(질본)확진자수 1천명 돌파 비밀 ARABOJA 골든보이가즈아 http://www.ilbe.com/view/11358309087 1. 검사 인원수 폭증 시켜→ 확진자 천명대로 떡상 시켰다는말 떠돌았는데 2. 구체적 숫자. 즉 검사인원수 일별 현황을 질본에서 공개 안했는데 3. 유튜브 강미은TV에서 한 회원이 일일이 손으로 입력 밝혀냄 ※(질본이 검사자수 일자별 인원 현황추이 공개안해서 강미은TV 회원이 일일이 손으로 떠서 만든거라 약간 차이가 있을수있다) 일단 보자 4. 먼저 일자별 검사인원수 확진자수 감염률 현황 머 대충 이런식이다. 알겠지 확진자수 대략 500명대에서 6백명정도 나온다 5월달도 비슷하고 6월도 비슷하지 6월중순부터 감염률이 1프로대 . 확진자수는 비슷 드디어 6월 28. 29일 재검표가 끝나고 밖에서 부정선거투표지 가 나왔다는 소식이 들리기 시작한다 갑자기 6월30일 부터 감염자수가 7백명 후반대를 오르내리고 감염자 많이 나온다 방송에서 떠들고 일주일 뒤 7월 6 .7일을 기점으로 검사자수를 8만명후반대로 올려버린다. 7월 8일9.10일은 드디어 검사인원 풀가동 11만대를 넘나든다 ㅡ주말은 검사자수가 줄고 7월 13일 14일부터는 검사인원을 13만명 14만명 미친듯이 돌리기 시작힌다. ㅡ딱2주만에 검사인원수를 2배로 떡상시킨것이다 ㅡ즉 감염률은 1프로 초반대로 비슷한데 6월달 6만명 7만명일대는 감염자수가 6백명 7백명인데 ㅡ7월달 13만명 14만명 씩 조져버리니까 당연히 1천3백명 1천6백명 나와버리는거다. ㅡ검사수 백만명씩 조져버리면 확진자수 1만명씩 찍어버리겠지 ㅡ이런식으로 확진자수 천명대 돌파시키고 시민들 겁주고 ㅡ검사인원수 비교못하게 일자별 현황은 절대 공개 못하고 ㅡ확진자수만 미친듯이 공개 ※확진자수를 관리 하고 있다는 흥미로운 수치가 있는데 검사인원수가 적은날에는 감염률이 확올라간다 주말이나 적은날 가령 맨마지막 7월26일 6만명이지 .그때는 감염률이 2.17프로를 뚫어버린다. 결론은 어떻게든 1천3백명대를 맞춰버린다는거다. 평상시 감염률 1프로 초반대로 계산하면 1천명 이하가 되겠지 . 다른 검사수가 적었던 날들을 볼까 7월19일 7월12일 7월5일 주말이 끼거나 검사 인인원수 적은날에는 이상하게 감염률이 확치솟아 확진자수가 맞처진다. (6월14일. 6월21일등 모든 검사자수가 적은날은 똑같다) ㅡ1. 인천재검표 6월29일 부정선거투표지가 나온 일주일 전후 7월7일부터 검사인원수를 6만명대에서 →13만 14만 두배 떡상시켜 → 확진자수를 떡상 2. 검사인원수가 적은날에도 귀신같이 그날은 감염자수가 확치솟아져서 비슷하게맞처져버림 =질본에서 확진자수 관리 결론: 그냥 검사자수 폭증시켜→ 확진자 1천명 찍어낸거 맞음 + 검사자수 적은날에도 확진자수 관리 의심 매우 높음↑ 국민을 개돼지 취급하고 확진자수를 관리 ※이렇게 하는이유는 부정선거집회나 815 문재앙 반정부 집회 막기 위한. 강력한 의심이 들어 내부자료 ! [강미은TV 방구석외신] https://youtu.be/5iPT5w_98Ks -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 일반인들은 법기술자에 비해 법지식이 없다 / 이런 점을 이용해서 천대엽과 그 밖의 대법관들이 국민을 속이고 있다 / 그러나 법도 보편적 상식을 담고 있는 것 [공병호TV] https://youtu.be/5gY6DQRYD_o -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 인천지검 이두봉 검사장과 아리조나 마크 브루노비치 법무장관의 선택 (Event Log 파일이 어떤 의미를 가지나?) 스콧 인간과 자유 이야기 https://youtu.be/pv_NmVyJtmk 트럼프 지지자가 국가의 적? 벌써 3백만 불법입국자? 미국을 뒤덮는 스태그플레이션 공포 https://youtu.be/JzhVK4gtB4Y --->현재 한국에서 정치는 사라졌다고 보아야 한다. 대선에 뛰는 후보들이 모두 청와대에서 조정하는 꼭두각시들 같다. 어디선가 대선의 흥행을 위해 극본을 쓰고, 후보들은 그 극본에 따라 움직이는 듯한 느낌이다. 물론 소수의 예외는 있다. 청와대가 이렇게 힘이 있는 이유는 모든 권력이 좌파의 수중에 있고, 더구나 다음 대선도 부정선거로 그들 마음대로 할 수 있다는 자신감 때문이다. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 文정부 신 북풍몰이···與 76인 '한미연합훈련 중단' 여론전(戰), 그 배후가 의심스럽다 조주형 기자 펜앤 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 델타플러스 국내 첫 확진자 2명 모두 AZ 접종 후 돌파감염(상보) 첫 사례 감염경로 오리무중…발현일 구분 어려워 당국 "델타플러스가 돌파감염 가능성 높다 보기 어려워"/ 뉴스 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fearmongering Has Done More Damage Than the Virus Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercol 공포 팔이가 바이러스보다 더 많은 피해를 입혔다. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Panic Pandemic Fearmongering from journalists, scientists, and politicians did more harm than the virus. John Tierney Stefan Baral, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins with 350 publications to his name, submitted a critique of lockdowns to more than ten journals and finally gave up—the “first time in my career that I could not get a piece placed anywhere,” he said. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist at Harvard, had a similar experience with his article, early in the pandemic, arguing that resources should be focused on protecting the elderly. “Just as in war,” Kulldorff wrote, “we must exploit the characteristics of the enemy in order to defeat it with the minimum number of casualties. Since Covid-19 operates in a highly age specific manner, mandated counter measures must also be age specific. If not, lives will be unnecessarily lost.” It was a tragically accurate prophecy from one of the leading experts on infectious disease, but Kulldorff couldn’t find a scientific journal or media outlet to accept the article, so he ended up posting it on his own LinkedIn page. “There’s always a certain amount of herd thinking in science,” Kulldorff says, “but I’ve never seen it reach this level. Most of the epidemiologists and other scientists I’ve spoken to in private are against lockdowns, but they’re afraid to speak up.” 장문의 글인데, 지난 1년이 넘는 시간 동안 코로나 히스테리와 공포 팔이가 끼친 피해를 잘 그려내고 있다. 더구나 여기에 언론인, 과학자, 정치가들이 합세해 반대 의견을 사회에서 아주 매장시킨 게 더 무서운 현상이다. 이제는 코로나에 대한 침착한 평가와 함께 정상적인 일상으로 돌아가야 할 때다. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 만약 과학이 그렇게 설득력 있고 그렇게 진실하다면, 그것은 자명할 것이고 어떠한 명령이나 검열도 요구하지 않을 것이다. (natural 뉴스) If SCIENCE was so compelling and so true, it would be self-evident and would require no mandates or censorship Today, most science that the populace is aware of and can access is paid for by Big Pharma. It’s manipulated, twisted, distorted and falsified for end-goal results. More often than not, the “science” that the pharmaceutical world and vaccine industrial complex presents is never verified by any other entities of science and research. No other organizations are allowed to even work with the same ingredients to find out if the tests, clinical trials and “peer-reviewed” research is even legitimate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 법무부는 정부가 당신의 몸을 소유하고 있다고 주장하며, 의무적인 코로나바이러스 백신 접종이 어떤 식으로든 합법적이라고 터무니없이 선언. (natural) Justice Department absurdly declares that mandatory coronavirus vaccinations are somehow LEGAL, claiming the government owns your body ---> 시민들의 정부의 소유물이나 자산처럼 되어서, 개나 돼지처럼 사육되는 세상이 되었다. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 총체적 모순: CDC의 월렌스키 박사는 아메리카 코비드 백신이 효과적이라고 말한 다음 백신 접종이 코비드를 확산시킬 수 있고 마스크를 다시 착용해야 한다고 말한다. (natural 뉴스) TOTAL CONTRADICTION: CDC’s Director Dr. Walenski tells America Covid vaccines are effective, then says the vaccinated can spread Covid and need to wear masks again 코로나 발발 이후에 12가지의 너무나 뻔한 모순 12가지 The 12 most blatant, obvious contradictions since the Covid-19 pandemic “broke out” 1. They (Fauci) said masks are useless for preventing transmission or contraction of Covid, later they made masks mandatory for everyone, everywhere. 2. You can’t spread Covid if you don’t have symptoms, then they switched that too. 3. There will be no forced vaccinations, now you get fired from your healthcare job without proof in California and New York. 4. You can take your mask off once you’re vaccinated, now you need to keep it on. 5. The Covid-19 vaccines are just as effective for Delta variant, now they say they have no idea if the vaccines work at all for anything. 6. It’s the unvaccinated that are spreading Covid, but now they’re saying you can spread it after vaccination and without any symptoms. 7. We can flatten the curve with herd immunity, but now the biggest Covid outbreaks are where the highest concentration of vaccinated people live, like Israel. Plus any Covid-19 immunity you might get from vaccines wanes quickly, will only work for a few weeks. 8. The Covid vaccines are “safe and effective,” except 17,000 people have died from the vaccines, over 400,000 seriously injured, and even more have caught Covid after being jabbed. 9. Children can catch and spread Covid, even if they never come down with it or show symptoms. Yet, there isn’t a single recorded case of this happening in the world. 10. Teens and college age youth need to be vaccinated, yet the only thing Covid-related that’s killing kids is the Covid vaccine. (And astronomical rates of suicide from the ‘social distancing’.) 11. The virus began in humans who were eating bats from a food market in China, and it’s a conspiracy theory to say it was engineered in a lab and released on purpose. Now all of MSM all but admits outright the “lab leak theory” — that it was made in a lab, and some even hint that it was released on purpose as a bio-weapon. So much for conspiracies. 12. Fraudulent Fauci said he was fully vaccinated, then showed up at a Senate hearing wearing a mask, after saying Americans need a reward for being vaccinated, and if you can’t even take off your mask, why bother getting vaccinated? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Record growth of coral cover on Great Barrier Reef provides latest proof that ‘human-caused climate change’ is a hoax Here’s the latest example of this climate change hoax, via the Climate Change Dispatch: The annual data on coral cover for the Great Barrier Reef, produced by the Australian Institute of Marine Science, was released on Monday showing the amount of coral on the reef is at record high levels. Record high, despite all the doom stories by our reef science and management institutions. Like all other data on the reef, this shows it is in robust health. For example, coral growth rates have, if anything, increased over the past 100 years, and measurements of farm pesticides reaching the reef show levels so low that they cannot be detected with the most ultra-sensitive equipment. 인간에 의한 기후변화가 사기라는 증거가 나왔다. 호주의 그레이트 베리어 리프의 산호초를 연구한 결과가 나왔는데, 기후변화로 산호초들이 죽어가고 있다는 주장과 다르게, 산호초들이 건강하고 지난 백년간 증가해왔다는 사실이 드러났다. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Legislators Blast Federal Overreach, Calling It Biggest Threat BY EMEL AKAN The pandemic exacerbated the trend of growing federal power, and Republican state legislators are concerned about it. New mask guidance has spurred a backlash from local leaders who are now anxious about the possibility of further restrictions, including a vaccine mandate and new lockdowns. 연방정부의 월권 행위가 최대의 위협이다. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 미국의 기업 과두제와 국가 사회주의로의 길 --->히틀러가 독일 사회를 어떻게 국가 사회주의로 변화시켰는지 설명한 글이다. 좌파들은 히틀러를 말할 때는 반드시 극우라고 하는데, 사실 히틀러의 독일은 국가 사회주의였고, 좌파였다. 흔히 우파라고 하는 사람들도 히틀러를 극우라고 하는데, 이는 당시의 역사도 경제도 모르고 하는 소리이다. 히틀러는 좌파 이데올로기에 국가주의를 결합해 제3제국을 건설했다. 이에 반해 레닌의 소련은 국제공산주의이다. Our Corporate Oligarchy and the Road to National Socialism Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr. It was common on the Left to intimate that George W. Bush was like Hitler, a remark that would drive the National Review crowd through the roof but which I didn't find entirely outrageous. Bush's main method of governance was to stir up fear of foreign enemies and instigate a kind of nationalist hysteria about the need for waging war and giving up liberty through security. Hitler is the most famous parallel here, but he is hardly the only one. Many statesmen in world history have used the same tactics, dating back to ancient times. Machiavelli wrote in his Art of War advice to the ruler: To know how to recognize an opportunity in war, and take it, benefits you more than anything else. But what's the point of studying Hitler's rise to power unless it is to learn from that history and apply the lessons? One lesson is to beware of leaders who come to power in troubled times, and then use foreign threats and economic crises to bolster their own power. Unless we can draw out lessons for our own times, history becomes nothing but a series of dry data points with no broader relevance. Certainly Bush used 9-11 to consolidate his power and the neoconservative intellectuals who surrounded him adopted a deep cynicism concerning the manipulation of public opinion. Their governing style concerned the utility of public myth, which they found essential to wise rule. The main myth they promoted was that Bush was the Christian philosopher-king heading a new crusade against Islamic extremism. The very stupid among us believed it, and this served as a kind of ideological infrastructure of his tenure as president. Then it collapsed when the economy went south and he was unable to sustain the absurd idea that he was protecting us from anyone. The result was disgrace, and the empowering of the political left and its socialistic ethos. The talk of Hitler in the White House ended forthwith, as if the analogy extended only when nationalist ideology is ruling the day. What people don't remember is that Hitlerism was about more than just militarism, nationalism, and consolidation of identity politics. It also involved a substantial shift in German domestic politics away from free enterprise, or what remained of it under Weimar, toward collectivist economic planning. Nazism was not only nationalism run amok. It was also socialism of a particular variety. Let's turn to The Vampire Economy by Guenter Reimann (1939). He begins the story with the 1933 decree that all property must be subject to the collective will. It began with random audits and massive new bookkeeping regulations: Manufacturers in Germany were panic-stricken when they heard of the experiences of some industrialists who were more or less expropriated by the State. These industrialists were visited by State auditors who had strict orders to "examine" the balance sheets and all bookkeeping entries of the company (or individual businessman) for the preceding two, three, or more years until some error or false entry was found. The slightest formal mistake was punished with tremendous penalties. A fine of millions of marks was imposed for a single bookkeeping error. Obviously, the examination of the books was simply a pretext for partial expropriation of the private capitalist with a view to complete expropriation and seizure of the desired property later. The owner of the property was helpless, since under fascism there is no longer an independent judiciary that protects the property rights of private citizens against the State. The authoritarian State has made it a principle that private property is no longer sacred. The rules begin to change slowly so that enterprise could no longer make decisions in the interest of profitability. The banks were nationalized. The heads of major companies were changed. Hiring and firing became heavily politicized. The courts ruled not on justice but on political priorities. It was no longer enough merely to obey the laws. The national will must trump economic concerns: The capitalist under fascism has to be not merely a law-abiding citizen, he must be servile to the representatives of the State. He must not insist on "rights" and must not behave as if his private property rights were still sacred. He should be grateful to the Fuehrer that he still has private property. This state of affairs must lead to the final collapse of business morale, and sound the death knell of the self-respect and self-reliance which marked the independent businessman under liberal capitalism. Price controls were next, enforced intermittently and with them grew up a large gray economy, with businesspeople spending more time getting around the rules than producing wealth. To increase his prices a dealer must have a special permit from the Price Commissar. A request for a price increase must first be certified to by the group leader; it must be accompanied by a detailed statement of necessity and other pertinent data, such as production and distribution costs. State production mandates were next. Goods were to be produced according to political goals. Backed by the General Staff of the army, Nazi bureaucrats have been able to embark upon schemes which compel the most powerful leaders of business and finance to undertake projects which they consider both risky and unprofitable. Bankers were required to act as state actors. Under fascism, big bankers, formerly independent — except, of course, 'non-Aryans' — have become State officials in everything but name. They are often in high and influential positions, but they are all members of the compact, centralized State machine. Their independence, their individual initiative, their free competitive position, all the principles for which they once fought fervently, are gone. If you think that the parallels stopped after Bush left power, consider this passage from Reimann: The totalitarian State reverses the former relationship between the State and the banks. Previously, their political influence increased when the State needed financial help. Now the opposite holds true. The more urgent the financial demands of the State become, the stricter measures are taken by the State in order to compel these institutions to invest their funds as the State may wish. Once the banks were forced wholly under the control of the government, they became the means by which all property became subject to the state: The totalitarian State will not have an empty treasury so long as private companies or individuals still have ample cash or liquid assets. For the State has the power to solve its financial difficulties at their expense. The private banks themselves, the financial institutions which previously dictated the terms on which they were willing to lend money, have built up the system of siphoning off liquid funds. This financial system is now utilized by the totalitarian State for its own purposes. So it was for the stock market, which was regarded as a national asset. Speculation was forbidden. Public companies were entirely subject to bureaucratic rule. Order replaced the old spontaneity, while speculation of the old sort became an entirely underground activity. The largest companies didn't entirely mind the course of events. The disappearance of small corporations gives rise to a tendency among small investors not to risk their capital in new competitive enterprises. The larger the big corporations grow and the closer they become connected with the State bureaucracy, the fewer chances there are for the rise of new competitors. So too for insurance companies, which were compelled to buy government paper. The tendency toward ever more economic regulation resulted not in socialism as such but fascist planning. The fascist State does not merely grant the private entrepreneur the right to produce for the market, but insists on production as a duty which must be fulfilled even though there be no profit. The businessman cannot close down his factory or shop because he finds it unprofitable. To do this requires a special permit issued by the authorities. The national demand for "stimulus" replaced private decision making entirely, as businessmen were required to produce and avoid any economic downturns that might embarrass the state. The Nazi government has expressly threatened the private entrepreneur with increased State coercion and reduction of personal rights and liberties unless he fulfills adequately the 'duty to produce' according to the State's demands. But stimulus could not and would not work, no matter how hard the party officials tried, because the very institutions of private property and competition and all market forces had been overwritten. The totalitarian regime has annihilated the most important conservative force of capitalism, the belief that private property ought to be a sacred right of every citizen and that the private property of every citizen ought to be protected. Respect for private property has penetrated the spirit of the people in all capitalist countries. It is the strongest bulwark of capitalism. Fascism has succeeded in destroying this conservative force … People still have to work for money and have to live on money incomes. Possession of capital still provides income. But this income is largely at the mercy of State bureaucrats and Party officials. Reimann sums up: In Nazi Germany there is no field of business activity in which the State does not interfere. In more or less detailed form it prescribes how the businessman may use capital which is still presumably his private property. And because of this, the German businessman has become a fatalist; he does not believe that the new rules will work out well, yet he knows that he cannot alter the course of events. He has been made the tool of a gigantic machine which he cannot direct. The regime also dramatically increased social and medical legislation, providing lifetime pensions to friends and conscripting doctors in the service of its dietary and medical goals. Now, if any of this sounds familiar, it is because the principles of intervention are universal. The Nazi regime represented not a unique evil in history but rather a now-conventional combination of two dangerous ideological trends: nationalism and socialism. We know both all too well. Originally published July 10, 2009 as "Headed to National Socialism." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 통치방通治方이 병을 고칠 수 있는 이유는, 몸의 자연 치유력 때문이다. 음양의 조화가 이루어지면 병이 낫는다. 闲话中药通治方 本人在临证中，发现刘绍武先生创立的葛根麻黄汤（麻杏甘石汤加葛根），是寒温通治方。《三部六病》定义葛根麻黄汤是用于太阳伤寒。如《三部六病》曰：“葛根麻黄汤主证，头项强痛，发热恶寒，无汗，脉浮，或咳喘。方药 葛根60g 麻黄10g 石膏30g 杏仁15g 甘草10g 水煎服，取微似有汗为佳。” 头项强痛，发热恶寒，为“伤寒”初起常见症状。“温病”初起多为不恶寒而渴。本人在临床实践中，发现葛根麻黄汤，对于感冒初起发热恶寒无汗者或发热不恶寒而渴者，皆有特效，这可是寒温通治，是什么道理呢？想来葛根麻黄汤方，葛根、石膏能解热，麻黄、杏仁能散寒，所以能寒温通治。但是其通治的根本作用并不是在药物上，而是在人体的自愈力上。自愈力，也就是免疫力。人体的自愈力或叫免疫力，依靠的是阴阳气谐和，即阴阳气流通顺畅，不偏强，也不偏弱。阴阳气流通顺畅，必然会将邪气排出体外，人即病愈。所谓邪气，就是病气，包括六淫（风寒暑湿燥火）和致病微生物（病毒、病菌）以及人体内的代谢产物。 一切疾病的好转或痊愈，从根本上，都是依靠人体的自愈力，即阴阳气自我调和的能力。如《伤寒论》曰：“凡病……阴阳自和者必自愈。”用药治病，不论是中药还是西药，都只是辅助人体纠偏，以达到阴阳气自和。假如阴阳气俱衰竭者，什么药物也不灵，什么治法也不灵，包括现代高科技如人工肺（呼吸机），人工心（体外循环机），人工肾（血液透析机）等，都不灵。从疾病痊愈的机理上认识中药通治方，就会明白，其通治的原理，是激发了人体的自愈力（免疫力），从而有利于人体纠正阴阳气的偏强或偏弱，借以达到阴阳自和，则气血流通顺畅而病愈。经方用药基本上是少而精，因为经方是专攻（专症）。时方用药基本上是多而杂，因为时方是散打（合症）。经方也有时方的影子，如薯蓣丸21味药，用于“虚劳诸不足，风气百疾”。时方也有经方的影子，例如我院儿科名医许靖三，常用芦根石膏散，双解小儿表里俱热发烧喘息。 总之，不论经方时方，其根本作用，都是调理阴阳，阴阳和者必自愈。所以，通治方（大方）的作用也是调理阴阳。假如人体不虚，一经调治，即可恢复阴阳自和的能力，其病必愈。不论经方时方，凡通治方（大方）效果不错者，就是因为其方治比较全面，总能对上某些症状