日本에서 본 탄핵 정변(政變)-(2)

 

在日회원

 

대통령 탄핵의 본질이 ‘제6공화국’ 좌경화30년의 최종적 단계로서 종북세력들의 최후의 총공세라는 것, 조선일보는 이미 ‘보수 매체’가 아니라는 것, 조선일보 사주가 차기 정권은 문재인으로 보고 올인 했다는 것, 특히 방상훈 사장이 TV조선의 이진동 부장에게 고영태 일당 공작을 잘했다고 금일봉(5,000만원)을 주었다는 등 한국의 內戰 상황을 한국어를 모르는 재일한국인들이 그런대로 알 수 있게 해주었다. (발췌, 조갑제닷컴)

 

----------------------------

 

 

 

-----------------------------------------

[출처] 재미교포 페친님의 우려

 

 

 

문재인은 세월호에서 희생된 아이들에게 팽목항을 찾아가 이런글을 남겼다...
미안하다....그리고 고맙다...

세월호에서 희생된 아이들과 유가족들의 아픔을 이용해서 결국 자신이 정권을 잡는 것이 최종 목표였다는 심리가 드러난 증거라고 밖에는 보이질 않는다.


어떻게 죽은아이들에게 고맙다는 표현을 할수있을까 ?

박근혜가 세월호를 빠드렸다는 주장에도 어이가 없지만...문재인이 그들의 희생을 재물로 삼아 정권를 탈취하기 위해 그동안 비열하게 작전을 펼친것이 아니고선 그따위 말을 할수는 없는 것이다.

 

#북한이 박근혜 퇴진 결정에 축하를 했다는 점에 국민들은 주목해야할것이다.


그들이 기뻐할일이...결국 #남한에 불행으로 이어질테니까..


그리고 그 불행은 문재인과 그 주변 인물들이 정권을 잡는 순간.시작될 것이 불보듯 뻔하다


미국도 의존하지 말고 중국도 의존 안한다는....
어처구니 없고 안일한 사고에 갖혀 현실을 직시하지 못하고 환상에 사로잡혀있는 사람들이 많아서 걱정이다.


남한의 미약한 군사력을 가지고는 결코 미국의 도움을 받지 않고 스스로 자신의 나라를 지킬수 없다는 사실을 인정하고 받아들이지 않고 안일한 자존심적 감정에서 헤어나오질 못하는 이상.


앞으로 한국에 미래는 암담할수 밖에 없을 것이다.

 

------------------------------------------

 

일베에 올라온 100년 전 파리 사진에서.

--------------------------------------------------

 I’d rather be dumb and antifragile than extremely smart and fragile.  ---나심 탈레브

나는 아주 총명하지만 취약하기보다는, 차라리 어리석지만 반(反)취약(antifragile)하기를 원한다.

서울대를 나오고 또 무슨 고시에도 붙은 사람이 어려운 일을 당한 뒤에 몰락하는 경우가 종종 있다. 그게 바로 총명하지만 취약한 사람의 예이다.


계속되는 탈레브 어록

We can live happily in a world we don’t understand.

The fragile wants tranquility, the antifragile grows from disorder, and the robust doesn’t care.

Debt always fragilizes economic systems.

I have an obsessive stance against government indebtedness.

“The albatross’s giant wings prevent him from walking”

Those from whom we have benefited the most aren’t those who have tried to help us (say with “advice”) but rather those who have actively tried - but eventually failed - to harm us.

------------------------------------------------------

1. 뱅모 박성현 구속

 

2. 김평우 변호사 대한변협 변호사회 징계회부

 

3. 우파 동영상 만들어 전파하던 석가모니 유튜브 계정 폐쇄

 

4. 특정 정치인 비방, 비난은 선거법 위반으로 처벌

    
5. 정규재 주필이 자신의 티비에서 각종 압력을 받고 있다고 고백했다.
 

위의 일베에서 가져온 글인데, 좌파 공안정국이 시작된 것 같다. 어제 내가 말했듯이 대통령을 엮어 넣을 정도라면, 일반 시민의 자유와 목숨은 완전히 파리 목숨과 같아진다는 것이다. 이걸 깨닫지 못하면 우리는 좌파 전체주의 독재로 곧바로 넘어간다.

 

-----------------------------

 

평등한 사회는 가족과 사회적 권위로부터 개인을 자유롭게 만들지만, 개인을 국가에 종속시킬 위험이 있다.

 

The Problem With Equality

December 23, 2016

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…

 

—Declaration of Independence, American colonies against Britain

 

Liberté, égalité, fraternité…

 

—The national motto of France; origins in the French Revolution

 

The ideas behind this sentiment had origin in the Enlightenment and even before with, for example, John Locke.

 

 

Enlightenment included a range of ideas centered on reason as the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and came to advance ideals such as liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government, and separation of church and state.

 

It is obvious, by mere observation, that all men are most certainly not created equal: some gifted in different ways, some gifted not at all. This was not necessarily the point of the idea of equality. Conceptually, at least, “equality” was considered equality under the law. This ideal did not last long. For example, as early as the Jacobin period of the French Revolution, it was enforced as equality of results. The “National Razor” (aka the guillotine) enforced this version of equality.

 

This ideal also did not last in the United States – there is certainly not equality under law; instead, virtually all of the population suffers under the weight of countless laws, regulations, and taxes designed to move toward equality of results.

 

Does it have to be this way? Is it inevitable?

 

The Enlightenment was a push back against the prevailing social order in Europe, the social order of the Middle Ages: kings, nobles, serfs; authority of the Church; conflicting spheres of power and authority; a social order of a greatly decentralized political system.

 

All men are created equal: it all sounded good on paper. I have spent much of my life almost in worship of the phrase; even at this moment, I struggle with questioning it. Like many political theories, good on paper does not mean good in the real world.

 

On Power: The Natural History of its Growth, by Bertrand de Jouvenel

 

 

Every central authority which follows its natural instincts likes and favours equality; for equality more than anything else facilitates the working of this sort of authority, and extends and assures it.

Alexis de Tocqueville

 

What was the prevailing authority that needed to be broken? Call it the authority of the clan leader, the natural aristocrat – which, at its root, had family. The king had no authority over members of the clan; he only had authority over the clan leader – and even in this, only the authority that the clan leader granted to the king.

 

The idea of equality broke this relationship: slowly but surely, equality gave to the king power over not only the clan leader, but also the son and the daughter; slowly but surely, equality required that the authority of the clan leader be eliminated: after all, if all men are equal, why should the clan leader be more equal?

 

This idea of equality was welcomed by the masses – a chance to break down the authority of the natural aristocracy. They welcomed this “secular work of destruction.” The result? A great centralization: the displacement of many private dominions by one general dominion.

 

In addition to the initial euphoria, the people were co-opted into this centralization by the gaining of power – being invited into the administration; a “statocracy” of individuals who gain their position via the state to replace the natural aristocracy.

 

 

The kings, who are most set on destroying the feudal baronies, are also the best friends of the merchants, the bankers, and the master manufacturers.

 

We see this latter phenomenon in the world around us: would Krugman, Bernanke, any number of the below-average entertainers, CEOs of the major banks or industrial conglomerates gain such a position or status without the apparatus of the state pushing them to the fore and otherwise ensuring their success? They know to whom they owe their position. They act accordingly.

 

As offered by de Jouvenel, a ship owner is not the chieftain of a gang of sailors; he merely employs their labor, to be made available to the king when demanded. A banker is assigned to amass wealth that can be used in service of the king when required.

 

 

Where will it end?

 

In the destruction of all other command for the benefit of one alone – that of the state.

 

In each man’s absolute freedom from every family and social authority, a freedom the price of which is complete submission to the state.

 

In the complete equality as between themselves of all citizens, paid for by their equal debasement before the power of their absolute master – the state.

 

In the disappearance of every constraint which does not emanate from the state, and in the denial of every pre-eminence which is not approved by the state.

 

Read each sentence one by one, and consider each carefully. It cannot be denied that this is reality under the state; it also cannot be denied that it is a pathetic, miserable reality for all of us who are now “created equal.”

 

When “perfect” is not held as the ideal, is this “equality,” led by statocrats, a better condition than what was before – a great, decentralized society organized by natural aristocrats?

 

Conclusion

 

 

In a word, it ends in the atomization of society, and in the rupture of every private tie linking man and man, whose only bond is now their common bondage to the state. The extremes of individualism and socialism meet: that was their predestined course. (Emphasis added.)

 

Unless one believes man can live without social connection to other men….

 

Communism has crashed on this shore. There are some libertarians – both on the left and those who believe pure libertarian theory can be applied to society of humans – who have yet to learn this lesson.

 

Libertarianism in theory is decentralization in practice.

 

 

by Bionic Mosquito

출처: reformed libertarian

 

-----------------------------

NEW YORK (AP) — New York state is poised to scrap a literacy test for people trying to become teachers, in part because an outsized percentage of black and Hispanic candidates were failing.

흑인과 스페인계 교사 후보들이 너무 많이 떨어져서, 교사 시험에서 어문(語文) 시험을 폐기하기로 했다는 놀라운 뉴스.

앞으로는 글자도 모르는 교사들이 학생들을 가르치게 된다는 말인데, 좌파적 사고에 익숙해지면 상식이 통하지 않게 되는 것 같다.

--------------------------------------

3차 세계 대전의 위험성이 증가하고 있다.

 

Global Leaders Rattle Their Sabers As The World Marches Toward War

 

By Michael Snyder, on March 9th, 2017

 

 

 

The World Marches Toward War - Public DomainIran just conducted another provocative missile test, more U.S. troops are being sent to the Middle East, it was just announced that the U.S. military will be sending B-1 and B-52 bombers to South Korea in response to North Korea firing four missiles into the seas near Japan, and China is absolutely livid that a U.S. carrier group just sailed through contested waters in the South China Sea. We have entered a season where leaders all over the globe feel a need to rattle their sabers, and many fear that this could be leading us to war. In particular, Donald Trump is going to be under the microscope in the days ahead as other world leaders test his resolve. Will Trump be able to show that he is tough without going over the edge and starting an actual conflict?

 

The Iranians made global headlines on Thursday when they conducted yet another ballistic missile test despite being warned by Trump on numerous occasions…

 

 

As tensions between the U.S. and Iran continue to mount, the semi-official news agency Tasnim is reporting that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has successfully conducted yet another ballistic missile test, this time from a navy vessel. Called the Hormuz 2, these latest missiles are designed to destroy moving targets at sea at ranges up to 300 km (180 miles).

 

Reports on the latest test quotes Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the IRGC’s Aerospace Force, who confirmed that “the naval ballistic missile called Hormuz 2 successfully destroyed a target which was 250 km away.”

 

The missile test is the latest event in a long-running rivalry between Iran and the United States in and around the Strait of Hormuz, which guards the entrance to the Gulf. About 20% of the world’s oil passes through the waterway, which is less than 40 km wide at its narrowest point.

 

So how will Trump respond to this provocation?

 

Will he escalate the situation? If he does nothing he will look weak, but if he goes too far he could risk open conflict.

 

Elsewhere in the Middle East, things are already escalating. It is being reported that “several hundred Marines” are on the ground in Syria to support an assault on the city of Raqqa, and another 1,000 troops could be sent to Kuwait to join the fight against ISIS any day now. The following comes from Zero Hedge…

 

 

While the Trump administration waits to decide if it will send 1,000 troops to Kuwait to fight ISIS, overnight the Washington Post reported that the US has sent several hundred Marines to Syria to support an allied local force aiming to capture the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa. Defence officials said they would establish an outpost from which they could fire artillery at IS positions some 32km (20 miles) away. US special forces are already on the ground, “advising” the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) alliance according to the BBC.

 

The defence officials told the Washington Post that the Marines were from the San Diego-based 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, and that they had flown to northern Syria via Djibouti and Kuwait. They are to set up an artillery battery that could fire powerful 155mm shells from M777 howitzers, the officials said. Another marine expeditionary unit carried out a similar mission at the start of the Iraqi government’s operation to recapture the city of Mosul from IS last year.

 

Meanwhile, China is spitting mad for several reasons. For one, the Chinese are absolutely furious that South Korea has allowed the U.S. to deploy the THAAD missile defense system on their soil…

 

 

China is lashing out at South Korea and Washington for the deployment of a powerful missile defense system known as the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, or THAAD, deposited at the Osan Air Base in South Korea on Monday evening.

 

The deployment of THAAD follows several ballistic missile tests by North Korea in recent months, including the launch of four missiles on Monday, three of which landed in the sea off the coast of Japan. Though THAAD would help South Korea protect itself from a North Korean missile attack, China is vocally protesting the deployment of the system, claiming it upsets the “strategic equilibrium” in the region because its radar will allow the United States to detect and track missiles launched from China.

 

Of course the U.S. needed to do something, because the North Koreans keep rattling their sabers by firing off more ballistic missiles toward Japan.

 

But it is one thing to deploy a missile defense system, and it is another thing entirely to fly strategic nuclear bombers into the region.

 

So if the Chinese were upset when THAAD was deployed, how will they feel when B-1 and B-52 bombers start showing up in South Korea?…

 

 

Earlier this week, trigger-happy Kim pushed his luck once more when he fired off four ballistic missiles into the seas near Japan.

 

Now US military chiefs are reportedly planning to fly in B-1 and B-52 bombers – built to carry nuclear bombs – to show America has had enough.

 

South Korea and the US have also started their annual Foal Eagle military exercise sending a strong warning to North Korea over its actions.

 

A military official said 300,000 South Korean troops and 15,000 US personnel are taking part in the operation.

 

The Trump administration has openly stated that all options “are on the table” when it comes to North Korea, and that includes a military strike.

 

It has been more than 60 years since the Korean War ended, but many are concerned that we may be closer to a new Korean War than we have been at any point since that time.

 

And of course our relationship with China is tumbling precariously downhill as well. Another reason why the Chinese are extremely upset with the Trump administration is because a U.S. Navy carrier battle group led by the USS Carl Vinson sailed past islands that China claims in the South China Sea just a few weeks ago.

 

In China, the media openly talks about the possibility of war with the United States over the South China Sea. Most Americans are not even aware that the South China Sea is a very serious international issue, but over in China this is a major focus.

 

And the U.S. military has recently made several other moves in the region that have angered the Chinese…

 

 

Also in February, the U.S. sent a dozen F-22 Raptor stealth fighters to Tindal AB in northern Australia, the closest Australian military airbase to China, for coalition training and exercises. It’s the first deployment of that many F-22s in the Pacific.

 

And if that didn’t get the attention of the Chinese government, the U.S. just tested four Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles during a nuclear war exercise, sending the simulated weapons 4,200 miles from the coast of California into the mid-Pacific. It’s the first time in three years the U.S. has conducted tests in the Pacific, and the first four-missile salvo since the end of the Cold War.

 

I can understand the need to look tough, but eventually somebody is going to go too far.

 

If you are familiar with my work, then you know that I believe that war is coming. Things in the Middle East continue to escalate, and it is only a matter of time before a great war erupts between Israel and her neighbors. Meanwhile, U.S. relations with both Russia and China continue to deteriorate, and this is something that I have been warning about for a very long time.

 

We should hope for peace, but we should also not be blind to the signs of war that are starting to emerge all over the planet. Relatively few people anticipated the outbreak of World War I and World War II in advance, and I have a feeling that the same thing will be true for World War III.

 

---------------------------------------------------

 

위의 이재명 경제학은 바로 케인즈 경제학을 쉽게 설명한 것에 지나지 않는다. 케인즈 경제학은 과거에 영구 기관(永久機關; Perpetual-motion Machine)을 믿었던 사람의 사고 방식과 유사하다.  물론 영구기관이 가짜요 사기였듯이 케인즈 경제학 역시 가짜이고 사기이다.

소비를 통해 나라 경제가 계속해서 번영을 지속할 수 있다는 엉터리 경제학이 바로 케인즈 경제학이다. 하지만 소비를 하려면 먼저 생산이 있어야 한다. 지금의 경제 위축을 소비 위축 때문이라고 말하는 멍청이 경제학자들이 너무 많다. 하지만 내가 누차 말했듯이, 문제의 원인은 소비 위축이 아니라 생산 위축이고 생산 절벽이다.

한국의 중소기업의 상당수가 중국이나 베트남 등지로 낮은 임금을 찾아 나가버렸다. 지금 다이소 등의 점포에서 만나는 대부분의 상품은 모두 동남아시아 등지에서 만들어 수입한 것들이다.


----------------------------------------------------