연합뉴스 구독 [2보] '검수완박' 검찰청법 본회의 통과…형사소송법도 곧 상정 반대 3인 국민의당: 이태규, 최연숙 시대전환: 조정훈 기권 2인 민주당: 양향자, 용혜인 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 북한이 그토록 원하던 상황이 만들어졌음 임청하 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11411712707 북한이 그토록 원하던 세가지. 국정원 마비, 국군 기무사 해체, 검찰 해체. 이로써 국가 전복 세력을 틀어막던 모든 정보 기관이 해체 됐음. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 조선일보 ‘검수완박’ 의회 독주... 중국식 인민 독재와 닮은 꼴 hone**** 검수완박은 부패완판!! 검수완박은 범죄 방치법!! 중국의 공안 같은 공수처는 게슈타포 짓 거리!! 공안 같은 경찰에 의한 통제는 독재와 전체주의를 밀어붙이는 더듬어 만진당의 🐕 수작!! 검수완박은 입법 독주! 권력형 비리사건을 덮으려는 것! 국민들의 피해를 묵살하고 원전 비리! 울산시장 선거 비리! 라임 옵티머스 디스커버리 펀드 금융 비리! 대장동 백현동 성남 FC 와 변호사비 대납 수사도 덮으려는 🐕 수작! 입법부 민주 깡패! 행정부 민주 건달! 사법부 민주 충견! 삼권 분립도 말아먹는 좌파들을 반드시 쓸어버리자~~!!!! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 간첩 대위, 새로 밝혀진 충격적인 내용 임청하 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11411696422 1. 간첩 대위는 알고보니 특전사 13여단 참수부대 2. 참수부대는 유사시 북괴 지휘부 제거가 목적임 3. 현재 작전계획 등 기밀유출도 우려되는 상황 대위 하나때문에 작전 관련 기밀유출도 우려해야만 하는 상황.. 소속 부대와 부대의 성격을 고려해본다면 진지하게 심각한 문제인거.. 특수전 병력도 북괴의 포섭에서 자유로울 수 없다 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 엘지LG유플러스 문재인 415부정선거 가담 문부엉이효수 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11411683293 엘지LG 유플러스 얘네들이 415부정선거에 가담하여 문재인 민주당애들한테 180석 안겨주었다. 중국공산당의 주구인 화웨이는 통신망과 통신기기 내부에 백도어backdoor를 심어놓는다. 이런 위험한 백도어가 설치된 장비를 엘지 유플러스는 아무 의심않고 도입해 사용하고 있다. 그것도 kt,skt같은 경쟁사 제압해 가며, 통신망을 전국적으로 넓혀가고 있다. 국가를 아예 통째로 중국공산당에게 넘겨줄 작정인가? 화웨이 장비를 사용하게 되면, 언제든지 중국공산당 지령에 의해 움직이는 중국 인민 해방군 소속 해커들이 침투해서 대한민국 내 군사기밀도 빼갈 수 있지만, 이번과 같은 문재인 180석 선거조작도 가능하고, 국민 개개인 사생활에 대한 정보도 무제한으로 빼갈 수 있다. 이를 테면 집주소나 주민번호, 통장계좌번호, 비밀번호도 손쉽게 빼갈 수 있다는 것이다. 나중에 언젠가 전국민들이 깨어나 415 부정선거 시위가 전국규모로 확대되어, 415 부정선거 수사에 대한 여론 압박이 심해지고, 그로 인해 검찰수사가 시작된다면, 사전투표와 본투표의 투개표에 모두 참여한 엘지LG유플러스 본사에 대한 압수수색부터 선행되어야한다. 중국 공산당이랑 밀접하게 연관되어있는 엘지 얘네들 보유하고 있는 랩탑, 하드드라이브, USB저장매체, 스마트폰 일체를 포렌식 조사로 털어내면, 문재인 이낙연 양정철 및 415부정선거에 가담했던 애들 형을 확정지을 결정적인 증거들도 거기서 쏟아져나올 것이다. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 지적 재산권의 음과 양 우리가 독점 자본주의라 부르는 것은 지재권과 관련이 있다 Meds: The Seen—and Unseen—of Intellectual Property Laws Bernardo Decoster Perhaps the greatest lesson to be learned in economics is that public policies have seen and unseen effects. The mastery of such a lesson is what separates the good from the bad economist. “The bad economist,” writes Henry Hazlitt, “sees only what immediately strikes the eye; the good economist also looks beyond. The bad economist sees only the direct consequences of a proposed course; the good economist looks also at the longer and indirect consequences. The bad economist sees only what the effect of a given policy has been or will be on one particular group; the good economist inquires also what the effect of the policy will be on all groups.” The same economic reasoning should be applied to intellectual property laws. By joining together not only the seen, but also the unseen consequences of intellectual property laws, we can achieve a solidly ironclad understanding of its impacts on humanity. Visible Effects of Intellectual Property laws In August 2015, Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired the marketing rights to Daraprim, a life-saving drug used to combat parasitic infections, and became its sole supplier. The next month, it hiked the price of the drug 5,000 percent, from $13.50 a tablet to $750, sparking nationwide protests. More noticeably than in any other sector, the patent system’s visible effects on the pharmaceutical industry are severely damaging to consumers and free enterprise. According to the Association for Accessible Medicine, “Innovation is critical to the success of the entire pharmaceutical industry. Without innovation there could be no generic pharmaceutical or biosimilar medicines for patients.” Big pharmaceutical corporations, with well-organized lobbying funding, are able to sustain the very monopolistic system that enables their abuse of consumers through high prices. Shielded by the power of the government, for example, Roche/Genentech has had a virtual monopoly on the cancer drug Herceptin since 1985, and AbbVie, which markets the world’s best-selling drug, Humira ($18 billion in global sales in 2017), has filed over 240 patent applications. These data points come from a 2018 report by the Initiative for Medicines, Access and Knowledge (I-MAK), which found that, on average across the top twelve grossing drugs in America #There are 125 patent applications filed and seventy-one granted patents per drug, the majority of which are granted. #Prices have increased by 68 percent since 2012, and only one of the top twelve drugs has actually decreased in price. #There are thirty-eight years of attempted patent protection that are blocking generic competition sought by drug makers for each of these top-grossing drugs—or nearly double the twenty-year monopoly intended under US patent law. #These top-grossing drugs have already been on the US market for fifteen years. Over half of the top twelve drugs in America have more than a hundred attempted patents apiece. These outrageous statistics point ever more strongly toward the notion that intellectual property laws, unnecessary to reward innovation, are merely tools used by crony corporations close to government power to block competition and increase the price of their products. Sadly, IP is not limited to the pharmaceutical sector, and its monopolistic effects are also heavily felt in the entertainment industry. The artificial monopoly granted and protected by the government leads to a standard “massified culture” and a creative stagnation within the entertainment industry, a phenomenon noted many decades ago by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, two Frankfurt scholars who missed the critical role played by IP laws in the phenomenon and then wrongly blamed entrepreneurs. It is precisely the blocking of competition, the blocking of free enterprise and entrepreneurial creation, that leads to a “mass cultural industry” dominated by big corporations. Besides its horrid healthcare consequences and sociological disasters, IP laws also weigh heavily and directly on the taxpayer via the bureaucracy of patent litigation. An incredibly detailed infographic from The Anatomy of a Patent Case draws from varied sources to show the bureaucratic burden of IP laws. It concluded that litigation functions as a tax of about $31 billion dollars per year (maybe as much as $42 billion) and a drag on free enterprise. Artificial monopolies, the bureaucratic burden, the rage-inducing high prices, and the destruction of creativity are only some visible effects of IP laws. Much worse, however, are its unseen effects. Unseen Effects of Intellectual Property laws The worldwide call to break the patent on covid-19 vaccines, fueled by the desire to accelerate their distribution, revealed a basic economic truth hidden in plain sight: to limit knowledge is to limit human prosperity. Even key players faced vaccine shortages due to third-party patents, yet virtually no one applied the same logical reasoning to other sectors. If patents on vaccine production limited the production (and subsequently, the distribution) of vaccines, why wouldn’t this apply to any other technological innovation? Let’s take a step back and look at the logic behind this truth. As economist Jesús Huerta de Soto writes: Restrictions in the economy are imposed not by objective phenomena or material factors of the outside world (for example, oil reserves), but by human entrepreneurial knowledge (the discovery of a carburetor capable of doubling the efficiency of internal combustion engines would exert the same economic effect as a doubling of all physical oil reserves). This is because production, the process of transforming inputs into outputs, involves human technique, which, in turn, depends entirely upon the entrepreneurial knowledge being employed. Humans employ a framework of knowledge, devices, and practices in order to produce goods, and entrepreneurs innovate by bringing more productive frameworks of knowledge into the economic reality. To slow down the development, use, and spread of technical innovation and prevent others from replicating and improving on innovations is to limit human production; it is to act against prosperity itself. While resources are scarce and limited, our growing “fund of experience” allows us to constantly innovate and apply new practical entrepreneurial knowledge. Fencing off said fund is fatally kneecapping humanity’s advancement. With these lenses, intellectual property comes into focus as a much more hideous and ghastly public policy. The life-saving medicine never produced by entrepreneurs, the hundreds of millions of goods never produced by entrepreneurs worldwide because they were prohibited from using the latest technology, and the millions—perhaps billions—of people never lifted out of poverty, the technology never rolled out to people who desperately need it are only a mere fraction of IP’s unseen effects. Conclusion With the data laid out, and the sound economic theory explained, we have applied good economic reasoning to achieve an ironclad understanding of the impacts of intellectual property laws on humanity: they are a fatal blow to entrepreneurship, free enterprise, and technological advancement. Their seen and unseen effects impose a terrible cost on humanity, and with virtually no benefit at all, IP laws are perhaps only of use to cronies who wish to prevent competitors from challenging their high prices. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------