--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
[출처] 할거 없어서 집앞 산책중/ 일베
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
언발에 오줌을 부으면 잠시 따뜻하지만, 시간이 지나면 더욱 차가워진다. 문죄인 정부의 소득 주도 성장은, 돈을 풀어 생산과 고용을 촉진할 수 있다고 생각한 엉터리 케인즈 정책의 하나이다. 재정을 풀면 잠깐 경기가 활성화 되겠지만, 투자와 고용은 더욱 위축되고, 결국은 엄청난 인플레로 서민들이 고통을 받게 된다. 국민들은 다가올 경제 파탄에 대비해야 한다.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1910년 미륵사지 석탑 동측면. [사진 문화재청]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
출처: 펜앤마이크
---------------------------------------------------------------------
요즘 아파트에도 달더만
열효율 떨어지고
황사 미세먼지로 빛 조사율 엄청 떨어지고
전지판에 미세 황사먼지 쌓여 효율 떨어지고
날씨 흐리면 무용지물이요 겨울철도 무용지물
나중 폐기시 중금속 토양오염 등 처치곤란에 빠진다
[출처] 태양광 열 전기 설치하지 마라
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
어린이들이 좌파들의 선전에 감염되지 않도록 그들을 가르쳐야 한다.
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
기본소득제는 생산에 들어갈 돈을 나누어 줌으로써, 생산력을 낮추고 경제를 후퇴시킨다.
A "Universal Basic Income" Costs More Than You Think
•José Niño
According to some media reports, the Universal Basic Income (UBI) party in Finland is coming to an end.
But Professor Olli Kangas, head of the research team at the Finnish social insurance agency, claims that the experiment “is proceeding according to plan and will continue until the end of 2018.” There are no concrete plans to expand the program after that, however.
Finland gained notoriety in 2017 when it launched a UBI program where the government handed out monthly stipends of 560 euros (roughly $670) to 2,000 randomly selected unemployed citizens with no strings attached.
Even though this program is slated to expire by the end of 2018, it’s only a matter of time before other countries replicate Finland’s model.
In the United States, the Californian city of Stockton, which filed bankruptcy in 2012 , is already launching its very own basic income test , fiscal risks notwithstanding.
While policy experimentation should be encouraged, UBI trials are not worth conducting, let alone expanding. Beyond fostering dependency and increasing fiscal burdens, UBIs ultimately reduce the private sector's ability to accumulate more capital and increase worker productivity — the most reliable ways of reducing poverty.
A Not-so-Revolutionary Idea with Questionable Results
UBIs are not exactly a novel idea, having garnered broad support from intellectuals of all stripes over the years. Even free-market economists such as Milton Friedman argued in favor of UBIs, claiming they would be less costly to implement and maintain than a traditional welfare bureaucracy.
In the late 1960s up until the 1970s, similar programs were implemented in the United States. They were called negative income tax experiments, where workers who earned below a certain threshold received payments from the government instead of paying taxes to the government. Although different from their UBI cousins, they still yielded interesting findings on the effects of basic income models.
In the study The Work Response to a Guaranteed Income: A Survey of Experimental Evidence, economist Gary Burtless found that “the negative income tax plans tested in the experiments were expected to reduce work effort among participants, and they did so.” Additionally, A Comparison of the Labor Supply Findings from the Four Negative Income Tax Experiments demonstrated a consistent trend of workers reducing labor supply when they received negative income tax benefits.
While these employment trends look troubling, there’s something much larger at stake when dealing with UBIs. Any serious discussion about economic growth starts and ends with increasing worker productivity. UBIs are completely detrimental in this regard.
Under normal circumstances in an unhampered market, firms are constantly seeking to increase worker productivity, which benefits individuals who actually show up to work. However, the costs behind a UBI require depriving employers of the resources needed to increase capital accumulation, and thus increase worker productivity. As a result, potential workers receiving government aid are benefiting at the expense of other actual workers who lose opportunities to become more productive. Those workers then receive lower wages than they would have in the absence of the UBI. This siphoning of wealth makes society poorer on net.
Despite the revolutionary branding, negative income taxes and other basic income tax proposals appear to function just like traditional welfare measures that stifle capital accumulation and divert wealth away from productive sectors of the economy.
Another Permanent Government Program
Given the broad scope of UBIs, they will only shift incentives away from productive work to make a living toward politics to sustain a living. Even if they start off with meager stipends, what’s to stop beneficiaries from asking for more generous sums? Politicians would have to raise punitive taxes even further.
Ironically, Milton Friedman understood that there is nothing so permanent as a temporary government program. A UBI would function no differently from the current means testing welfare paradigm and would just add more to ballooning deficits, diverting resources from society's productive sectors.
The Seen and Unseen
No economic analysis of welfare transfer policies is complete without the farsighted insights of French economist Frédéric Bastiat. Often overlooked in policy discussions, the concept of the “seen and unseen” demonstrates how policies like the UBI can’t solely be judged by their immediate and apparent effects.
When a transfer policy like the UBI is implemented, what is seen is the transfer of money from one sector of the economy to humbler sectors. However, what is not seen is the money that productive sectors of the economy lose out on. Under normal circumstances, this same money would otherwise be allocated towards business expansion and other ventures that increase worker output and worker incomes.
Private Initiative is Still the Best Anti-Poverty Program
If Finland wishes to tackle poverty, it should gravitate towards policies that enhance economic freedom.
A country like Finland is already ranked as one of the freest in the world, placing 26th and 17th in the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom and the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World rankings, respectively.
Policymakers in Finland and across the globe should work tirelessly to raise their country’s economic freedom rankings in order to fully reap the benefits of markets. Lowering taxes, reducing barriers to business creation, and facilitating labor freedom all play an integral role in spurring economic growth.
Jose Nino is a Venezuelan-American political activist based in Fort Collins, Colorado
----------------------------------------------------------------
담낭 용종의 비방
治疗胆囊息肉的绝密方
方剂如下：金钱草、虎杖、夏枯草、法半夏、柴胡、丹参。上药常规剂量为各10克，临床需结合辩证。
上药每疗程为30天，每天一剂，服药前去医院拍片，疗程结束后去医院检查对比，一般中轻度患者一疗程痊愈，重症3疗程内100%痊愈，多年来无一例外
大黄附子细辛汤的妙用
偏痛，不论左右，凡胸胁至腰，痛者宜用之。一切痛，不论内外，皆可用之。凡顽固偏僻兼挟之积，皆阴阳错杂，非常例所拘，附子与大黄为伍，所治皆非常之证。又用此方治腰脚拘急痛甚，两脚挛急不能起，昼夜呻吟，配合芍药甘草汤二三日，痛全安。又用此方治膝肿毒，鹤膝风，而左脐下拘急尤甚，按之则引左脚而痛，初用此方加甘草二三日，后用四逆散加良姜，牡蛎，刘寄奴而愈。此方治牙痛灵妙，并治一切痛，不论内外，莫不捷效。又有家传治牙痛方，即是此方加石膏，煎取汁，随漱随咽，顷刻笑颜。并屡用治面神经麻痹，三叉神经痛及脑血管意外，效亦甚佳。此方寒热并用，力峻效捷，所治皆非寻常之疾，乃《辅行诀五脏用药法要》辛咸除滞之剂也，其所治之偏痛，当为顽积所致也。《金匮要略》云：“胁下偏痛，发热，其脉紧弦，此寒也，以温药下之，宜大黄附子汤。”大黄虽为苦寒之品，但配伍附子、细辛辛散大热之品，则制其寒性存其走泄之性。三味协力，共成温散寒凝，苦辛通降之剂。寒实积滞所致的便秘，在非温不能散其寒、非下不能去其实的情况下，使用本方最为恰当。1.临床以便秘腹痛，手足不温，苔白腻，脉弦紧为证治要点。2．以本方加减治疗胆绞痛、胆囊术后综合征、慢性痢疾、尿毒症等属寒积者，常获良效。《成方便读》：“胁下偏痛，发热，其脉弦紧，此阴寒成聚，偏着一处，虽有发热，亦是阳气被郁所致。是以非温不能散其寒，非下不能去其积，故以附子、细辛之辛热善走者搜散之，而后大黄得以行其积也。”《金鉴》引张璐：大黄附子汤，为寒热互结，刚柔并济之和剂。近世但知寒下一途，绝不知有温下一法。盖暴感之热结而以寒下，久积之寒结亦可寒下乎？大黄附子汤用细辛佐附子，以攻胁下寒结，即兼大黄之寒以导之。寒热合用，温攻兼施，此圣法昭然，不可思议者也。《温病条辨》：附子温里通阳，细辛暖水脏而散寒湿之邪；肝胆无出路，故用大黄，借胃腑以为出路也。大黄之苦，合附子、细辛之辛，苦与辛合，能降能通，通则不痛也。周扬俊《金匮玉函二注》卷10：“此寒邪之在中、下二焦也。胁下属厥阴之部分，于此偏痛，必有所积，积而至于发热，其为实可知也。及视其脉不滑数而紧弦，洵为阴脉，果是阴邪结于阴位矣。且紧属痛，固因寒而痛；弦为实，亦因寒而实。故非下则实不去，非温则寒不开。然肝肾同一治也，厥阴之实，系少阴之寒而实，苟不大用附子之热，可独用大黄之寒乎？入细辛者，通少阴.
----------------------------------------------
治疗肾综，慢肾，肾衰的中医秘方
益母草30
水肿明显者加：泽泻20 猪苓20
益母草：活血调经，利尿消肿。现代研究表明益母草具有抗凝，抗
党参，黄芪，白术：增强机体免疫力，扩张血管，降压，护肝，促
---------------------------------------------------------------------
장시춘의 생기산
JT叔叔说过这个生肌散的神效. 女儿上周三磕破膝盖, 蹭掉指甲盖大一块皮, 用了云南白药创可贴, 两天后伤口还没有开始合的迹象, 伤口也没有干, 她很痛. 周六早上看伤口还有指甲盖大小, 还是湿的. 上午10点半给她喝了生肌散(汤剂), 12点半查看伤口已经缩小到一粒米大小了, 周围长出薄薄的膜, 继续喝了两次药, 晚上睡觉的时候已经全部结痂, 而且是很小的痂, 周围的皮居然都长的很平整光滑了. 连带本来她嘴巴上有一个溃疡处也好了.
生肌散 我的用量: 黄芪4克, 天花粉4克, 乳香1.5克, 没药1.5克, 白芍2克, 丹参1.5克, 甘草1.5克.
---------------------------------------------------------
암의 말기 처방
摘录：
육부의 병증
治疗胆囊息肉的绝密方
方剂如下：金钱草、虎杖、夏枯草、法半夏、柴胡、丹参。上药常规剂量为各10克，临床需结合辩证。
上药每疗程为30天，每天一剂，服药前去医院拍片，疗程结束后去医院检查对比，一般中轻度患者一疗程痊愈，重症3疗程内100%痊愈，多年来无一例外
-------------------------------------------------------------------
대황부자세신탕의 묘용
大黄附子细辛汤的妙用
生大黄15，细辛10，制附片15，三副。
偏痛，不论左右，凡胸胁至腰，痛者宜用之。一切痛，不论内外，皆可用之。凡顽固偏僻兼挟之积，皆阴阳错杂，非常例所拘，附子与大黄为伍，所治皆非常之证。又用此方治腰脚拘急痛甚，两脚挛急不能起，昼夜呻吟，配合芍药甘草汤二三日，痛全安。又用此方治膝肿毒，鹤膝风，而左脐下拘急尤甚，按之则引左脚而痛，初用此方加甘草二三日，后用四逆散加良姜，牡蛎，刘寄奴而愈。此方治牙痛灵妙，并治一切痛，不论内外，莫不捷效。又有家传治牙痛方，即是此方加石膏，煎取汁，随漱随咽，顷刻笑颜。并屡用治面神经麻痹，三叉神经痛及脑血管意外，效亦甚佳。此方寒热并用，力峻效捷，所治皆非寻常之疾，乃《辅行诀五脏用药法要》辛咸除滞之剂也，其所治之偏痛，当为顽积所致也。《金匮要略》云：“胁下偏痛，发热，其脉紧弦，此寒也，以温药下之，宜大黄附子汤。”大黄虽为苦寒之品，但配伍附子、细辛辛散大热之品，则制其寒性存其走泄之性。三味协力，共成温散寒凝，苦辛通降之剂。寒实积滞所致的便秘，在非温不能散其寒、非下不能去其实的情况下，使用本方最为恰当。1.临床以便秘腹痛，手足不温，苔白腻，脉弦紧为证治要点。2．以本方加减治疗胆绞痛、胆囊术后综合征、慢性痢疾、尿毒症等属寒积者，常获良效。《成方便读》：“胁下偏痛，发热，其脉弦紧，此阴寒成聚，偏着一处，虽有发热，亦是阳气被郁所致。是以非温不能散其寒，非下不能去其积，故以附子、细辛之辛热善走者搜散之，而后大黄得以行其积也。”《金鉴》引张璐：大黄附子汤，为寒热互结，刚柔并济之和剂。近世但知寒下一途，绝不知有温下一法。盖暴感之热结而以寒下，久积之寒结亦可寒下乎？大黄附子汤用细辛佐附子，以攻胁下寒结，即兼大黄之寒以导之。寒热合用，温攻兼施，此圣法昭然，不可思议者也。《温病条辨》：附子温里通阳，细辛暖水脏而散寒湿之邪；肝胆无出路，故用大黄，借胃腑以为出路也。大黄之苦，合附子、细辛之辛，苦与辛合，能降能通，通则不痛也。周扬俊《金匮玉函二注》卷10：“此寒邪之在中、下二焦也。胁下属厥阴之部分，于此偏痛，必有所积，积而至于发热，其为实可知也。及视其脉不滑数而紧弦，洵为阴脉，果是阴邪结于阴位矣。且紧属痛，固因寒而痛；弦为实，亦因寒而实。故非下则实不去，非温则寒不开。然肝肾同一治也，厥阴之实，系少阴之寒而实，苟不大用附子之热，可独用大黄之寒乎？入细辛者，通少阴.
----------------------------------------------
治疗肾综，慢肾，肾衰的中医秘方
益母草30
水肿明显者加：泽泻20 猪苓20
益母草：活血调经，利尿消肿。现代研究表明益母草具有抗凝，抗
党参，黄芪，白术：增强机体免疫力，扩张血管，降压，护肝，促
---------------------------------------------------------------------
장시춘의 생기산
JT叔叔说过这个生肌散的神效. 女儿上周三磕破膝盖, 蹭掉指甲盖大一块皮, 用了云南白药创可贴, 两天后伤口还没有开始合的迹象, 伤口也没有干, 她很痛. 周六早上看伤口还有指甲盖大小, 还是湿的. 上午10点半给她喝了生肌散(汤剂), 12点半查看伤口已经缩小到一粒米大小了, 周围长出薄薄的膜, 继续喝了两次药, 晚上睡觉的时候已经全部结痂, 而且是很小的痂, 周围的皮居然都长的很平整光滑了. 连带本来她嘴巴上有一个溃疡处也好了.
生肌散 我的用量: 黄芪4克, 天花粉4克, 乳香1.5克, 没药1.5克, 白芍2克, 丹参1.5克, 甘草1.5克.
---------------------------------------------------------
암의 말기 처방
摘录：
육부의 병증
面热者，足阳明病；鱼络血者，手阳明病；两跗之上脉坚若陷者，足阳明病。
大肠病者，肠中切痛而鸣濯濯，冬日重感于寒即泄，当脐而痛者，不能久立。
胃病者，腹瞋胀，胃脘当心而痛，上支两胁，隔咽不通，饮食不下。
小肠病者，小腹痛，腰脊控睾而痛，时窘之后，当耳前热，若寒甚，若独肩上
膀胱病者，小腹偏肿而痛，以手按之，即欲小便而不得，肩上热，若脉陷，即足小指外廉及胫踝后热。
胆病者，善太息，口苦，呕宿汁，心下澹澹，恐人将捕之，嗌中吤吤然，数唾。
三焦病者，腹胀气满，小腹尤坚，不得小便，窘急，溢则为水留即为胀。
腹中常鸣，气上冲胸，喘不能久立，邪在大肠
小腹控睾，引腰脊，上冲心，邪在小肠
善呕，呕有苦，长太息，心中澹澹，恐人将捕之，邪在胆
饮食不下，膈塞不通，邪在胃
小腹痛肿，不得小便，邪在三焦
【胆液泄则口苦，胃气逆则呕苦】
-------------------------------------------------------
大肠病者，肠中切痛而鸣濯濯，冬日重感于寒即泄，当脐而痛者，不能久立。
胃病者，腹瞋胀，胃脘当心而痛，上支两胁，隔咽不通，饮食不下。
小肠病者，小腹痛，腰脊控睾而痛，时窘之后，当耳前热，若寒甚，若独肩上
膀胱病者，小腹偏肿而痛，以手按之，即欲小便而不得，肩上热，若脉陷，即足小指外廉及胫踝后热。
胆病者，善太息，口苦，呕宿汁，心下澹澹，恐人将捕之，嗌中吤吤然，数唾。
三焦病者，腹胀气满，小腹尤坚，不得小便，窘急，溢则为水留即为胀。
腹中常鸣，气上冲胸，喘不能久立，邪在大肠
小腹控睾，引腰脊，上冲心，邪在小肠
善呕，呕有苦，长太息，心中澹澹，恐人将捕之，邪在胆
饮食不下，膈塞不通，邪在胃
小腹痛肿，不得小便，邪在三焦
【胆液泄则口苦，胃气逆则呕苦】
-------------------------------------------------------
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기