망국의 원인이 될 공무원 수를 특별법을 통해 대량감축해야 한다 특히 세무공무원 이러온디넝니엊이 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11329093714 세무공무원은 사실 거의 필요없다 전자세금계산서, 현금영수증, 카드.... 모든 자료가 오픈되어 있어 있다면 구멍가게에서 현금받는 것 ... 이거 단속하는 것보다 그 단속하는 공무원 월급이 더 많이 들어가 그것도 한번만 들어가는 것이 아니라 20년 30년간 지속되잖아. 그냥 전산화에 따른 세금부가가 가장 맞다 뭔 신고를 해 그러면 그 신고를 받는 공무원이 필요하잖아 왜 신고를 하니? 그냥 가스요금처럼 전산에 있는 것으로 부과를 하면 되는데 70%이상 줄여도 아무 이상이 없다 Auberge 댓글달기 세무 공무원 뿐만 아니라 문재앙정권에서 막대하게 증원된 공무원들에 대한 심각성을 대개의 국민은 관심이 없거나 알아도 모른 척하고 넘어가고 있지만 기회있을 때 동네 주민센터 및 보건소 같은 데 가서 함 보기를 바란다.... 도대체 무슨 생지랄들 하고 있는지를..... 표면적 명분은 취업문제 해결, 그러나 그 이면에는 좌빨의 구조적 지지기반 확대 노림수... 그 대표적 정책이 전면적 학교급식.... 급식종사자들 전부 민노총산하 노조에 가입됨.... 또한 급식관련 관련 식자재 및 급식관련 도구,장비 납품업체들 그리고 이들의 친인척 가족들 모두 싫컨좋컨 생계가 걸려있다는 것.... (좌빨이 하는 짓들에는 단 하나도 순수하고 정직한 것이 없다는 것) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 복지는 최소로 해야 한다.... 좌빨잡자 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11329084474 복지수준이 수혜자의 "사회적 '실질적기여' "를 넘어서면 사회는 비효율로 떨어지면서, 추락하는 비효율은 엄청난 댓가를 요구하게 된다. 사회적 약자들이 승자에게 필요이상(수혜자의 사회적기여이상)을 요구하게 되면 사회는 추락을 시작하게 되고 결국 "보이지 않는손"의 무서운 댓가를 치르게 된다. 80년대말과 90년대초에 벌어진 공산집단의 붕괴, 그리고 북괴사회의 참혹한 현상을 목도하고도 똑같은 주장을 되풀이 하는 작태가 개탄스럽다.... 그런식으로 역사를 뒤퓔이 하고 싶으냐? 지금 우리의 현실은 전두환정권시보다 훨씬 후퇴했다. 지난 30년 넘게 줄곧 참혹하게 추락한 공산집단의 모습을 따르려는 자들로 사회가 처참하게 추락하고있다. 90년대 소련이 패망하면서 소련의 가장 처참한 모습은 터키에 소련여인들의 매춘이 처절할 정도라는 사실을 아나? 지금도 러시아는 그 퇴보에서 완전히 벗어나지 못하고있다. ------ 80년대의 안정됬던 사회에서 지금의 "헬조선 化"한 것은 사회적 효율을 극도로 왜곡시켜 놓은 ㄱ려과다.... 그중 특히 노조의 비효율을 극대하시킨 것이 지금 "헬조선"의 가장 큰 원인이이다. 노조는 그들의 "실질적 기여"없이 엄청난 댓가를 사회가ㅣ 지불하고 있기때문이다. 이 '우리사회의 암덩어리 노조' 만 막아도 우리 젊은이들의 '헬-조선 9/10은 막을 수있다. 노조의 폭력적 임금도둑질은 이사회가 가장크게 치르는 "不勞所得의 원흉"임을 알라.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GDP가 알려주는 것 한 나라의 경제 상태를 알기 위해 경제 전문가들은 국내총생산(GDP)이라는 통계에 의존한다. GDP는 특정 기간의 최종 상품과 서비스의 가치를 알려주는 수치이다. 그런데 이 통계는 경제의 동력은 부(富)의 생산이 아니라 그 소비라는 생각에 바탕을 둔 것이다. 이와 같은 생각에는 상품에 대한 수요가 있으면 곧바로 공급이 따라온다는 가정이 들어 있다. 하지만 이런 생각은 최종 상품이 나오기 전의 여러 생산의 단계를 모두 무시하고 있다. 현실 세계에서는 상품이 나오기 전에 다양한 생산의 단계에서 일하는 다양한 사람들이 먹고살아야 하는 다양한 소비재가 준비되어 있어야 한다. 여기에서 각 개인들이 먹고살아가는 생존의 수단은 그의 실질 저축에 있다. 제빵사가 하루에 빵 10개를 만들고, 그중에 2개는 먹고 8개는 기타 다양한 소비를 위해 남겨둔다면, 그 8개의 빵이 바로 그의 실질 저축이다. 그런데 GDP에서는 저축을 하면 할수록 소비가 위축되고 케인즈의 승수효과도 위축되므로, 저축에 대해 적대적이다. GDP의 공식에서는 상품과 서비스를 생산하는 게 개인들의 행동이 아니라, 그런 행동 밖의 “경제”라고 가정한다. 최종 상품과 서비스의 가치를 모두 합계해서 정부의 통계전문가들은 경제라는 허구를 구체화시킨다. 하지만 GDP 공식은 최종 상품과 서비스가 과연 진정한 부의 팽창인지 아니면 자본 소비를 반영한 것인지 말해주지 않는다. 예를 들면 정부가 개인들의 복지에는 아무 도움이 되지 않는 피라미드를 건설한다고 해도, GDP 공식에서는 이를 경제 성장에 기여하는 요소로 간주한다. 전체를 계산하기 위해서는 여러 가지 상품을 더해야 한다. 하지만 이렇게 더하려면 공통의 단위가 있어야 한다. 말하자면 세탁기와 자동차와 셔츠를 함께 더할 수가 없다는 것이다. 따라서 평균 가격 수준이란 개념은 모자와 설탕과 버터 등 전혀 다른 단위의 상품들을 더하기 하므로 전혀 의미가 없는 짓이다. GDP는 국가적 총생산이라는 것이 있다는 느낌을 주지만, 부는 개인들에 의해서만 생산되고 개인들에게 독립적으로 속할 뿐이다. GDP는 실제 경제 성장과는 아무 관련이 없고 단지 통화를 경제에 얼마나 퍼부었는지 반영할 뿐이다. What Does GDP Really Tell Us? Frank Shostak To gain insight into the state of an economy, most financial experts and commentators rely on a statistic called the gross domestic product (GDP). The GDP framework looks at the value of final goods and services produced during a particular time interval, usually a quarter or a year. This statistic is constructed in accordance with the view that what drives an economy is not the production of wealth but rather its consumption. What matters here is the demand for final goods and services. Since consumer outlays are the largest part of the overall demand, it is commonly held that consumer demand is the key driver of economic growth. All that matters in this view is the demand for goods, which in turn will give rise almost immediately to their supply. This framework ignores the whole issue of the various stages of production that precede the emergence of the final good. In the real world, it is not enough to have demand for goods—one must have the means to accommodate the demand. The means are various final consumer goods that are required to sustain various individuals in the various stages of production. The key source for the means of sustenance is individuals’ real savings. For instance, John the baker produces ten loaves of bread and consumes two loaves of bread. The unconsumed eight loaves of bread constitute real savings. John the baker could exchange the saved eight loaves of bread for the services of a technician in order to improve his oven, i.e., the improvement of his infrastructure. With the help of an improved infrastructure, John could lift the production of bread—increase the economic growth. Note that the eight saved loaves of bread sustain the life and well-being of the technician while he is working to enhance the oven. Observe that real savings is the determining factor as far as future economic growth is concerned. If a strengthening in economic growth requires a particular infrastructure while there is not enough real savings to make such an infrastructure—the desired strengthening in the economic growth is not going to emerge. The GDP framework is hostile to savings given that in this framework more savings weakens consumption and weakens the so-called Keynesian multiplier. The GDP framework gives the impression that it is not the activities of individuals that produce goods and services, but something else outside these activities called the "economy." Yet, at no stage does the so-called economy have a life of its own independent of individuals. The so-called economy is a metaphor—it does not exist. By aggregating the values of final goods and services together, government statisticians concretize the fiction of an economy by means of the GDP statistic. But, the GDP framework cannot tell us whether final goods and services that were produced during a particular period of time are a reflection of real wealth expansion, or a reflection of capital consumption. For instance, if a government embarks on the construction of a pyramid, which adds nothing to the well-being of individuals, the GDP framework will regard this as a factor that contributes to economic growth. In reality, however, the building of the pyramid will divert real savings from wealth-generating activities, thereby stifling the production of wealth. GDP and the Real Economy—What Is the Relationship? There are serious issues regarding the calculation of real gross domestic product (GDP). To calculate a total, several things must be added together. To add things together, they must have some unit in common. However, it is not possible to add refrigerators to cars and shirts to obtain the total of final goods. Since the total real output cannot be defined in a meaningful way, obviously it cannot be quantified. To overcome this problem, economists employ total monetary expenditure on goods, which they divide by an average price of those goods. There is, however, a serious problem with this. Suppose two transactions were conducted. In the first transaction, one TV set is exchanged for $1,000. In the second transaction, one shirt is exchanged for $40. The price or the rate of exchange in the first transaction is $1000/1TV set. The price in the second transaction is $40/1shirt. In order to calculate the average price, we must add these two ratios and divide them by 2. However, $1000/1TV set cannot be added to $40/1shirt, implying that it is not possible to establish an average price. On this Rothbard wrote in Man, Economy, and State, Thus, any concept of average price level involves adding or multiplying quantities of completely different units of goods, such as butter, hats, sugar, etc., and is therefore meaningless and illegitimate. The employment of various sophisticated methods to calculate the average price level cannot bypass the essential issue that it is not possible to establish an average price of various goods and services. Accordingly, various price indices that government statisticians compute are simply arbitrary numbers. If price deflators are meaningless so is the real GDP statistic. Even government statisticians admit that the whole thing is not real. According to J. Steven Landefeld and Robert P. Parker from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, In particular, it is important to recognize that real GDP is an analytic concept. Despite the name, real GDP is not "real" in the sense that it can, even in principle, be observed or collected directly, in the same sense that current-dollar GDP cannot in principle be observed or collected as the sum of actual spending on final goods and services in the economy. Quantities of apples and oranges can in principle be collected, but they cannot be added to obtain the total quantity of "fruit" output in the economy. Now, since it is not possible to quantitatively establish the status of the total of real goods and services, obviously various data like real GDP that government statisticians generate should not be taken too seriously. The whole idea of GDP gives the impression that there is such a thing as the national output. In a market economy, however, wealth is produced by individuals and belongs to them independently. Goods and services are not produced in totality and supervised by one supreme leader. This in turn means that the entire concept of GDP is devoid of any basis in reality as far as the market economy is concerned. According to Mises in Human Action the whole idea that one can establish the value of the national output, or what is called the GDP, is somewhat farfetched: The attempt to determine in money the wealth of a nation or the whole of mankind are as childish as the mystic efforts to solve the riddles of the universe by worrying about the dimension of the pyramid of Cheops. Furthermore, If a business calculation values a supply of potatoes at $100, the idea is that it will be possible to sell it or replace it against this sum. If a whole entrepreneurial unit is estimated at $1,000,000 it means that one expects to sell it for this amount, the businessman can convert his property into money, but a nation cannot. So what are we to make out of the periodical pronouncements that the economy, as depicted by real GDP, grew by a particular percentage? All we can say is that this percentage has nothing to do with real economic growth and that it most likely mirrors the pace of monetary pumping. Since GDP is expressed in dollar terms, it is obvious that its fluctuations will be driven by the fluctuations in the amount of dollars pumped into the economy. From this, we can also infer that a strong real GDP growth rate most likely depicts a weakening in the process of real wealth formation. Once it is realized that so called real economic growth, as depicted by real GDP, mirrors fluctuations in the money supply growth rate it becomes clear that an economic boom has nothing to do with real economic expansion. On the contrary, such a boom is about real economic contraction since it undermines the pool of real wealth—the heart of real economic growth. (Note that boom is generated by the increase in the money supply growth rate, which gives rise to various bubble activities that undermine the process of wealth generation). It is no wonder that in the GDP framework, the central bank can cause real economic growth, and most economists who slavishly follow this framework believe that this is so. There is no shortage of so-called economic research designed to produce "scientific support" for popular views that, by means of monetary pumping, the central bank can grow the economy. It is however overlooked by all these studies that no other conclusion can be reached once it is realized that GDP is a close relative of the money stock. Conclusion The real GDP growth rate does not measure the real strength of an economy but rather reflects monetary turnover adjusted by a dubious statistic called the price deflator. Obviously then the more money is pumped, all other things being equal, the stronger the economy appears to be. In this framework of thinking one is not surprised that the Fed can "drive" the economy since by means of monetary pumping the central bank can influence the GDP growth rate. By means of the real GDP statistic Fed policy makers and government officials can create an illusion that they can grow the economy. In reality, the policy of intervention of the Fed and the government can only deepen the economic impoverishment by weakening wealth generators. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------