걸 이용해 우리 혈세를 문재인 딸가족을 통해 문재인 해외계좌로 빼돌리고, 이것을 문재인 딸이 관리하고 우리 혈세로 수십억 경호비용까지 지불한 거라면? 그래서 취임4년이 넘도록 대통령친인척 감시관 끝내 임명안하고 악착같이 검찰 탄압하고 공수처 만들려 했군요. 이상직이 자기는 불사조라고 자랑했을만 하네요. 단임이니까 퇴임전에 실직자 가족들 돈까지 싸그리 쪽쪽 빨아먹겠다? 이 자가 잘못 대처해서 코로나,불황,실직,파산,부도로 서민들은 쓰러져 가는데, 문재인은 올해도 지 연봉 올리고 퇴임후엔 매달 수천만원 연급받으니, 이 혈세내는 백성들은 피눈물을 흘립니다. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 문재인, 우리 혈세로 남한의 수십억 나무와 원전들 없애고 북한에 원전과 나무들 심어주겠다고? 바닥민심 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11342542285 -문재인은 집권하자마자, 한국의 핵무기개발능력과 세계원전수출2위였던 수백조원 먹거리산업 없애려고 탈원전 정책시행. 이 와중에 북한에는 핵개발 돕기위해 혈세지원하느라 혈안. -그 결과, 세계원전시장은 중국이 다 차지하고 한전은 흑자공기업에서 수십조원 누적적자 발생하자 전기료 인상해서 국민에게 떠넘김. -결과적으로 문재인은 북한이 남한을 초토화시킬 수 있는 핵무기 수백개 만들고 중국은 서해안에 수십개 원전 지어 우리가 방사능 오염 수산물 먹게 되었는데도 찍소리도 못함. -탈원전으로 에너지가 부족해지자, 운동권 좌빨들이 수십조원의 정부보조금으로 중국에서 태양광설비 마구 수입해서 금수강산 다 파헤쳐서 태양광시설로 덮어 태풍만 오면 산사태 발생하고 태양광패널 독극물로 전국이 오염되어 이 물 우리가 마시고 있음. 태양광이 날만 흐려도 에너지생산이 안되어 결국 석탄,석유,천연가스 더 수입하여 결과적으로 국제탄소규제한도 위반 -다급하니 문재인 이번엔 전라도에 48조원 혈세 사용해 풍력발전하겠다고 하고 운동권 좌빨들 이 혈세 빼먹고자 관련 업체 막 만듬. 이 풍력발전소도 바람 안 불면 발전안되니 결국 적정발전용량 유지위해 석탄,석유,천연가스 수입해야 하는데 최근 원자재시장 강세로 올라간 도입비용도 국민이 내는 전기료에 전가 중. -국제탄소규제한도 맞추기 위해, 이번에 우리가 낸 혈세로 우리 금수강산에 있는 뿌리깊은 수십억 나무들 깡그리 밀어버리고 묘목을 남한과 북한에 심는다네요. 묘목보다는 뿌리깊은 성목이 더 많은 탄소 가두는데 이런 짓을 하는 이유는 혈세 빼먹고 북한 지원해주려는 의도로밖에 안 보여. -가뜩이나 태양광으로 우리 강산이 이미 황폐화되었는데 이젠 비만 오면 산사태 나게 생겼음. 지금 운동권 좌빨들이 이 혈세 빨아먹으려고 벌목회사와 묘목회사 설립하려고 난리 중. 지난번엔 수십조의 우리 혈세로 북한에 원전, 도로, 항만 등을 지어줄 수 있는 법안도 통과해서 결과적으로 혈세로 남한엔 원전없애고 북한엔 원전 지어주고 우리 국민은 온갖 공해 시달리면서 혈세주고 비싼 전기료 내고… -가뜩이나 서민들은 불황과 코로나로 힘든데, 문재인은 올해에도 지 연봉은 올리고 퇴임하면 땅값오른 양산호화주택에서 매달 수천만원 혈세로 연금받으며 우리 개돼지 국민들을 비웃고 있겠죠. 오늘도 백성들은 피눈물을 흘립니다. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 일베간 김대중 출생비밀 밝혀낸 사람은 전남 완도출신 손창식씨 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11342436011 ---->드라마 작가도 감히 상상하기 힘든 김대중의 출생의 비밀! 김대중의 모친 장노도가 제갈씨에게 시집 갔지만, 제갈씨는 바다에 나갔다가 사망. ---> 죽은 형을 대신해 동생이 형수를 돌봐주다가 눈이 맞아 임신.--->술집을 하면서 윤씨와 동침을 하다가 김대중을 출생. -- 그래서 김대중의 어릴 적 이름은 윤성만. 하지만 실제 부친은 제갈 씨 ---이후 다시 부자인 김운식이라는 노인의 후처로 들어감.-- 여기에서 김대중이라는 이름이 나옴. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 현실을 부정하면 독재와 사회적 실패로 나아간다. 바이마르 정부로 시작해서 소련연방에 이르기까지, 실패한 사회를 관통하는 공통점은 병적으로 현실을 부정한다는 사실이다. 아래 3가지는 대표적인 잘못된 현실 인식이다. *파멸적인 지구 온난화/ 기후 변화는 인간에 의해 초래되었고, 반드시 멈춰져야 한다. *우한폐렴(코로나)는 세계인의 생존을 위협한다. *현대통화이론에 따르면 정부는 지출을 마음대로 할 수 있다. Denying Reality Leads to Tyranny and Societal Failure Patrick Barron The common thread that connects failed societies, from Weimar Germany to the Soviet Union, is an almost pathological insistence on denying reality. Weimar Germany denied that masses of printed money would destroy civilized society. The Soviet Union insisted that Soviet Man would emerge spontaneously from the ashes of capitalist society. Weimar Germany spawned Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany was completely destroyed, both physically and politically, by the World War II Allies. Mercifully, the Soviet Union simply collapsed after seventy years of consuming capital to achieve the phantom of the classless society. Today both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union are synonymous with tyranny and failure. Both nations murdered millions. Both nations no longer exist. True, Germany exists as does Russia, but I contend that both are new nations. Neither is perfect, but neither claims a political heritage to the nation that preceded it. Pathological policy errors flowed inexorably from a skewed view of reality in both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Once this view of reality was deemed to be above criticism, its champions adopted increasingly tyrannical policies. Nazi Germany's Aryan Supremacy racial theories seemingly justified the murder of the handicapped, Gypsies, those of alternative sexual orientation, Jews, and Slavs. In the name of birthing a new Soviet Man, the Soviet Union murdered anyone who stood in the way of its program to confiscate all businesses, including small farms. When businesses and farms failed, there was no soul searching as to root causes that might lie in Marxism itself. No, the problem had to be saboteurs within society. Reality, you see, was what the Soviet Union's Politburo said it was. As the vanguard of the proletariat, the Politburo stood outside society and saw its flaws. Those who disagreed were blind to this insight and had to be eliminated. Chasing the Phantoms of Alternative Reality Today the West especially is adopting policies that flow from alternative realities that, frankly, do not exist. Here I list just a few: Catastrophic global warming/climate change is caused by man and must be stopped. I prefer to qualify the term "global warming/climate change" by the adjective "catastrophic". Is the world warming? Who knows? Is the climate changing? Probably. But neither global warming nor climate change is "catastrophic". Yet it has become almost an article of faith that the earth is on the precipice of an environmental catastrophe, requiring ever more radical handicaps on our freedoms and the economy. White privilege in the US is responsible for crimes against minorities and disparities in wealth. This critical race theory has spawned witch hunts for secret and shadowy white supremacist groups especially in the military, which has empowered investigators to find evidence of these groups and root them out. It will be imperative that these investigators actually uncover such groups, whether they exist or not. Critical race theory is the old Marxist class struggle theory in new clothes. The Marxist class struggle theory postulated that we all are born into a class and cannot escape its prejudices. But notice that the Marxist and now the Race theorists consider that they themselves are not susceptible to the prejudices in which all the rest of us are trapped. Very convenient, eh? Covid-19 is an existential threat to human life on earth. Constitutionally guaranteed human rights may be violated with impunity. Who gets to decide all this? Why, elected officials and government bureaucrats, of course. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) explains that government need not moderate its spending. Government can always manufacture more money in order to fund new programs and pay its debts . More government spending can always prevent a drop in aggregate demand. Government debt is irrelevant, because "we owe it to ourselves". MMT gave government elected officials exactly what they always wanted--carte blanche to spend, spend, and spend some more and not worry about justifying or prioritizing spending. As Keynes actually said, pay people to dig holes in the ground and pay others to fill them back up. What could possibly go wrong? Champions of the above denials of reality refuse to discuss whether their view of reality is accurate. All are articles of faith and cannot be questioned. In fact, to question them is considered to be an admission of ignorance, guilt, or perfidy. One wants to destroy Mother Earth, enslave minorities, kill innocent people, and prevent all in society from enjoying unlimited prosperity. It's the old straw man fallacy on steroids. Furthermore, resources will be expended to pursue these phantoms, and more resources will be expended to protect oneself from being caught in a witch hunt. Society will live in fear--fear of global warming, fear of being branded a racist, fear of contracting a dread disease. Unfortunately, what society does not fear is that our lifetime's savings will be wiped out by inflation made possible by MMT. The Basics of Reality Contrast these phantoms with the pragmatic basics of sound economics: namely, that in order to prosper man must face the reality of human existence—primarily scarcity and uncertainty. People's preferences must be accepted at face value. Man acts. This is an irrefutable axiom in that to deny it is to confirm its validity. His action is rational in the sense that he believes that his action will improve his condition. He understands cause and effect. He performs one act at a time. He performs the most important act first; in other words, he ranks his actions in order of importance. Performing an act means that he must sacrifice the execution of others until later; in other words, acting means giving up some other preference, at least until some later time. Man's ordinal ranking of preferences means that the cost of an action is determined by what he eschews until later. No two men have the identical ordinal ranking of preferences; plus, the preferences cannot be assigned a cardinal value in order to compare one man's preferences with another. Man discovers the concept of comparative advantage and adopts the division of labor in order to accomplish more. Through the market process, man adopts a universal medium of exchange (money) in order to break the tyranny of direct barter. Now man can indirectly exchange his specialized production for a universal medium of exchange in order to obtain his real wants. Man invents government as a specialized service in order to protect his person and his property at a lower cost. He invents law in order to adjudicate inevitable disputes. All this is reality. Peaceful exchange requires social cooperation, which brings about peace and prosperity among men everywhere. As advice columnist Ann Landers used to say, Wake up and smell the coffee! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 자유무역을 지지했던 사회주의자들 막스는 자유무역이 산업 자본주의의 진보된 형태로, 그것이 사회주의 혁명에 한발 다가서는 조건이라 보고, 자유무역을 지지했다. 초기 사회주의자들은 보호무역주의가 가난한 사람들의 생활을 향상시키지 못한다는 것을 알고 있었다. The Socialists Who Supported Free Trade Lipton Matthews Many socialists think that protectionism benefits the poor. But these views deviate from the free trade tradition that can be found in some corners of socialist thought. Like liberal economists in the nineteenth century, some socialists also argued that protectionism served the interests of corrupt entrepreneurs. The forgotten contribution of socialists to the free trade tradition is clearly fleshed out in an article titled “Marx and Manchester: The Evolution of the Socialist International Free-Trade Tradition, c.1846-1946,” featured in The International History Review. For scholars interested in unlocking the complex relationship between socialism and free trade this article is a must-read. Marc-William Palen ably disputes the notion that socialists are universally in favor of protectionism. However, he admits Marx and Engels proposed free trade because of the perception that it accentuated the socialist revolution: “Marx and Engels viewed the international turn to free trade as an advancement of the global capitalist project, the dawn of a new epoch of capitalist internationalism. For Marx, free trade was a progressive condition of industrial capitalism, moving it a step closer to socialist revolution. Protectionism, by contrast, was regressive and belonged to the pre- and proto-industrial capitalist era. For Marx’s close friend and patron Friedrich Engels, too, free trade was preferable to protectionism as the former would ‘expand as freely and as quickly as possible’ the capitalist system and thus hasten the destruction of ‘the whole system.” Based on Palen’s presentation it appears that Marx and Engel advocated free trade due to the assumption that it would accelerate revolution. Yet he offers evidence indicating that both expressed genuine dislike for protectionism. Like classical liberals, Marx perceived protectionism as a function of backward economies. As Palen notes his condemnation of protectionism as archaic is quite revealing: “People are thus about to begin in Germany with what people in France and England are about to end. The old corrupt conditions against which these countries are rebelling in theory and which they only bear as one bears chains, is greeted in Germany as the dawn of a beautiful future.’’ Engel in his description portrays protectionism as being “at best an endless screw, and you never know when you have done with it. By protecting one industry, you directly or indirectly hurt all others, and have therefore to protect them too. By so doing you again damage the industry that you first protected and have to compensate it . . . and so on ad infinitum.” Interestingly, even Marx thought that protectionism fueled interstate conflicts, since antitrade policies could be construed as an act of aggression. The tendency of protectionism to lead to war was also asserted by Karl Kautsky, as Palen reminds us: “The higher the tariff barriers between individual capitalist states grow, the more each of them feels the need to assure itself of a market which no one can exclude them from, and to gain supplies of raw material which no one can cut off,’ thereby creating an ‘arms race’ that ‘must grow ever greater and the danger of a world war come ever nearer.” In this arena, Kautsky, is like Kant who taught that trade nurtured international peace. Probably, in the socialist tradition Eduard Bernstein is the most strident critic of protectionism. As such, Palen will be cited at length: Like Kautsky, Bernstein was consistent in his support for free trade over the course of his socialist political career. Bernstein believed free trade was not only progressive but also good for both the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. Also, like Kautsky (and Marx), Bernstein condemned List-inspired ‘infant industrial’ protectionism for creating geopolitical tensions and for being reactionary and atavistic, a throwback to the era of mercantilism and a stumbling block to modernization. His critique of militarism – for which he blamed jingoism, nationalism, protectionism, and the undue influence of arms manufacturers on German policymaking — owed much to the influence of later Engels. And like Kautsky, Bernstein’s critique shared much in common with Hobson and Schumpeter, as did his belief that free trade and industrialism were the foundation stones of a peaceful economic order, such that R. A. Fletcher posits that Bernstein was ‘not only fundamentally more British than German but also thoroughly imbued with the values of Cobdenite radicalism. Moreover, the hostility of some socialists to protectionism was not unique to Europe. Palen contends that during the Great Depression, American labor leaders were vehemently opposed to protectionism: A Marx-Manchester ‘utopian’ planned supranational vision of free trade and peace prevailed not only among European socialist federal unionists, but also among socialist internationalists in 1930s and 1940s America. Under the political and intellectual leadership of Norman Thomas and Scott Nearing, American socialists renewed their Marx-Manchester commitments in response to the Great Depression and continued Republican protectionism. Palen singles out Thomas for his raging denouncement of protectionism: “Under his leadership, the Socialist Party of America made sure to single out the GOP’s protectionist 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff, calling it ‘the most monstrous tariff legislation in the history of the country. . . . It has, in effect, declared economic war against the rest of the world and served to aggravate the instability of world economy and world trade.” Clearly, unlike their contemporary counterparts, socialists in an earlier tradition understood that protectionism did not elevate the poor. Yet despite the evidence against protectionism as a tool to improve living conditions, it is gaining traction on the left and right. But socialists and their friends on the right can save us from the dangers of protectionism by applying the wisdom of the maverick thinkers discussed in this piece. I urge them to read Dr. Marc-William Palen. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------