조국의 '보상받았어도 손해배상 청구 가능하다' 발언. 법학교수 맞나?
--->조국 같은 쓰레기가 대학, 그것도 한국 최고라는 서울대학의 교수라는 게 한국의 수준을 보여준다.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
난민이라면 이웃 국가로 급하게 피신을 해야한다. 그런데 비행기가 아니면 올 수 없는 머나먼 한국으로 피난을 왔다고? 난민이 아니라 이민이다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"좌파의 모순은 다들 노동자가 아닌 노조위원장이 꿈이라는 데 있다"
누구 말일까요?
누구 말일까요?
대학교 1학년 당시 제가 인문대 좌익 운동권 선배들 앞에서 한 말입니다.
노동자가 주인이 되는 세상,
노동해방 떠드는데,
잘 들어보면,
결국 노동자가 되겠다는 게, 아니라,
노조위원장이 되겠다는 겁니다.
노동을 팔아먹는데, 실제 노동에 대해 아무 관심도 없고
기술연마도 하지 않는게 말이 되냐는 거지요.
이게 사실 계급타파를 주장하면서
실제 공산당의 막강한 계급사회를 만들게 되는
좌파의 이론적 실질적 모순인 거지요. --------- 변희재
---->좌파의 모순은 좌파 지식인들이 좌파 전체주의국가에서 노동자가 아니라, 관리자가 되려는데 있다.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
경찰총장을 대머리에 우산을 든 사람으로 묘사한 이유.
대머리를 한자로 無發라고 쓰는데, 이는 無法와 음이 같다. 우산은 하늘을 가리는 도구이며, 하늘의 순리, 천도(天道)를 위배한다는 의미.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
중국이 법적 수단을 이용해, 세계의 정보 흐름을 통제하고 있다.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
중국이 캄보디아의 시아누크빌 해군 기지에 사용권을 따냈다!
Jeremy Page 裴杰
China will build 2 new piers at Cambodia's Ream naval base, according to early draft of secret deal. U.S.-funded facilities to be relocated. Ream also attracted great power interest in Cold War: U.S. bombed it in 1975 and Soviets helped repair it in 1980s.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
60년 동안 목욕을 하지 않은 이란인. 어쩌면 이란처럼 건조한 곳이라서 가능했던 듯.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
문화혁명 시대에 토호를 타도하던 상황을 재연하는 중국의 초등학생들.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
모든 주사파는 역사의 뒤안길로 사라져야!_190719이슈 1.주사파 대부 김영환씨 자유한국당 영입 반대 이유
2.일본 문제의 간단한 해법_
김미영 원장 /[전환기의 세계보기]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
큰일 났다!!! 한국 영토에 북한군 주둔!!!
(다반뉴스) / 신의한수 19.07.22
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
나치가 공산주의자가 되거나 그 반대의 경우는 잘 알려져 있다. 그들의 행태는 그들이 밀접하게 관련되어 있다는 것을 보여준다. 그들 모두의 공통의 적(敵)은 낡은 자유주의자들이었다.
---나치를 극우라고 하는데, 그렇지 않고 좌파의 일종이라고 하는 말이다. 나치를 극우라고 주장하는 건 좌파들의 선전선동이다. 나치는 좌파의 한 분파일 뿐이다.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
미국의 대통령들을 조각한 러시모어 산의 반대편이라는데, 왜 굳이 몸을 조각했는지 모르겠다!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
문죄인 정부가 소주성 정책으로 경제가 망가지고, 그 분노가 정부를 향해 폭발하려 하자, 한일 갈등을 증폭시켜, 국민의 불만을 일본에 전가하려 한다는 주장.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
로마인들은 기술을 과학으로 착각하지 않았다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
사회 구성주의는 어떻게 성 중독 모델을 만들었나?
How Social Constructionism Created the Sex Addiction Model
Michael Aaron
Imagine it is the year 1965, in frozen Winnipeg, Manitoba. Two twin boys are scheduled for routine circumcisions. Using an unconventional practice known as cauterization, one of the boy’s penises was accidentally burned beyond repair. Dispirited and confused, the boys’ parents were watching late night television one evening when a charming, well-spoken psychologist appeared on the air. Sexologist John Money claimed he had discovered, through his “theory of gender neutrality,” that gender was a complete social construct, created entirely through social learning. Emboldened, the parents contacted Dr. Money, who ordered sex reassignment surgery for the injured boy, and instructed his parents to raise him as a girl. Because this surgery occurred at such as young age, the (now) girl would never realize she had once been a boy and would live her life as a normal female.
Money touted the success of his work, publishing extensively on his triumphant results. However, eventually the truth came out. The young boy never acclimated to being a girl, and eventually as an adult sought to transition back to being a male. In 1997, the boy, now an adult named David Reimer, confided his story to sexologist Milton Diamond, who encouraged him to go public with his story. In the end, the story ended tragically. Money was disgraced, while David Reimer committed suicide in 2004, never having recovered from the trauma suffered under the hands of Dr. Money. This sad, tragic case is detailed in the wonderful book As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl for anyone looking for more information and a painful, yet powerful read.
Let’s move now to early 1970s Los Angeles, California. UCLA researchers George Rekers and Ivar Lovaas pioneered an experimental new type of treatment to literally “knock out” the effeminate behavior of young “sissy boys” through the use of severe corporal punishment. Like Money before them, they triumphantly published their successful findings in 1974 in the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology under the title “The Behavioral Treatment of a ‘Transsexual’ Preadolescent Boy.” They concluded, “This treatment holds promise for correcting pathological gender identity development and for relieving the associated emotional adjustment problems.” This “successfully” treated boy, now a grown man of 38 named Kirk Murphy, committed suicide in 2003 due to feeling “broken” by his participation in the research.
These are just two examples of the horrors of a scientific enterprise influenced by a purely social constructionist ideology. Despite all this, social constructionism is still alive and well, influencing both the social sciences and public policy. Take a look at this article for example about an elementary school teacher who pushes her female students to play with Legos, while forbidding her male students to do the same, all in the name of “gender equity.”
So what does all of this have to do with sex addiction? Plenty. Sociologist Janice Irvine, in her book Disorders of Desire: Sexuality and Gender in Modern American Sexology meticulously details the rise of the social construction of desire to the same 1970s period in which all of these other troubling experiments were conducted. In a chapter appropriately entitled “Regulated Passions,” she persuasively argues that both “inhibited sexual desire,” pushed by Helen Singer Kaplan and sex addiction were both offsprings of the cultural belief that sexuality is a social construct, one that can be controlled, modified, and neatly packaged according to the social norms and mores of the time. Indeed, the very first sex addiction 12-step group, Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous (SLA) met in Boston in 1977.
In the case of sex addiction, we have a perfect storm of psychiatrists, psychotherapists, and other assorted mental health professionals trying to fit sexual behavior into a socially constructed paradigm of monogamy, pair bonding, and yes, even intimacy. Famed sociologist Anthony Giddens, in his book The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies carefully points out that the notion of romantic love and intimacy dates back only to the late 1700s. In this analysis, the author concludes, “It is an interesting idea that romantic love is a product of modernity – or, at least, was accompanied with the process of modernization. Giddens assumes that romantic love ‘began to make its presence felt from the late eighteenth century onward’ (39) and that it is associated with ‘romance,’ not only as a literature genre of novel but also as a form of storytelling in which self is narrated. For Giddens, in the pre-modern era there was no intimacy in love relationship. Romantic love based upon intimacy was impossible in the social environment where ‘most marriages were contracted, not on the basis of mutual sexual attraction, but economic circumstance'(38). It is within this socially constructed narrative of romantic love that the sex addiction model was hatched and grown.
Now that we’ve taken a look at what social constructionism has to offer us, let’s now take a closer look at science. My colleague Chris Ryan, in his book Sex at Dawn, makes a very compelling case for the idea that prehistoric people were much more sexually active and “promiscuous” than we may have realized. He details a lot of facts including the size and shape of the human penis, research demonstrating the real case for ‘sperm wars‘ and concealed ovulation as all prime examples of evidence towards non-monogamy. These are all theories. Compelling theories, but theories nonetheless. However, we also have some very concrete DNA evidence to point the way.
According to famed psychologist Roy Baumeister, DNA research indicates that historically 80% of women have reproduced, while only 40% of men have managed to do same. In other words, throughout history, most men have not managed to reproduce. Another study found that something happened about 8,000 years ago in which 17 women reproduced for every one man! Yes, 17 to 1! Such research seems to indicate that ancient society was polygynous (much like gorillas), while others such as Ryan argue in favor of polyandry (like bonobos), but these controversies, although certainly important, still agree on one salient point: human civilization has historically been non-monogamous.
How does sex addiction fit into this narrative? If homo sapiens were truly monogamous creatures, we would sure be the outliers when it comes to the animal kingdom. According to this article, of about 5,000 total mammalian species, only 3-5% are “socially monogamous,” which means they pair bond. However, when these species are examined for their DNA, researchers find that only 5 total species in the entire animal kingdom are truly monogamous, or “genetically monogamous,” meaning they never have sex with other animals outside of their pair bond. Here are the five purely monogamous animals: the California mouse, Kirk’s dik-dik (a small antelope), the Malagasy giant jumping rat, pack-living coyotes, and the fifth, newly discovered one, the owl monkey. Mice, rats, and dik-diks, oh my!
Coming back to the issue of sex addiction, we are still left with the unanswered question of what kind of sex and at which frequency is sex normal. Unfortunately, due its social constructionist and morally biased lenses, the sex addiction model has no answers. Look, I know there are people out there who feel out of control or compulsive with their sexuality. Research indicates that for these folks, other issues, ranging from OCD to religiosity, to yes, high sex drive are more correlated to their subjective experiences than some actual kind of addiction process. And if the sex addiction folks just stuck with these sort of clients, they would never have been able to manufacture an entire sex addiction industry, complete with dozens of ultra expensive inpatient treatment facilities. The only way a treatment becomes an industry is when its scope creeps to include anyone who is having the kind of sex that someone (either the individual or family member) deems to be a problem.
And unfortunately, that problem is usually one which is socially constructed, rather than scientifically valid.
Michael Aaron is the author of Modern Sexuality: The Truth About Sex and Relationships, and a psychotherapist in private practice in New York City. Visit his website at www.drmichaelaaronnyc.com and follow him on Twitter @MichaelAaronPhD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기