반일 선동하다가 상황이 여의치 않자 꼬리를 내렸다. 하지만 이미 피해가 만만치 않다. 때려죽여도 시원치 않은 놈이다. / 일베
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Times 논평 488]
오산 미 공군기지에 델타여객기? 뭔가 일어나고 있다!(2020.07.26)
와이 타임즈 진행자는 추부길이라는 사람인데 고향은 전라도이고, 이명박 정부에서 일했던 경력이 있다. 좌파인지 우파인지 좀 애매한 사람이다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
펑티모] 한국에서도 많은 사랑을 받은노래 《소행운 | 小幸运》 영화 나의소녀시대OST
펑티모(FengTImo) 고양이송
学猫叫——小潘潘&小峰峰
小潘潘：
我们一起学猫叫
一起喵喵喵喵喵
在你面前撒个娇
哎呦喵喵喵喵喵
我的心脏砰砰跳
迷恋上你的坏笑
你不说爱我我就喵喵喵
小峰峰：
每天都需要你的拥抱
珍惜在一起的每分每秒
你对我多重要
我想你比我更知道
你就是我的女主角
小潘潘：
有时候我懒的像只猫
脾气不好时又张牙舞爪
你总是温柔的
能把我的心融化掉
我想要当你的小猫猫
合唱：
我们一起学猫叫
一起喵喵喵喵喵
在你面前撒个娇
哎呦喵喵喵喵喵
我的心脏砰砰跳
迷恋上你的坏笑
你不说爱我我就喵喵喵
我们一起学猫叫
一起喵喵喵喵喵
我要穿你的外套
闻你身上的味道
想要变成你的猫
赖在你怀里睡着
每天都贪恋着你的好
小潘潘：
有时候我懒的像只猫
脾气不好时又张牙舞爪
你总是温柔的
能把我的心融化掉
我想要当你的小猫猫
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
문산당(?)을 무찔러 아이들의 자유를 지켜주세요. 식을줄 모르고 커져만가는 블랙 물결과 열기. KBS 취재.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“문재인 내려와” 포털 1위 화근 덩어리 혁명으로 끝내자 - 이계성의 구국의 소리 제61회 2020.07.24 -[뉴스타운TV]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMF보다 더 망하는 시대,불현듯올수있다 준비한 자는 큰 부자되는 기회가 되지만
그렇치 않는자는 망하고 부도나고 가정파탄은 물론 ,노숙자로 전락한다, 철저히 대비하자 각자할일
삶테크 티비
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
전자출입명부는 베리칩입니다. 전국민의 이동경로를 추척합니다 [바실리아TV]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
닐 퍼거슨
A couple of good reads. First on the true nature of the social justice cult(ure) quillette.com/2020/07/20/wha and then
@sullydish
's latest on the impact of the pandemic on the Great Awokening: andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/the-summer-o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
코로나 예방에는 저렴하고 빠르고 저 민감인 테스트가 고가에 느리고 복잡하고 고 민감인 테스트보다 우월하다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
불황을 이기는 유일한 방법은 저축을 늘리는 것이다.
불황에 접어들면 활용되지 않는 자본과 노동이 생긴다. 그러면
불황의 원인이 상품과 서비스에 대한 수요가 부족하기 때문이라는 주장이 고개를 든다. 마침내 수요 부족이 불황이라고 정리되면, 다음으로 수요를 촉진하기 위해 정부와 중앙은행이 개입하라고 촉구한다.
이런 주장을 하는 사람들은 한 개인의 소비는 다른 사람의 수입이 된다고 믿는다.
하지만 수요를 행사하려면 적절한 수단이 있어야 한다. 예를 들어 메르스데스를 사고 싶어도 자전거를 살 돈 밖에 없다면 그 수요는 충족될 수가 없다.
일반적인 생각과는 달리 돈은 결제의 수단이 아니라, 교환의 매개체이다. 돈은 단지 하나의 상품의 대가를 다른 상품으로 지불하는 과정을 원활히 할 뿐이다. 따라서 돈을 더 찍어내면 진정한 저축의 기반이 줄어들 뿐이다.
경제 불황을 이기는 방법은 진정한 저축의 기반을 되도록 크게 증가시키는 것이다.
그 방법은 정부의 돈 뿌리는 구멍을 모두 막고, 정부 지출을 철저하게 삭감하는 것이다.
상품이 팔리지 않고 노동자가 직업을 구하지 못한다면, 그 유일한 원인은 가격이 너무 높기 때문이다. 상품을 팔거나 취업을 원하는 사람은 그들이 부르는 가격을 낮추어야만 한다. 그것이 시장의 법칙이다. (여기서 말하는 저축은 우리가 은행에 돈을 예금하는 걸 의미하지 않는다. 여기서 저축이란 소비되고 남은 잉여 소비재의 양을 말한다. Savings are the amount of consumer goods produced in excess of the consumption of these goods. )
The Only Long-Term Solution to a Bust Is to Rebuild Savings
Frank Shostak
Once an economy falls into a recession some commentators express concern that as a result there is now nonutilized capital and labor. Resources that can be used are now made unemployed. It is held that the key issue behind this is insufficient demand for goods and services.
Once it is accepted that the key factor is insufficient demand, these commentators are of the view that what is required is somehow to boost the overall demand in the economy. With a stronger demand, it is held, idle resources will be employed again. Hence, what is recommended is for the central bank to embark on very loose monetary stance to strengthen the overall demand for goods and services. If individuals are reluctant to increase their demand for goods and services, then the government and the central bank must step in to boost the demand to revive the economy. (Note that in this way of thinking spending by one individual becomes the income of another.)
But what is overlooked here that without adequate means it is not possible to exercise any demand. For instance, if an individual has a desire for a luxurious car such as a Mercedes 600 yet his means are sufficient only to secure a bicycle. Means, however, are not something that can be printed; they have to be produced.
Contrary to popular thinking, money is just a medium of exchange, not the means of payment. In a sense, individuals are paying for goods with other goods. All that money does is facilitate the payment of one good for another good.
Consequently, printing more money doesn’t generate more means but rather leads to an exchange of nothing for something, i.e., to the depletion of the pool of real savings. It leads to the diversion of real savings from those individuals who have contributed to this pool to those who made no contribution whatsoever.
How, then, can an economic slump be eliminated? By increasing as much as possible the pool of real savings—the increase in this pool is the key to the increase in the well-being of individuals.
What is required is to seal off all the channels that undermine the generation of real savings. This means that what is required is to close all the loopholes that enable monetary pumping and to cut the government outlays to the bone. (Observe that by cutting government outlays it will instantly be possible to lower all sorts of taxes on individuals.) These policies will put more real savings in the hands of wealth generators, which will help to revive the economy.
It must be understood that no central bank or government tampering with markets can make the overall “pie” bigger—all that such policies as a rule generate is a redistribution of a given “pie.” And over time these policies lead to the weakening of the amassing of real savings and to economic impoverishment. According to Mises in Human Action,
Out of the collapse of the boom there is only one way back to a state of affairs in which progressive accumulation of capital safeguards a steady improvement of material well-being: new saving must accumulate the capital goods needed for a harmonious equipment of all branches of production with the capital required. One must provide the capital goods lacking in those branches which were unduly neglected in the boom. Wage rates must drop; people must restrict their consumption temporarily until the capital wasted by malinvestment is restored. Those who dislike these hardships of the readjustment period must abstain in time from credit expansion.
Furthermore Mises argues in Human Action,
In the opinion of the public, more inflation and more credit expansion are the only remedy against the evils, of an economic slump….Here, they say, are plants and farms whose capacity to produce is either not used at all or not to its full extent. Here are piles of unsalable commodities and hosts of unemployed workers. But here are also masses of people who would be lucky if they only could satisfy their wants more amply. All that is lacking is credit. Additional credit would enable the entrepreneurs to resume or to expand production. The unemployed would find jobs again and could buy the products. This reasoning seems plausible. Nonetheless it is utterly wrong.
If commodities cannot be sold and workers cannot find jobs, the reason can only be that the prices and wages asked are too high. He who wants to sell his inventories or his capacity to work must reduce his demand until he finds a buyer. Such is the law of the market. Such is the device by means of which the market directs every individual's activities into those lines in which they can best contribute to the satisfaction of the wants of the consumers. The malinvestments of the boom have misplaced inconvertible factors of production in some lines at the expense of other lines in which they were more urgently needed. There is disproportion in the allocation of nonconvertible factors to the various branches of industry. This disproportion can be remedied only by the accumulation of new capital and its employment in those branches in which it is most urgently required. This is a slow process. While it is in progress, it is impossible to utilize fully the productive capacity of some plants for which the complementary production facilities are lacking.
----------------------------------------------
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기