서울경제 ‘적폐 청산’ 띄운 尹 “나 같은 사람 검찰총장 임명할 것” 文 정권 겨냥해 “검찰 이용해 범죄 저질러” 靑 “아무리 선거라도 지킬 선 있다” 반발 與 “노골적인 정치 보복” “검찰 권력자의 망언” 尹 “문제 없다면 불쾌할 일 아냐” 꼬집어 ---->운석열이 문죄인의 심복이라면 할 수 없는 발언이 오늘 나왔다. 짜고 치는 고스톱인지, 아니면 정말로 윤석열이 우파로 전향한 것인지는 알 수 없다. 윤석열 "文 정직한 분…그를 둘러싼 거대집단, 내로남불 전형" 중앙일보 --------->문죄인은 빼고 적폐청산한다는 말임! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 뻥튀기장수/ 일베 댓글 경찰 = 실적에 미친 병신새끼들. 성범죄는 '여성청소년'계가 담당 검찰 = 성범죄는 무적권 여검사에게 할당 법원 = 우리법연구회등 좌빨 판사가 판결때림 성범죄로 처벌받기는 졸라 쉬움. 여성부의 권고로 10만원짜리 처벌만받아도 아동청소년기관 취업제한은 거의 무조건 때리게 되어있음(최소 2년) 작년12월, 경찰이 불법음란물을 보기만해도 신상공개 하는 방안을 검토중이라고 함 어떤 대학교수는 불법성착취물을 걸러내기 위해서 정부에서 프로그램을 만들어서 개개인의 PC를 원격으로 감시해야된다고 주장 (그 불법야동을 만드는 여자는 처벌안함) 단, 이 모든건 여자는 해당되지 않음 (성추행해도 부수적 처분 X. 신상등록,취업제한,성폭력치료프로그램,사회봉사등등) 또한 몰카를 잡는다면서 타겟은 무조건 '남자'임 안심보안관 모집기준을 여성으로 한정하고 여자화장실만 검사함 (여자를 일자리주고 세금퍼주고 남자만 범죄자 만들겠다는거임) 남자가 레깅스입으면 모든 법을 동원해서 처벌가능 여부 검토, 여자가 레깅스 입으면 일상복 그러나 남자가 그 일상복입은 여자를 찍으면 처벌가능. 초상권이 아닌 무려 성범죄로. 여자가 유튜브 찍는다고 길에서 빨통보이는 나시입고 보지 흔들어도 처벌불가. 공연음란죄 아님 일베충들은 이 와중에도 똥된장 구분못하고 이런거 지적하면 보적보라느니 좋기만 하다느니 헛소리함 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 세계최대 규모의 ㄹㅇ 진천선수촌 수준...jpg IillIIIll http://www.ilbe.com/view/11394333402 예산 5130억원 들여서선수촌 축구장 200개 규모로 새로 만듦 각종 최첨단 장비에 숙소만 823개 21개 훈련시설 식사 고급 뷔페식 한중일양식 푸드 올림픽 수준 거기에 가정의학과 재활의확과 의사 간호사 물리치료사 전문의료진들이 선수촌에 상주중 완공하는데만 5천억 넘게 들었는데 인건비랑 기타등등 관리비용이랑 유지비용도 어마어마하게 들듯 미르히 댓글 미친 새키들 올림픽 나가서 메달따는게 뭔데 세금으로 저지랄하는거냐? 지금이 쌍팔년도인줄 아나 태릉선수촌 폐쇄시켜도 모자랄 판에 더 큰 걸 처만들었네 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "확진자 추적 불가능"…방역당국, 전자출입명부 폐지 검토 노컷뉴스 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 고용은 경제성장에 도움이 되지 못한다. 다수의 경제학자는 고용 증가가 경제 성장의 핵심이라고 생각한다. 더 많은 사람이 월급을 타서 지출을 하면 경제가 성장한다는 단순하고 멍청한 생각 때문이다. 하지만 경제 성장의 진정한 핵심 요인은 점점 커져가는 저축의 규모이다. 여기서 저축이란 현재의 소비를 제하고도 남아도는 잉여 생산을 가리킨다. 바로 이 저축이 물질적 복지의 개선을 위한 첫 단계이다. 왜냐하면 저축이 있어야만 기간시설의 향상과 확충을 위한 자금을 댈 수 있기 때문이다. 그리고 기간시설이 향상되면, 개인의 복지를 증진하고 유지하기 위한 최종 상품과 서비스의 생산이 증가하게 된다. 실업은 사실 쉽게 바로잡을 수 있다. 정부가 노동시장의 개입에서 손을 떼면 되기 때문이다. 상식과는 달리 가격 인플레를 부추기는 것은 임금이 아니라 연준의 방만한 통화 정책이다. Why Employment Is Not the Key to Economic Growth Frank Shostak In December 2021, the US unemployment rate fell to 3.9 percent from 4.2 percent in the month before. The number of unemployed individuals fell by 500,000 to 6.3 million. Many commentators have expressed satisfaction with the decline in unemployment. According to commentators, the fall in unemployment is indicative of a strong economy. For most economists the key to economic growth is a strengthening in the labor market. This way of thinking is based on the view that because of the reduction in the number of unemployed, more individuals can afford to increase their expenditure. As a result, economic growth is likely to follow suit. This is based on the view that an increase in demand is going to trigger an increase in supply. Expanding Savings Are the Key to Economic Growth The key driver of economic growth is an expanding pool of savings and not the state of the labor market as such. Fixing unemployment without addressing the issue of savings is not going to increase economic growth. According to Ludwig von Mises, The sine qua non of any lengthening of the process of production adopted is saving, i.e., an excess of current production over current consumption. Saving is the first step on the way toward improvement of material well-being and toward every further progress on this way. It is the pool of savings that funds the enhancement and expansion of the infrastructure. An enhanced and expanded infrastructure permits an increase in the production of the final goods and services required to maintain and promote individuals' lives and well-being. Now, if employment were the driving factor of economic growth, then it would make a lot of sense to eliminate unemployment as soon as possible by generating all sorts of employment programs. For instance, policy makers could follow the advice of John Maynard Keynes and employ individuals in digging ditches or various other government-sponsored activities. Note that the aim here is just to employ as many individuals as possible. Since government is not a wealth-generating entity, in order to fund the employment programs it would have to divert wealth from the wealth generators to the various individuals that are going to be employed in government employment programs. As a rule, this wealth diversion will occur either by means of various taxes and levies or by means of monetary pumping. A policy of wealth diversion leads to the depletion of the pool of savings. Employing individuals in various non-wealth-generating activities that require wealth transfers from wealth-generating activities undermines wealth generators. This in turn weakens the process of wealth generation and in turn undermines prospects for real economic growth. Unhampered Labor Markets and Unemployment Unemployment as such can be fixed relatively easily by freeing the labor market from tampering by the government. In an unhampered labor market, any individual that wants to work will be able to find a job at the going wage for his particular skills. Obviously, if an individual demands a non-market-related salary and is not prepared to move to other locations, there is no guarantee that he will find a job. For instance, if the market wage for John the baker is $80,000 per year, yet he insists on a salary of $500,000, obviously he is likely to be unemployed. Over time, a free labor market makes sure that every individual earns in accordance with the value of the product he generated. Any deviation from the value of his contribution sets in motion corrective competitive forces. Ultimately, what matters for the well-being of individuals is not that they are employed as such, but their purchasing power in terms of the goods and services that they earn. Individuals' earning power, all other things being equal, is conditioned upon the infrastructure that they operate. The better the infrastructure, the more output an individual can generate. A higher output means that a worker can command higher wages. Monetary pumping by the central bank that is supposedly aimed at helping workers improve their living standards achieves the exact opposite. Loose monetary policy undermines the pool of savings. This in turn weakens the wealth generators' ability to enhance and improve the infrastructure. As a result, workers' productivity comes under pressure and their ability to command higher wages weakens. Additionally, loose monetary policy after a time lag lifts the prices of goods and services, thereby eroding the purchasing power of workers' earnings. Do Wage Increases Increase the Prices of Goods? Some economists are of the view that the currently observed acceleration in the momentum of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is in response to the increase in the momentum of individuals' wages. The yearly growth rate of the CPI jumped to 7 percent in December 2021 from 1.4 percent in December 2020. These commentators hold that in order to lower the CPI's momentum it is necessary to lower wages' growth rate to around 4 percent.1 Note that the yearly growth rate of wages stood at 8.9 percent in November 2021, against 3.4 percent in November 2020. A visible correlation between the yearly growth rate in the CPI and the yearly growth rate in wages lagged by four months seems to support the view that wages are an important driver of CPI momentum. But statistical correlations can only describe, not explain. To explain, we have to establish the definition of what prices and wages are all about. Observe that the price of a good and the price of labor is the amount of money paid per unit of a good and per hour of work. All other things being equal, an increase in money supply means that individuals can now spend more money on goods and labor services. This means an increase in the prices of goods and an increase in wages. Hence, to set the foundation for low price inflation what is required is not to lower workers' wages, but for the Fed to reverse its loose monetary policy. Note that the yearly growth rate of the Austrian money supply measure for the US climbed to 79 percent in February 2021 from 4.8 percent in January 2020. Is Fixing Unemployment Cost-Free? Once an economy falls into a recession and the unemployment rate starts to rise, most commentators are of the view that it is the duty of the government and the central bank to step in to counter it. Some commentators are of the view that the lowering of unemployment is going to be cost-free given that the unemployed individuals are idle. According to Paul Krugman, If you put 100,000 Americans to work right now digging ditches, it is not as if you are taking those 100,000 workers away from other good things they might be doing. You are putting them to work when they would have been doing nothing.2 But how is the lowering of unemployment going to be funded? Who is going to pay for this? It seems that Krugman and other commentators are of the view that funding can be easily generated by the central bank by means of printing presses. Again, contrary to Krugman and other commentators, funding is not about money as such, but about savings, which is the amount of consumer goods produced less the consumption of these goods by their owners. Observe that in order to maintain their lives and well-being people require final consumer goods and services, not money as such. Money only helps to facilitate trade among producers—it does not generate any real stuff. Contrary to Krugman and other commentators, the artificial generation of employment such as digging ditches is not going to be cost-free. Various individuals employed in non-wealth-generating projects must be sustained (i.e., funded). Since government does not produce any wealth, obviously, it cannot save and therefore it cannot fund any activity. Hence, for the government to engage in these activities, it must divert funding (i.e., savings) from wealth generators. This, however, weakens the process of wealth generation. Conclusion A reduction in unemployment is not the key factor for economic growth. The heart of economic growth is the expanding pool of savings. It is savings that are instrumental in the expansion and the enhancement of the production structure. With an expanded and enhanced production structure, stronger economic growth can be secured. Contrary to some commentators, the government policies of lowering unemployment are not cost-free. The various government projects that are aimed at artificially boosting employment divert savings from wealth generators toward various government programs. In the process, this undermines wealth generators' ability to grow the economy. Also, contrary to popular thinking. it is not wages that drive price inflation, but the Fed's loose monetary policy. Hence, what is required to arrest the acceleration in price inflation is for the Fed to arrest its loose monetary policy. 1.On CNBC on January 25, 2022, a Goldman economist said it’s tough to sustain wage gains of 5 percent to 6 percent without "meaningfully high" inflation. 2.Paul Krugman, interview by CNBC, CNBC, August 31, 2010. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------