--------------------------------------------------------------------
▲ 선거제·공수처 패스트트랙을 저지하기 위한 자유한국당의 국회 점거가 자정을 넘어서까지 계속되고 있는 가운데 26일 새벽 국회본청 의안과 앞에서 국회 관계자가 해머로 문을 두드리고 있다. ⓒ데일리안 홍금표 기자
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
이해찬
정조가 1800년에 돌아가셨다. 그 이후 219년 동안, 김·노 전(前) 대통령 10년과 문 대통령 2년 등 12년을 빼놓고 전부 일제강점기거나 독재거나 아주 극우적인 세력에 의해 이 나라가 통치돼 왔다. 운동장이 기울어져 있는 게 아니라, 벼랑 끝에 평화·민주 세력이 겨우 손만 잡고 있는 형상이다.
--->거의 정신병자 수준의 역사 인식. 한국의 폴포트가 될 수 있는 자격이 충분하다.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
최저시급 인상으로 전체적인 물가인상
쪼개기 알바로 알바로 먹고살던
서민층들은 수입이 도리어 줄어듦
여기에 무슨 알바가 수십대 1의 경쟁률인
미친 나라를 만들어 버렸다
상위계층은 10.4% 임금이 인상됬지만
하위계층은 무려 17.7% 임금이 급감
경제학자들이 주구장창 최저임금 인상은
서민들의 숨통을 옥쬔다고 그렇게들 이야기했는데
계속 기다리고만 하더니 결과는 결국 이렇게 나옴
더 최악인건 시간대비 생산성도 국제사회에서
떨어지는걸로 유명한데 여기에 주 52시간에
최저임금 주휴수당까지 다 붙여버려서
중견.대기업들은 다 해외로 이전해버림
베트남은 월 35~50이면 근로자 채용가능함
일베에서 존나게 까던 좆소는 사람도 뽑지 않음
그나마 폐업 러쉬중이고.........
ㄹㅇ 딱 그 정부에 그 국민수준이다
[출처] 최저시급 인상하면 서민이 잘 산다는 병신들은 이 기사를 봐라.........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
탄핵관련 첫 사죄하는 배보윤 전 헌법재판소 공보관(변호사회관)20190425(목)[선구자방송
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
화웨이는 직원들의 소유가 아니라 중국 국가 소유이다.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
삼성이 향후 10년간 1150억 달러를 투자해 로직 칩을 개발하려고 한다. 중국이 메모리 칩으로 추격하니까, 중국의 추격을 따돌리려면 새로운 길을 모색할 수 밖에 없다.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
국가 세금으로 사관학교부터
장군까지
전투한번 안하고 나이롱뽕 군생할
퇴역후 거액년금 쳐받어며
이쑤시개 쑤시면서
나라가 어떻고 저떻고
뒤에서 들개무리처럼 짖기만 하는
개쓰레기 집단이
예비역 장성들이라는
역적도당
야이 씨발놈들아
지금 최전방이 무너지는데
뭐하고 자빠져있냐?
이럴려고 니들 세금으로
쳐멕여 여자껏 살린줄 아느냐?
조국에진빚
지금
니들 목숨으로 갚아라
피흘릴때 흘려야 하지
아가리 마이크 장군이 뭔소용?
좌파보다
부랄만긁는
니들이 더밉다
이게 우국충정
보수냐?
들개무리보다 못한
쓰레기 새끼들
인민군 남침점령후
전부
공개총살
고사포로 갈기갈기 찢어갈겨야
정신 차릴레!!!!!
[출처] 군인이 아니라 인민군 개돼지 사육한거네
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[서지문 칼럼] 보수는 영원히 좌파의 숙주인가?
김종문 2019-04-26 11:43:17
(속보)김정은 급변사태돌입하나??블라디방문일정 전격취소! 급히 평양돌아간다!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
☆ 미스 트롯 준결승 2위 정미애 6 곡☆
개인적으로 미스트롯 중에 최고의 가창력
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
어린이들을 겁주는 짓을 구만 두어야 한다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
전체 그린하우스 가스 중에 3.62%만이 이산화탄소이다.
전체 이산화탄소 중에 3.4%만이 인간에 의해 만들어졌다.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
그것은 분권화된 네트워크이다.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
정치적 권력집중이 로마 공화국을 붕괴시켰다.
연방주의와 정치적 분리에 대한 지지를 조롱하는 사람들은 역사의 교훈을 무시하고 있다.
분권화가 혼란과 살육을 야기할 거라고 말하지만, 그와 반대로 로마 제국은 정치적 집중화로 인해 혼란과 살육을 맞았다.
고결한 카토는 로마인들이 두려워할 대상은 야만인들이 아니라, 야만인들을 물리친 카이사르 같은 존재라고 경고했다.
카이사르는 몇 가지 개혁을 통해 이전까지 자율성을 누리는 지방 정부를 단일한 국가로 변화시켰다.
카이사르는 사치법을 통과시켜 시민들이 살 수 있는 상품을 제한했고, 자신에 대한 반대를 뿌리 뽑기 위해 정치를 논하던 전문 길드를 불법화했다.
Political Centralization Ended the Roman Republic
Dave Benner
Those that passionately advocate for political decentralization are often portrayed as fringe carpers whose ideas are entirely unworthy of consideration. Indeed, the mainstream media and ruling class has repeatedly alleged that events like Brexit and Calexit would cause chaotic political shifts, and routinely deem supporters of such causes radical extremists or “Neo Confederates.” Many such individuals ascribe religious qualities to modern political unions, and denigrate anyone who dares to argue that political arrangements serve a utilitarian – rather than a sacramental – function.
Tactlessly, those who deride the supporters of federalism and political fragmentation imperil us all by ignoring the lessons of history. Candid scholars, on the other hand, recognize that several junctures from the past contradict the orthodox narrative against disunion and decentralized government. One such case was the demise of the Roman Republic, where it was actually the marked transition to political consolidation that caused the very chaos and bloodshed we are always told decentralization will bring.
In the decades prior to the end of the republic, citizens celebrated the Rome’s military might and European conquest. Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, better known as Pompey the Great, used his uncanny military acumen to put down a series of slave rebellions known as the Servile Wars. An attempt to overthrow the Roman Republic, the Catiline Conspiracy, was swiftly exposed and suppressed by the Roman army. The subjugation of Gaul was completed in 52 BC, and Rome was the strongest power on earth. Roman patriotism among the plebian class was at an all-time high.
Through it all, the virtuous Cato cautioned that it was not the barbarians that Romans had to fear, but the one man who achieved such prestige as the result of their downfall – Gaius Julius Caesar. Claiming that Caesar sought only to elevate himself in political stature and usurp the power of the republic, Cato pleaded his fellow senators to curtail his political privileges, and eventually, to declare him an outlaw and confront him militarily. If left unopposed, he thought, Caesar would place all authority within the republic in his own hands.
And centralize Caesar did. Bestowed with the privileges of a dictator – a ruler with near unlimited power – he quickly made use of his newfound authority. A friend the plebian class, Caesar developed a cult of personality that allowed him to stretch his authority beyond all imaginable limits. Without Pompey in his way, there was little to stop him from doing so.
In one of his most significant acts as dictator, Caesar imposed several reforms that transformed the republic from a fragmented series of provinces into a single, unitary state. Prior to this overhaul, Rome’s provinces retained a substantial amount of autonomy. Italy especially had been a mosaic of independent regions and cultures, and its unification was consummated only through brutally accelerated violence, confiscation of property, and civil war.
During his dictatorship, Caesar often made unilateral decisions behind closed doors, and issued edicts as if they had been adopted by the Roman Senate through legitimate constitutional processes. During his absences from Rome, his two non-senatorial advisors, Oppius and Balbus, also wielded unprecedented power. In the words of esteemed Roman scholar Ronald Syme, Caesar’s ascension was characterized by an elevation to supreme and personal rule, and the rise of a national, transformed Roman state.
Because the Senate had been depleted in the wake of the civil war between Pompey and Caesar, the dictator made hundreds of new appointments, filling the assembly with Caesarian partisans who zealously backed his vision for political consolidation. Many of them were notoriously corrupt, and engaged in rampant extortion. Caesar eventually assumed the power to appoint all magistrates of the republic, effectively transitioning them from representatives of the people to fervent supporters of himself.
Caesar also passed a sumptuary law, limiting the citizens’ ability to purchase and consume various goods. He also planned grandiose construction projects, including a temple to himself known as the Forum of Caesar. Perhaps most significantly, though, he outlawed Rome’s professional guilds – associations that openly debated political topics of their day. Doing so, he believed, would root out all remaining opposition to the Caesarian regime.
In a move that was absolutely unprecedented in the Roman Republic, Caesar established a police force for the first time. For centuries, Roman cities and neighborhoods effectively policed themselves, and the patronage system that linked patricians with the plebeians protected the safety of the people. With the dictator’s climb to power, however, the iron hand of the enforcement state – which would be later expanded by Augustus – was established for the first time.
Despondent were those who resisted Caesar’s treacherous reign until the bitter end. Cato famously plunged his own sword into himself rather than live under Caesar’s unitary rule over Rome. The age’s best-known orator, Cicero, refused to join Caesar in the First Triumvirate because he believed it would undermine the republic and lead to the accumulation of too much power. In his last days, he condemned the dictator, sympathized with those that assassinated him, and worked to obstruct his successors. Though the Liberators that assassinated Caesar remained convinced that the republic’s traditions and customs must be preserved at all costs, they too fell prey to military alliance between Mark Antony and Octavian.
The path to Roman centralization was only made possible, however, because of a sizable political shift that transpired during the prior generation. Indeed, the undertakings of Lucius Cornelius Sulla did much to lay the groundwork for Caesar’s rise.
It was Sulla, after all, that first rallied his army to march on Rome in an unprecedented act of treason. After his military successes, he implemented an array of reforms to the Roman Constitution, including a revival of the malignant proscription system – which authorized the type of political purges Mark Antony and Augustus utilized and build upon. Additionally, it was Sulla that revived the dictatorship – where a single individual was granted near unlimited power over the state. In a manner that Caesar and Augustus came to emulate, Sulla achieved political prominence through military strength and political domination rather than republican virtue.
All of these factors, in combination, played crucial roles in the demise of the Roman Republic – a system of limited and divided political power, where the proclivities of the ambitious were at one time hindered by traditional restraints. In our contemporary age, where the number of potential Caesars has grown exponentially, it behooves us to avoid the pitfalls of political centralization and the calamity it has wrought upon western civilization.
-------------------------------------------------
마지막으로 보수의 각성을 염원하다 하셨는데 제 생각에 그것은 불가능합니다.
왜냐하면 국민은 물론이고 대부분의 언론종사자와 우리사회의 지식인이라는 대학교수들 조차도
자유민주주의적 가치가 무엇인지 그리고 무엇을 지켜야 하는지 잘 모르기 때문입니다.
선생이 모르고 언론이 모르는데 무엇을 어떻게 각성합니까?
교수님께 질문드리죠
미국의 뉴욕타임즈와 CNN이 자유민주적 가치를 실현하는 언론인가요?
전 아니라고 생각합니다.
그런데 우리 언론, 그 중에 보수라는 조중동은 이들의 기사를 마치 참인것 처럼 비판없이 의심없이 퍼트립니다.
교수님은 사회주의자들의 화두인 "모두가 평등하게 잘사는 세상"이 현실에서 "지옥으로 가는 길"임을 얼마나 설득력있게 설명할 수 있나요?