법률안 거부권 1호 가즈아~ 탕밖의여자 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11418788009 文 사저 시위에…민주 “시위 가장한 폭력” 집시법 개정안 발의<조선일보> 집회나 시위의 준수 사항에 개인의 명예를 훼손·모욕하는 행위, 개인의 인격권을 현저하게 침해하거나 사생활의 평온을 뚜렷하게 해치는 행위, 악의적 표현으로 청각 등 신체나 정신에 장애를 유발할 정도의 소음을 발생해 신체적 피해를 주는 행위금지 5년간 청와대 쳐박혀서 국민들 목소리 안듣고 묻지도 따지지도 못하게 한 새끼한테 할 말 하겠다는데 왜 입을 막아 이 씹새끼들아!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "조전혁, 50% 빼앗기다" / 서울시교육감 선거 철저 해부 / 조전혁, 사전투표 득표수 무자비하게 가져가다 [공병호TV] https://youtu.be/UrfQT0PPhpo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 경기도지사 부정선거! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 좌빨살인단원5555 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11418802787 왜 재검표 요구하지 않고 눈물 질질 짜고 있는거니???? 김은혜 넌 경기도지사 도둑 맞았다니깐~~~~ 경기지사 부정선거 은폐하기 위해 강용석을 패배원인이라고 프레임 씌우고 있는 부정선거설계자들과 성상납범 좆준석 패거리들!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 경기지사 무효 투표수만 무려 57822 표~~~~.. 승패를 가른 건 겨우 8000 여표~~ 5820000 투표수 중 단 8000 표 차이로, 단순히 계산해서 582명이 투표해서 단 1표 차이로 졌는데 재검표도 안하고 바로 승복한다? 이게 말이야 방구야? 동네 이장 선거도 저 따위로 안하겠다. 재검표하면 뭐가 겁나서 당에서 못하게 하는 것일까? 강용석표가 0.9 % 보다 훨씬 더 나올까봐? 아니면 빳빳한 신권 투표지가 쏟아질까봐? 공범이 제 발 지렸나? 존나 이상하지 아이하니???ㆍ.... 국힘당 경기지사 패배원인은 강용석이다라고 전언론 전커뮤니티에서 프레임 씌우기작업중~~ 580만표 중 단 8000표 차인데 그대로 승복??? 오백팔십만분의 8000인데 그대로 승복??? 전자개표기 에러확률보다도 높은 수치인데 그대로 승복??? 무효표가 57800표나 쏟아졌는데도 그대로 승복? 국힘당 저 새끼들 정말 수상하지 않아?? 그것도 부정선거로 논란인 사전투표로 막판에 표가 쏟아졌는데 말이다. 미대선 때와 100% 빼박인 부정선거 형태였다. 국힘당 저 개쓰레기들이 그대로 승복하는 이유는 괜히 불복했다가 민좃당 부정선거 탄로나면 지들도 무사하지 못하니까 그대로 승복한 것 같다. 같은 한패~~ 세상에 수백만 유권자가 투표해서 단 8000표 차이 났는데 그대로 승복해버리고 패배원인을 강용석에게 뒤집어 쒸우는 것 보고 철저하게 기획된 부정선거구나 하는 생각이 들더라~ 밤에 개표방송 봤으면 알거다. 사전투표 까기 시작한후 어느 싯점에서 갑자기 김동연한테 뭉태기 표가 가는 것을~~~~~~~~~~ 이것은 아래 미대선때 보인 그래프 처럼 부정선거 빼박인 것인데 왜 아무도 그런 얘기를 안하고 강용석때문에 졌다면서 온통 언론 방송 각종 커뮤니티등에서 바람을 잡고 있을까?? 내 생각에는 지금 철저하게 분석에 돌입한 전문가들이 있을 것이고 내일부터 본격적으로 내용을 알릴것으로 본다.ㆍ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [속보] 민경욱TV에 올라온 부정선거 증거.JPG 쌍성총관부 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11418769987 1. 개표장에서 일련번호 태그 달려 있는 표가 무더기로 발견됨. 2. 개표일 당일 일련번호 달려있는 표들 무더기로 가위로 잘라내던 사람이 있어 경찰출동함. 그 이후 상황 모름. 3. 서울시는 시장이 압도적이니까 구청장 투표에 장난을 쳤고 경기도는 도지사가 박빙이니까 도지사에 장난을 친 듯... 4. 상식에 부합되지 않는 교차투표가 유독 서울, 경기만 일어남. ( 시장을 국힘찍고 구청장을 더불찍는다든가 도지사를 더불찍고 시군구를 국힘찍는 현상) 5. 이번 선거가 대승이라고 ??? 원래 전라도는 전라도가 먹고, 경상도는 경상도가 먹는 거였음. 나머지 수도권을 누가 먹느냐 게임이었는데... 가장 큰 경기도를 뺏김. 서울은 원래 오세훈이 먹는 거였고... 충정도 싹쓸이한 건 승리 맞음. 6. 이재명 인천계양을과 김동연 경기도 개표에 대해 정밀 검증이 필요하다. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 미국 분유 부족 사태를 170년 전에 예견한 프랑스의 바스티아 대중은 2가지 희망을 갖고 있고, 정부는 2 가지 약속을 한다. 즉 혜택은 많은데 세금을 내지 않는다는 것이다. 하지만 이 두 가지는 서로 상충되기 때문에 절대 실현될 수 없다. 미국의 분유 부족 사태는 정부가 수입을 금지하고 몇몇 대기업에 분유 공급을 맡겼기 때문에 발생했다. 대기업 중에 하나라도 문제가 생기면 공급에 차질이 생길 수 밖에 없는 구조이기 때문이다. Bastiat Predicted the Baby Formula Crisis 170 Years before It Happened Robert Zumwalt The current baby formula shortage in the United States is a pressing crisis, and many in the media have been rushing to explain how such a thing could have happened. But on close analysis, it appears to share the same root as virtually every other crisis experienced in the modern world: a government promised benefits without costs. Our political leaders either fail to understand or outright ignore the basic, unavoidable limitation on government action, that no government benefit comes without a cost. As French writer and politician Frédéric Bastiat wrote in his 1848 essay, Government: Thus, the public has two hopes, and Government makes two promises—many benefits and no taxes. Hopes and promises that, being contradictory, can never be realized. Now, is not this the cause of all our revolutions? For between the Government, which lavishes promises which it is impossible to perform, and the public, which has conceived hopes which can never be realized, two classes of men interpose—the ambitious and the Utopians. It is circumstances which give these their cue. It is enough if these vassals of popularity cry out to the people—"The authorities are deceiving you; if we were in their place, we would load you with benefits and exempt you from taxes." The current baby formula shortage is one more example of government promises running into the contradictory reality of their own hidden costs. Government Promises and Hidden Costs The formula shortage is due in large part to past and present government promises of "costless" benefits. As Ryan McMaken has already shown, it is largely the consequence of federal import restrictions, a government benefit to domestic producers, and the federal Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), a government benefit to both consumers and producers. These policies made the US formula supply dependent on a few large producers such that an unanticipated disruption in one producer's output now threatens to cut off thousands of infants from the nutrition their parents had believed they could depend on. So, to the taxation levied to pay for formula subsidies and the higher domestic prices that resulted from protectionism—the "predictable" costs economists typically associate with such policies—we must add unreliable supply as another "hidden" cost of the promised benefits of publicly supplied baby formula. However, government sources extol the benefits of programs like the WIC. The US Department of Agriculture (which administers the WIC) references studies claiming to show that the WIC program "reduces fetal deaths and infant mortality," "improves the growth of nutritionally at-risk infants and children," and "helps get children ready to start school." Perhaps these statements are all true, but these benefits' costs are entirely omitted. Rather than Admit Costs Exist, Governments Redouble Their Efforts to Provide "Benefits" A baby formula shortage is therefore a grave threat to the government's power, or more specifically, the power of those politicians who control the government. If people were to realize how illusory promises of "costless" benefits really are, they might eventually decide the political class and its empty promises are not worth their burden. Even among the beneficiaries who are not taxed for the public benefits they receive, tolerance for the government's intrusion in their lives and paternalistic direction of their needs may begin to wane when those promises are found to be riddled with hidden, and sometimes disastrous, costs. Therefore, it should be no surprise that the federal government has taken brisk action in an attempt to relieve the shortage, not by eliminating the barriers to free-flowing formula that it erected, but in the decidedly more dramatic and visible fashion of airlifting small batches of formula from overseas one planeload at a time. According to a May 18 White House press release, the current administration has "directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to use Department of Defense (DOD) commercial aircraft to pick up overseas infant formula that meets U.S. health and safety standards, so it can get to store shelves faster." According to the White House, as of this writing, two planeloads of European-manufactured formula have been delivered to American shores, one on May 19 and another on May 22, delivering in total "the equivalent of up to 1.5 million 8-ounce bottles." With roughly half of US babies relying on formula, there may be at least 1.5 million babies needing up to thirty-two ounces of formula per day. This means the government spent three days obtaining enough formula to keep American babies fed for about six hours. One has to imagine that simply declaring a moratorium on import restrictions would have accomplished at least as much. Thus, the government's actions here seem to make little sense unless we realize its primary goal in all of this isn't necessarily to feed babies, but rather to appear to feed babies. In fact, plenty of journalists and photographers were on hand to document the triumphant unloading of this cargo from DOD planes, accomplishing the important task of convincing the American people that their political leaders have saved, rather than harmed, them. Conclusion Like any purveyors of fiction, those who promise benefits without costs must maintain that fiction even in the face of failure. Rather than be revealed as incompetent or liars, they simply devise new promises. Today's new promises come in the form of a government airlift of miniscule volumes of baby formula set to artificial fanfare. Bastiat continues: These two promises are forever clashing with each other; it cannot be otherwise…. Why, then, the new Government takes a bold step; it unites all its forces in order to maintain itself; it smothers opinion, has recourse to arbitrary measures, repudiates its former maxims, declares that it is impossible to conduct the administration except at the risk of being unpopular; in short, it proclaims itself governmental. The subject of this quotation was French politics in the revolutionary time of 1848, but Bastiat could be mistaken as describing present-day American politics with uncanny exactness. Thus, the root cause of these crises always has been, and probably always will be, the same: the unwavering commitment of those who seek political power to promising the public unlimited benefits without heeding their unavoidable costs. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------