조선일보 김기현 “날 평검사만 시켜주면 대장동 비리 한달 내 발본색원” “김오수 검찰은 대장동 뭉개고, 민주당 특검은 대장동 통째로 파묻기” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 신권다발, 이번에도 쏟아져 나오다 / 대구 중남구 보궐선거(도태우 변호사 출마) 증거보전신청에서 통갈이 의심케 하는 상황 발생 [공병호TV] https://youtu.be/ilKR6jWoaYg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 속보) 공무원 1인당 평균 7700만원 해외여행비 지급ㄷㄷㄷ 순혈미접종 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11405497080 지방공무원들 장기 해외연수 명목으로 1인당 평균 7700만원을 쓴 정황이 들어났는데 유학 결과물은 대부분 비공개에 공개된 연구 결과는 모조리 이미 발표된 연구논물 짜집기 표절 이런 해괴한 장기 해외연수가 벌어진건 2017~2021년으로 딱 문씹새끼 강점기였다 1인당 평균 탕진액이 1억이 넘는곳도 있들도 즐비하고 1억8천만원 가까이 세금으로 여행다녀온 정황이 발각됐다 이 개씨벌년놈들이 주로 간곳은 비싸기로 유명한 미국, 캐나다가 주를 이뤘다 한달에 760만원씩 써재껴서 1억 넘게 탕진하는 동안 활동한 내용이 연구 업무와 연관성이 인정된 새끼도 없다 개씨발새끼들 존나 빡치네 씨발 세금내는 놈 따로 있고 국민들이 낸 세금으로 흥청망청 외국에서 쳐노는 새끼 따로 있었노 1. 문씹새끼 강점기인 2017~2021 동안 2. 공무원들 1인당 한달 760써서 총 1억8천씩 해외여행다님 3. 개씨발새끼들 사형시급 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/047/0002347501?sid=100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 뉴데일리 김정숙 옷값' 현금 논란 유송화… 6년 전 박근혜 옷값에 "뇌물" 공격 유송화 전 춘추관장, 2016년 12월 박근혜 옷값에 뇌물 공세 논평 "박근혜, 4년간 옷값 7억4000만원… 뇌물인지, 대통령실 예산인지 밝혀라" 유송화, 2012년부터 김정숙 수행하다 文 당선 뒤 청와대서 승승장구 김정숙 일부 옷값 5만원권 현찰 지불 정황… 유송화 동행해 돈 전달 의혹 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 특수활동비를 기준으로 김대중 정부 1132억 원, 노무현 정부 1146억 원, 이명박 정부 1210억 원 박근혜 정부는 4년간 983억 원을 썼는데 이 정부는 4년간 400억 원 대를 사용했다? https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20181112076100004 2018년 한 해에 특활비 예산만 2천억이 넘어가드만 그럼 이 돈 들을 고이 모셔두고 계셨어? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 유럽의 환경론자들이 유럽의 에너지 독립을 불가능하게 만들었다. European Environmentalists Have Made Energy Independence Impossible Daniel Lacalle 유럽은 싸고 풍부한 에너지가 필요하다. 하지만 정치가들은 핵발전, 천연가스, 석유 등을 악마화했다. 그 결과 정치가들이 제안한 정부의 개입주의적 정책들로 인해 에너지 가격이 상승하고 소비자들이 고통받는 상황에 이르렀다. Europe is not going to achieve a competitive energy transition with the current interventionist policies. Europe does not depend on Russian gas due to a coincidence, but because of a chain of mistaken policies: banning nuclear in Germany, prohibiting the development of domestic natural gas resources throughout the European Union, added to a massive and expensive renewable rollout without building a reliable backup. Solar and wind do not reduce dependency on Russian natural gas. They are necessary but volatile and intermittent. They need backup from nuclear, hydro, and natural gas for security of energy supply. Dependency on these backup sources rises in periods of low wind and little sun, just when prices are highest. “Solar goes to zero for twelve hours a day, and that is guaranteed. The wind blows sometimes, and sometimes it does not, also guaranteed. They both depend on weather, which is 100% out of human control. They are on their best day a supplement,” wrote a Navy pilot follower. Batteries are not an option, either. It is impossible to build an industrial-size network of enormous batteries; the cost would be prohibitive and the dependency on China (for lithium, etc.) to build them would be even more of a problem. At current prices, a battery energy-storage system of Europe’s size would cost more than $2.5 trillion, according to an MIT Technology Review paper, massively more expensive than any other alternative. The added cost of a battery grid plus the distribution and transmission network would make household bills soar even further. Inflation was already out of control in Europe before the invasion of Ukraine was even a risk. Consumer price inflation in Spain was 7.6 percent, in Portugal it was 4.2 percent, and in Germany, 5.1 percent. Euro area consumer price inflation was 5.8 percent. In the face of the impact on prices and energy from the invasion of Ukraine, we must remember: Europe was already in an energy crisis in 2020 and 2021, with the cost of CO2 permits soaring and wholesale electricity prices reaching record-high levels by December 2021. Europe does not “depend on Russian gas.” It is codependency. Russia needs Europe to export, and Europe has no cheaper alternative. Let us remember that Russian gas is much cheaper than any other realistic alternative. The long-term contracts signed with Gazprom are closed at prices that can be up to ten times lower than some of the current alternatives. The 150 billion cubic meters that Europe imports from Russia can be replaced with liquefied natural gas from Norway and the North Sea, the United States, Algeria, Qatar, or Israel, but it will be much more expensive. The only alternative to Russia is to show that European countries have diverse and cheap sources of supply. If Russia sees that European governments ban nuclear power, prohibit the development of indigenous gas reserves, intervene in imports, and add massive CO2 taxes, Russian authorities will know that there is no competitive alternative, and that European industry and consumers will collapse due to the rising cost of energy European governments should think hard about misguided policies when the continent has been saved this winter by natural gas imported from the United States produced with fracking, a technology that has been banned in Europe. Europe wants cheap and abundant energy, but politicians demonize nuclear, gas, and oil. All the interventionist proposals that are put forward by European politicians entail a higher cost for long-suffering consumers. Natural gas flows all the time and is cheap and abundant. It cannot be substituted with renewables that are intermittent, volatile, and unpredictable. The example of Germany is clear. After investing massively in renewables and doubling bills for consumers, it depends more on lignite coal and Russian gas to guarantee supply. Germany has had to reactivate coal plants after spending more than $200 billion in subsidies and renewables! All technologies are necessary, and renewables are key, but they are not the alternative because they need natural gas backup while the technology is developed, as it is still in its infancy. Let’s not forget that installing renewables involves a huge cost in networks. Who will lower bills if the fixed cost of networks is increased by the $150 billion we estimate are needed to strengthen distribution and transmission networks? All the "magical" alternatives that interventionism sells mean going from depending on Russia to depending on China. Where are we going to get the silicon, aluminum, rare-earths, copper, lithium, etc. necessary for those massive magical investments announced? Demonizing nuclear energy has left Europe in the hands of expensive and volatile alternatives. The energy transition must be considered with an understanding of the importance of security of supply and competitiveness. We need all technologies, without ideological bias. We need solar, wind, natural gas, hydro, oil, and nuclear, or we will go from crisis to crisis, and always paying more. It is absurd to maintain the hidden tax scheme of CO2 emissions during an unprecedented crisis. Governments must use this income to reduce citizens’ bills. Border taxes on oil products and natural gas are not taxing producers; they are taxing consumers in European countries. Whoever believes that the taxes that have been announced will be paid by Qatar, Nigeria, or Brazil has a serious problem of economic understanding. A true energy transition must be competitive, reliable, and cheap, not a tax-collection and looting machine. It must consider all technologies. More industry and less politics. More competition and less ideology. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Left Thought Collective: One Hundred Years of the Socialist Commonwealth | Andrei Znamenski 어려운 철학적 논의 없이 평이하게 백년간의 공산주의의 변화를 서술한다. https://youtu.be/KtPqAZE5lms 공산주의는 과학과 종교의 결합이다. 1950년대 이후로 공산주의의 실패가 나타나면서, 공산주의자들은 랑게의 시장 사회주의, 정부의 재정 관리로 국가의 경제를 통제하는 케인스의 경제학, 그리고 환경 파괴로 인해 온난화가 일어났고, 그 결과 지구에 대재앙이 올고 있다는 선동으로 돌아섰다. 신neo 원시주의는 반反 발전, 반 효율성, 친환경을 주장하고 있다. 그들은 비서구권 국가, 과거 등을 찬양하고 회귀를 주장한다. 혁명의 전사들로서 노동자들이 있었지만, 그들이 점차 이탈하자, 좌파들은 연구에 연구를 거듭한 끝에, 성소수자, 유색인종, 장애인, 여성 등을 그들의 혁명 전위대로 삼기로 한다. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------