이번 탄핵 사태를 통해 우리는 언론인들이 별 볼 일 없는 인간일 뿐만 아니라, 대한민국에 극히 해로운 반역적인 개자식들이라는 것을 확인했다.
-------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
이번 탄핵 사태를 객관적으로 바라본 기사이다. 이번 탄핵 사태가 특이했던 점은, 이전까지 우파라고 우리가 믿고 있던 새누리 비박계와 기타 국가 헌법질서를 유지해야 할 검찰, 법원, 언론, 국정원, 경찰 등이 모두 좌파와 협조를 했거나, 또는 복지부동하거나 겁을 먹고 침묵을 지켰다는 것이다.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[출처] 각하되면 이렇게 하라
모두 두손을 모으고 애국가를 불러라
그리고 호국영령과 순국선열에 묵념을 해라
그리고 대한민국만세 삼창을 해라
그리고 박근혜 대통령 만세 삼창을 해라
그리고 동지들과 뜨겁게 악수하라
그리고 이제 대한민국을 정상화 시키기위해 대통령에게 절대적인 힘을
보태줘야한다
대통령과 애국세력과 국민들과 온힘을 다하고 온마음을 다합쳐 국가
대개조의 역사적 소명을 수행해야 한다
--------------------------------------------------------
백악관 수석 전략가 배넌의 역사관
미국 역사는 4개의 세대가 예측가능한 발전을 거쳐 변화하고, 각 세대는 약 20년에 해당한다. 80년에 걸친 세대의 발전이 완결되면, 그 이후에 새로운 세계가 시작된다.
The World According to Bannon
by Alexander Livingston
Bannon’s Vision
Bannon’s political vision finds its clearest expression in his 2010 documentary, Generation Zero. The film presents the financial meltdown and bailout as the product of a corrupt and incompetent political class beholden to global financial elites. “The party of Davos,” Bannon argues, ruthlessly plundered the wealth of the nation’s working men and women. But the documentary, of course, is no leftist polemic.
Underpinning Generation Zero’s melodramatic, right-populist discourse — which suffused President Trump’s “carnage”-filled inaugural address — is a strange theory of historical change proposed by Neil Howe and William Strauss.
Writing in the 1990s, Howe and Strauss asserted that American history could be understood as an orderly system of generational change. Every four generations constitutes a “saeculum” that passes through four predictable stages of development, each lasting approximately twenty years.
A saeculum begins in the wake of a great crisis. Conformity and self-denial reign, and energy is channeled into building and protecting stable institutions. This first generation, or “turning,” eventually gives way to a subsequent generation where the social order begins to erode. Stultifying conformity is thrown off in pursuit of spiritual discovery and individual freedom.
The second turning leads to a third, where corroding skepticism unravels stable institutions and social trust breaks down. Society atomizes and identities fracture, while speculation and elite power break free of traditional constraints. This cycle of unraveling is followed by a cataclysmic “fourth turning” into the new saeculum. The complete collapse of social institutions plunges society into chaos, and individuals are forced to embrace a common purpose in order to rebuild society. As Howe explains in Bannon’s Generation Zero, fourth turnings are tragic but necessary stages in the consolidation of national unity.
Howe and Strauss identified three great cycles of climactic crisis in American history: the revolutionary war, the Civil War, and the Second World War. In each case the nation faced existential annihilation from internal division or external dangers. And in each case, the nation emerged stronger than before because of citizens’ heroism and sacrifice.
Generation Zero positions the 2008 financial crisis as the nation’s latest fourth turning, the byproduct and successor to the counter-culture of the 1960s and ’70s.
As Bannon tells it, the socialism and black power politics of the 1960s laid siege to both the institutional stability of the 1950s and the cultural values that had traditionally sustained American free enterprise, unleashing a torrent of greed that ultimately sparked the financial crisis. Generation Zero traces the convergence of these lines of crisis back to the Clinton presidency, when crony capitalism and welfare socialism ostensibly conspired to gut the American economy and abandon “the forgotten men.”
Bannon sees the current cycle of crisis as the most perilous yet, for the United States lacks the “Judeo-Christian values” that sustained American exceptionalism in prior eras of crisis. Will the United States and its tradition of liberty and free enterprise endure the coming convulsion? Or will this “turning” be the end of American civilization as we know it? Does the zero that numbers this generation denote being first or last? All Trump’s chief adviser knows is that the Right must gird itself for a twenty-year battle to see the fourth cycle through.
Bannon’s War
Bannon and Breitbart News’s fixation on gore, violence, and sacrifice is well-documented. His co-writer on a hip-hop adaptation of Coriolanus set in the 1992 Los Angeles riots told the New York Times that Bannon “was drawn to Shakespeare’s Roman plays because of their heroic military violence.”
Bannon’s fascination with violence is not merely provocation. Like Roosevelt, he sees in war a transformative experience of moral regeneration that serves as a bulwark against civilizational decline. One “of the biggest open questions in this country,” Bannon declared on Breitbart Radio this past summer, is whether the United States is willing to embrace the strenuous life. “Is that grit still there, that tenacity, that we’ve seen on the battlefields . . . fighting for something greater than themselves?”
For Bannon, this war has already begun. As he explained in his Vatican lecture:
[T]here is a major war brewing, a war that’s already global. It’s going global in scale, and today’s technology, today’s media, today’s access to weapons of mass destruction, it’s going to lead to a global conflict that I believe has to be confronted today.
The war in Bannon’s mind is the war radical Islam is waging on the “West.”
출처: Jacobin
---------------------------------------------
Time crystals: New form of matter once thought to break laws of physics created by scientists
Ian Johnston Science Correspondent
A new kind of matter – dubbed a “time crystal” – has been created by two teams of scientists in a feat once considered theoretically impossible.
Normal crystals, anything from diamonds to snowflakes, have atoms arranged in a repeating three-dimensional lattice.
However the atoms in time crystals – the existence of which was first suggested in 2012 – repeat a pattern across the fourth dimension, time.
This essentially means they should oscillate forever without any external influence.
Before their apparent creation, some researchers had expressed doubt that time crystals could be made as perpetual motion contradicts the laws of physics.
But it is thought to be possible partly because of the strange way matter behaves at the quantum level.
A time crystal seems to be a closed system, so no energy is lost to the outside world. And it also appears to have properties similar to superconductors so electrons can move without any resistance.
This allows the observed motion to continue, theoretically at least, for all time.
The practical applications are thought to be far off, but it is believed the crystals’ unique properties could help make quantum computing a reality.
Prototype quantum computers exist, but need to be heavily shielded from the slightest interference from the outside world. The crystals could help protect the stored information, overcoming one of the greatest obstacles to the widespread use of computers many millions of times faster than the ones used today.
중앙일보에도 타임 크리스털에 대한 기사가 나왔는데, 위의 기사가 더 이해하기 쉽게 되어 있고, 더 공정(?)하다. 중앙일보 기사는 너무 한국인을 추켜올리는데 중점을 두었다.
---------------------------------------------
Christina Sommers 트윗
Dear @NYTimes: The smothering of free speech on campus started a long time ago, but glad you finally noticed.
뉴욕타임즈 귀하: 대학가에서 자유 언론을 억압하는 일은 이미 오래 전에 시작되었습니다. 귀사에서 마침내 그 사실을 인지했다니 반갑습니다.
---> 미들버리 대학에서 찰스 머리 교수가 봉변당한 일에 대해 뉴욕타임즈가 사설을 쓴 데 대해.
위키피디아에 있는 크리스티나 소머스 소개
Christina Marie Hoff Sommers (born September 28, 1950) is an American author, former philosophy professor, and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a conservative think tank. Sommers is known for her critique of contemporary feminism. Her work includes the books Who Stole Feminism? (1994) and The War Against Boys (2000), and her writing has been featured in a variety of different media outlets, including The New York Times, Time, and The Atlantic. She also hosts a video blog called The Factual Feminist.
Sommers' positions and writing have been characterized by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as equity feminism, a classical-liberal or libertarian feminist perspective which suggests that the main political role of feminism is to ensure the right against coercive interference is not infringed. Sommers has contrasted equity feminism with victim feminism and gender feminism, arguing that modern feminist thought often contains an "irrational hostility to men" and possesses an "inability to take seriously the possibility that the sexes are equal but different"
-----------------------------------------------
What Do Economists Actually Know?에서
“The most erroneous assumption is to the effect that the aim of public education is to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence, and so make them fit to discharge the duties of citizenship in an enlightened and independent manner. Nothing could be further from the truth. The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment at all; it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States, whatever the pretensions of politicians, pedagogues and other such mountebanks, and that is its aim everywhere else.”
– H.L. Mencken
-----------------------------
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기