[김건희] "보수 내에서 박근혜 탄핵시킨 것" --->요즘 윤창중도 이런 얘기를 하고 잇고, 변희재는 오래 전부터 ㅇ런 얘기를 했다. 하지만 그러면 보수가 대통령을 탄핵하고도 아무런 대책도 없이 다음 대권을 문죄인에게 주었다는 웃기는 얘기가 된다. 이건 굉장한 사실 왜곡이고 역사 왜국이다.어쩌면 좌파들이 원하는 스토리라고 볼 수 있다. 간단히 말하면 탄핵의 주범은 민주당, 종범이 비박계 의원들이라고 보아야 한다는 게 내 생각이다. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 이동욱회장 대국민 호소 긴급 기자회견.(220117) https://youtu.be/MDRoIXuTOos ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 동아일보 전교생 449명중 한국인 초등생은 여섯명뿐…[공존:그들과 우리가 되려면] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "성남시 반대하자 공사, 이재명에 직접 '1공단 분리' 결재 받아"(종합2보) 성남도개공 팀장 "공무원들, '찍어누르기'라 받아들여 안 좋게 생각" 檢 "정민용, 이재명 찾아가 직접 결재"… 팀장 "특혜 아닌 유리한 계약" 뉴스1 제공 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 현재 좌파 상황이 이거 맞음? 이새로미 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11390026469 이해찬(파) = 이재명, 조국 문재인(파) = 윤석열, 이낙연 이해찬이 조국을 법무부 장관 시키고 대통령 만들라고 했는데 문재인의 검 윤석열이 조국 쳐냈다가 좌파 집중 공격에 우파로 건너가고 이해찬의 검 이재명이 친문 이낙연을 꺾고 좌파 대선주자가 되었다 이거 맞냐? 그래서 현재 대깨문들이 윤석열 찍겠다는 상황이고 윤석열은 우파, 좌파 모두가 찍는 상황인거네 김건희 녹취록 푼 사람이 좌파 기자라며? 그 좌파 기자가 큰 일을 해낸 거구만 김건희랑 통화하면서 누님이라고 부르더니 좌파들한테 윤석열이 사실은 우리편이었다는걸 알려주게 해서 윤석열한테 큰 도움 준거 같은데? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 조선일보 [단독] ‘별정직 6급’ 정진상, 성남시 근무 때 5년간 문서 7000건 결재 대장동 관련 문서도 포함돼 “李 최측근이 문고리 역할” --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 문틀딱이 UAE에서 까인 이유는 간단함. 조더크리틱스 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11390016131 1. 문재인 틀딱은 이미 국제사회에서 만나선 안 될 인물로 찍혀 있음. - 치매 또는 그에 버금가는 정신적 장애가 있다는 걸 알고 있음. - 북한 대변인에 불과하기 때문임. 2. 아래서 일하는 새끼들 중에 국제/외교 전문가는 없고 국제 네트워크도 없는 그냥 좌빨 잡놈들 집단임. - 제대로 외국 정부와 의사소통하고 의전 챙길 수 있는 새끼가 없음. - 좌빨놈들은 그래서 맨날 북한하고 "우리끼리"를 외치는 것임. - 영어 하나 제대로 하는 새끼가 없음. 좌빨 세력의 최대 약점임. 3. 주한 미대사관을 화염병 들고 공격한 임종석 빨갱이 씹새끼를 데리고 왔는데 UAE가 미치지 않은 이상 미국 제끼고 만나줄 이유가 없음. - 임종석 씹새끼는 테러리스트임. 미국에 영원히 입국 금지임. 문재인 틀딱 새끼한테 이번 건 포함해서 그동안 해외여행 다닌 비용 다 구상권 행사해서 받아내야 함. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 조선일보 바이든 ‘백신의무화’도 美연방대법원에 막혀 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 조선일보 [단독] 승진 보장된 김명수 대법의 재판연구관 5명, 인사 앞두고 단체 사표 법관 출신의 한 변호사는 “법원이라는 ‘난파선’에서 선원(법관)들이 뛰어내리는 모습 같다”고 했다. fear**** 진짜 사표 낼 인간은 김명수다. 정권의 🐕 김명수도 사표내고 옷 벗어라. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ❌곧 식량부족사태옵니다..(식량통제법/농수산물값 물가 오르고 토종씨앗 말살) 농사도 맘대로 못함 ❌ 반대부탁!! 국가가 농민의 종자 사용에 대해 과도한 통제와 감시를 하여, 식량에 관한 중앙집권적 통제권을 가지려는 20일마감 https://pal.assembly.go.kr/law/readView.do?lgsltpaId=PRC_J2I1O0B9R1A7M1T8U2J0Y3L3S4X8U7 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 세의 씨발 자슥아!!!!!!!!!!!! 안대장군 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11390043499 박통 탄핵 시킨 놈들과 박통 45년 구형하고 형집행정지 까지 거절한 새끼 랑 누가 더 나쁜놈이냐? 니는 아주 이중 삼중 성격이라고 밖에 볼수 없어. 그런 윤석열을 졸라 빨면서 왜 박통팔이는 계속하냐? 박통이 니가 하는 저질스런 방송을 본다고? 에라이 박통팔이 새끼야. 니같은 놈이 우파 노조의 위원장? 그러니 뭐가 되겠나? 건희가 너들을 평가한 그 옳은 소리는 왜 인용하지 않니? 가세연을 쓰레기라고 하지 않았나? 그것이야 말로 건희가 제데로 보고있는거야. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 윤석열씨! 혹시 태블릿PC가 누구 것인지 아시나요? https://youtu.be/aACAkAA9Zec 이상로의 카메라출동 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 가격 인플레가 과도한 수익 때문이라는 거짓을 멈추어라 Stop Pretending Price Inflation Is a Result of "Too Much" Profit Frank Shostak 만일 기업가가 상품의 가격을 인상해서 소비자 가격이 인상되면, 특정 상품의 가격 인상은 있지만, 모든 상품 가격의 전반적인 인상은 아니다. 그런데 그것은 인플레가 아니다. Some commentators attribute the latest sharp increase in the Consumer Price Index to businesses pushing prices of goods higher in order to secure higher profits. (See the New York Times article “Democrats Blast Corporate Profits as Inflation Surges,” January 3, 2022). Note that the yearly growth rate of the Consumer Price Index jumped to 6.8 percent in November 2021 from 1.2 percent the year before. However, is it true that businesses are determining the prices of goods and services? As a rule, a supplier sets the price. After all it is the supplier who offers the goods to the buyers. So it is the supplier who must set the price of a good before he presents the good to the buyers. In order to secure the price that will improve his lot, the price that the supplier sets must cover his direct and indirect costs and provide a margin for profit. By setting the price, the supplier must make as good an estimate as possible regarding whether he will be able to sell his entire supply at the price set. The process of making the estimate involves the assessment of the possible responses of the buyers and the possible responses of his competitors—other suppliers. If his estimates are accurate, then he makes a profit. By making a profit, the supplier expands his pool of resources, which in turn enables him to attain more ends. His standard of living improves. Observe that while the cost of production in some cases would appear to be the main factor in price determination, this is not so. Ultimately, it is the evaluation of the buyer that dictates whether the price set by the supplier is going to be realized. Every buyer decides in his own context whether the price paid for a good betters his life and well-being. If the cost of production were the driving factor behind setting market prices, then how can we explain the prices of goods that have no cost because they are not produced—goods that are simply there, like undeveloped land? Likewise, the cost-of-production theory cannot explain the reason for the high prices of famous paintings. According to Rothbard, "Similarly, immaterial consumer services such as the prices of entertainment, concerts, physicians, domestic servants, etc., can scarcely be accounted for by costs embodied in a product."1 It follows then that businesses striving to make profits cannot cause increases in the prices of goods and services without the consent of consumers. Defining Price The price of a thing is the amount of money paid for the thing; for example, the number of dollars per loaf of bread or the number of dollars per shirt. The key driving factors here are the amount of dollars and the quantity of goods. Now, with all other things being equal, an increase in the amount of money paid for goods and services implies that the price of these goods and services is going to be higher. More money is now paid for these goods and services. In the absence of an increase in the amount of money there cannot be a general increase in prices. If a business raises the price of its goods and consumers have agreed to this increase then consumers are going to have less money to spend on other goods, all other things being equal. Hence, we will have here a specific price increase but not a general increase in prices. Inflation Is All about Increases in Money Supply By popular thinking, it is the role of the central bank to guide the economy onto the path of economic and price stability. If central bank officials anticipate that the economy will fall below the path of economic and price stability, then officials are expected to prevent this decline through monetary pumping. Conversely, if officials are of the view that the economy is likely to shoot above the stable path, then they are likely to prevent this by reducing the monetary pumping. In response to covid-19 and in particular the lockdowns and other restrictions, central bank officials expected severe damage to the economy. The economy was expected to fall strongly below the path of stability. In this case, strong monetary pumping was considered as a welcome move. The strong monetary pumping is believed to have brought the economy onto the stable path. But monetary pumping cannot generate economic stability. The pumping sets in motion an exchange of nothing for something, or the diversion of wealth from wealth generators to the early recipients of the newly pumped money. This undermines the process of wealth generation and weakens the prospects for economic growth. As a rule, because of the monetary pumping, individuals are going to have more money in their pockets, which they are likely to dispose of by buying goods and services. This means a greater amount of money is going to be spent on various goods and services. This means that the prices of goods and services are going to increase, all other things being equal. Given the massive increase in the monetary pumping, the yearly growth rate of the US money supply jumped to 79 percent in February 2021 from 6.5 percent in February 2020, according to the True Money Supply metric—an average increase of 43 percent. Allowing for the time lag between changes in money supply and changes in prices, it is not surprising that the momentum of the Consumer Price Index displays massive increase. Hence, the culprit here is the alleged defender of the economy—the central bank itself. Curiously, very few commentators are mentioning the role of the central bank in fueling general increases in the prices of goods and services. Note that the massive increase in the growth rate of money supply, coupled with lockdowns and various other restrictions, has intensified the upward pressure on the prices of goods and services. The combination of not enough savings allocated toward the expansion and the enhancement of the production structure and a strong demand for various goods and services due to the massive increase in money supply has resulted in shortages. After a time lag, prices are therefore likely to increase further to eliminate the shortages that have emerged. Could Price Controls Resolve the Issue of General Price Increases? Some commentators are of the view that the government should introduce price controls in order to prevent further increases in the prices of some key consumer goods. A policy of restricting price adjustments due to the monetary pumping is going to weaken various marginal producers. Consequently, these producers are likely to move to activities which are not subject to government price controls. As a result, the supply of some key consumer goods will come further under pressure. So rather than benefiting consumers, such a government policy would hurt consumers’ well-being. Hence, a policy of price controls is likely to increase shortages and stifle the production of goods and services. In fact, this could ultimately lead to the imposition of the price controls on a large variety of economic activities, which in turn is likely to result in the economic system that resembles the former Soviet Union.2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------