복잡계 혁명이 몰려온다

6월 1일

이낙연 총리

"촛불혁명은 정부의 무능·불통·편향에 대한 절망적 분노에서 출발해 새로운 정부 가동에 대한 희망적 지지로 전개되고 있다"
"문재인 정부의 공직자들은 촛불혁명의 명령을 받드는 국정 과제의 도구들이다"

---------------------------------------------

당귀사역탕은 손발이 얼음처럼 차가운 데 상용되었다. 황황은 이 방제가 고대에 수족 궐랭厥冷의 치료약이었다고 말한다. 이 방제의 환자는 脈細의 특징이 있고, 각종 통증, 동상, 레이노씨 병 등에 응용된다.

調理手腳冰冷常用當歸四逆湯

「當歸四逆湯」常用於調理手腳冰冷。南京中醫藥大學教授黃煌表示，此方為古代治療手足厥冷的專方，有溫經止痛的功效，適用於以腹痛、頭痛、關節痛而手足冷、脈細為特徵的疾病。

黃煌表示，當歸四逆湯經典配方包括：當歸、桂枝、芍藥、細辛、甘草、通草、大棗，共七味。適用於「手足厥寒」證；也就是身體遠端器官寒冷性疾病，表現可見手足冰冷，或者口吐清涎，其脈多細。病症常因為寒冷刺激而加重。患者常見手足涼，指尖更明顯，多伴有麻木、冷痛、甚至青紫，覆被加熱不易轉溫，天熱也陰冷異常，甲色、唇色、面色較蒼白。還有，「脈細欲絕」；因血管收縮，局部供血不足所致。

黃教授表示，患者體質常見頭痛、牙痛、胸痛、背痛、關節冷痛、女子痛經等，其痛多為刺痛、絞痛、牽扯痛等，疼痛呈慢性化。還有脈細，按後如絲或沈伏不出。因此，臨床上也將此方應用於痛症、凍瘡、雷諾氏病等疾病。

-------------------------------------------------

당귀사역탕

古代治療手足厥冷的專方，有溫經止痛的功效，適用于以腹痛、頭痛、關節痛而手足冷、脈細爲特征的疾病。

【經典配方】當歸三兩，桂枝三兩（去皮），芍藥三兩，細辛三兩，甘草二兩（炙），通草二兩，大棗（擘，二十五枚）。上七味，以水八升，煮取三升，去滓。溫服一升，日三服。（《傷寒論》）

【常用劑量】當歸15g，桂枝15g，白芍15g，北細辛10g，炙甘草10g，통초 10그램, 大棗30g。

*한국에서는 일반적으로 통초 대신에 목통을 쓴다. 아마도 통초가 구하기 어려워 일본에서 목통을 대신 쓰기 시작한 듯 하다. 황황은 통초를 넣지 않아도 상관 없다고 말하고 있다.

【煎服法】以水1100ml，煮沸後調文火再煎煮30～40分鍾，取湯液300ml，分2～3次溫服。

【經典方證】手足厥寒，脈細欲絕者。（315）

【體質要求】神情萎靡，懶于言語，手足涼，指尖爲甚，多伴有麻木、冷痛，甚至青紫，覆被加熱不易轉溫，夏天亦陰冷異常，甲色、唇色、面色較蒼白。多伴有頭痛、腹痛等，女性多有痛經。

【適用疾病】雷諾病、血管神經性頭痛、血栓閉塞性脈管炎、凍瘡、紅斑性肢痛、硬皮病、手足皸裂、精索靜脈曲張、椎一基底動脈供血不足、冠心病、大動脈炎、高血壓頭痛、腦外傷頭痛、三叉神經痛、消化性潰瘍、腸痙攣、輸尿管結石、肩周炎、慢性腹膜炎、腰肌勞損、子宮附件炎、子宮内膜異位症、閉經、痛經、膽囊炎、膽道蛔蟲症、坐骨神經痛、梅尼埃綜合征、過敏性紫癜、慢性荨麻疹、急慢性前列腺炎、附睾炎、縮陰症、陽痿、腱鞘炎。

【加減法】惡心、嘔吐、頭痛者，加吳茱萸、生薑，名當歸四逆加吳茱萸生薑湯；月經不調、痛經、閉經、不孕以及女性皮膚枯黃、唇乾、脫發、貧血、性欲低下者，合溫經湯。

【注意事項】本方有細辛，不用散劑；通草一般不用，不影響全方效果。

* 사역산이나 사역탕과 혼동하기 쉬우니 조심해야 한다.

-----------------------------------------------------------

당귀사역탕

[注论精选]

胡希恕：此为桂枝汤的加减方，故主荣卫不利之外寒。与四逆汤、通脉四逆汤专以里寒为治者大异。此所谓厥寒，亦为伤寒之寒，以示寒之在外，与厥冷不同。本方治冻疮有验，亦由于寒伤于外也（《经方传真》）。

柯韵伯：手足厥寒，脉微欲绝者，阳之虚也，宜四逆辈，脉细欲绝者，血虚不能温于四末，并不能荣于脉也，夫脉为血之府，而阳为阴之先，故欲续其脉必益其血，欲益其血必温具经，方用当归芍药之润以滋之，甘草大枣之甘以养之，桂枝细辛之温以行之，而尤藉通草之人经通脉以续其绝而止其厥（《伤寒来苏集》）。

程门雪：厥寒与厥冷稍异。盖厥冷重而厥寒转轻也。以此证厥逆非少阴亡阳之比，只是血分虚寒，血虚寒束，血中温气不足，故但手足厥寒。寒者不温也，冷者冰冷，寒之甚也。此云厥寒，彼云厥冷，仲景用字，极有斟酌，如此等处，真不可轻易放过，其微奥甚矣。非诸家穿凿之说町比。又亡阳之厥寒，曰脉微欲绝；脉微者，鼓动不显，是明明阳气之衰微也。血虚寒束之厥，则曰脉细欲绝，血少当细，寒主收引亦细，明明血中温气不足，寒邪拘束，脉缩形细而不大也。鼓动无力不显曰微，脉搏形不充缩小曰细；微为阳亡，细为血少。此汤主治脉细欲绝，一字之别，全局所关，岂可不慎思明辨也哉。当归四逆汤大有温荣祛寒通脉之功，投之合度，则厥逆自还为温暖；脉细欲绝，亦得续渐复矣（《书种室歌诀二种》）

-------------------------------------------------------

화폐 공급의 변화는 경기 순환을 유발하지 않는다.

밀턴 프리드먼은 화폐 공급의 변화가 경기 순환을 유발한다고 주장하지만, 경기 순환을 유발하는 것은 화폐 공급율의 변동이 아니라, 허공에서 만들어진 화폐 공급율의 변동이다.

Changes in the Money Supply Don't Cause Business Cycles

•Frank Shostak

According to the Nobel Laureate in Economics, Milton Friedman, the root of the business cycle is the fluctuations in the growth rate of money supply....

Now if economic cycles are caused by fluctuations in money supply growth then it makes a lot of sense to eliminate such fluctuations. In this sense, the constant money growth rate rule seems to be the right remedy to eliminate such cycles.

However, what sets in motion these cycles is not fluctuations in the growth rate of money supply as such, but the fluctuations in the growth rate of money supply generated out of “thin air.” By money “out of thin air” we mean money that is created by the central bank and amplified by fractional reserve lending by commercial banks.

An increase in the money supply out of “thin air” provides a platform for non-productive activities, which consume and add nothing to the pool or real wealth. Money out of “thin air” diverts real wealth from wealth generators to non-wealth generating activities, thus weakening the wealth-generating process.

Once the proportion of non-productive activities from overall activities starts to increase, this tends to put pressure on the profitability of companies. This in turn raises the likelihood of an increase in banks’ bad assets. Consequently, banks expansion of credit through the fractional reserve lending (i.e, the expansion of lending out of “thin air”) is likely to slow down, and this in turn is likely to weaken the growth rate of money supply.

A fall in the growth rate of money out of “thin air” is thereby going to undermine, various non-productive activities that arose from and were supported by the fractional reserve bank lending. This sets in motion an economic downturn. (발췌)

---------------------------------------------------------

2017年03月24日

【노조는 국가와 기업의 재앙】전국노동조합총연맹 김기봉 원장이 밝히는 민노총 이야기

한국석유공사 초대 노조위원장을 지낸 김기봉씨가 '노조는 국가와 기업의 재앙'이라는 책을 펴냈다. 김기봉씨는 최근 민주노총과 한국노총을 싸잡아 비난하며 제3노총 '전국노동조합총연맹' 설립에 기여한 인물이다.

김씨는 양대 노조가 정치판보다 더 야비하고 잔인하게 국가와 기업을 파괴하고 있으며, 특히 현대중공업 노조는 회사가 망하건 말건 자기들만 살겠다고 아우성치고 있다고 질타한다. 또 "하청노동자보다 좋은 환경에서 고임금을 받는 현대차 노조가 파업만 일삼는다. 파업에 대한 대가는 임금 상승이 아니라 공장을 해외로 옮기는 것"이라고 경고한다.

김씨는 박근혜 정부의 노동개혁 정책을 반대했던 문재인 전 민주당 대표를 원색적으로 비난하면서 기업인을 존경할 줄 알고 노동개혁을 추진할 사람이 차기 대통령이 돼야 한다고 강조한다.

https://youtu.be/tUoon-xNp3U

https://youtu.be/CBQzweeug7Q

---> 레닌: 노조는 사회주의를 배우는 학교이다.

--------------------------------------------------------------

앞으로 언론은 구글이나 트위터 등이 검열하게 된다

자유의남신 2016-09-

Mahir Zeynalov 인증된 계정 

‏@MahirZeynalov

Twitter told me that it will block my account at the request of Turkey for "instigating terrorism," putting an end to my ~7-year reporting.

Mahir Zeynalov는 허핑턴포스트와 알아라비아에 기사를 쓰고 있다고 한다.

트위터가 테러를 부추긴다는 터키의 항의를 이유로, 나의 (터키) 계정을 차단해서, 나의 7년간의 기자 생활을 끝냈다.

-------------

앞으로 언론은 구글이나 트위터 등이 검열하게 되고, 그래서 바로잡기가 더 어려워질지도 모른다.

-----> 작년에 본인이 수컷닷컴에 쓴 내용. 하지만 이번의 일베 검색 차단은 구글의 행동이라기 보다는, 정부의 압력이라고 보는 게 타당하다.

--------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

자본주의는 적게 일하고 많이 벌자는 주의이다.

영국의 매트 리들리에 따르면, 경제 발전의 주요 목적은, 우리가 필요한 상품을 생산하기 위해 일해야 하는 시간을 감축하는 것이다.

생산성을 높이는 요소는 첫째로 분업과 교역이고, 두 번째는 기술의 발전과 자본 축적이다.

Capitalism Is About Working Less to Earn More

•Ferghane Azihari

Ferghane Azihari is a law student in Paris at Université Paris-Est Créteil.

In 1800, you had to work, on average, one hour to obtain ten minutes of artificial light. Today, this same hour allows you to buy 300 days of light. In 1900, one kilowatt-hour of electricity cost one hour of work. This costs five minutes of our time now. Buying one cheeseburger in McDonald’s required 30 minutes of hard labor in 1950. This same sandwich now costs about three minutes of your life.

According to British intellectual Matt Ridley, this evolution is the ultimate illustration of wealth in modern societies. In his book The Rational Optimist published in 2010, he evaluates our prosperity by outlining the goods and services we can purchase for the same amount of work. Thus, the main objective of economic development is to reduce the amount of time we have to work in order to produce what we need to live.

This discourse may sound surprising in a world where it is often said that “job creation” is the most important goal of economic policy. But a job is not an end in itself. It is just a means to live better. As Milton Friedman reminds us in this conference dedicated to free trade, we don’t want jobs per se but productive jobs: jobs which enable us to consume goods and services we produce at a minimum expenditure of efforts.

In other words, if working is the price we pay to obtain things we want, then economic progress has always consisted of decreasing this price thanks to perpetual productivity growth. This explains our ability to create more wealth with less and less labor, in order to save time for more valuable activities.

There is nothing secret about the factors which enable us to increase our productivity. The first of them is the division of labor and trade. To better understand the interest of trade, one has to imagine how our condition would be without it. A young Youtuber named Andy George tried to experience the production of a sandwich from scratch.

He made a sandwich by using as little trade and processed products as possible. He had to grow vegetables, produce cheese, make bread, all himself. Of course, he “cheated” a little by using kitchen tools and other “capital goods” which would have been unavailable in a total autarkic economy. But even with this, he spent $1,500 and six months of his life to obtain one sandwich.

Today, it costs a few dollars and mere minutes to buy a sandwich in a supermarket. Free trade is precisely what allows us to obtain an ever more optimal division of labor when it is enabled on a large scale. This division of labor allows us to save time while reducing poverty.

The other factors underlying productivity growth are technical progress and capital accumulation. More efficient instruments, tools, and machines reduce the amount of labor necessary to produce goods and services which increase our well-being. However, these phenomena have always been denigrated in the name of “job protection.”

The most famous historical example of such anxiety is the Luddite movement during the 19th century. Workers from the textile industry in England protested against the spread of better machines. People feared this process would lead to more unemployment and poverty. Of course, this alarmist forecast has been invalided by experience, in accordance with the Shumpeterian theory of creative destruction.

Today, there is among workers and politicians a weird nostalgia for old manufacturing jobs, leading businessmen like Bill Gates to suggest the need to “tax robots.” Weird, because those manufacturing jobs have always been considered alienating for the workers, especially by the socialist intelligentsia. One must, therefore, be thrilled at the idea to get rid of laborious tasks to embrace new opportunities offered by an economy driven by services. As no one is going to regret the time where everyone was working in the fields, there is no reason to fear a decline in manufacturing jobs either.

The process of mechanization benefits the whole of society, generating productivity gains which are redistributed through prices decreasing. Like trade, this process allows us to save time and free production factors and other resources which can be allocated to satisfy other needs which were previously nonexistent or too costly to satisfy. This is why there is no correlation between the decline of manufacturing jobs and unemployment in the OECD.

Capital accumulation and technical progress must, therefore, be acclaimed and not demonized. Of course, this accumulation needs strong institutional prerequisites that modern central banks are not going to like: an environment which protects incentives to accumulate savings in order to invest in more efficient capital goods.

Matt Ridley’s book has the merit to refute all pessimistic speeches which promise us an ever more decadent mankind while humanity has never been as wealthy as it is today. This progress does not imply that we must be satisfied with the current situations to the extent that there are still many things to improve.

Besides, Matt Ridley mentions a few exceptions to the tendency for global prices to decrease in some economic sectors like healthcare and education. This may sound surprising until we remember these activities don’t operate under a free trade regime.

------------------------------------------------------

Forget Peace & Stability - Washington's Policy In The South China Sea Is Confrontational

The US whose coast is 12,000 miles from the South China Sea where its ships zig-zag in ‘Freedom of Navigation’ operations, and its electronic warfare aircraft roam the skies forcing China to activate its mainland defensive radars so that they can be identified as future targets, refuses to sign the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Much of the world believes that the United States, 12,000 miles from the South China Sea, is the country that wants to control it. Methodical strategy might be the way to go about it, but as we have seen in the swathe of nations from Afghanistan to Libya, by way of Iraq and Syria, the strategy of the United States is not methodical. But it is decidedly confrontational. And disastrous. (발췌)

이 글의 필자는 미국의 군사행동에 대해 비판적이지만, 만약 미국이 남중국해에서 발을 뺀다면 동아시아 국가들은 중국에 종속될 수 밖에 없다.

------------------------------------------------------