친일 청산하자는 민주당의 코미디

 

민주당 김희선의원의 아버지는

만주유하경찰서 특무 간부로 독립군을

탄압했음으로 독립군 손녀로 위장했고,

 

이미경의원 부친은

일본군의 핵심사찰 요원으로 황군헌병이었고,

 

정동영의 부친은

조선 착취 제일선기관인 조선식산회사 산하

금융조합 서기로 5년간 근무하고,

 

노무현대통령 장인 권오석은

일본국 면서기에 남한공산당 간부였고,

친조부는 일제앞잡이였고

친부 노판석은 남한공산당 남로당빨치산이었다.

 

정동채의원의 아버지는 일본 헌병 오장이었고,

 

김근태의원의 아버지는 일본국 교사이었고

친형 3명은 스스로 월북한 사람이다.

 

유시민 친부는 일본국 교사고

백부는 일본국 면장이었다.

 

조기숙의원의 아버지는

조선총독부 기관지 기자로 근무했다.

 

권영길은 일본에서 1941년 11월5일 출생했다.

 

문재인의 아버지는

일제시대 흥남 농업계장으로 친일공무원이었고

6.25전쟁때는 북괴군 상좌였다.

 

박원순의 아버지 박길보는

일제시대 우리나라 젊은이들을 징용보내고

젊은처녀들을 위안부로 보내는

일본보국대 직원으로 7년이나 근무했다.

 

안철수 친조부는

세금수탈,토지정리 등을 맡아하는

총독부 산하 금융조합 직원이었다.

 

민주당과 문재인이 친일을 떠들

자격이 있는가.

 

[출처] 일베, 정말 기막힌 사실!

      

간결하게 잘 정리했다.

 

-------------------------------------------

 

 

-------------------------------------

 

 

 

우리의 정계가 적의 추종자들에 의해 장악되었다는 놀랍고도 한심한 소식이다.

---------------------------------------------------------

 

대부분의 지식인이라는 사람들이 몸조심하고 제대로 말조차 못하고 있는데, 곽 교장이 자신의 소신을 학생들에게 발표했다니, 요즘의 상황에서 용기 있는 행동이라고 할만 하다.

 

---------------------------------------------

 

 

  

 

2030년이면 중국이 경제 대국이 되고, 미국은 2등 국가로 전락할 수 있다. 위의 표가 그걸 말해준다. 더구나 트럼프가 자유주의적 원칙에 따라 경제를 개혁할 것 같지는 않다. 그렇다면 미국의 쇠락은 피할 수가 없다.

 

-------------------------------------------------

 

Nigel Farage 트윗

A refugee is somebody in fear of their life. Most people coming to Europe and America are actually economic migrants.

난민이란 생명의 위협을 느끼는 사람들이다. 하지만 유럽과 미국에 오는 대부분의 난민이라는 사람들은 사실은 경제적 이민들이다.

----> 나도 몇달 전에 이런 글을 썼다. 지금의 난민들은 사실은 난민이 아니다.

 

--------------------------------

 

 

Would Ayn Rand Have Cast President Trump As A Villain? Steve Simpson

Friday, February 10, 2017

 

아래의 인용 글들은 모두 위의 글에서 가져온 것이다. 아인 랜드의 글들인데, 모두 읽어볼만한 것들이다.

   

Rand memorably describes this process in the famous “money speech” in Atlas Shrugged:

 

 

But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law — men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims — then money becomes its creators’ avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they’ve passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.

========== 

 

아인 랜드Rand의 글 “The Money Making Personality:”에서

 

The Money-Maker is the discoverer who translates his discovery into material goods. In an industrial society with a complex division of labor, it may be one man or a partnership of two: the scientist who discovers new knowledge and the entrepreneur — the businessman — who discovers how to use that knowledge, how to organize material resources and human labor into an enterprise producing marketable goods.

 

The Money-Appropriator is an entirely different type of man. He is essentially noncreative — and his basic goal is to acquire an unearned share of the wealth created by others. He seeks to get rich, not by conquering nature, but by manipulating men, not by intellectual effort, but by social maneuvering. He does not produce, he redistributes: he merely switches the wealth already in existence from the pockets of its owners to his own.

 

 

The Money-Appropriator may become a politician — or a businessman who “cuts corners” — or that destructive product of a “mixed economy”: the businessman who grows rich by means of government favors, such as special privileges, subsidies, franchises; that is, grows rich by means of legalized force.

 ======

 

Rand rejects the whole idea of the “public interest” as vague, at best, and destructive, at worst. As she says in an essay called “The Pull Peddlers”:

 

So long as a concept such as “the public interest” … is regarded as a valid principle to guide legislation — lobbies and pressure groups will necessarily continue to exist. Since there is no such entity as “the public,” since the public is merely a number of individuals, the idea that “the public interest” supersedes private interests and rights, can have but one meaning: that the interests and rights of some individuals takes precedence over the interests and rights of others.

공공이란 실체는 없다. 공공이란 단지 다수의 개인들일 뿐이다. 공공의 이익이 개인적 이익에 앞선다는 말은, 사실은 일부의 이익이 다른 일부의 이익에 앞선다는 말일 뿐이다.

 

If so, then all men and all private groups have to fight to the death for the privilege of being regarded as “the public.” The government’s policy has to swing like an erratic pendulum from group to group, hitting some and favoring others, at the whim of any given moment — and so grotesque a profession as lobbying (selling “influence”) becomes a full-time job. If parasitism, favoritism, corruption, and greed for the unearned did not exist, a mixed economy [a mixture of freedom and economic controls] would bring them into existence.

 

 

 

As Rand put it in Atlas Shrugged (through the words of protagonist John Galt):

 

 

Rights are conditions of existence required by man’s nature for his proper survival. If man is to live on earth, it is right for him to use his mind, it is right to act on his own free judgment, it is right to work for his values and to keep the product of his work. If life on earth is his purpose, he has a right to live as a rational being: nature forbids him the irrational. Any group, any gang, any nation that attempts to negate man’s rights, is wrong, which means: is evil, which means: is anti-life.

 

 

In 1962, Rand wrote the following in an essay called “The Cold Civil War”:

 

A man who is tied cannot run a race against men who are free: he must either demand that his bonds be removed or that the other contestants be tied as well. If men choose the second, the economic race slows down to a walk, then to a stagger, then to a crawl — and then they all collapse at the goal posts of a Very Old Frontier: the totalitarian state. No one is the winner but the government.

 

 --------------
 

 

As Rand put it in Atlas Shrugged (through the words of protagonist John Galt):

 

 

Rights are conditions of existence required by man’s nature for his proper survival. If man is to live on earth, it is right for him to use his mind, it is right to act on his own free judgment, it is right to work for his values and to keep the product of his work. If life on earth is his purpose, he has a right to live as a rational being: nature forbids him the irrational. Any group, any gang, any nation that attempts to negate man’s rights, is wrong, which means: is evil, which means: is anti-life.