하얗게 빛나는 원구(圓球)는 무엇이었나?

사학자 닐 퍼거슨

----------------------------------------------------------

 

ian bremmer‏

 

When China becomes largest economy, there isn't a "free market."

 

When US doesn't promote democratic values, there isn't a "free world."

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------

 

유럽은 스스로의 운명을 개척해야 --- 메르켈
--------------------------------------------------------------

 

왜 이슬람주의자들은 자유로운 여성을 두려워하나?

그들에게 해방된 여성보다 더 위험한 존재는 없다.

 

Why do Islamists fear women who are free?

 

Janice Turner

 

 

‘Don’t need permission,” sings Ariana Grande. “Made my decision, to test my limits.” It is her spiritedness, as much as pussycat ears and glittery basques, that draws her young fans. Grande’s tour is called Dangerous Woman. No wonder flicking through What’s On in Manchester it caught Salman Abedi’s eye: to Islamists there is nothing more dangerous than a liberated girl.

--------------------------------------------------------------

 

황황이 말하는 자감초탕

 

자감초탕炙甘草汤은 복맥탕复脉汤으로도 불린다.

본방은 고대 군대의 의사가 상용하던 방제로, 전장에서 군사들이 대량 출혈이 있고, 脉结代、心动悸 등의 증상이 있을 때 사용하던 방제로 추측된다. 서령태徐灵胎는 <난대궤범兰台轨范>에서 자감초탕을 “治血脉空竭”이라 했는데, 정곡을 찌른 말이다.

나(황황)는 이 약을 암 환자가 수술, 화학요법, 방사선 치료 등을 받은 뒤에, 몸이 마르고 가슴이 뛰고 기천(氣喘)하며, 대변이 굳을 때 투여한다. 이때 식욕이 아직 살아 있는 환자는 이 약을 사용할 수 있다.

 

炙甘草汤

 

炙甘草参枣地胶，麻仁麦桂姜酒熬；

益气养阴温通脉，结代心悸肺痿疗。

 

　　炙甘草汤又名复脉汤，在《伤寒论》中主治“伤寒，脉结代，心动悸”。《金匮要略》载《千金翼方》的主治是“治虚痨不足，汗出而闷，脉结代，行动如常，不出百日，危急者十一日死。”《外台》的主治是“治肺痿涎唾多，心中温温液液者。”其方名和主治都不统一。对于仲景的方名而言，以药名作为方名的情况多是小方，如甘草干姜汤，芍药甘草汤、干姜附子汤等。而本方是一张九味药的大方子，不合仲景方名之常例。仲景以药名方，皆方中之主药，其用量也相对要大。

 

但本方炙甘草的量并非最大，只用四两，而生地黄用量却独大，用一斤。由此可见，复脉汤的方名更适合本方。另外，《伤寒论》的条文是否存在脱简，也是一个值得考虑的问题。对此，清代经方家莫枚士也有独特的看法。他在《经方例释》说“疑经文本当云：伤寒脉结代，心动悸，炙甘草汤主之，复脉汤亦主之，且二方互可并治。”并举两个例子来证明。一是《伤寒类要》以一味甘草治疗伤寒脉结代，心动悸。二是《千金》以一味甘草治疗肺痿涎唾多，心中温温液液者。莫氏的观点值得重视。

 

　　关于复脉汤，我想提出个人的一点新的看法。那就是本方的的最初很有可能是古代的一张军医用方。是用于那些在战场上受伤后造成大出血的士兵们的。大量的出血，也同样可出现脉结代、心动悸。方中用大剂量地黄和阿胶就是为了止血。这一点从内补当归建中汤的条文中可以看出：“若去血过多，崩伤内衄不止，加地黄六两、阿胶二两。”黄土汤和胶艾汤都主血证，也都用地黄阿胶，由此类推，可知本方也应主治血证。桂枝甘草取桂枝甘草汤治悸之意。有形之血不能速生，当补以无形之气，人参之用义该如此。大出血致使肌体极度衰弱，故又配合大剂麦冬、麻仁、大枣。为防补药滋腻碍胃，故配生姜。在没有输血补液的古代，这的确也是一首对证之方了。徐灵胎在《兰台轨范》中也说本方“治血脉空竭”，诚可谓是独具慧眼。

 

　　《本经》说地黄“长肌肉”，麦冬主“羸瘦短气”，大枣主“补少气，少津液，身中不足”，麻仁主“补中益气”，甘草“长肌肉，倍力”。这些药物主治的共同点都是其人枯瘦乏力。因此，我在临床上常以此方治疗以肿瘤为代表的恶病质类疾病。肿瘤病人经过手术、化疗、放疗后常常表现形体消瘦干枯，动辄气喘心慌，大便干结，病情进入虚痨阶段。此时只要食欲尚佳者都可用本方。我的经验是：治疗食道癌时，麦冬要用６０克或更多，呕吐者加半夏；肺癌还应加天冬４０克、甘杞子１５克；心悸甚者加龙骨、牡蛎，桂枝再加量；贫血时加鹿角胶。便秘者用麻仁，不寐者，可改为酸枣仁。另外，我还以此方治疗肺气肿，多加山萸肉３０克、五味子１０克、龙骨２０克。冬季服者，可以熬成膏剂。

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

調理心臟“偷停”的炙甘草湯

 

 

作者：羅大倫

 

於是，回去翻書，結果翻開《傷寒論》，裡面說：脈結代、心動悸，炙甘草湯主之。

 

這個心動悸就是我當時的感受，大家容易理解，脈結代，這是兩種脈象，結脈，《傷寒論》說：“脈來緩，時一止複來者，名曰結脈”，意思是跳動緩慢，同時經常停止一下的，叫結脈；代脈是跳動得快，同時經常停止一下的。總之，只要是經常偷停的，張仲景就用這個炙甘草湯來調理。

 

原來，炙甘草湯的組成是炙甘草、生薑、桂枝、人參、生地黃、阿膠、麥門冬、火麻仁、大棗。

 

這個方子具體的作用是：益氣滋陰，通陽複脈。

    

主治範圍是，氣陰兩虛，心脈失養證。脈結代，心動悸，虛羸少氣，舌光少苔，或質乾而瘦小者。　

 

 

原來大家都以為火麻仁在這裡面是潤燥的，通大便，因為火麻仁有通便的作用，很多古代的醫家都是這麼認為的，有的人甚至認為這個火麻仁可以去掉。後來我偶然看美國人的科研報告（這裡就看出學英文的好處了），結果發現美國人也在研究火麻仁，他們研究的結果顯示，火麻仁有修復受損的心肌細胞的作用。

 

 

這下就全明白了，為什麼這個方子裡面用火麻仁，為什麼它可以治療心肌炎，因為它有這個作用，我看到這個報告後，才明白我們的老祖宗早就知道它是治療心臟用的，所以在這個方子裡面加入了，意味深長啊，是我們後人笨，反而認為它只會通大便潤腸了

 

另外，我再講點題外話，我們的《黃帝內經》裡面，有這樣的話：五穀為養、五果為助、五畜為益、五菜為充等等的。我們大家一直認為這就是說營養學的內容的，講我們吃什麼好的，其實，這都是沒有明白裡面真正的道理。

 

陶弘景的《輔行訣》裡面說：“經雲：毒藥攻邪，五菜為充，五果為助，五穀為養，五畜為益，爾乃大湯之設。”

 

什麼意思，原來，在最早的中醫方劑的書《伊尹湯液》裡面，很多方子是叫“大湯”，意思是正式的方子，這是中藥方的最早的形態，是非常正式的，正規的，每個方子非常的講究，方子裡面用藥物來治病，這叫“毒藥攻邪”。同時，用其他的食物來輔助藥物，行藥力，護正氣，每個方子裡面必須要用到菜、穀、果、肉，來起到這些作用，比如炙甘草湯，我認為它一定是《伊尹湯液》裡面的方子，因為它有大湯的建制，比如，菜是生薑、穀是清酒（是穀物釀制的）、果是大棗、畜是阿膠（動物皮熬制的）。(발췌)

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

黃煌：為啥多病的長壽，沒病的早死？

황황: 왜 병을 달고 사는 사람은 장수하고, 무병한 사람은 일찍 죽나?
명사들의 건강 장수 비결은?
 

 

7、平常心才長壽，攀比心最折壽

 

養生先養心，這是中國傳統的養生理念。養心，就是調整心態，尤其是日常生活的心態，是一種世界觀、價值觀、榮辱觀、幸福觀。心態好，就長壽，心態不好，就生病。

 

唐代大詩人白居易活了74歲，遠遠超過了李白和杜甫，儘管他體質很弱，但心態很好。樂觀、自娛，對物質的追求看得很淡。有詩為證：

 

自靜其心延壽命，無求於物長精神。

 

國民黨元老陳立夫先生2001年2月8日去世，終年101歲。其養生48字訣為：

 

養身在動，養心在靜，

 

飲食有節，起居有時，

 

物熟始食，水沸始飲，

 

多食果菜，少食肉類，

 

頭部宜冷，足部宜熱，

 

知足常樂，無求乃安。

 

著名的佛學大師、中國佛教協會會長趙朴初於2000年5月21日逝世，享年93歲。他在92歲時作《寬心謠》一首：

 

日出東海落西山，愁也一天，喜也一天；

 

遇事不鑽牛角尖，人也舒坦，心也舒坦；

 

每月領取養老錢，多也喜歡，少也喜歡；

 

少葷多素日三餐，粗也香甜，細也香甜；

 

新舊衣服不挑揀，好也禦寒，賴也禦寒；

 

常與知己聊聊天，古也談談，今也談談；

 

內孫外孫同樣看，兒也喜歡，女也喜歡；

 

全家老少互慰勉，貧也相安，富也相安；

 

早晚操勞勤鍛鍊，忙也樂觀，閒也樂觀；

 

心寬體健養天年，不是神仙，勝似神仙。

 

看看當今，和別人比較，已經成為經濟社會中人們生活的一種習慣方式，而比來比去，你總不可能是第一。生活的累，一小半源於生存，一大半源於攀比。俗話說，人比人，氣死人。比來比去，總達不到自己理想的狀態，於是厭世，於是頹廢，於是抑鬱，於是想到自殺。所以，很多疾病大多與心境有關，古人說：「自身有病自心知，身病還將心自醫」。

 

人在當今世上，說不比是不可能的。但關鍵是如何比較，與什麼比較？我說，對於在職的中青年人來說，不比財富，不比地位，要比知識的占有量，要比對社會的貢獻，要比人格的修養。對退休的老年人來說，不比財富，不比身體，要比快樂、比輕鬆、比誰活得自在。「高薪不如高壽，高壽不如高興」。발췌

 

--------------------------------------------------------------  

 

 

 

사설] 비정규직 95%가 中企인데 "재벌 반성하라"니

 

 

새 정부는 비정규직 문제가 재벌이나 보수 정부 때문에 생긴 것인 양 말하고 있다. 그러나 비정규직 제도는 '파견근로자보호법'을 만든 김대중 정부 때 도입됐고, 노무현 정부의 '비정규직보호법'은 취지와 달리 도리어 비정규직을 양산했다. 다른 사람들에게 반성하라고 할 일이 아니다. 새 정부의 비정규직 대책이 지금 식으로 가면 문제를 더 꼬이게 만들 가능성이 있다. 전체의 95%인 중소기업 비정규직에 초점을 맞추고 먼저 동일 노동, 동일 임금부터 정착시켜 나가야 한다. (조선일보, 발췌)

 

-----------------------------------------------------------
 

 

NassimNicholasTaleb‏

 

아래 그림은 소수에 편중된 부를 보여주고 있다. 하지만 마치 이들이 전체에 부를 보탰다기 보다는, 다른 사람들의 것을 빼앗은 듯이 보여주고 있다.

 富는 지대(地代) 착취가 아니다! 

 

They show concentration of of wealth among a few: as if these TOOK away from others rather than ADDED to the pot

Wealth ≠ Rent Seeking !

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------  

   

 

NassimNicholasTaleb‏

 

Most "humanities" profs have minimal erudition; they spent their time studying THEORIES made by other profs.

Universities killed humanities

 

대부분의 인문대 교수들은 최소의 지식을 지니고 있다: 그들은 다른 교수들이 만든 이론을 공부하는데 시간을 허비했다.

대학들이 인문학을 죽였다.

 

----------------------------------

 

------------------------------------------------

 

 파리 기후 협약에 반대하는 과학적 논거

 

The Scientific Argument against the Paris Climate Agreement

 

 

 

By Patrick J. Michaels

 

 

This article appeared in the The Hill (Online) on May 25, 2017.

 

 

 

Last May, Donald Trump vowed to “cancel the Paris climate agreement.” It was a scripted remark in a prepared text, an unusual speech for the then-presidential candidate.

 

Since then, he has reportedly been under pressure from his daughter Ivanka — who has set up an intensive review process on climate change policy — along with her husband Jared Kushner and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to remain in the deal. But Ivanka’s left-leaning tendencies have likely colored her choice of scientists allowed into the discussions.

 

All of this ignores a heretofore unrecognized fact: The Paris Agreement is based upon a fundamental misconception of climate history and science. The objective is to hold temperatures to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, and to “pursue efforts” to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

 

The key misconception is that all of the warming since the Industrial Revolution — 0.9 degrees Celsius — is a result of human activity.

 

Hardly. Since the beginning of reliable global temperature records in the late 19th century, there have been two periods of significant warming that are statistically indistinguishable in magnitude. The first period ran from 1910 through about 1945, with a temperature increase of around 0.5 degrees Celsius. There could only be minimal human influence on this period, simply because humans had not emitted very much carbon dioxide.

 

After a slight cooling, the second one began sometime around 1976 and ended with the big 1998 El Nino. This period was likely in part due to a greenhouse effect.

 

The reason this period was affected by greenhouse warming is because the lower stratosphere cooled at the same time, which is a prediction of greenhouse theory. If, as some people maintain, “it’s all the sun,” then the whole atmosphere would warm.

 

Interestingly, when the lower atmospheric warming paused after 1998, the stratosphere also stopped cooling. What’s happening now is quite unclear as surface temperatures are constantly being readjusted.

 

So, after allowing for a small bit of other influence on the second warming, we’re left with the notion that the maximum warming caused by humans is somewhere between 0.4 and 0.5 degrees Celsius — half of the total since the Industrial Revolution.

 

This has huge implications. If, as the Paris Agreement erroneously assumes, all of the warming of 0.9 degrees is a result of human activity, there is no way that the aspirational goal of 1.5 degrees can ever be met. Thanks to the huge thermal inertia of the ocean, current models show there’s between 0.4 degrees and 0.6 degrees of warming on the way, even if emissions were capped at 2000 levels.

 

That’s a total of 1.5 degrees already guaranteed. Meeting the 2 degrees objective allows only an additional half of a degree in wiggle room. The Paris Agreement only mitigates about 0.2 degrees of warming. Again, believing in those models, that would be an additional warming of over 2 degrees Celsius this century.

 

So according to the United Nation’s own climate models, it is scientifically impossible. President Trump, that’s grounds enough to withdraw.

 

On top of that, the models that form the basis of the Paris Agreement are predicting way too much warming in the lower atmosphere, and erroneously predicting a dramatic warming of the upper atmosphere over the tropics. Most precipitation on earth is a result of the temperature difference between the lower layers and what’s aloft.

 

Get that wrong, which the climate models do systematically, and the models are of very little utility.

 

There are other, more reality-based approaches to estimating future warming, and these point to a 21st century increase of closer to 1.4 degrees Celsius. Adding that to the maximum human contribution to-date of 0.5 degrees yields 1.9 degrees, meeting the Paris objective without the Paris Agreement.

 

President Trump, that’s also grounds enough to withdraw.

 

Patrick J. Michaels

is director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------

자유주의자들이 전통적인 우파들의 관심 영역인 복지 개혁, 감세, 학교 선택권, 사유재산권, 유럽연합에 대한 회의 등에 집중할 때, 그들은 대처나 레이건처럼 놀라운 성과를 얻을 수 있다.

  

Daniel Hannan         

 

------------------------------------------------------------

 

인도의 마스타나마라는 할머니가 화제이다. 들판에서 자연에서 얻은 재료들로 요리를 하는데, 그녀의 나이는 무려 106살이라고 한다. 그녀가 무슨 특별한 외국의 장수 식품이나 노화 방지 식품을 먹은 건 아니다. 그냥 인도의 전통 음식을 먹고 살았을 것이다. 그녀가 추천하는 요리는 카레이다. 어제도 말했지만, 장수나 노화 예방은 무슨 특별한 음식을 먹어서 이뤄지는 게 아니다. 그보다는 전통적인 음식에 마음의 평화와 안정이 무엇보다 중요하다.

 

106-year-old grandma becomes a cooking sensation on YouTube

Mastanamma, now 106 years old, has 2,48,000 subscriber on YouTube. 

----------------------------------------------------------------

JPMorgan: "Large Parts Of Society Are Not Seeing Any Growth In Income And Job Opportunities At All"

 

 

"Large parts of society are not seeing any growth in income and job opportunities at all and thus demand change... the anger of those left behind by slow and stable growth could lead to more populist measures that eventually give us both less stability and less growth."

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

미국은 중국과 리더십을 나눌 준비를 해야 한다. 압력을 받고 할 수 없이 양보하기 보다는, 미래를 기획하면서 사려 깊게 양보하는 게 낫다.

 

How America Could End Up In An Unexpected War With China

 

Doug Bandow

May 24, 2017

 

 

"...the PRC might not be an ally, but there is no reason it should be an enemy. Yet attempting to dominate and contain China risks turning it into an angry and well-armed adversary. Instead, Washington should prepare to share global leadership. Far better to yield thoughtfully while shaping the future than to be forced to concede even more under pressure."

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------