2019년 9월 27일 금요일

나경원

조국 탄핵은 과거 조국의 명령입니다. 
과거에 뭐라고 했습니까? 
김용판 전 서울경찰청장이 권은희 당시 수사과장에게 전화를 건 사실 하나만으로 '구속수사로 가야 한다'고 주장했습니다.
----------------------------------------------
문재인저 인간이 인권을 입에 올린다구?
그냥 확 아가리를 찢어버려야지 ~~
대한민국 군대는 지금 뭐하고 있나?
청와대를 탱크로 확 밀어버려야지!!
나는 지금 군인에 의한 쿠데타에 한 표 던진다. / 일베


--->군인들은 이미 박 대통령 탄핵 사태 때에 일어나야 했다. 지금도 가능할지 의문이다.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gordon G. Chang
#China's only weapon these days are lies.
 
요즘 중국의 유일한 무기는 거짓이다.
 
Darren Byler
“The most shocking piece of post-truth politics I experienced came with regards to Xinjiang. On three occasions when I broached this subject, I was told that Uyghurs were responsible for a ‘genocide against Han Chinese people.’”
 

내가 신장의 주민들이 억압받고 있는 상황을 세 번이나 폭로했는데, 그때마다 내가 들은 대답은 위구르 인들이 한족 학살에 책임이 있다는 것이었다.

--------------------------------------------------------------
 David Rennie
인증된 계정17시간 전
To understand why Communist propaganda is so successful within the mainland, and so bad at winning hearts and minds in Hong Kong, think of the CPC as a state-run monopoly, floundering in free markets for ideas. My Chaguan

중국공산당의 선전선동이 대륙에서 성공적인 이유는, 그것이

국영 독점 조직이기 때문이고, 그로 인해 자유시장경제인 홍

콩에서는 실패하는 것이다.

----------------------------------------------------------

skyfm+2
더불어민주당은 굉장히 위험한 정당임.
국민 60%가까이 반대했던 조국임명을 단한명도
반대하지도,할수도없는 전체주의 공산당같은 정당임.
입바른소리하면 홍위병 달창,맘충들 이용해서
문자폭탄날리고 협박하고 옳고그름에대한
보편적 가치관 자체를 무시하고
오로지 내편 니편만있는 이런 정당과 지지자들을
두글자로 "파쇼"라고 하는거다...ㅎㄷㄷ...
파쇼,전체주의 정당은 100% 독재로 가는거다
이거 문재인 지지자들 생각하고 있을까???
일베
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
, 조국 위기 몰리자 여당검찰 싸움을 


대통검찰 싸움으로 만들어버렸다

조선일보
-----------------------------------------------------
[단독]文정부 고위당국자, “TV조선 방통위 전파인증 

통과 어려워” 발언

일요신문
------------------------------------------
웃어야 할까, 아니면 우리에게도 닥칠 일이니까 한숨

을 쉬어야 할까?

---------------------------------------------------------
Matt Ridley인증된 계정 
If you think being descended from apes is bad for your self-esteem, then get used to the idea that you're also descended from viruses.

인간이 원숭이의 후손이라는 게 자존심에 걸리면, 인간은 또한

바이러스의 후손이라는 생각으로 위안하라.

-----------------------------------------------------------

전형적인 환원론적 사고와 방법의 책. 즉 인간을 쪼개고 쪼개

서 마지막에 얻은 지놈으로 인간을 이해할 수 있다는 과학주의

적 사고의 책. 하지만 한번 읽어볼 만은 하다.

Adam Shomsky
Although I've read books about DNA before, this one had quite a few new surprises and insights in it. For instance, each time a cell duplicates itself (during embyology or in the process of everyday bodily upkeep), a cell copies its DNA, but fails to copy the first few letters of each DNA strand. Thus the strand gets a little shorter each time it is copied. Each chromosome is equipped with a "telomere", a several-thousand letter buffer zone on the ends which can be safely discarded. Thus, one of the limits to human life spans (or other animals for that matter) is the number of times a cell can be duplicated before it starts to lose meaningful DNA. The DNA of sex cells do not shorten when copied because of a repair enzyme known as telomerase. Perhaps immortality depends upon (among other things) using telomerase in other cells.

Cells must be able to duplicate in order to repair damage due to daily wear and tear. But the duplication must be kept under strict control; cancer is the uncontrolled duplication of cells. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy work by damaging cell DNA, which triggers the body's own tumor-suppression genes to cause the tumor cells to self-destruct.

I had never heard before that genes can be switched on and off in response to external events, and that give a whole new dynamic view to the genome. Ridley explains that most genes in most cells at any given time are "turned off". But, for example, the body makes cortisol in response to stress, and cortisol is made by switching on a gene that produces an enzyme to convert cholesterol into cortisol. He gives the impression that this is not some isolated case, but commonplace in everyday events. This leads to implications on free will vs. genetic determinism.

Free will
Ridley gives the best description of free will I've ever heard: "If genes can affect behavior and behavior can affect genes, then the causality is circular. And in a system of circular feedbacks, hugely unpredictable results can follow from simple deterministic processes." This is an example of a chaotic system, like the weather. Tiny variations in input conditions soon yield enormous differences in output, and the weather is thus unpredictable in detail beyond a few days in advance (although we know general patterns, such as the fact that summer will be warmer than winter). "This interaction of genetic and external influences makes my behavior unpredictable, but not undetermined. In the gap between those words lies freedom."  아마존의 독자 서평
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nassim Nicholas Tale더 보기
Manti (Istanbul): the ancestor of ravioli. Except, of course, better.

라비올리의 원조 음식인 이스탄불의 만티

The Lebanese (not Lebanese Armenian) manti (shish barak) is cooked in goat milk yoghurt with Med herbs (laban immo) and left to marinate for a bit.

Noticed that in Tatarstan & Kazakhstan they stuff their manti with horse meat, and, mostly, horse fat; the yoghurt is made from mare's milk.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nassim Nicholas Taleb's Wisdom 
"Primitive societies are largely free of cardiovascular disease, cancer, dental cavities, economic theories, lounge music, and other modern ailments." - Nassim Nicholas Taleb in Antifragile

원시사회에서는 심장병, 암, 충치, 경제 이론, 라운지 음악, 기

타 현대의 질병이 없었다.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
I would tell him that he should feel lucky. Compare these to the worst possible nightmare: an association with Ayn Rand.Nassim Nicholas Taleb 님이 추가했습니다
 
 
I do share a lot of readers with Ayn Rand and there are some commonalities: 1) To do good, focus on your own business, 2) Bureaucrats are evil, etc.
But there are yuuuge differences. I do not believe that individuals should be "selfish", I do believe that the entrepreneur is
 
a hero who serves the collective (expected return is negative as 999/1000 will fail) and there is no such thing as a "failed" entrepreneur;
I subscribe to virtue ethics and Christian morality which makes some of her stances repugnant to me both as a Christian & a Classic-ist.
 
And Ayn Rand doesn't get scaling. In that sense I prefer people to focus Mandeville who inspired Adam Smith's "it's not the benevolence of the butcher..."
A good society is one that via scale transformation makes a virtuous collective out of somewhat selfish individuals.
 
좋은 사회란 스케일 변형을 통해 이기적인 개인들이 도덕적인 집합으로 바뀌는 곳이다.
 
This does'nt make "selfishness" honorable. Nature has no junk: it recycles & makes fertilizers out of animal & human waste. Likewise society recycles somewhat selfish pursuits as fertilizer.
So we should not be glorify selfishness, no more than we do w/excreta.
 
Ofer just answered the central point: we are not really talking about selfishness, but symmetry. So long as do you not transfer risks to others, you are honorable. You are even more honorable when you take the risks of others.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ofer Rubin
 
If you have #SkinintheGame you are not "selfish" , Selfishness is being concerned excessively or exclusively in risk transferring for one's advantage, pleasure, or welfare by transferring the risk to others maliciously or without there consent.
 
당신이 스킨 인 더 게임이라면, 당신은 이기적이지 않다. 이기

심은 악의적으로 또는 타인의 동의를 받지 않고, 자신의 이익

을 위해 자신의 위험을 타인에게 전가는 것이

--------------------------------------------------------------------
일본의 기막힌 전철 선로 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quillette 
"In the suggested world of universal basic income, what puts pressure on the government to maintain democracy and political rights? Will they be afraid of a popular uprising?"

기본소득제가 시행되는 국가에서, 누가 정부에 민주제와 정치

적 권리를 유지하라고 압력을 넣을 것인가?


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Sixsmith 
Broadly speaking, you know a progressive comedian because the applause is ten times louder than the laughter.

좌파 코비디언을 아는 방법: 웃음소리보다 코미디언을 환호하

는 소리가 10배 나 크다. (별로 웃기지 않지만 하여튼 좌파라는

이유만으로 크게 환호해줌)

-------------------------------------------------------------

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기