정은경 씨발 멧돼지 사기꾼 백신 살인마년아 깜빵가자 ㅋㅋ 빅센터 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11416856650 [속보] 화이자·모더나 백신 부작용으로 심낭염 공식 인정/ 서울경제 출처 : https://www.sedaily.com/NewsView/2664BKBTY9 백신 부작용 없다며 씨발년아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 모더나 화이자에서 인정했는데? 존나 무능한 씨발년이 질본청장을 해?ㅋㅋ 씨발년이 뭐 처먹고 자빠져 잘 줄만 알고 정작 진짜 국민들 건강 위험에 대해선 개좆도 모르는 씹멧돼지 짐승같은년아 씨발 모르면 아가리라도 처 닫고 있던가 백신부작용이 없어? 이개좆같은년 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 깜빵가야지 씨발년아 어딜 조용히 도망가노 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 조선 윤미향, 위안부 합의 알고 있었다… “발표 전날까지 외교부가 4번 설명” 한변, 외교부 문건 공개 그러나 이용수 할머니는 2020년 5월 기자회견을 열고 “윤미향 대표가 소수의 위안부를 회유해 반일(反日)에 역이용했다”며 “윤 대표가 10억엔 등 위안부 합의 내용을 외교부로부터 들어 알고 있었으면서도, 피해 당사자인 할머니들에게 알려주지 않았다”고 주장했다. 위안부 합의의 ‘핵심 내용’인 10억엔 출자에 대해 윤 의원이 알면서도 할머니들에게 알리지 않았다는 것이다. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 한국경제 [속보] 이창용 "연말 기준금리 2.25~2.5% 전망 합리적" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (재업) 헨리 키신저 우크라이나 항복하라고 한 이유 애국팔이 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11416827723 1. 윗 짤 헨리 키신저 미국 전외무장관임 2. 이 양반 미국중심의 현실주의 외교관이며 대통령의 책사였음 3. 며칠전 아니 어제 이 양반이 우크라이나 더 이상 우크라이나 민중들 생명과 재산을 그만 희생시키고 러시아엑 항복하라는 말음 함 4. 이 양반이 트럼프 때 대통령이었던 트럼프를 개인적으로 여러번 만나 국제정세를 이야기 하고 나날이 커져가는 중국을 효과적으로 견재할 수 있을지 함께 토의 함. 5. 그가 제안한 대안은 러시아를 키워 중국을 견재하는 것이었음 6. 키신저의 어드바이스를 받아 트럼프는 친러적인 태도를 취했다 7. 젤렌스키는 트럼프와의 만남에서 민스크협정파기와 러시아의 크림반도 반환을 요청할 것이니 전쟁이 발생할 수 있으니 막아달라고 부탁을 함 8. 트럼프는 알아서 잘해보라고 하고 존나 냉정하게 대했음 9. 눈치빠른 젤렌스키는 결과적으로 자신의 집권부 초반까지는 러시아를 전혀 자극하지 않았음 10. 하지만 트럼프가 재선에 실패하면서 젤렌스키는 러시아의 도발을 부르는 행동을 함 11. 마침내 러시아는 우크라이나를 침공함 12. 키신저의 대중국 견재 계획이 무산되고 있음. 13. 지금 바이든 정부는 러시아를 나락으로 떨어트리려하고 있음 14. 하지만 러시아 몰락으로 중국은 엄청난 군사기술의 이전받게 될 것이라고 키신저가 경고하고 있음. 15. 만약 중국이 망해가는 러시아를 중국은 돈으로 군사기술을 이전받을 것이며 만약 그렇게 된다면 미국은 중국을 군사적으로 제어할 수 있는 레버리지를 완전히 잃게 되는 거임 16. 키신저는 이러한 얼척없는 상황이 발생할지 모른다는 두려움에 쌓여있음 17. 이런 이유로 그는 미국이 러시아의 승리를 인정하고 우크라이나에서 벌이고 있는 이 대리전쟁을 그치기를 바라고 있음 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 지난 3년간의 코로나 광기 필자 역시 지난 5월 코로나를 앓았지만 언론에서 떠드는 것처럼 그렇게 죽을 병은 아니었다. 코로나가 발생하자마자 언론과 학계 그리고 정치권은 그것을 트럼프를 몰아낼 좋은 기회로 보았다. 좌파들은 cdc의 정책을 이용해 트럼프만이 아니라 그들에 반대하는 모든 적들을 물리칠 무기로 사용했다. 좌파들은 코로나를 정치적 바이러스로 변질시켰고, 만인이 다 위험에 처했다는 상상에 따라 록다운과 휴교, 경제 봉쇄 등을 실시했다. 물론 권위자들의 방조도 있었다. 런던 왕립대학의 닐 퍼거슨은 록다운을 하지 않으면 코로나로 인해 미국에서 2백 2십만명이 죽을 거라고 주장했다. 뉴욕타임지는 이를 지지하면서 엄격한 조치를 요구했다. 좌파들은 개인의 자유를 주장한 사우스다코타 주지사 크리스티 노옴Kristi Noem을 죽음의 천사라 부르고, 반대로 코로나 환자들을 요양원에 몰아넣어 죽게 한 뉴욕 쿠오모 지사에게는 찬사를 퍼부었다. 미국인의 생활에서 코로나로 인해 망가지지 않은 곳은 없다. 필자처럼 코로나에 걸렸던 대다수의 사람들이 가벼운 증상만을 앓고 병이 나았다는 것은 이제 사실이 되었다. 코로나의 공식 사망 통계에서 알 수 있듯이, 대부분의 사망자는 65세 이상의 노인이거나 당뇨같은 기저 질환이 있는 사람들이었다. 현재 미국의 좌파 중에 중국의 제로 코로나 정책과 심각한 봉쇄 등을 비난하는 사람은 없다. 자신들의 과오를 인정하지 않는 그들은 같은 짓을 반복할 게 분명하다, Covid-19: Assessing the Madness in Year 3 William L. Anderson On the morning of Wednesday, May 4, I woke up feeling the onset of illness. My eyes burned and my muscles ached. As someone who had not been ill for more than a decade, I knew there was a problem, and I wondered if I had caught covid-19 after avoiding it ever since its outbreak in the United States more than two years ago. Because of the contagious nature of covid, I stayed in isolation in our bedroom. (My immune-suppressed stepdaughter lives with us, and my wife and I agreed we needed to take measures to protect her. And we have a VERY comfortable bedroom, one that would be the envy of most of our readers, so I didn’t exactly languish during my convalescence.) However, I did contact friends and acquaintances who had contracted covid, and most of them reported symptoms like mine. Although my experience was not necessarily “typical” of covid patients, the notion that covid was a deadly threat to everyone was overblown, and there is something we can learn from that, some very hard lessons. The first thing to remember about the outbreak of covid-19 is that the news media, academic, and political classes in general (or what we might call America’s “ruling class”) immediately saw covid as an opportunity to drive Donald Trump from the White House. I remember seeing posts by Democratic friends of mine on Facebook blaming Trump for every single death related to covid and excoriating him for not immediately locking down the entire country. Thus, covid-19 entered the USA as both a novel virus and a political vehicle to place progressives back in power, as progressive politicians and their media allies used covid as a political weapon, not just against Trump, but against anyone that dissented from the narrative created by the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health. By turning covid into a political virus (just as the CDC and NIH had done with AIDS nearly forty years before), governments at all levels imposed the typical political “solution,” operating according to the fiction that everyone was equally at risk, which thus supposedly required lockdowns, school closures, and shutting down huge swaths of the economy. Note that this one-size-fits-all approach was not necessary, but once the situation was labeled a crisis, all that was left was for the authorities to crack down on American liberties, knowing that the media had their backs. Not that the politicians made these decisions without voices of “authority” behind them. Perhaps the loudest voice in the early days was that of Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London, who created an epidemiological model that predicted up to 2.2 million covid deaths in the US unless authorities immediately imposed hard lockdowns. Not surprisingly, the New York Times immediately endorsed the “study” and urged American authorities to enact draconian policies immediately. From that point on, progressive American governors and mayors engaged in a perverse competition to see who could close the most businesses and lay out the most draconian policies of school closure and quarantine of healthy people. Those governmental executives who favored an approach of personal freedom and personal responsibility, like South Dakota governor Kristi Noem, were savaged by the progressive media. While the media called Noem an “angel of death,” they heaped praise upon a real angel of death, the former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, who recklessly ordered covid patients into nursing homes, resulting in mass deaths. To put it another way, much of the media coverage of covid and the policies used to deal with covid followed strict narratives that were upheld even when those narratives collided with the facts. Two years later, we know things that progressives still don’t like to admit. The first is most important: by emphasizing covid reduction above everything else, progressives created a string of disasters elsewhere that now are destroying civil society. Politicians believed that they could shut down millions of businesses, put people out of work, and then print trillions of dollars to ostensibly replace the lost incomes and lost goods and services. The result has been the highest rates of inflation in forty years, and these are almost guaranteed to go higher. There is almost no part of US life that has not been harmed by the covid measures. Even government authorities that two years ago were gung ho for closing schools and locking down whole communities now are reassessing those policies. Austrian economist Henry Hazlitt in Economics in One Lesson noted that the difference between “good” economists and “bad” economists involved looking at the entire effects of policies, not just immediate effects: The whole of economics can be reduced to a single lesson, and that lesson can be reduced to a single sentence: The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups. How one assesses the success or failure of public health policies—in this case, the response toward the covid infections—should follow the same line of reasoning. While public health officials and the media have demanded policies that emphasized keeping as many people as possible from getting covid in the first place, they ignored the harmful effects of zero-covid measures. Furthermore, we know now that the vast majority of people who have caught the virus have mild symptoms, much like what I experienced. Those most at risk are over sixty-five years old or have other physical conditions, such as diabetes, that make people vulnerable to other illnesses. The official death toll of covid shows that most fatalities were concentrated in the upper age groups and in people who had other health issues. Even in the early days of the pandemic, it was obvious who was most at risk of dying from covid, yet the progressive authorities treated everyone as being equally vulnerable, distributing resources to deal with the problem accordingly. The political response to the spread of covid produced political results: death and destruction. Massive school closures and isolating children has led to a rash of suicide and mental health crises, yet to this day, no one in an official capacity has admitted to wrongdoing. While no government entities in the USA have yet tried to emulate the massive lockdowns seen now in China, no progressive politician here has openly condemned those extreme measures, either. Instead, progressives continue to mirror what Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand wrote of the Bourbons when they were reinstated to power in France: “They had learned nothing, and forgotten nothing.” Indeed, people in authority who refuse to admit they were wrong the first time almost surely will do the same thing again and again. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------