대법원이 은폐를 결심? 검찰 수사와 범국민 투쟁이 유일한 길 (이재용 부회장 가석방 꼼수) 스콧 인간과 자유 이야기 https://youtu.be/mCp15CXlRxU ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 중앙일보 "전라도 것들이 세상 망쳤다"···광주고검 흉기난동범이 쓴 글 show****댓글 100퍼센트 공감합니다. 전라족이 나라를 망치고 해쳐먹는 중입니다. --->지금 한국의 독재 체제는 좌파들과 전라도 인들의 지지로 유지되고 있다. 특정 지역의 주민들이 공산화에 이렇듯 큰 역할을 하는 경우는 매우 드믄 일이다. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 오바마는 해도되고, 트럼프는 하면 안되는것 (열폭주의) 날씨조작HAARP http://www.ilbe.com/view/11359805843 오바마 새끼, 맨날 사회정의니 공정이니 외치면서 아가리털더니 졸라게 호화스러운 저택에서 500명 초대해서 생일파티하다가 걸렸다 마스크 쓰게하고 이제 강제접종까지 준비하면서 지들은 마스크도 안쓴다 완전 황제노릇하는데 아주 역겹다 이 파티에 조지클루니니 좌파 연예인들은 다 갔는데 얘들 하는 짓을 보니 우리나라 꼬라지 생각이 난다 이번주나 다음주에 봉쇄들어간다에 한표 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 뉴스1 문대통령, 조해주 선관위 상임위원 사표 반려…"6개월 잔여임기 채워라" --->악업을 쌓는 것 같아서 못하겠다는데, 계속 악업을 쌓으라고 강요하는 악마! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 글로벌 금융 쓰나미 노리나!/SCMP, "중공 외교부와 국방부 극심한 갈등/ 해방군보가 누설한 중공해군의 약점/리투아니아의 패기 박상후의 문명개화 상하이방이 배경인 사우스차이나 모닝포스트가 중공외교부와 국방부 사이에 심한 알력이 발생하고 있다고 보도했습니다. 중공외교부가 국방부의 속내도 모르고 국제사회에서 전랑외교를 밀어붙여 사방에 적을 만들었다는 불만이 팽배합니다. 정작 전쟁이 발발하면 총을 들고 싸우는 것은 군인데 외교부가 아무것도 모르고 전쟁분위기를 고조시키고 있는데 따른 불만입니다. 외교부와 국방부는 시진핑에게 자신들의 입장을 보고하면서 내부투쟁을 벌이고 있다고 이 신문은 분석했습니다. 중공내부소식통을 인용하는 사우스차이나 모닝포스트는 중공의 권력투쟁구도에 대해서는 나름 정통한 매체입니다. 중공군부는 고민이 많습니다. 최근에는 남지나해에 진입한 영국 퀸엘리자베스항모를 중공핵잠수함이 몰래 추적하다가 바로 탐지되는 굴욕을 겪었습니다. 또 6월 초 해방군보는 중공군 해군 호위함의 대항훈련을 보도했는데 이에 따르면 미사일과 레이더에 심각한 문제가 있습니다. 한편 리투아니아가 타이완과 대표처를 교환한다고 하자 중공은 자국대사를 소환하고 리투아니아에도 대사소환을 요구했습니다. 단교까지 염두에 둔 조치로 봐야 하는데 리투아니아는 중공에 전혀 굴복하지 않고 있습니다. 한편 시진핑이 알리바바, 텐센트, 신동방, 헝다같은 IT, 교육, 부동산의 거물을 빈사상태가 되도록 두들기는데 대해 왜 그런지를 해석한 시사평론가의 해설이 나왔습니다. 상하이방과 월가에 자해식 금융쓰나미를 일으키려 시도하고 있다는 무시무시한 분석입니다. https://youtu.be/8jG0dMjz_6w --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 상위 0.1%에 진입하려면 [박훈탁TV]6시간 전 Dominion 내부 고발자가 South Dakota에서 오늘 오후 7시(현지시간) Mike Lindell의 사이버 심포지움에 출연해서 2020년 선거도둑질을 입증하는 반박할 수 없는 증거를 제시한다고 합니다. 이 증거는 중국 공산당의 선거조작을 입증할 것이라고 합니다. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 자본이득세를 폐지하라! 바이든의 엄청난 재정 지출을 감당하기 위해 정부는 자본이득세(capital gains tax)를 최고 43.4%까지 올리기로 했다. 자본이득세란 자산의 매각으로 얻는 수익에 대해 부과하는 세금이다. 이 세금이 오르면 투자의 수익을 실현해서 얻는데 소요되는 비용을 상승시키게 되고, 따라서 투자의 기회를 분석할 때, 개인이나 기업의 비용-수익 분석을 변화시키게 된다. 그리고 이는 다시 자본의 재배치와 자본의 가용성에 근본적인 영향을 끼치게 된다. 투자가들이 새로운 투자가 과연 수익을 낼 것인지 분석할 때, 그들은 자본이득세를 고려에 넣기 때문이다. 투자가들은 자본이득세 때문에 투자를 꺼리게 되고, 현재의 비효율적인 자산을 그대로 유지하게 된다. 이로써 자본이 부족해지고 제한되면 건전한 산업의 성장이 왜곡된다. 지난 1977년에 지본이득세가 49%에서 20%로 감세되었을 때, 종자 자본 펀딩seed-capital funding이 6천8백만 달러에서 51억 달러로 무려 700% 상승했다. 자본이득세는 감세는 자본이 부족한 지역과 소수 집단에 투자 자본을 유인하는 길이 된다. 또한 이는 취업자 수를 늘리고 경제를 발전시키는 방법이기도 하다. 만일 이 세금을 없애버린다면, 숨어 있던 엄청난 자본이 풀려나와서 수많은 고용을 창출하고 새로운 기업들을 만들어낼 것이다. It’s Time to Abolish the Capital Gains Tax McCoy Dorr President Biden’s ridiculously high spending proposals require equally ridiculous tax proposals. Among the craziest proposals is a massive increase in the capital gains tax rate. According to the Tax Foundation, Biden’s proposal would raise the top federal rate on capital gains tax to 43.4 percent. When accounting for state and local rates, the average top rate would be 48 percent, up from the current 29 percent. This is about nineteen steps in the wrong direction. Progressives, the largest proponents of the tax on capital gains, believe that this tax is a necessary and just tool used to rein in the greed of the rich and ensure that the selfless government can implement righteous social programs to help the needy. This belief could not be further detached from reality. The existence of taxes on capital gains significantly distorts the natural flow of investment in markets, which harms the social welfare of all Americans, and it is past time to abolish the capital gains tax. The capital gains tax is imposed on the profits gained from the sale of an asset. This increases the costs involved in realizing the profits of an investment, therefore altering individuals and businesses' cost-benefit analysis and decision process when evaluating investment opportunities. This has a substantial impact on the reallocation of capital and the availability of capital, because investors have to take the capital gains tax into account when weighing if a new investment is worthy. Investors are forced to decide if the new investment has a profit potential that outweighs the impact of the capital gains tax and the future profit potential of whatever asset they may currently be invested in. Many investors decide it is not. This creates the “lock-in effect.” The capital gains tax creates the incentive for investors to retain their current subpar-performing investments even when more profitable investment opportunities are present. This keeps capital locked into inefficient and underperforming assets as opposed to more efficient and profitable assets. Therefore, these inefficient assets have an inflated value and worth compared to what a free market, undistorted by the capital gains tax, would have allocated to them. As capital is a scarce and limited resource, these distortions inhibit the growth of other industries and assets that are more worthy of investment and consequently harm the social welfare of all Americans, as these industries with a deflated worth are unable to provide the goods, services, and jobs the market would have otherwise provided. This is why an unaltered flow of capital and investment is integral to the health of a free economy. The great Henry Hazlitt explains in Economics in One Lesson (order your free copy) that when investors realize they lose the whole dollar when they lose, but can keep only a fraction of it when they win, they decide it is foolish to take risks with their capital. In addition, the capital available for risk-taking itself shrinks enormously. It is being taxed away before it can be accumulated. In brief, capital to provide new private jobs is first prevented from coming into existence, and the part that does come into existence is then discouraged from starting new enterprises. These new enterprises that are blocked from coming into existence would have otherwise created better and cheaper goods. In the end, not only is the investor harmed but so are the consumers and producers that are deprived of an improved standard of living. It is nearly impossible to dissect and weigh all of the societal harms that have occurred due to the implementation of the capital gains tax, because we have been robbed of a reality we could use as a control. The industries and companies that have been deprived of growth due to the capital gains tax are invisible. However, we can examine the effects previous changes in the capital gains tax rate have had on investments. The clearest metric we can use to examine the flow of capital into new enterprises is seed-capital funding. Seed-capital funding is funding provided by investors to the creators of a new start-up venture in exchange for equity. This seed-capital funding is linked to the capital gains tax, because investors likely have to divest their capital from another firm or asset, a taxable event, to then invest in a new company in exchange for equity, which would then be taxed again if ever sold. In an examination of past changes in the tax rate of capital gains and the volume of new seed-capital funding, an article published by National Review found that when the capital gains tax rate was cut in 1977 from 49 percent to 20 percent, there was an increase in seed-capital funding from $68 million to $5.1 billion, a 700 percent increase. A later increase of the rate to 28 percent in 1986 resulted in a 60 percent decrease in seed-capital funding. This shows that funding for new ventures is intrinsically linked to the free flow of capital, which is instead obstructed by the capital gains tax. Investors are deprived of healthy returns on investment, producers are denied economic opportunity, and consumers are impoverished. Examining just a few studies on the effects of the capital gains tax demonstrates the effects an abolition would have in boosting the quality of life for the lower and middle classes. First, economists from the Tax Foundation examined IRS data and found “that more than 80 percent of taxpayers who claim dividend income earn less than $100,000 and 76.4 percent of those who claim capital gains earn less than $100,000.” This shows that the burden of the capital gains tax falls on the middle class. This burden can be alleviated by removing the capital gains tax. Furthermore, the Cato Institute discovered that a capital gains tax reduction is a way to attract investment funds to capital-starved areas and minority groups. In the ’80s, when the capital gains tax was slashed, the number of black-owned businesses increased by one-third. And later when it was cut again, that number increased by an additional 38 percent. While the precise results that the elimination of the capital gains tax would have are incalculable due to the stubborn fact that we lack omniscience, an elimination would unequivocally lead to the creation of a large number of jobs and economic growth, which would bring an improvement to the quality of life of poverty-stricken communities by encouraging a culture of private ownership and entrepreneurship. Eliminating the capital gains tax would free up an unprecedented amount of capital, create countless new jobs, and result in the formation of new enterprises dedicated to providing cheaper and improved goods and services. The abolition of the capital gains tax would create an economically productive and stable society, yet the fallacy persists that the capital gains tax is beneficial. The failure of progressives to see beyond the increased government revenues is the reason we are shackled with the capital gains tax today. Progressives are failing Hazlitt’s one lesson (not that anyone has ever accused progressives of being economically literate). As Hazlitt states at the end of his magnum opus, economics “is a science of recognizing secondary consequences. It's also a science of seeing general consequences. It is the science of tracing the effects of some proposed or existing policy not only on some special interest in the short run, but on the general interest in the long run.” Progressives look at the immediate effects, increase in government revenue and funding for their social programs, and are blind to the havoc they have wrought in the market. This failure to comprehend the impacts of distorting the flow of capital results in the average American consumer being deprived of an indecipherable higher standard of living. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------