문화일보 코로나 백신 294만회 분량 폐기…유효 기간 경과가 99% 금액으로는 278억 원어치 ----> 저 돈은 잘못한 담당자나 정치가에게 받아내야 하는 거 아닌가? ohsk**** 문씨일당들에게 손해배상해라!!!극악무도한 살인백신 살인마들!!![천벌을받을것이다!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 티비 조선 尹대통령, 文 사저 시위에 "대통령 집무실도 시위 허가하는 판" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 불만이 터져나오다 / 도대체 그 분은 뭘하는 겁니까? / 정작 중요한 사안에 대해선, 전혀 입장 표명이 없지 않습니까! [공병호TV] https://youtu.be/-b3LbY8ZFFI --->부정선거는 한국에서 금기어이다. 정가와 언론에는 부정선거에 관한 한 뭔가 묵계가 있는 듯한 낌새다. 부정선거를 언급하는 정치인이나 언론인은 잘못하면 박원순처럼 일찍 하직할 수도 있다. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [황교안 TV_6월7일] 특종! 경기도지사선거 성남분당 표조작증거 2분6초 동안 1번표만 연속으로 783개가 쏟아져 나오다. https://youtu.be/yPdd0CJzo5M ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (서울=연합뉴스) 최인영 기자 = 방역당국은 원숭이두창 예방에 효과성이 입증된 백신을 국내에 도입하기 위해 제조사와 협의를 진행하고 있다고 7일 밝혔다. 권근용 코로나19 예방접종대응추진단 예방접종관리팀장은 이날 중앙방역대책본부 브리핑에서 "현재 3세대 두창(천연두) 백신에 대해 제조사와 국내 도입 협의를 진행하고 있다"고 말했다. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 조선일보 文정부 ‘광주형 일자리’ 2년… “처우개선하라” 근로자 불만 터져나왔다 ckn2**** 사실상 공기업 국영기업이지. 나중에 매출 떨어지면 세금으로 다 충당해야함. 이딴짓 계속하다가 나라 망한다. 재앙이가 싼똥은 진짜 어마어마함. jds7**** 여긴또 뭐야 배고프다혀서 밥 주었더니 밥 솥채 달라는거야?? 여기도 민주노충 가입? 양산가서 시위하던지!! 애초에 만들지 말았어야 했다! xjh7**** 광주형 일자리라고 캐스퍼 타고 다닐거처럼 하던 문재인도 퇴임하고 제네시스 g90타던데... kery**** 지방에서 그정도 급여면 최고네 년봉3500만원이면 경쟁율엄청난 시험통과한 789급 공무원보다 훨등히많네 지금9급공무원 년봉2000만원이다, 정신차려라 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 모든 형태의 권위주의가 인간을 복종하는 로봇으로 만들려 했지만 모두 실패했다. 워크Woke 자본주의나 중국의 사회 고과 점수제social credit scores 등이 바로 최신의 권위주의의 예이다. LIBERALS LIE 님이 리트윗함 Ron Paul @RonPaul · 6월 5일 Every form of authoritarianism has been tried (many times over) to turn free human beings into obedient robots. The failure rate is 100%. "Woke" Capitalism, with "ESG scores" for corporations, and "social credit scores" for individuals, are merely the newest iteration. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 평등법이 말하는 평등이란? l feat. 무시무시 합니다... 복음한국 https://youtu.be/gg9Z0Sbx7e8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 최저임금은 의무사항아닌 "권장사항"으로 규정하라 좌빨잡자 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11419474929 자본주의 사회에서 노동계약등 모든 계약은 당사자간의 문제지 노동조합등 조합이 간여할 문제는 아니다. 자본주의 사회의 발전과정에 자본주의 "약탈행위"가 성행해 노조를 허용하게 되었던 건 다 아는 사실....... 그런데 그런 상황이 노조를 보호했더니 지금은 오히려 "노동자가 사용자를 약탈하는 시대"가 됬다. 이는 자본주의에 대한 중대한 도전이다. 반드시 노조를 박살내야 한다. 더구나, 노조는 한걸음 더 나아가 반국가행위까지 서슴치 않고있다. 이는 반국가행위로 노동운동과는 별개로, 혹독한 처벌을 해야 한다. ----> <자본주의 "약탈행위"가 성행해 노조를 허용하게 되었던 건 다 아는 사실> 이 문장은 좌파들의 거짓으로 잘못 알려진 정보이다. 자본주의 덕분에 농촌의 빈민들은 도시로 올라와서 자본가들이 제공한 직업을 얻어 생존할 수 있었고, 좌파들이 주장하듯이 그렇게 악랄한 노동 조건은 아니었다. 노동자들이 자신이 악랄하게 착취되고 느꼈다면 그대로 다시 시골로 돌아가면 된다. 그건 그의 자유이다. 하지만 노동자들은 계속 도시에 남아 노동자로서 생활했다. 농촌보다는 도시의 공장 생활이 나았다는 증거이다. 분신한 전태일이 노동 조건의 개선을 주장하며 분신을 당했지만, 그는 당시 상당한 돈을 벌던 성공한 기술자였다. 단지 좌파 대학생들의 노동법 강의에 홀딱 속아 넘어가 어린 석은 짓을 하다 분신을 당하고 말았다. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 국가라는 우상과 싸운 미제스 이미 지난 1950년대에 글을 쓰며, 미제스는 교회가 사회주의를 조금씩 받아들인 끝에 마침내 사회주의를 옹호하고 자본주의를 배격하는 세력이 되었다고 개탄했다. 미제스는 시회주의를 옹호하는 종교인들과의 싸움에 주저하지 않았다. 미제스는 종교적 신정 체제를 반대했지, 종교 자체를 반대하지는 않았다. 미제스는 이렇게 말했다. 무신론자들은 기독교의 생존이 자본주의 때문이라고 믿었고, 천주교는 현대의 무종교와 현대인의 죄악이 자본주의 때문이라고 생각했고, 개신교는 자본주의의 탐욕을 비난했다. 미제스는 종교인들이 또한 국가의 옹호자들이 된다고 믿었다. 미제스는 독일 사회주의자 라쌀의 말 <국가는 신이다>를 자주 인용했다. Mises Debunks the Religious Case for the State Laurence M. Vance In 1920, Ludwig von Mises wrote a comprehensive critique of the economics of socialism that launched the "calculation debate." The significance of his seminal essay, "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth," as Mises Institute Senior Fellow Joseph Salerno writes in a postscript, is that it "extends far beyond its devastating demonstration of the impossibility of socialist economy and society. It provides the rationale for the price system, purely free markets, the security of private property against all encroachments, and sound money. Its thesis will continue to be relevant as long as economists and policy-makers want to understand why even minor government economic interventions consistently fail to achieve socially beneficial results." But Mises also recognized that the economic fallacies of socialism were only part of the problem. He accordingly extended his critique of socialism into the full-scale book Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. There he not only comprehensively analyzed all forms of interventionism, but addressed politics, history, property, ethics, and even religion. Indeed, for someone who was an agnostic, Mises wrote a great deal about religion. The number of references he makes to religion is staggering, actually numbering over twenty-five hundred in his published corpus. He mentions God over two hundred and fifty times in his writings. There are seven references to religion on the opening page of Human Action. His books Omnipotent Government, Theory and History, and Socialism are permeated with references to religion. So why should we be interested in what Mises had to say about religion? Did not Mises himself say: "I am an economist, not a preacher of morality"?1 What Mises said about religion is important for two reasons. Religion cannot be separated from the study of history. The Bible itself is primarily a history book, not a religious book. Mises had a keen sense of history, and was extremely well-read, which, in previous ages, would have included the Bible. He recognized not only the place of the Bible in history, but its authority, even if he didn't subscribe to its tenets. Mises actually "quotes" Scripture on thirty-two occasions throughout his writings.2 So unlike many who are irreligious, Mises was knowledgeable about religion. He mentions the doctrines, customs, occupations, and activities of various sects. He refers to religious people and events in history. Religious controversy and conflict is a theme he visits often: the "great schism" of the Eastern and Western Churches, anti-Semitism, the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Reformation and Counter-Reformation. Mises's writings are full of religious imagery: "The Philistine will be quite prepared to give up the tickets which admit him to art exhibitions in return for opportunities for pleasure he more readily understands."3 "The idea of this third solution is very old indeed, and the French have long since baptized it with a pertinent name."4 Whether or not the Italian Fascists "knew that their gospel was merely a replica of British guild socialism is immaterial."5 From the Communist Manifesto the Progressives have learned "that the coming of socialism is inevitable and will transform the earth into a Garden of Eden."6 Some maintain that "good economics should be and could be impartial, and that only bad economists sin against this postulate."7 Socialists have "proclaimed the socialist program as a doctrine of salvation."8 "If it rains manna for forty years, other things being equal, the price of manna must go down."9 According to Marxians, "Private ownership in the means of production is the Red Sea which bars our path to this Promised Land of general well-being."10 Public opinion "looks askance at wealth acquired in trade and industry, and finds it pardonable only if the owner atones for it by endowing charitable institutions."11 Marx knew that "the final cause of historical evolution was the establishment of the socialist millennium."12 Eminent writers of history "have preached the gospel of war, violence, and usurpation."13 One cannot avoid religion when studying the works of Mises. But there is another reason to note what Mises said about religion, for in Mises's day, as in ours, the religious arguments for socialism prove to be the most intractable; they stem from deep-rooted beliefs about God and man and the purpose of the universe. And yet the arguments must be addressed. Writing in the middle of the twentieth century, Mises observed about Christianity and socialism: "The Christian churches and sects did not fight socialism. Step by step they accepted its essential political and social ideas. Today they are, with but few exceptions, outspoken in rejecting capitalism and advocating either socialism or interventionist policies which must inevitably result in the establishment of socialism."14 Unfortunately, nothing has changed since Mises wrote this almost fifty years ago. Liberal churches and denominations that have all but abandoned traditional orthodox Christianity have also abandoned the free market. Their pleas for "equity" and "social justice" are pleas for socialism, pure and simple. Conservative churchmen today are for the most part interventionist to the core. Their support of government-financed "faith-based" initiatives and moral crusades, their incessant demands for constitutional amendments, and their acceptance of state intervention as long as it is on behalf of their causes are only exceeded by their ignorance of the most basic economic principles. Read Mises? He was an agnostic Jew, why should I read Mises? Mises did not shy away from engaging religious defenders of socialism. He rightly criticizes religious rejecters of capitalism whose only fault with Marxian socialists is "their commitment to atheism or secularism."15 Mises perceptively points out that "many Christian authors reject Bolshevism only because it is anti-Christian."16The Church "opposes any Socialism which is to be effected on any other basis than its own. It is against Socialism as conceived by atheists, for this would strike at its very roots; but it has no hesitation in approaching socialist ideas provided this menace is resumed."17 But Mises did not condemn religious ideas because he was an agnostic. To the contrary: "The popular attacks upon the social philosophy of the Enlightenment and the utilitarian doctrine as taught by the classical economists did not originate from Christian theology, but from theistic, atheistic, and antitheistic reasoning."18 It would therefore be a "serious mistake to conclude that the sciences of human action" and liberalism are "antitheistic and hostile to religion. They are radically opposed to all systems of theocracy. But they are entirely neutral with regard to religious beliefs which do not pretend to interfere with the conduct of social, political, and economic affairs."19 The fact is, not only atheists, but even religionists have almost universally accepted socialism and interventionism. They are all guilty, as Mises tragically recognized: "The atheists make capitalism responsible for the survival of Christianity. But the papal encyclicals blame capitalism for the spread of irreligion and the sins of our contemporaries, and the Protestant churches and sects are no less vigorous in their indictment of capitalist greed."20 Accordingly, Mises criticizes both religion and atheism at the same time for the same economic fallacies. Both "Christian Socialism" and "atheist socialism" have brought about the "present state of confusion" in the world today.21 Both pious Christians and "radical atheists rejected the market economy."22 Both divines and atheists rejected the ideas of laissez faire.23 "Militant antitheists as well as Christian theologians are almost unanimous in passionately rejecting the market economy."24 One reason that Mises used so much religious terminology in his writings is that he viewed the supporters of the State as devotees of a religion. The state has its priests that people consider infallible,25 as well as its monks to serve it.26 Mises terms the idolization of the state "statolatry,"27 which he classifies as a counterfeit religion along with socialism and nationalism.28 Supporters of "the new religion of statolatry" are even more fanatical and intolerant than were the Mohammedan conquerors of Africa and Spain.29 If the supporters of the State are devotees of the religion of statolatry, the ultimate result is that the State is made into a god. How assorted socialists and interventionists make the State into a god is a theme that appears throughout Mises's works.30 He often quotes or refers to the German socialist Ferdinand Lassalle (1825–1864), who actually said: "The State is God."31 And once the State is made into a God: "He who proclaims the godliness of the State and the infallibility of its priests, the bureaucrats, is considered as an impartial student of the social sciences. All those raising objections are branded as biased and narrow-minded."32 Mises relates that the state, like a religion, considers some things to be heresy.33 In discussing how governments are intent on "restricting the freedom of economic thought," he points out how some believe that "government is from God and has the sacred duty of exterminating the heretic."34 But it is not just the religious arguments for socialism that are so deep-seated. Today it is the same with regard to the religious arguments for war. We can make a case against war, the most violent of all socialist means, and do it with economic, historical, and philosophical arguments. And yet, many supporters of war on Iraq care nothing about these issues. This is true about religious arguments for any subject. Make an issue a religious issue, and the indifferent and apathetic suddenly become interested. Connect religion with a cause and someone will be willing to die for it. What drives many supporters of this war is faith. In particular, they have come to believe that Christianity has licensed this war and God has blessed it and the nation that pursues it, or at least that is what they outwardly profess. (Although I find it strange that over 1,400 dead American soldiers is God's way of blessing America.) Actually, however, Christian advocates of the war in Iraq are more like the Moslem armies that Mises refers to who "conquered a great part of the Mediterranean area" while believing that "their God was for the big, well-equipped, and skillfully led battalions."35 Those concerned about the future of freedom need to follow Mises's example and not shy away from engaging these religious arguments. I have made an attempt to do so in my book Christianity and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State. There I contend that Christian enthusiasm for the state, its wars, and its politicians is an affront to the Savior, contrary to Scripture, and a demonstration of the profound ignorance many Christians have of history. Christians who condone the warfare state and its nebulous crusades against "evil" have been duped. There is nothing "Christian" about the state's aggressive militarism, its senseless wars, its interventions into the affairs of other countries, and its expanding empire. Paul Craig Roberts has recently pointed out how "evangelicals, aghast at Vietnam era protests of America's war against 'godless communism,' turned to the military as the repository of traditional American virtues." Unfortunately, the same thing was basically done in regard to the Republican Party. A point I do not raise in any of the essays in my book is a possible reason why some evangelical Christians are so quick to support the state and its coercive arm of aggression, the military, in its various wars and interventions. That reason is their support of state intervention in general. Intervention at home leads inevitably to intervention abroad, as Mises says when writing about the economics of war: "What has transformed the limited war between royal armies into total war, the clash between peoples, is not technicalities of military art, but the substitution of the welfare state for the laissez-faire state."36 The religious arguments for socialism and war are really arguments for the state. Conservatives who decry the welfare state while supporting the warfare state are terribly inconsistent. Mises reminds us that "whoever wishes peace among peoples must fight statism."37 Those who want "peace among nations must seek to limit the state and its influence most strictly."38 Interventionism of any kind is a curse because "government interference always means either violent action or the threat of such action. Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning. Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom."39 There are no sensible, logical arguments, religious or otherwise, for socialism, interventionism, or war. Religious arguments can and should be dealt with at every opportunity. Originally published February 10, 2005. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------