"또 속으면 개 돼지"(태극기 집회 프래카드).

--->사회 각 분야에는 일정 비율의 멍청이들이 존재하고, 이들이 앞장서서 선전선동에 부화뇌동하면, 또 상당수의 국민이 여기에 휩쓸린다. 결국 일부의 국민이 개 돼지가 되면, 나머지도 거기에 휩쓸려 개 돼지가 된다. 이것이 소위 민주제의 함정이다.
------------------------------
우리 아버지는 왜 남로당원이 되었을까?
이민복(대북 풍선단장)

 일생을 다 바쳐 본 공산주의를 놓고 부친은 한마디로 말씀하신다. 
"정치는 최대의 협잡이야!"
(조갑제닷컴 발췌)
--------------------------------------------

Chris Murphy

 

This is such irresponsible simplification and it’s how we get into dumb wars of choice

 

The Saudis and Houthis are at war. The Saudis attack the Houthis and the Houthis attack back. Iran is backing the Houthis and has been a bad actor, but it’s just not as simple as Houthis=Iran.

 

사우디와 후티 족이 전쟁 중이고 이란은 후티족을 밀고 있다. 후티족은 이란이 아니다. 

------------------------------------------

Chris Murphy

‏

 

So let’s be honest - there is a war going on between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis. The Saudis are bombing and shooting at the Houthis everyday, with our help. What we should probably be doing is working to end the war, not expecting that one side will unilaterally stop fighting.

 

Lindsey Graham

Iranian supported Houthi rebels who attacked Saudi oil refineries is yet another example of how Iran is wreaking havoc in the Middle East. The Iranian regime is not interested in peace - they’re pursuing nuclear weapons and regional dominance.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At Edinburgh Place, secondary school students are erecting Hong Kong's "Lady Liberty" statue.

https://twitter.com/SCMPHongKong/status/1172757003510439936

홍콩의 자유의 여신상

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gordon G. Chang‏ 

#China exempting US pork and soy from additional tariffs: http://bit.ly/2lNSwoo . Why? It absolutely has to. Soaring food prices risk protests. Let the Chinese make even more #trade concessions. These arrogant communists need to know that we know they have no bargaining power.

중국이 미국의 돼지고기와 콩에 대한 추가 관세를 면제한 이유

는, 식품 가격이 높아지면 주민들의 반발이 예상되기 때문이

다.

-------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------

교황이 포퓰리즘은 모든 것을 조종하려는 사회 위험 요인이라고 언급했다. 

딱 현 정부가 나라 팔아먹으려고 돈 퍼주기 하는 게 떠오르네. 8월 한 달에만 노인 단기 일자리 40만 개 만들고 청년이라고 청년 수당, 외국인이라고 다문화 보육료, 여자라고 여성주택, 여성창업지원금, 구직촉진수당, 일자리안정자금 등 실효도 없는 수당이란 수당은 다 쳐만들고 있음.

거기다 세금 줄줄 세는 게, 일자리안정자금 집행하는 용역비 인건비만 600억이다 공무원들이 일 안 하고 직원 뽑아서 처리하는 중.

중앙정부 복지예산만 전체 예산의 34% (이명박은 26, 박근혜는 28)

이게 나라냐  / 일베

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

출처 일베

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Matt Ridley‏인증된 계정 

"The USSR and Nazi Germany spent the first 22 months of the war as allies. Theirs was not some cold, perfunctory non-aggression pact. It was an enthusiastic partnership."

소련과 나치 독일은 2차대전 전쟁 초기 22 개월 동안 동맹이었

다. 그들 사이의 불가침 조약은 그냥 형식적인 조약이 아니라,

열렬한 동반자 관계였다.

DANIEL HANNAN

80 years after the Soviet invasion of   Poland, the Western Left is still playing apologist for Russia

--------------------------------------------------------------

Wrath Of Gnon‏ 

Wrath Of Gnon 님이 리트윗했습니다 P. D. Mangan  🇺🇸

We know that modern grains are far less nutritious than ancient grains. Turns out even our great-grand parents ate vegetables that were many times as nutritious as what we are eating today.

현대의 곡류는 고대의 곡류보다 훨씬 영양이 적다.

P. D. Mangan  🇺🇸‏

Mineral content of vegetables may have declined 80-

90% over past 100 years. Add massive consumption of ultra-processed food and >45% of Americans are magnesium deficient.

채소의 미네럴이 과거 100년 동안 80 ~ 90% 감소했다.

또 현대인은 고도로 정제된 식품을 섭취하고, 미국인의

45%는 마그네슘 결핍이다.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163803/

옛날에 장사들이 많았다는 전설이 있는데, 그때는 영양가 많은 식품들을 섭취한 덕인가?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nassim Nicholas Taleb‏인증된 계정 

Of course, the Genetically Modified Mosquito project has gone wrong, with, really, "unforeseen outcomes". When will IYIs learn that we don't understand complex systems enough to play with them? Or when will we learn that science is not scientism?

유전자조작 모기 프로젝트는 "예기치 못한 결과"로 인해 실패

했다. 지적인 멍청이들은 인간이 "복잡계"를 완전히 이해하지

못하고 있다는 사실을 알기나 할까?

-------------------------------------------------------------

Quillette‏ 

“Undoubtedly, some people overdo porn to the point that it impacts their lives. However, that’s true for many other pleasurable activities—ranging from food to exercise, work, shopping—even fishing and dancing”

일부 사람들은 그들의 생활에 영향을 미칠만큼 포르노에 탐닉

한다. 하지만 음식, 운동, 일, 쇼핑, 낚시, 춤 등 기타 많은 오락

활동 역시 그러하다.

Anti-Pornography Campaigners’ Pseudo-Scientific Treadmill

written by Christopher J. Ferguson

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

정말 미친 거 아냐? 거짓말과 사기가 일상이 되어버린 정부!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

사촌형이 나이가 30대 초반인데 평생 백수였고 어렸을 때부터 꿈이 프로게이머였음 

그런데 저번 대선기간에 갑자기 뜬금없이 문재인 캠프에 들어가서 홍보 활동했었음 

약간 좌파 성향인건 알았는데 평생 백수였던 사람이 문재인 캠프에 들어간거 보고 깜놀랬음

카톡프사에 민주당 정치인들하고 같이 찍은 사진도 올리고 그랬음

문재인 대통령 되고 나서 작년에 사촌형이 환경 보호 시민단체 만들었음 

사촌형이 시민단체 사무실 놀러와서 구경하라고 해서 구경갔었는데 

사무실 직원들 하루종일 게임만 하고 있었음

환경 보호 단체가 아니라 게임 보호 단체로 보일 정도로 여러가지 게임을 열심히 하고 있었음

사촌형이 그러는데 사무실 운영비 직원 월급 다 국가에서 지원해준다고 함

가끔 주한미군 기지 앞에 가서 환견 보호 집회 하고 그런다고 함 

사촌형 앞에서는 말 안했는데 내가 낸 세금이 이딴식으로 쓰이고 있다는게 짜증났음

사무실 직원들 하는 짓 보니까 게임 - 커뮤사이트에 댓글 달기 - 게임 - 무한반복이던데

왜 인터넷에는 좌파가 훨씬 많아 보이는지 이해가 되었음 

사촌형이 운영하는 사무실 구경하고 나서 진짜 세금 내기가 싫어졌음 

문재인 개새끼

다크매니아+32019.09.15 20:05:54 

저런 좌파단체가 문재인대통되고 수천개가 생김. 대선때 자기 대통되게 조금이라도 밀어줬던넘들 죄다 저런 나이롱단체차림. 본문에 써있듯 운영비 월급등 백퍼 정부에서 지원해줌. 특히 전라도새키들이 세운 단체가 많은데 이새끼들 언제 정권바꿜지 모르니 좌파정권때 이것저것 단단히 해쳐먹어 때돈벌고있음.

출처 일베

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

불황 해결을 위한 정부 정책은 왜 결국 실패하고 말까?

 

과거에 불황이 오면 여론은 늘 일자리를 만들고 가격 하락을 막기 위해 정부가 공공사업에 나서라고 주문했다. 하지만 문제는 공공사업을 할 돈을 어디에서 구하느냐는 것이다. 만일 정부가 세금을 걷거나 돈을 빌리면, 그것은 케인즈가 말하는 총 지출의 양에 아무 영향을 끼치지 못한다. 또 정부가 돈을 찍어 인플레를 유발하게 되면, 단기적으로는 불황을 막을지 몰라도, 후에 더 큰 위기를 만들게 된다.

개입주의자들의 근본적인 오류는 그들이 자본재의 부족을 무시한다는 것이다.

모든 정부는 저금리, 여신 팽창, 인플레 등의 정책을 고집하고 있다. 그러다 그 결과 불황이 찾아오면, 그들은 단 한 가지 해법, 즉 인플레 정책을 실행한다.

 

Why Government Plans for Fixing Recessions Ultimately Fail

 

Ludwig von Mises

 

An essential element of the "unorthodox" doctrines, advanced both by all socialists and by all interventionists, is that the recurrence of depressions is a phenomenon inherent in the very operation, of the market economy. But while the socialists contend that only the substitution of socialism for capitalism can eradicate the evil, the interventionists ascribe to the government the power to correct the operation of the market economy in such a way as to bring about what they call "economic stability." These interventionists would be right if their antidepression plans were to aim at a radical abandonment of credit expansion policies. However, they reject this idea in advance. What they want is to expand credit more and more and to prevent depressions by the adoption of special "contracyclical" measures.

 

In the context of these plans the government appears as a deity that stands and works outside the orbit of human affairs, that is independent of the actions of its subjects, and has the power to interfere with these actions from without. It has at its disposal means and funds that are not provided by the people and can be freely used for whatever purposes the rulers are prepared to employ them for. What is needed to make the most beneficent use of this power is merely to follow the advice given by the experts.

 

The most advertised among these suggested remedies is contracyclical timing of public works and expenditure on public enterprises. The idea is not so new as its champions would have us believe. When depression came, in the past, public opinion always asked the government to embark upon public works in order to create jobs and to stop the drop in prices. But the problem is how to finance these public works. If the government taxes the citizens or borrows from them, it does not add anything to what the Keynesians call the aggregate amount of spending. It restricts the private citizen's power to consume or to invest to the same extent that it increases its own. If, however, the government resorts to the cherished inflationary methods of financing, it makes things worse, not better. It may thus delay for a short time the outbreak of the slump. But when the unavoidable payoff does come, the crisis is the heavier the longer the government has postponed it.

 

The interventionist experts are at a loss to grasp the real problems involved. As they see it, the main thing is "to plan public capital expenditure well in advance and to accumulate a shelf of fully worked out capital projects which can be put into operation at short notice." This, they say, "is the right policy and one which we recommend all countries should adopt." However, the problem is not to elaborate projects, but to provide the material means for their execution. The interventionists believe that this could be easily achieved by holding back government expenditure in the boom and increasing it when the depression comes.

 

Now, restriction of government expenditure may certainly be a good thing. But it does not provide the funds a government needs for a later expansion of its expenditure. An individual may conduct his affairs in this way. He may accumulate savings when his income is high and spend them later when his income drops. But it is different with a nation or all nations together. The treasury may hoard a considerable part of the lavish revenue from taxes which flows into the public exchequer as a result of the boom. As far and as long as it withholds these funds from circulation, its policy is really deflationary and contracyclical and may to this extent weaken the boom created by credit expansion. But when these funds are spent again, they alter the money relation and create a cash-induced tendency toward a drop in the monetary unit's purchasing power. By no means can these funds provide the capital goods required for the execution of the shelved public works.

 

The fundamental error of the interventionists consists in the fact that they ignore the shortage of capital goods. In their eyes the depression is merely caused by a mysterious lack of the people's propensity both to consume and to invest. While the only real problem is to produce more and to consume less in order to increase the stock of capital goods available, the interventionists want to increase both consumption and investment. They want the government to embark upon projects which are unprofitable precisely because the factors of production needed for their execution must be withdrawn from other lines of employment in which they would fulfill wants the satisfaction of which the consumers consider more urgent. They do not realize that such public works must considerably intensify the real evil, the shortage of capital goods.

 

One could, of course, think of another mode for the employment of the savings the government makes in the boom period. The treasury could invest its surplus in buying large stocks of all those materials which it will later, when the depression comes, need for the execution of the public works planned and of the consumers' goods which those occupied in these public works will ask for. But if the authorities were to act in this way, they would considerably intensify the boom, accelerate the outbreak of the crisis, and make its consequences more serious.

 

All this talk about contracyclical government activities aims at one goal only, namely, to divert the public's attention from cognizance of the real cause of the cyclical fluctuations of business. All governments are firmly committed to the policy of low interest rates, credit expansion, and inflation. When the unavoidable aftermath of these short-term policies appears, they know only of one remedy — to go on in inflationary ventures.

 

[Human Action (1949)]

----------------------------------------------------------