트럼프, “선거 조작됐고, 이틀 뒤 큰일 벌어진다!” … 크라켄, 모든 증거 확보! ... 이슈방담#.218 ... 2020.12.08. ... [박훈탁TV 국가정보국(DNI) 국장 John Ratcliffe … “선거소송 해결 전에 대통령 당선자 선언 불가능!” 우편투표 부정, 중요한 이유 … “73% 미국인, 사전투표 그들의 대부분은 우편으로 발송!” 정보장교 출신의 군사 분석가 프라더(Jeffrey Prather) … “Kraken, 국방부가 운영하는 사이버전(戰) 프로젝트이고, 선거 사기와 이에 관련된 매국행위 증거 모두 확보!” 2021년 1월20일 트럼프 재선 이후, 미국에서 엄청난 변화가 있을 것이고 이 변화의 물결이 한국에서 415부정선거 해결할 것이다 https://youtu.be/zlSSTsaR5j4 ---->이틀 뒤에 계엄령이 실시된다는 추측이 있는데, 지켜 보아야 할 듯. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Per Bylund What causes #poverty? Nothing. It's the original state, the default and starting point. The real question is, What causes #prosperity? 무엇이 가난을 초래 하냐고? 그런 것 없어. 인간의 원래 상태가 가난이니까. 우리가 진짜 물어야 할 질문은, “무엇이 번영을 만들어 낼까?”야. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 세계 경제 포럼이 예측한 2030년에는, 사적인 비밀도 사유 재산도 없다. 그들이 예측한 8가지 좌파 환경주의자들의 이상사회로 가기 위해 대중을 유혹하는 미끼는, 보편적인 의료 보장과 기본 소득이다. 1. People will own nothing. Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state. 2. The United States will no longer be the leading superpower, but a handful of countries will dominate. 3, Organs will not be transplanted but printed. 4. Meat consumption will be minimized. 5. Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees. 6. To limit the emission of carbon dioxide, a global price will be set at an exorbitant level. 7. People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life. 8. Western values will be tested to the breaking point.. No Privacy, No Property: The World in 2030 According to the WEF Antony P. Mueller The World Economic Forum (WEF) was founded fifty years ago. It has gained more and more prominence over the decades and has become one of the leading platforms of futuristic thinking and planning. As a meeting place of the global elite, the WEF brings together the leaders in business and politics along with a few selected intellectuals. The main thrust of the forum is global control. Free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values, but state interventionism and collectivism. Individual liberty and private property are to disappear from this planet until 2030 according to the projections and scenarios coming from the World Economic Forum. Eight Predictions Individual liberty is at risk again. What may lie ahead was projected in November 2016 when the WEF published “8 Predictions for the World in 2030.” According to the WEF’s scenario, the world will become quite a different place from now because how people work and live will undergo a profound change. The scenario for the world 2030 is more than just a forecast. It is a plan whose implementation has accelerated drastically since with the announcement of a pandemic and the consequent lockdowns. According to the projections of the WEF’s “Global Future Councils,” private property and privacy will be abolished during the next decade. The coming expropriation would go further than even the communist demand to abolish the property of production goods but leave space for private possessions. The WEF projection says that consumer goods, too, would be no longer private property. If the WEF projection should come true, people would have to rent and borrow their necessities from the state, which would be the sole proprietor of all goods. The supply of goods would be rationed in line with a social credit points system. Shopping in the traditional sense would disappear along with the private purchases of goods. Every personal move would be tracked electronically, and all production would be subject to the requirements of clean energy and a sustainable environment. In order to attain “sustainable agriculture,” the food supply will be mainly vegetarian. In the new totalitarian service economy, the government will provide basic accommodation, food, and transport, while the rest must be lent from the state. The use of natural resources will be brought down to its minimum. In cooperation with the few key countries, a global agency would set the price of CO2 emissions at an extremely high level to disincentivize its use. In a promotional video, the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements: 1. People will own nothing. Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state. 2. The United States will no longer be the leading superpower, but a handful of countries will dominate. 3, Organs will not be transplanted but printed. 4. Meat consumption will be minimized. 5. Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees. 6. To limit the emission of carbon dioxide, a global price will be set at an exorbitant level. 7. People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life. 8. Western values will be tested to the breaking point.. Beyond Privacy and Property In a publication for the World Economic Forum, the Danish ecoactivist Ida Auken who had served as her country’s minister of the environment from 2011 to 2014 and still is a member of the Danish Parliament (the Folketing) as elaborated a scenario of a world without privacy or property. In “Welcome to 2030,” she envisions a world where “I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.” By 2030, so says her scenario, shopping and owning have become obsolete, because everything that once was a product is now a service. In this idyllic new world of hers, people have free access to transportation, accommodation, food, “and all the things we need in our daily lives.” As these things will become free of charge, “it ended up not making sense for us to own much.” There would be no private ownership in houses nor would anyone pay rent, “because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it.” A person’s living room, for example, will be used for business meetings when one is absent. Concerns like “lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment” are things of the past. The author predicts that people will be happy to enjoy such a good life that is so much better “than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth.” Ecological Paradise In her 2019 contribution to the Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils of the World Economic Forum, Ida Auken foretells how the world may look in the future “if we win the war on climate change.” By 2030, when CO2 emissions will be greatly reduced, people will live in a world where meet on the dinner plate “will be a rare sight” while water and the air will be much cleaner than today. Because of the shift from buying goods to using services, the need to have money will vanish, because people will spend less and less on goods. Work time will shrink and leisure time will grow. For the future, Auken envisions a city where electric cars have substituted conventional combustion vehicles. Most of the roads and parking spaces will have become green parks and walking zones for pedestrians. By 2030, agriculture will offer mainly plant-based alternatives to the food supply instead of meat and dairy products. The use of land to produce animal feed will greatly diminish and nature will be spreading across the globe again. Fabricating Social Consent How can people be brought to accept such a system? The bait to entice the masses is the assurances of comprehensive healthcare and a guaranteed basic income. The promoters of the Great Reset promise a world without diseases. Due to biotechnologically produced organs and individualized genetics-based medical treatments, a drastically increased life expectancy and even immortality are said to be possible. Artificial intelligence will eradicate death and eliminate disease and mortality. The race is on among biotechnological companies to find the key to eternal life. Along with the promise of turning any ordinary person into a godlike superman, the promise of a “universal basic income” is highly attractive, particularly to those who will no longer find a job in the new digital economy. Obtaining a basic income without having to go through the treadmill and disgrace of applying for social assistance is used as a bait to get the support of the poor. To make it economically viable, the guarantee of a basic income would require the leveling of wage differences. The technical procedures of the money transfer from the state will be used to promote the cashless society. With the digitization of all monetary transactions, each individual purchase will be registered. As a consequence, the governmental authorities would have unrestricted access to supervise in detail how individual persons spend their money. A universal basic income in a cashless society would provide the conditions to impose a social credit system and deliver the mechanism to sanction undesirable behavior and identify the superfluous and unwanted. Who Will Be the Rulers? The World Economic Forum is silent about the question of who will rule in this new world. There is no reason to expect that the new power holders would be benevolent. Yet even if the top decision-makers of the new world government were not mean but just technocrats, what reason would an administrative technocracy have to go on with the undesirables? What sense does it make for a technocratic elite to turn the common man into a superman? Why share the benefits of artificial intelligence with the masses and not keep the wealth for the chosen few? Not being swayed away by the utopian promises, a sober assessment of the plans must come to the conclusion that in this new world, there would be no place for the average person and that they would be put away along with the “unemployable,” “feeble minded,” and “ill bred.” Behind the preaching of the progressive gospel of social justice by the promoters of the Great Reset and the establishment of a new world order lurks the sinister project of eugenics, which as a technique is now called “genetic engineering” and as a movement is named “transhumanism,” a term was coined by Julian Huxley, the first director of the UNESCO. The promoters of the project keep silent about who will be the rulers in this new world. The dystopian and collectivist nature of these projections and plans is the result of the rejection of free capitalism. Establishing a better world through a dictatorship is a contradiction in terms. Not less but more economic prosperity is the answer to the current problems. Therefore, we need more free markets and less state planning. The world is getting greener and a fall in the growth rate of the world population is already underway. These trends are the natural consequence of wealth creation through free markets. Conclusion The World Economic Forum and its related institutions in combination with a handful of governments and a few high-tech companies want to lead the world into a new era without property or privacy. Values like individualism, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are at stake, to be repudiated in favor of collectivism and the imposition of a “common good” that is defined by the self-proclaimed elite of technocrats. What is sold to the public as the promise of equality and ecological sustainability is in fact a brutal assault on human dignity and liberty. Instead of using the new technologies as an instrument of betterment, the Great Reset seeks to use the technological possibilities as a tool of enslavement. In this new world order, the state is the single owner of everything. It is left to our imagination to figure out who will program the algorithms that manage the distribution of the goods and services. Author: Dr. Antony P. Mueller is a German professor of economics who currently teaches in Brazil. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <한 나라 진기의 양생에서 음식을 조심하라는 말> 갖가지 질병과 죽음은 음식에서 비롯하는 수가 많으니 음식으로 인한 재난은 색을 탐해서 비롯하는 재난보다 많다 여색은 노년이 되면 끊을 수 있지만, 음식은 하루도 끊을 수 없다. 음식은 몸에 이롭기도 하지만, 해롭기도 만만치 않다 음식 섭취를 부당하게 하면 해를 입지만, 절제를 하면 이롭다. [漢]陳紀「養生誡食患」訣 百病橫夭，多由飲食。① 飲食之患，過於聲色。② 聲色可絕之逾年，飲食不可廢之一日。③ 為益亦多，為患亦切。④ 多則切傷，少則增益。⑤ [注釋] ①百病：形容很多疾病，泛指各種疾病。 〇橫夭：指（各種疾病）橫生而導致人體衰弱、生命夭折。唐代名醫孫思邈《枕中記》曾記述解釋：「百病橫生，年命橫夭，多由飲食。」 ②患：禍患；災難。 〇過於：超過；大於。 〇聲色：歌舞和女色。這裡偏重指好女色而多行房事。 ③絕：斷絕；停止。 〇逾年：超過年齡。這裡指年紀老邁。 〇廢：停止；斷絕。 ④為益：產生裨益。 〇為患：產生禍患。 〇切：迫切；切要。 ⑤多：這裡指過多。 〇增益：增加益處。 [譯文] 許多疾病橫生性命夭折，大多由於飲食惹禍作孽。 飲食給人帶來的禍患啊，遠遠大於聲色後果惡劣。 上了年紀自然斷去聲色，而飲食是一日不可停絕。 飲食給人體的補益很多，而禍患也是很多並迫切。 飲食過多或不當就傷害，而節制合理就增加補益。 [名家簡介] 陳紀（129—199），東漢末年著名學者、大臣。字元方，潁川許（今河南許昌）人，陳寔之子，與弟陳諶俱以至德稱，兄弟孝養，閨門雍和。他與父親陳寔和弟弟陳諶，在當時並稱為「三君」。遭父喪，哀痛嘔血，豫州刺史表上尚書，官府圖畫其像，張貼於百城，以勵風俗，所以他美名天下。著有《陳子》。詳情參閱本書第九編《歷代名家小傳》「陳紀」。 [養生旨要] 陳紀對養生學頗有研究，並有獨到見解，強調人生「以食為本」，飲食對於健壯體魄具有重要作用，但又特別告誡人們，飲食習慣不良、方法不當卻是人體百病的根源。飲食的禍患是「惡魔」，更是「嬌怪」，因為飲食的禍患滋生之日，往往正是人在樂意品嘗著某種口味、享受著所謂口福之時；因為飲食的禍患滋生，又往往是漸漸地、慢慢地、暗暗地在進行，人的耳朵聽不見，眼睛看不到，甚至是連人體本身也很難立即感覺出來。然而，經過天長日久，一旦釀成疾病，卻是既迫切又頑固，藥力難道，到時候需要食補時，卻又吃不香、喝不下。飲食方面所產生危害往往比聲色的危害既頻繁得多，還要厲害迫切，因為人老了，自然會漸漸離開聲色的進攻，而對於正常人來說，一日三餐的飯菜、食前飯後的茶水，誰個能離開得了？所以說，在飲食上防病與保健，當千萬小心，點滴不可馬虎。 陳紀的這種養生理論至精切要，因此一向受到歷代醫學家、養生學家的贊同並反覆論述、宣傳。南朝梁名醫陶弘景名著《養性延命錄》中的《食誡篇》專講飲食衛生，其中就轉錄了陳紀的這段名言，唐代名醫孫思邈《枕中記》論飲食之道時，也重提了陳紀的這段飲食論。 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------