"이번 생은 망했다" 그러게 왜 좌파를 찍으셨어요?
---?제목이 재미있다. 그런데 지난 번 총선은 부정선거만 없었다면, 우파의 승리였다. 국민들은 다행히 그렇게 어리석지 않았다.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"여인이 한을 품으면 여름에 눈발"/끝없는 재앙과 이상현상/홍콩의 분서갱유
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
사법부 장악 [공병호 TV]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--->
저 놈들의 꼬라지가 얼마나 더럽고 눈꼴 시리면, 좌빨이 노래로 한숨 짓나?
자신의 운명을 극복하고 태어난 아이!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
남미의 아르헨티나에서 본 무지개 산 / 출처 일베, 이하 동
기차무덤에서 찍은 밤하늘
소금 사막의 밤 풍경
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
사람들이 샤넬을 사는 것은 높은 퀄리티 띠문이 아니라, 상표로 과시하기 위한 것이다. 사람들이 하버드에 들어가는 것 역시 지식을 얻기 위한 게 아니라, 졸업장을 얻기 위한 것이다.
--->학벌의 폐해. 앞으로는 상당수의 지식을 인터넷으로 얻을 수 있는데, 지식을 얻기 위한 거라면 굳이 하버드에 갈 필요가 있을까?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
메뚜기떼 습격에 중국 '식량창고'가 모조리 불타는 상황
| 신세기TV
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
오구오구오구구구
ㅁ미사여구 빼고 좀더 진솔하게 가사써라
기껏해야 정권의 나팔수
고작해야 콩고물들의 앞잡이 노릇이나 한 걸 깨달았다면
안씨
콩고물이 뭐야 콩고물버러지 라고는 써야지
위선으로 둘째가라면 서러울까봐 상스럽게까지 지들뱃속채우기만 혈안이된
후안무치정권 탄생에 기여했으면
아이러니 정도의 제목갖고 가당키나 하나?
안치환 너도 슬그머니 발빼지말고
사람 집단 못알아본 사죄의 노래부터 단단히 부르고
비판하려거든 칼같이 해라
무슨 아이러니
미적지근하게 발뺌하는 노래네 / 일베 댓글
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--->학벌의 폐해. 앞으로는 상당수의 지식을 인터넷으로 얻을 수 있는데, 지식을 얻기 위한 거라면 굳이 하버드에 갈 필요가 있을까?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Germany Must Do for a Speedy Recovery
Philipp Bagus
The German "stimulus" package does nothing to actually stimulate true economic growth. If Germany policymakers were smart, they'd be cutting taxes and spending, while abolishing regulations.
독일의 경기 부양책은 경제 성장에 아무 역할도 못한다. 진정으로 경기를 부양하고 싶다면, 세금을 깎고, 지출을 축소하고, 규제를 폐기하라!
---->한국을 비롯해 기타 국가들에도 똑같이 적용되는 조언.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
코로나 사태로 이제 시장경제는 사라졌다!
코로나의 대유행으로 인해 “법정 화폐 시장”의 베일이 벗겨졌다. 지금까지 시장을 가장했지만 코로나 유행이 그것을 모두 벗겨버린 것이다. 정부와 중앙은행이 수요와 공급을 창출하고, 구제금융과 보조금으로 좀비 기업들이 연명하고 있고, 복지와 보편적 기본 임금을 받아 시민들이 장을 보고 있다. 이것이야 말로 사회주의의 한 형태가 아니고 무엇인가!
The Market Economy Has Been Replaced by a "Fiat Economy"
Yazid Suleiman
The COVID-19 pandemic has torn the veil off what we can now call a "fiat market. It has stripped away all pretense of a true market. Governments and central banks now create both supply and demand. Bailouts and subsidies are handed down so that zombie corporations can produce on the one hand, while welfare, universal basic income, and other handouts are distributed so that citizens can buy the products. Strictly speaking, this is a type of socialism.
In Europe, the European Central Bank's (ECB) asset purchase programs currently stands just shy of €3 trillion. That is excluding its newly expanded €1.35 trillion Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program—equivalent to the entire GDP of Spain and considerably higher than that of the Netherlands. A big show was made of the Trump administration's $4.5 trillion relief bill and the Fed's $2.3 trillion program to "bolster" the economy. The G7 central banks have racked up asset purchases of $1.64 trillion in March and expect to top out at $6 trillion when all is said and done. Welfare and unemployment checks now pay more than salaries in many caess.
Each of the above programs injects more money and credit than the GDPs of all the countries in the world, with the exception only the biggest thirteen. Cumulatively, they add up to more than the GDP of all countries except China and the US.
So how did we end up in this "fiat market"?
The Basis of Economic Growth
Economic growth is driven by capital investments, entrepreneurship, and innovation. These form the basic pillars of growing, stable, and sustainable economies. When capital investments and entrepreneurship are suffocated, innovation and progress are stifled.
The economic system is relatively balanced by interest rates and prices through cycles of savings and consumption. Savings encourage long-term capital investments that translate into productivity gains across the production chain. During the consumption cycle, the capital gains on previous savings are spent by consumers (savers) on cheaper, better products from prior capital investments financed by their savings (in the form of loans).
In an interventionist economy, good money, and by extension good investment, is driven out by the "bad money" injected through perpetual interventions. With current levels of monetary easing and deficit spending running into trillions across the globe, productive savings are essentially drowned out.
Breaking the Real Market via Fiat
The fiat economy also shifts the economy toward less competitive, more wasteful firms. The bailouts, welfare, and subsidies, by definition, shift competitive advantage to unproductive individuals and zombie corporations by plundering the productive and profitable.
The relentless push, under different acronyms, to inject cheap money and credit into the system causes structural distortions via misallocation of resources within the economy. This misallocation shifts resources from their most productive uses to lesser (often least) productive uses by pushing interest rates below their natural levels—keeping zombie corporations in business, unviable projects alive, and by crowding out innovative and productive corporations and entrepreneurs.
Productive individuals and profitable corporations earn competitive advantages through skills, education, thrift, innovation, excellent management, and customer service. But the "stimulus" and bailout programs aim to transfer enough wealth to unproductive individuals and zombie corporations by taxing the productive and profitable out of their competitive advantage.
One such example is the auto industry, where large legacy corporations have repeatedly won loans and grants from governments with favorable conditions so as to keep these inefficient corporations going in order to "save jobs." Other programs such as scrappage programs (such as "cash for clunkers") in the name of "safety" essentially channel new money (serving as a carrot) and customers into auto dealerships. This isn't surprising. As we have seen on numerous occasions, legacy corporations maintain a stable of lobbyists on retainer to secure government bailouts and other favorable policy shifts—this excludes indirect bailouts secured through banks with access to Federal Reserve credit facilities. This essentially buys market share at the expense of innovative and productive companies (such as Tesla) and neutralizes new and innovative companies' competitive advantage. The gains in productivity and value that would have folded the dinosaurs and shifted resources and capital to productive sectors of the economy is lost, and waste is incentivized in the legacy corporations.
Production continues only because of government subsidies and access to cheap government-created or central bank–created credit. Demand remains because of government welfare schemes. Through this new money and cheap credit, governments and central banks enable zombie firms to produce products for unproductive individuals to consume without producing anything themselves. Moreover, the government and central banks plan the economy from the top down, determining which sectors are allowed to produce what, by how much, who will buy what and from whom. Clearly, this is not a market economy. It is a "fiat economy."
Author:
Yazid Suleiman
Yazid Suleiman is an economist and consultant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기