“대체 한국 시장만 왜 이래?”...'R의 공포'에 주가·원화값 또 연저점 중앙일보 추락하는 한국 증시에는 날개가 없다. 코스피와 코스닥은 22일에도 속절없이 무너졌다. 연저점을 또다시 썼다. 원화가치도 13년 만에 가장 낮은 수준까지 떨어지며 달러당 1300원 코앞까지 갔다. ‘I(Inflation·인플레이션)’의 공포가 ‘R(Recession·침체)’의 공포로 옮겨붙자 한국 시장이 제일 먼저 겁을 먹었다. 한국 시장이 ‘탄광 속 카나리아’가 된 모양새다. --->무슨 개소리야! 지금 미국도 불황으로 달려가고 있는데? 엉터리 케인스 정책의 결과이고, 미친 문죄인의 흥청망청 낭비와 반자본주의적 악법들 때문이다. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- voix/ 일베 댓글 동무, 놀고있네.. 경기하강이 정부교체 40여일만에 온다고라??? 문씹새가 원전폐기등 이단옆차기 산업정책과 나랏돈 존나리 풀고, 코로나로 공금망 좆되서 경제망조들게 만든거여.. 그래서 삼성도 골병든거고.... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 이양희가 김철근에서 꼬리 자르기를 할 수도 있어. 일베고양이 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11422837978 김철근은 자기 혼자 했다고 하고 이준석은 전화 통화 후 보름 정도 후에 각서는 작성해서 자기는 모른다고 하고.... 이런 이유로 이양희가 김철근만 징계하고 이준석은 개입했는지 확실하지 않아 징계를 하지 않거나 경고 수준의 처분을 할 수 있음. 7월 7일로 연기한 것도 이준석한테만 좋은 일이야. 윤리위도 제소 후 2개월이나 지나서 열지를 않나 열고도 징계를 안 하고 2주후로 미루지 않나 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 분석) 무슨 짓 하고 떠났나(8탄) 국민연금이 수상하다. 위기의 주범 시대정신연구소 https://youtu.be/rcUhGOMZsWE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 좌파 코스프레 끝판왕.jpg 미종접자 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11422815218 (서울=연합뉴스) 이정훈 기자 = 더불어민주당 박주민 의원이 23일 오전 국회에서 열린 정책조정회의에 한쪽 안경다리가 없는 안경을 착용한 채 참석해 있다. 일부러 안경테 없는거 끼고와서 경향 기자가 안경테 없다하니까 (이것도 서로 짠거같음) "일하느라 바빠서 몰랐다" "일해야죠"라고 개드립침 진짜 코스프레는 이새끼만한놈이 없는듯 --->저런 게 통한다고 생각하는 것도 대단하고, 저런 발상을 하는 자체도 대단하다! 코미디언들의 빰을 때리는 한국 좌파들의 거지 코스프레! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 매경 물가 난리인데…공무원까지 "월급 7% 올려달라" 빗속 시위 용산 대통령실 앞 빗속 시위 금리 상승해 더이상 못버텨 올해 실질임금 감소분 반영 물가 오른만큼만 올려달라 직무·성과급 도입도 반대 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 매경 [단독]공기업 직원 늘리더니…1억 육박 1인당 영업이익, 작년 150만원 고강도 쇄신 압박받는 공기업 36곳 전수조사해보니 재무개선 않고 채용만 늘려 5년새 영업익 1억서 수직낙하 공기업 2곳 중 1곳은 번 돈으로 이자비용조차 못내는 상황 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 중앙일보 "확 죽여버릴라" 전주시장 당선인의 폭언…"터질 게 터졌다" --->신임 광복회장(장준하의 장남)은 부정선거 항의에 권총을 꺼내 위협했다고 한다. 막가는 세상이 되었다. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 문재인 탈원전 하는 사이 세계 원자력 순위 2 위에서 4 위 중국은 4 위에서 2 위로 껑충 DABO http://www.ilbe.com/view/11422885950 문재인 탈원전 하는 사이 세계 원자력 순위 2 위에서 4 위 중국은 4 위에서 2 위로 껑충 문재인 정부의 탈원전 정책으로 인해 국내 원전 산업 경쟁력이 하락하는 사이, 전 세계 원자력 발전량 중국 비중이 크게 확대된 것으로 나타났다. 풍력 산업에서도 상황은 마찬가지다. 작년 풍력 발전용 터빈 제조사 현황을 보면 글로벌 상위 기업 10개 사 중 6개 사가 중국기업으로 나타났다. 전경련 관계자는 “최근 몇 년간 대대적인 정부 지원을 바탕으로 중국의 재생에너지 산업이 급성장했다”며 “전 세계적으로 재생에너지 발전이 확대되는 상황에서 국내 기업의 글로벌 경쟁력 확보를 위해 투자세액공제비율 향상 등 기업 지원정책 개정이 시급하다”고 말했다. 대표적인 재생에너지로 꼽히는 태양광 발전의 경우, 밸류체인 상에서 중국 기업의 독점현상이 두드러졌다. 특히 태양광 발전 시스템 구축의 필수 부자재인 잉곳과 웨이퍼는 중국이 글로벌 시장의 95% 이상을 점유하고 있다. / 조선 요약 : 문가가 친중 하는동안 한국은 후퇴 중공놈들은 발전했다 재생에너지 노래를 부르고 지랄하더만 뭐 하나 발전한것도 없다 결국 탈원전 5 년 전기세만 오르고 한것은 좆도 없다 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 코로나 바이러스에 대한 정부의 거짓말에 대한 진실 12가지. 익명50마오 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11422899419 마이크 예돈 박사: 12가지 측면에서, 여러분의 정부는 코로나에 대해 거짓말을 했습니다. 1) 믿을 수 없을 정도로 치명적이지 않습니다. 사망률은 인플루엔자의 약 두 배이다. 2) 모든 사람이 감염될 수 있는 것은 아니다. 인구의 최소 30~50%가 교차 면역성을 가지고 있다. 3) 차별적이죠. 노인들이 젊은이들보다 더 위험하다. 4) 무증상 전염은 공포를 조장하기 위한 거짓이다. 5.) PCR 테스트는 진단 도구가 아닙니다. 6.) 마스크가 작동하지 않습니다. 7.) 봉쇄는 효과가 없고 해를 끼친다. 8.) 치료 가능합니다. 9.) 일단 회복되면 재감염될 것 같지 않아요. 10.) 천천히 변이한다. 어떤 변종도 자연 면역에서 벗어날 위험이 없다. 11.) 의학적 개입의 안전성이 효능보다 우선한다. 12) 4가지 유전자 기반 백신은 독성이 있다. Mike Yeadon 박사의 12가지 COVID 거짓말에 대한 자세한 정보 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 아이들이 죽임을 당할 때 왜 경찰들은 가만히 있을까? 경찰 문화는 경관의 안전에 집중되어 있다. 대중의 신임을 배신하는 행위를 해도, 경찰은 노조에 의해 보호되고, 정치인들은 세금으로 경찰 예산을 더 올려준다. Why Police Do Nothing While Kids Are Killed Ryan McMaken Police culture is fixated on "officer safety," and when police betray the public trust, they are protected by labor unions as politicians pad police budgets with even more tax money. -->현재 우리나라에서도 유사한 일들이 일어나고 있고, 앞으로 계속 일어날 일이다. 경찰이고 소방관이고 국가 또는 국민이 통제할 수 없는 괴물 집단이 되어 가고 있다. Here is an often-used tactic employed to defend government police organizations from criticism. Whenever critics point out police incompetence of abuse, defenders counter with: "The next time you need help, call a crack head!" This same phrase was used by Louisiana Senator John Kennedy when singing the praises of uniformed government bureaucrats in 2021. The phrase often produces many smug nods from the "Back the Blue" crowd, and one can buy T-shirts with this progovernment slogan as well. The reality however, is something quite different. Experience continues to teach us again and again, that when one encounters violent felons—as did the children in Uvalde, Texas—calling a crackhead may not produce results much worse than calling the police. A crack head is probably going to run the other direction when faced with a gun-toting maniac. As we learned at Uvalde, many police officers will do exactly the same. The "call a crackhead" propaganda is also especially insidious because it is designed to back the idea that "taxes are the price we pay for civilization" and the myth of the "social contract." In this supposed quid pro quo, the taxpayers pay their taxes, and then the government provides "public safety." That, at least, is the myth the regime repeats over and over. This myth is being exposed for what it is in real time in the Uvalde investigation right now. Each new revelation shows just how uninterested law enforcement officers can be in providing any of that "protection" they insist the taxpayers pay so much to fund. Rather, Uvalde has shown that the primary interest of law enforcement was officer safety, not public safety. So much for that "social contract" we keep hearing about. New Revelations Show Police Simply Chose to Do Nothing In the Texas Senate this week, senators and the public are starting to see what passes for police work in Texas. Although police spokesmen repeatedly claimed they could not engage the shooter because of a locked door, it turns out that was a lie. Reuters reported yesterday: The classroom door in the Uvalde elementary school where 19 children and two teachers were killed in May was not locked even as police waited for a key, Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steven McCraw said on Tuesday. There was no evidence any law enforcement officer ever tried the classroom door to see if it was locked, McCraw said at a Texas Senate hearing into the shooting. "I don't believe based on the information we have right now that door was ever secured," McCraw said. "He (the shooter) didn't have a key … and he couldn't lock it from the inside." So, why did police wait outside so long? They claimed it was because they didn't have the equipment they needed. That also turned out to be a lie. Instead, the fact show, according to Steven McGraw at the Texas Department of Public Safety: "three minutes after the subject entered the building, there was a sufficient number of armed personnel to isolate distract and neutralize the subject…. the on-scene commander decided to place the lives of officers before the lives of children." Expect a Cover-Up Naturally, police personnel and their allies in local government have acted to conceal information on the police response from the public. The city's district attorney has intervened to prevent the release of "any records." Moreover, the Texas Department of Public Safety is pressuring the state's attorney general to ensure that body camera footage from the incident remains hidden—presumably forever because police rather conveniently claim the footage exposes police tactics to potential future shooters. No Accountability Unfortunately, legal recourse for police incompetence and inaction is virtually nonexistent in the US, and police have no legal or contractual obligation to protect anyone or do much of anything at all. Federal courts have made it clear police are simply not obligated to act to protect any member of the public. Police labor unions ensure police can easily deflect any legal woes related to "neglect of duty." In Texas specifically, little has been done to increase police accountability, such as making body camera footage more easily accessible. This has been done in some states such as Colorado. In Texas, however, police enjoy high political status and de facto political immunity from criticism. The routine solution for police issues in Texas is to hand more taxpayer money over to police. Police departments receive more taxpayer funding than anything else in Texas's largest cities. Contrary to claims that police budgets are being bled dry by left-wing activists, Texas's most left-wing city is increasing its police budget. The senate has passed passed legislation penalizing local governments that reduce police funding. The National Rifle Association's only response to the Uvalde shooting has been to call for more taxpayer money for police. Moreover, there is a rising narrative that the police are among the victims of the Uvalde debacle. On the Joe Rogan, show, for example, retired US Army employee and author Tim Kennedy blamed Uvalde on the "defund the police campaign." Kennedy argued police are subject to "demonization" and didn't receive enough money to be properly trained. On Bill Maher's Real Time, politician Michael Shellenberger said Americans should feel sorry for the police at Uvalde, mawkishly attempting to get the crowd on his side by stating "many of those police officers are having a hard time sleeping at night." Shellenberger then went on to say it is wrong to criticize "our institutions" when "they fail us" and "the answer to it is more training." The truth however, is the Uvalde police, like most police departments have received enormous amounts of training on school shootings and related events, with one training occurring just two months before the shooting. At the school on the day of the shooting, the police were better trained, better armed, and more numerous than the shooter. But no amount of training can overcome the realities of police culture, which increasingly leans toward favoring "officer safety" over public safety. As Ryan Cooper has shown in The American Prospect, "American police are taught first and foremost to fear for their own lives" The lives of school children? That's secondary. Cooper continues: But this horrifying story should come as no surprise. What it illustrates is simply the cowardly culture of American police in action. Contrary to the chest-thumping rhetoric of police unions, they are neither trained nor legally expected to protect citizens in danger. In the pinch, they frequently put their own safety above those they are charged with protecting—even elementary school kids…. [The police response at Uvalde is] the polar opposite of approved police tactics these days. After the Columbine shooting, where police waited outside for hours while a teacher bled to death, police are supposed to dash into the scene as fast as possible. They just didn’t do it. The reason is the powerful fear instilled by other parts of police training, as well as the overall police culture. That is, two important pillars of police training are at odds. One on hand, the training is to engage shooters. On the other hand, the training emphasizes that it is always a priority to ensure the police officer returns home safe. As explained by Ryan Grim, if this is the primary goal, the best tactic is to move more slowly to "reduce casualties"—namely, police casualties. The outcome is what we saw at Uvalde: police officers standing around waiting for more safety gear and more backup to ensure the police don't get hurt. Indeed, this attitude even broke through to the public when a Texas Department of Public Safety official Chris Olivarez admitted if they proceeded any further not knowing where the suspect was at, they could’ve been shot, they could’ve been killed, and that gunman would have had an opportunity to kill other people inside that school. In other words, the police had to protect themselves first, because if the police are hurt, then the suspect can do even more damage. There is a certain reasonable logic here of course, but it's in conflict with post-Columbine training. Moreover, the emphasis on officer safety may make police even less likely to put themselves in danger than an average person. After all, we frequently hear of good samaritans who put their own lives at risk to save children from drowning, traffic hazards, or other threats. Firemen rush into burning buildings to save people. These people have not been trained to focus on their own safety to the extent police have. Moreover, it's a safe bet that many of the desperate parents at Uvalde would have rushed into to confront the killer themselves had they not been assaulted, cuffed, and tazed by law enforcement officers at the site. Just the Latest Example Any criticism of police will arouse claims that any reports of police shortcomings are just a matter of "a few bad apples." Perhaps. But how do you know the local police in your town aren't among those police officers who will let children die to avoid harm to themselves? Will you bet your child's life on that? After, all Uvalde certainly isn't the only cautionary tale. Before Uvalde, at Parkland's Stoneman Douglas High School, the police ran and hid while students were slaughtered inside. The year before, it took police an hour and twelve minutes to respond to the 2017 Las Vegas shooter who killed more than fifty people as he opened fire on a crowd near the Las Vegas strip. Although hotel security had reported the location of the gunman—who had shot a security guard—even before the shooting began, local police agencies waited more than hour before entering the shooter's room. It remains unclear why the shooter stopped shooting after only about ten minutes, but we do know that he would have been free to keep shooting for a much, much longer period of time. In contrast to this sort of police "efficiency": in Arvada, Colorado, when a shooter opened fire in a crowded shopping district, the police ran for cover. The gunman was then shot dead by a private citizen with a gun. The police then came out of hiding and shot the good samaritan dead instead. Private gun owners saved countless lives at a Texas church in 2019 where church members were the ones who shot back at the assailant, and then chased him down in a high-speed pursuit. The police did nothing but write some reports afterward. Mere days after the police ran away in Uvalde, a woman in West Virginia saved lives by running toward danger to engage a gunman at a graduation party. In other words, when your training emphasizes over and over and over again that getting home safe at night is of primary importance, how can we be surprised that police seem even less inclined to take on personal risk than the average Joe when it comes to saving children? So, when faced with danger, should we "call a crackhead"? Probably not, but if heroics are necessary, an ordinary person with a gun may be a safer bet than calling people whose primary concern is officer safety. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------