조선 인민민주주의 세상입니까?

엄상익(변호사)


 “저는 요즈음 민주주의를 말하면 먼저 어떤 민주주의냐고 묻습니다. 그러니까 조선 인민민주주의를 말하는 것인지 소비에트식 민주주의를 말하는 것인지 아니면 자유민주주의를 말하는 것인지 분명히 해달라고 합니다. 저는 자유민주주의만이 우리가 지켜야 하는 법치를 본질로 하기 때문이라고 생각합니다.”
 “지금 상황을 보면 법치주의가 무시되고 중국의 문화혁명 당시같이 무조건 낙인찍고 단죄하는 분위기가 우리 사회에 팽배해 있습니다. 좌파정권의 위원회에서 친일파로 낙인을 찍으면 역적이 되고 재산을 몰수당하는 세상입니다. 좌파판사들은 그런 위원회의 결정을 무조건 기계적으로 지지하는 판결을 내놓고 있습니다. 이미 오래 전 법에 근거해 간첩죄로 선고된 죄인을 위원회가 민주화 인사로 결정해 버리는 세상 아닙니까?”
 “우리 사법부의 판사들도 좌파와 우파로 갈리고 있습니다. 일부 판사들이 모임을 가지고 대법원을 공격하고 있습니다. 심지어는 부장판사라는 사람이 언론에 익명으로 법원 내부의 문제를 보내 그대로 보도되게 함으로써 사법부를 흔들고 있습니다. 법원 내부마저 좌우로 분열되면 사법부는 무너지는 것입니다. 그래서 우리 대한변협은 성명을 내기로 결론을 내렸습니다.” (발췌)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

'가쓰시카 호쿠사이'(葛飾北齋, 1760~1849)의 우키요에(가나가와(神奈川) 앞 바다의 파도)./ 펀드빌더
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------

민노총 회원들의 국회내 시위

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

이승만 대통령이 불교개혁 운동을 펼치고 
경허선사와 경허선사의 제자들이 대한민국 불교의 선풍을 바로 잡았으나 


이후 좌파정권이 공권력을 동원 
좌파승려들이 불교를 장악하게 한 이후 
대한민국 불교는 '진리를 추구하는' 종교로서의 존재 가치를 잃어버렸다.


출가를 해 깨닫기 위해 수행하기 보단 
어떻게 줄을 잘 서서 주지 자리 하나 얻으려는 땡중들이 
결국엔 권력과 돈줄에 서서 주요 자리를 차지하고 앉아
좌파정치 놀음의 시녀가 되어버린 것이다.


어차피 이 땅에 불조들의 법맥은 끊어졌고 
선문답 하나 법답게 할 줄 아는 중도 없으며 
깨달으려 노력하는 중도 없다.
어차피 이 땅에 불교는 더 이상 불교도 아니거니와 
진리를 탐구하는 종교로서의 역할도 하지 못한다.


부처님 오신 날을 맞이하여 
이 땅에 이렇게 의미없어진 가짜 불교는 
문을 닫고 해산하길 권고한다.

[출처] 한국의 불교는 이미 끝났다

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

드루킹 사건을 수사 중인 검‧경의 부실수사 논란과 관련해서는 “부실수사는 어제오늘 문제가 아니다”라며
“경찰이 뒤늦게 하려 해도 검찰이 증거를 은폐‧은닉할 수 있도록 영장을 기각하며 도와주고 있다”고 지적했다.

이어 “내가 검찰로 공직생활을 시작한 이후 이런 모습은 처음”이라며
“특검이 실시되면 (영장 기각으로) 수사를 막은 검찰부터 잡아넣어야 한다”고 비난했다.

[출처] 홍 “특검이 실시되면 .수사를 막은 .....검찰부터 잡아넣어야 한다” ㄷㄷㄷ

-------------------------------------------------------------------

그렇치 않으면
문재인은   임기  채우는건  쉽지 않을거로 보인다




일부 언론이
외신을 인용하는데
완전  오역을 하고 있다고  열받앗네,


일부 언론이 엊저녁  전화통화에서
트럼프가  문재인에게 조언을 구햇다고 
외신을 인용햇는데,  이건   외신 보도를 왜곡한것이다


사실상 
트럼프가 한 말은,
남북 판문점회담후,
문이 트럼프에게 전달한 내용과 
지금 북이 하는말과   왜 다르느냐고   물은것이다
이건 사실상  질책한것이다




이런식으로,
외신을   왜곡 보도 하는게,
기자가 
기자 쓰레기라는   의미의   '기레기' 라고 불리는 이유다

[출처] 뱅모) 방미하면, 문재인은 부도신고하고 파산신청해라

----------------------------------------------------------------

어제도 썼지만, 이건 미국이 하고 있는 중국과의 치킨 게임이다. 벼랑 끝까지 끌고 가는데, 겁을 먹고 먼저 무릅을 꿇으면 지는 게임이다. 미국이 전쟁이 난다며 중국을 위협하고 있는 것이다.

---------------------------------------------------------

종교는 비판하지만 엉터리 경제학자, 사회학자, 통계학자 등은 비판하지 못하는 사회. 하지만 엉터리 정치 이론으로 죽은 사람이 더 많다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

사과한 뒤에 곤경에 빠진다.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

반인플레 프로그램들

정부의 정책만이 인플레를 만들 수 있다. 따라서 무엇보다 정부에 의한 통제가 아니라, 정부를 통제해야 한다. 1939년 이래 지속된 통화 팽창을 중단해야 한다.

 

An Anti-Inflation Program

 

•Henry Hazlitt

 

[Newsweek column from June 25, 1951, and reprinted in Business Tides: The Newsweek Era of Henry Hazlitt.]

 

Regardless of what Congress actually does before June 30, it is instructive to consider what a sensible anti-inflationary legislative program would be like if we could get it.

1—What is primarily needed is not more controls by the government but more controls on the government. It is government policy, and government policy alone, that creates hyperinflation. Inflation means an increase in the volume of money compared with the volume of goods. It is government policy that either permits, encourages, or directly produces such an increase.

 

2—The enormous increase in the volume of money and credit since 1939 has been directly caused by the policy of cheap money and government bond support followed by the Federal Reserve System. That policy should be definitively stopped by Congressional direction. And whether or not powers are given to the Federal Reserve to increase still further the required reserves of member banks, Congress should restore, at least to their pre-1945 level, the required reserves of the Federal Reserve Banks themselves. It is absurd to control the low-powered credit of installment buying and the medium-powered credit of member bank loans, while failing to put even normal restraints on the high-powered credit created by the Federal Reserve Banks.

 

3—Congress should insist that the Administration keep the Federal budget balanced. Budget deficits cause inflation by forcing an increase in the volume of money and credit. The budget should be kept balanced mainly, of course, by drastic slashes in unjustified expenditures rather than by still more burdensome taxation.

 

4—Price control should be dropped. It is a fake remedy for inflation. It creates and intensifies shortages. It prolongs inflation by diverting public attention from the real cure, which is simply for the government to stop printing more money. It leads to ever-widening government controls, which tend to stay long after the “emergency” which was the original excuse for them has passed. The controlled economies of Europe, and the permanence of rent control almost everywhere, are typical examples. The price controllers neither understand nor trust the workings of a free market.

 

5—The Administration’s priority and allocation powers, though they have so far been handled rather ineptly, should be continued. The controllers usually try to tie in price control with allocation powers. But while price control creates a need for rationing and allocation, the causation does not work the other way. Allocations work best without price control.

 

6—No good case has been made out for any of the additional powers asked for by the Administration. The proposed food subsidies, for example, would be merely a way of concealing real inflationary increases in costs by adding them to your tax bill instead of to your butcher or grocer bill. The only way the British Labour Government could keep the cost of meat subsidies from going up was to forbid British consumers to eat more than two mouthfuls meat per week. Where there is no price control, there is no excuse for a food subsidy.

 

7—There is no convincing case, either, for giving the government the blanket discretionary powers it has asked for to build its own “defense” plants. It has not proved that it cannot get private industry to build and operate such plants, and at a far lower cost than the government could. If there should turn out to be a real need for a few plants that private industry would not in fact build, the Administration could go to Congress for specific authorization to build each of those plants. If any project were alleged to be top secret, it could appear in a Congressional bill as project X4Y, but at least a few key members of the Military Affairs Committees should know what it is.

 

8—In the light of sad experience, any extension of controls should carry a double termination trigger. In no case should extension run for more than a year. In addition, the new law should be terminable at any time by a majority vote of either House of Congress. Congress should never make itself impotent to repeal emergency powers that are being abused or that have ceased to be needed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

미국은 5개년 경제계획을 필요로 하지 않는다

역사를 보면 일단의 관료들에 의한 과학적인 경제 계획이 자유시장 경제보다 더 우수했다는 주장은 헛소리이다.

중국은 정부의 간섭에도 불구하고 성장하고 있는 것이다.

정부의 지도를 필요로 할만큼 현명하지 못한 인간들이, 왜 관료란 이름으로 불리면 갑자기 현명해진다고 생각하는지는 불가사의한 일이다.

경제 권력을 정부에 내주는 것은 정체와 가난으로 가는 지름길이다.

 

America Doesn’t Need a 5-Year Plan

 

•Jeffrey Harding

 

Back in 1999, I was in Tanzania relaxing by the pool at my hotel in the Serengeti after a dusty day of wildlife photography. A young attendant approached and informed me that former Tanzanian president Julius Nyrere was one of the most influential men in the world and that world leaders were streaming into Dar es Salaam to pay homage at his funeral. Nyrere had just died a few weeks before my arrival. The attendant went on to recite the many successes Nyrere and the government had achieved.

 

Like most African post-colonial leaders of his time, Nyrere was a dedicated socialist influenced by Marx, Mao, and Stalin. In the 1960s and ‘70s he launched Tanzania on a series of disastrous 5-year economic plans which devastated the country. His one-party state collectivized farms which resulted in starvation and mass upheaval (an estimated 10 million peasants were moved off their farms). His plans were a disaster for Tanzania.

 

By the time I got there (the first of three visits), top-down economic plans were still being promoted. In 1999 there was a new 3-year plan (“Vision 2025”). Their most recent plan is still aiming at 2025. The unsurprising result is that Tanzania remains a poor country. The latest data (2017) shows that it had a GDP of about $1,200 per capita. It’s about $62,000 per capita in the US. They still have a problem with hunger.

 

Imagine my shock when I saw Steve Rattner on Fareed Zakaria’s GPS Sunday morning program claim that China’s form of “state capitalism” (rife with 5-year plans) was outperforming our comparatively “hands-off” form of capitalism. He bemoaned our lack of a government economic plan.

 

Rattner, a well-known investment manager, is CEO of the firm that runs Michael Bloomberg’s personal assets. One of his claims to fame was his role as Obama’s “auto czar” in 2009 when he was tasked with the problem of what to do with union-encumbered GM and Chrysler who were then on the verge of bankruptcy. His solution: government bailout.

 

Rattner’s comments on GPS mirrored his recent opinion piece in the NY Times. His thesis is that the US is stagnating and China is surging economically and the reason is that they have a government-directed economic policy (“national strategy”) and we don’t.

 

China, he says, has brought more people out of poverty faster than any other country in history, yet we have “failed in recent years to deliver broadly higher standards of living.” Rattner praises China’s “Made in China 2025” policy of investing in industry that will compete in the manufacture of higher-end products like information technology, aerospace/aeronautics, and automated machine tools and robotics. It took two and a half years and 150 government engineers to produce the plan. China’s is now in its 13th 5-year plan.

 

According to Rattner, while we can’t even pass a budget addressing our “national priorities”, China is moving ahead with exciting projects like infrastructure spending, building a new Silk Road to access markets in Central Asia, and their new planto make China a leader in artificial intelligence by 2030.

 

Rattner believes that China is savvier than we are because it “understands the benefits of incorporating a robust free-enterprise element” in its planning. After all, he says, “in a complex global economy, the public sector should play an important role, and ours just isn’t.” We need “to get our government to perform the way it did in passing the New Deal and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society.”

 

Why Rattner is given time on the national stage to advocate junk economics sums up the poor state of economics reporting in America. It’s just more Progressive wishful thinking about government’s role in the economy. Would that it were so. Well, it isn’t so.

 

This stuff reminds me of the Japanese “threat” back in the 1980s. It was the same kind of thing. The wise bureaucrats in Japan’s Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) were responsible, they said, for Japan’s economic surge which resulted in advanced manufacturing techniques and the splurge of Japanese investors in overpriced U.S. real estate. It didn’t work out very well as Japan’s economy has more or less stagnated for the past 20 years and they’ve run up huge public debt (highest of advanced economies). We bought back a lot of that real estate at discount prices.

 

If history is to be any guide on policy, the premise that “scientific” economic planning by a bunch of bureaucrats has performed better than free market capitalism is a joke or a fantasy.

 

Rattner reacts like a lot of economic tourists who go to China and are dazzled by the skyscrapers, new roads and rails, and massive factories. They are also dazzled by China’s claim that their GDP is growing at somewhere between 7% and 11% per year post-Deng Xiaoping’s economic liberalization. They may or may not be growing at that rate; it depends if you believe the State’s data—which I don’t.

 

What Rattner fails to understand is that China is growing despite government meddling in the economy. It is an emerging economy with pent-up energy being released through their private sector. Growth has come because the government relaxed their control of the economy, especially since the more “radical” (for communists) reforms starting in the mid-1990s, which is when GDP started to take off:

 

What I don’t understand is why Progressives like Rattner, who see people as fallible human beings needing government to guide them in their economic activities, believe those same fallible humans are wise and capable when they are called “bureaucrats”. There has been a lot of research on this topic (public choice theory) by economists such as Nobel prize winner James Buchanan and others who revealed that bureaucrats are not necessarily high-minded folks looking out for our best interests: they have ulterior motives and are driven by self-interest just like the rest of us.

 

You can count on that in spades when it comes to Chinese bureaucrats. They are given goals by the government and you can be assured they will report that they have met them. The result is massive waste, corruption, and malinvestment. That’s why you can’t trust their numbers.

 

Rattner cites Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal as a good example of can-do government. Like China’s economic mandarins, the New Deal was an attempt by Roosevelt to replace our free market economy with a command economy where prices, wages, and output were to be determined by his idealistic “Brain Trust” mandarins. The New Deal got things wrong, very wrong. Between Hoover’s and FDR’s policies of economic meddling, what would have been an ordinary recession became the Great Depression which held back the economy for more than 20 years (the stock market did not get back to its pre-Depression 1929 high until 1954). Perhaps Rattner should read a history of the New Deal by someone other than FDR’s apologists.

 

America doesn’t need 5-year plans. Rattner protests that we don’t want to give up our liberties and become like China, but that is exactly what he is proposing. It seems that there is a corollary between granting government the power to direct the economy and the loss of liberty. As economist Ludwig von Mises said, there is no middle ground between “state capitalism” and liberty. The history of ceding economic power to the government has been a one-way street to stagnation and poverty.

 

 

Jeffrey Harding is a real estate investor in Santa Barbara, California

  -----------------------------------------------------------------

 

 우리에게도 저런 일이 일어날 수 있다.
----------------------------------------------------------------

낮은 성장률과 빈곤을 지지하는 교황 프란치스코

젊은 시절 페론주의에 영향을 받은

좌파 교황의 반자본주의적 발언들

 

Pope Francis Endorses Slower Growth, More Poverty

 

Daniel J. Mitchell

 

I almost feel guilty when I criticize the garbled economic thoughts of Pope Francis. After all, he was influenced by Peronist ideology as a youngster, so he was probably a lost cause from the beginning.

 

Moreover, Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell have already dissected his irrational ramblings on economics and explained that free markets are better for the poor. Especially when compared to government dependency.

 

But since Pope Francis just attacked tax havens, and I consider myself the world’s foremost defender of these low-tax jurisdictions, I can’t resist adding my two cents. Here’s what the Wall Street Journal just reported about the Pope’s ideological opposition to market-friendly tax systems.

 

The Vatican denounced the use of offshore tax havens… The document, which was released jointly by the Vatican’s offices for Catholic doctrine and social justice, echoed past warnings by Pope Francis over the dangers of unbridled capitalism. …The teaching document, which was personally approved by the pope, suggested that greater regulation of the world’s financial markets was necessary to contain “predatory and speculative” practices and economic inequality.

 

He even embraced global regulation, not understanding that this increases systemic risk.

 

 

The supranational dimension of the economic system makes it easy to bypass the regulations established by individual countries,” the Vatican said. “The current globalization of the financial system requires a stable, clear and effective coordination among various national regulatory authorities.

 

And he said that governments should have more money to spend.

 

A section of the document was dedicated to criticizing offshore tax havens, which it said contribute to the “creation of economic systems founded on inequality,” by depriving nations of legitimate revenue.

 

Wow, it’s like the Pope is applying for a job at the IMF or OECD. Or even with the scam charity Oxfam.

 

In any event, he’s definitely wrong on how to generate more prosperity. Maybe he should watch this video.

 

Or read Marian Tupy.

 

Or see what Nobel Prize winners have to say.

 

P.S. And if the all that doesn’t work, methinks Pope Francis should have a conversation with Libertarian Jesus. He could start here, here, and here.

 

Originally published at Dan Mitchell's blog International Liberty

-----------------------------------------------------

유럽 은행들이 위험에 빠진 7가지 원인

유럽연합은행의 제로 금리 정책은 신용 팽창을 위한 것이었으나, 오히려 신용 위축을 유발하고 있다. 장차 불황이 닥치고 통화 공급이 하락할 것이다. 위기는 은행권을 위험에 빠뜨릴 뿐만 아니라, 유로화 자체를 위태롭게 할 것이다.

 

7 Reasons Why European Banks Are in Trouble

 

•Philipp Bagus

 

 

While the euro crisis seems far away as all Eurozone countries ran government deficits below 3 percent of GDP, there is one problem for the euro that quietly keeps growing: the unresolved banking crisis. And this is not a small problem. The Eurosystems´and euro banks´ balance sheets totaled €30 trillion in January 2018, that is about 291 percent of GDP.

 

European banks are in trouble for several reasons.

 

First, banking regulation has become tighter after the financial crisis. As a consequence regulatory and compliance costs have rise substantially. Today banks have to fulfill demands by national authorities, the European Banking Authority, the Single Supervisory Mechanism, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the national central banks. Being at a staggering 4% of total revenue currently, compliance costs are expected to rise to 10% of total revenue until 2022.

 

Second, there are risks hidden in banks´ balance sheets. That there is something fishy in European banks´assets can quickly be detected when comparing banks market capitalization with their book value. Most European banks have price-to-book ratios below 1. German Commerzbank´s price-to-book ratio stands at 0.49, Deutsche Bank´s is at 0.36, Italian UniCredit´s at 0.23, Greek Piraeus Bank at 0.14, and Greek Alpha Bank at 0.34.

 

With a price-to-book ratio below 1, buying a bank at the current prices and liquidating its assets at book value, an investor could make profits. Why are investors not doing that? Simply, because they do not believe in the book value of the banks´assets. Assets are too optimistically valued in the eyes of market participants. Considering that the equity ratio (equity divided by balance sheet total) of the Euro banking sector is at only 8.3%, a down valuation of assets could quickly evaporate equity.

 

Third, low interest rates have contributed to increasing asset prices. Stocks and bond prices have increased due to the monetary policy of the ECB, thereby leading to accounting profits for banks. Monetary policy has, thereby, artificially propped up banking profits during the last years.

 

Fourth, according to the ECB non-performing loans (NPLs), i.e. loans where borrowers have fallen behind in their payments, amount to €759 bn., that is 30% of the banks´ equity.

 

Fifth, more trouble for banks lies ahead. Due to artificially low interest rates, insolvency rates have fallen. In Germany in 2003, 39,470 companies (1.36% of existing companies) became insolvent. By 2017 insolvencies had fallen to 20,200 companies (0.62%).

 

 

Companies that otherwise would have had to close, can survive due to interest rates close to zero. Their survival is not without cost as they suck up resources that could be used in other projects. Every year of the ECB´s zero interest rate policy 10,000s of bankruptcies are postponed adding to a growing stock of zombie companies. The zombie companies contribute to the anemic growth because they mal use resources that could be use more productively in other lines of production. Once interest rates increase rapidly these zombie companies will come to the roost and insolvency rates will return to more normal levels leading to problems for banks.

 

Sixth, lower interest rates have posed severe problems to banks´net interest margin. The passive, the transformation and the credit margin of banks have fallen. The passive margin results from investing deposits of bank clients in the overnight interbank market. Banks could earn traditionally a margin this way but not in a world of negative interbank rates. The transformation margin results from maturity transformation, when a bank borrows short-term from a client and lends long-term to another client. With a flattened yield curve, this transformation yields less than it normally would. Borrowing at 0% in order to lend long term at 0% is not profitable. Moreover, when banks lend long term at very low interest rates and short-term rates start to increase, margins fall further.

 

The credit margin results from the risk of lending. Banks try to compensate the falling passive and transformation margin by assuming higher credit risks. The competition of banks in this field drives down the credit margin as well. Thus the zero interest rate policy of the ECB has cannibalized traditional bank profitability.

 

Seventh, banks in the Eurozone are still connected closely to their government. As of January 2018, Eurozone banks held €3.536 bn. Government debt on their books which amounts to 13% of their balance sheet total. When in the next recession, the sovereign debt crisis looms again banks can expect losses on their sovereign debt portfolio.

 

When interest rates increase in the future banks will be confronted with several difficulties. First, non-performing loans will increase and zombie companies will go bust. Second, banks' long term low interest rate loans will become more difficult to refinance profitably. Third, asset prices will fall leading to losses. Government may get into trouble.

 

As a result of these losses, banks will be forced to restrict credits as their equity shrinks. Ironically, the ECB´s zero interest rate policy designed to promote credit expansion will finally lead to a credit contraction. There will be a severe recession and a fall in the money supply. The crisis will not only endanger the banking system but the euro as such, because troubled Eurozone government will try to recapitalize their banks through a monetization of newly issued debts.

 

Philipp Bagus is an associate professor at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

 

-------------------------------------------------------------




뜸 입문 문답

1问 病从何来？

 答 古人云，“宁事温补、勿事寒凉”.

 现代人往往反其道而行之。从小生活在空调、冰箱、冷饮无处不在的环境里，女性们更是为了美丽穿露脐装，露背装。大量使用寒凉药物，激素。贪食生冷食物，甚至常年穿裙子骑电动车，损耗了身体的阳气，造成免疫力低下，身体各系统功能失调，被寒凉所伤，而引发了各种疼痛，亚健康，终身病，慢性病。

2问 病从何去？

 答 最好的办法是灸关元穴，和足三里，中脘穴。补充身体的元阳。这是治本。

 同时配合灸局部疼痛点。这是治标。

3问 足三里有什么作用？

  答经过大量的案例表明常灸三里穴，能够防治二十多种疾病，又无一丝的毒副作用，确实能够在很短的时间里强壮身体、提高人体免疫、增强抗病能力、有益寿延年的功效

  足三里位于外膝眼下四横指、胫骨边缘  足三里是一个强壮身心的大穴，有调节机体免疫力、增强抗病能力、调理脾胃、补中益气、通经活络、疏风化湿、扶正祛邪的作用。古今大量的实践都证实，足三里是一个能防治多种疾病、强身健体的重要穴位。足三里是抗衰老的有效穴位，对于延年益寿大有裨益。灸足三里穴，可使胃肠蠕动有力而规律，并能提高多种消化酶的活力，增进食欲，帮助消化；在神经系统方面，可促进脑细胞机能的恢复，提高大脑皮层细胞的工作能力；在循环系统、血液系统方面，可以改善心功能，调节心律，增加红细胞、白细胞、血色素和血糖量；在内分泌系统方面，对垂体-肾上腺皮质系统功能有双向性良性调节作用，提高机体防御疾病的能力。能治疗胃十二指肠球部溃疡、急性胃炎、胃下垂等，解除急性胃痛的效果尤其明显，对于呕吐、呃逆、嗳气、肠炎、痢疾、便秘、肝炎、胆囊炎、胆结石、肾结石绞痛以及糖尿病、高血压等，也有辅助治疗作用。

4问 灸能美容吗？

 答 能。

 灸中脘穴，关元穴，足三里，调内而养外，标本兼治，通过调节内分泌等系统调动先天后天之元气，使人体的阴阳气血充足而上达头面，具有醒脑提神、滋养五官发肤的功效，能够有效的淡化、分解面部表皮的黑色素沉淀，消除面部水肿、眼袋、黑眼圈、色斑等等，有效的改善面部倦容，五官、肌令爱美的广大女性，肤色泽红润，富有弹性、无皱纹、无斑点、精神饱满，神采奕奕。

而且，在美容的同时，可以通过内分泌等系统起到减肥，根除妇科疾病的作用。

5问 高血压能灸吗？

 答 灸足三里，关元穴，中脘穴，涌泉穴。

灸时原来服用的降压药不能随便停，否则会引起血压反弹。

 足三里穴是强壮人体的养生要穴，对人体具有非常大的强健作用，经常艾灸这个穴能够预防和调理二十多种疾病，对高血压、眩晕有非常好的调理作用。

6问 感冒怎么灸?

灸大椎，效果非常快，大部分患者灸一次就可以治好。

患者低头在颈椎部最高点的第七椎处找“大椎穴”，再将不锈钢灸盒用毛巾包好，赛在衣服领子里或用松紧带固定，大椎穴要灸到皮肤发红发潮为佳；每次操作做到有汗微出效果最好。

7问 体质热的人是不是不能灸?

 答灸具有双向调节功能，经过经络的传导，来调整身体的寒热虚实。  热症施灸，《类经》说“因其势而解之、散之、升之、扬之，如开起窗，如揭起被，皆谓之发”，艾火施灸可以使血管扩张，血流加速，腠理宣通，从而达到“火郁发之”的散热退热祛邪外出的目的，所以称“火有拔山之力，开门驱邪之功”。   所以，大家不必害怕，我们身体的功能很神奇，正气内生，寒热之邪自然出矣。所以热性之人可灸！

比如，我对于扁桃体发炎，咽喉疼痛牙痛的患者，灸大椎，大部分患者会感觉咽喉有湿润感，症状减轻。

8问 遗精怎么灸？

 答 灸关元为主。配合中脘，足三里。睡觉前也可以灸涌泉穴。

9问 艾灸有没有季节的限制?

答 没有。任何季节都可以灸。

网友问，中里巴人说 夏天不能灸 夏天是往外发的 灸是往里的 说是会冲

类似这样的观点纯属无稽之谈。

四时皆可扶阳。

虽然春天树木发芽时人体的老毛病容易复发，此时人体阳气生发，灸时效果比较好，以及冬病夏治，三伏天灸时效果比较好，等等，都是相对而言。

  如果有什么毛病，早灸早好，根本没有必要等到特定的节气再灸。

10问 夏天热老虎又来了，灸法能不能将夏天的郁闷之气宣泄出去呢？

答

最佳的方法就是少食寒凉、以灸泻热。用艾灸的方法，选则阳穴灸之，便达到以火泻热的效果。在施灸的过程中，会适量或大量的出汗，这样闷热之气会随汗液得以宣泄，而且积蓄一冬的毒气也得以散发，灸完之后，再喝一些温薄荷叶水，顿时人就会感觉到清爽无比，闷热之气一扫而光。所以夏天艾灸，泻热清凉是养生避暑的最佳方法。据说日本人也都是在用我们老祖宗的这种方法来过夏的.

11问纯阳是什么？

《内经》所说：“阳气者，若天与日，失其所则折寿而不彰”所以说阳气是生命的根本。    阳气的是否充足与人体的衰老和疾病甚至死亡的发生，都有着极为密切的关系。如果我们把阳气算作一百，那么人从生到死，就是阳气从一百到零的过程，也就是说人从生到死，从健康到疾病，就是阳气的消耗过程。故而养生贵在于保养阳气、强壮阳气。阳气强壮固密，营卫调和，就可以防御外邪之侵袭；脾阳健壮，就可运化精微，营养全身；肾阳充足，能够推动整个机体气血的循环运行，滋养五脏，强壮身体，使人之寿命延长。这正是道学中所讲的“阳精若壮千年寿”“阳精若在必能生”养生境界。

12问 为什么艾火能壮阳气呢?

 答古代燧人氏以艾绒钻木取火，见艾可以产生火，古人就把太阳称为天之阳，把艾称为地之阳。

艾之火是纯阳之火，具有走三阴通十二经之功，灸火连续燃烧，可使艾火的纯阳温热之气由肌表透达经络，又因经络和脏腑相互联系，能使阳气通达五脏六腑。

 

特别是关元穴，是足三阴与任脉之会，又居下焦真阴真阳关锁于此，道家称之为丹田，故灸此温热之气，能直达精宫以助元阳。元阳，为全身之真阳，是五脏六腑阳气活动的动力。也可以说关元，是周身阳气之源，坚持不懈的灸关元，可以打通丹田，大补元阳。

再加上本店艾条的特殊配方，使得艾燃烧时产生特殊频率的辐射，使其补阳之力更加显著，从而达到养生壮阳之功。

13问 你灸为什么不化脓灸，只用手持灸？

答 毋庸置疑，化脓灸治大病效果极佳。

 但是实际操作时如果没有专业医师监护，很难坚持。

因为化脓灸要持续在伤口施灸，需要患者有极大的毅力。一些患者不能持之以恒的坚持，会出现伤口迁延不愈等麻烦。手持灸主要是患者自己在家操作，所以用持续的温和灸。只要坚持，可以达到一样的效果。

14问 什么是灸感？

答 灸之要，气至而有效。

灸感是在做艾灸时患者自我所感知的一种气的变化。各种各样，甚至千奇百怪，奇妙无比。不是亲身感受，很难体会其中奥妙。

第一种是灸火循经：多表现为透热、扩热、传热三种热感现象，这表明为体内的经气被激活推动循环起来了；比如灸足三里时热气会向下传感到小腿。

第二种是正邪相搏:多表现为酸、麻、胀、痛、痒的灸感，这表明为体内的经气被激发自动与病灶的邪气相搏斗。最常见的是风气大的患者发痒，湿气大的患者局部出水气。

第三种为开门驱邪：多表现为风、寒、凉、冷的灸感，这表明为体内的经气充足，开始将病气驱除体外了。甚至一些患者明显感觉有一股气从脚尖跑出去。

第四种是丹田气足，奇经八脉畅通。比如丹田整天暖洋洋，冬天不怕冷，夏天不怕热，等等。

灸感个体差异非常大，不是每个人或者每次都有。

15问 为什么有些人艾灸后会暂时有疾病加重的反应？

 答艾灸后常常会有疾病加重的反应，这是正邪交战的正常现象，那么病邪在体内寄居很久，他也不会轻而易举的乖乖就范。所以这时候就免不了有反应，你用艾灸的方式激发正气想把邪气赶出，那么邪气就先顽强抵抗。这时的正气不足，而邪气旺盛的时候，当然你会有各种不适反应出来。当你逐渐艾灸，体内慢慢累计了很多正气的时候，这时的病邪就会逐渐地赶出体外了。

16问 艾灸后出现口干舌燥怎么办?

答很多人艾灸后会出现口干舌燥，这也是艾灸的一种反应，这种现象表明阴阳正在调整，阳不胜阴，这时要多喝白开水或者小米米汤。此时患者会觉得喉咙异常干痛，这是病邪（寒邪）逐渐外发时的必然症状（病邪被驱赶到哪里，哪里就会出现西医所谓的炎症，此时许多中医专家都会任认为灸过火了，会立即停止治疗，使得功亏一篑）。

17问 什么情况下不能灸？

答  1孕妇不灸

2严重心脏病慎灸

3局部红肿热痛慎灸

4极度疲劳，过饥、过饱、酒醉、大汗淋漓、情绪不稳，或妇女经期忌灸

5某些传染病、高热、昏迷、抽风期间，或身体极度衰竭，形瘦骨立等忌灸

6无自制能力的人如精神病患者等忌灸。

18问 对于皮肤感觉迟钝者或小儿，怎么调节施灸温度？

答用拾指和中指置于施灸部位两侧，以感知施灸部位的温度，做到既不致烫伤皮肤，又能收到好的效果。也可以隔一会用自己的小指肚测试局部温度。小孩可以观察面部表情。

19问 针与灸有什么区别？

答 针只能通经脉，不能补元阳。灸在补元阳的同时也能通经脉。

针刺疗法虽有“迎随补泻、”的道理，但一般只可以治疗“不盛不虚”的症

状；而灸法则不问虚实寒热，都可以使用灸法。

20 问 不知道穴位能灸吗？

答能，那里不舒服灸那里。中医把这种方法叫阿是穴或天应穴。局部疼痛点必定是那里气血经脉不通造成的，灸局部可以直接通经脉，调气血，驱病邪。

21问 艾味有害吗？

答艾味无毒。人类用艾的历史上万年。现在研究表明，艾烟中对人体有益的成分有几十种。而且，我在临床中发现，艾烟对戒烟有非常显著而快速的作用。

22问 暖水袋或红外线理疗仪或电针能代替艾吗？

答 不能

 艾燃烧时能产生特殊的短红外线，渗透力是普通长红外线的3到4倍，对人体的渗透力在10mm以上，能够激活细胞免疫激活素，提高人体特殊免疫力。艾灸同时具有自动找病位和通经脉的功能。中医研究机构用其他药材好其他各种物质各种物理化学方法射线等等与艾做对比研究，结果没有一种方法可以完全替代艾。人类上万年唯独以艾为主做灸的原材料，自有原因。

23问 艾真能续命吗？

答 能，坚持艾灸能补充元阳，补充人体生命能量，最大减少疾病，尽享其自然寿命。保命之法，艾灼第一。

附录 《扁鹊心书》须识扶阳

须识扶阳

道家以消尽阴翳，炼就纯阳，方得转凡成圣，霞举飞升。故云∶“阳精若壮千年寿，阴气如强必毙伤。”又云∶“阴气未消终是死，阳精若在必长生。”故为医者，要知保扶阳气为本。人至晚年阳气衰，故手足不暖，下元虚惫，动作艰难。盖人有一息气在则不死，气者阳所生也，故阳气尽必死。人于无病时，常灸关元、气海、命关、中脘，更服保元丹、保命延寿丹，虽未得长生，亦可保百余年寿矣。（今人只是爱趋死路，动云∶我有火病，难服热药。所延之医，悉皆趋承附和，不言上焦有火，即云中、下积热，及至委顿，亦不知变迁。或遇明眼之医，略启扶阳之论，不觉彼此摇头，左右顾盼，不待书方，而已有不服之意矣。生今之世，思欲展抱负，施姜附尚且难入，而丹药、灼艾之说，断乎其不可行也。

24问 灸能补肾吗？

答 灸关元是最佳补肾法。

附录 《扁鹊心书》住世之法

住世之法

绍兴间刘武军中步卒王超者，本太原人，后入重湖为盗，曾遇异人，授以黄白住世之法，年至九十，精彩腴润。辛卯年间，岳阳民家，多受其害，能日淫十女不衰。后被擒，临刑，监官问曰∶汝有异术，信乎？曰∶无也，唯火力耳。每夏秋之交，即灼关元千炷，久久不畏寒暑，累日不饥。至今脐下一块，如火之暖。岂不闻土成砖，木成炭，千年不朽，皆火之力也。死后，刑官令剖其腹之暖处，得一块非肉非骨，凝然如石，即艾火之效耳。故《素问》云∶年四十，阳气衰，而起居乏；五十体重，耳目不聪明矣；六十阳气大衰，阴痿，九窍不利，上实下虚，涕泣皆出矣。夫人之真元乃一身之主宰，真气壮则人强，真气虚则人病，真气脱则人死。保命之法∶灼艾第一，丹药第二，附子第三。人至三十，可三年一灸脐下三百壮；五十，可二年一灸脐下三百壮；六十，可一年一灸脐下三百壮，令人长生不老。余五十时，常灸关元五百壮，即服保命丹、延寿丹，渐至身体轻健，羡进饮食。六十三时，因忧怒，忽见死脉于左手寸部，十九动而一止，乃灸关元、命门各五百壮。五十日后，死脉不复见矣。每年常如此灸，遂得老年康健。乃为歌曰∶一年辛苦唯三百，灸取关元功力多，健体轻身无病患，彭寿算更如何。（先生三法实为保命之要诀，然上策人多畏惧而不肯行；中策古今痛扫，视为险途；若下策用之早而得其当，亦可十救其五。予遵行历年，不无有效、有否。效则人云偶中，否则谗谤蜂起，此非姜附之过，乃予热肠之所招也。吾徒不可以此而退缩不前，视人之将死可救而莫之救也。）

25问 手持温灸灸法有什特点?

答 使得渗透力源源不断的作用于穴位，不但方便，舒服，而且治疗效果比直接灸或其他工具更加好。

26问，灸时可以配合食疗吗？

答 可以。手持艾灸调理在使用一周之内，大部分患者的消化吸收功能大大改善。体质虚弱的可以吃一些高质量的饮食。

火气大的喝小米米汤。

肿瘤患者每天早上吃薏苡仁粥，能够有效防止复发。

27问，灸后口干眼涩起疙瘩，是不是灸的上火了？

答，不是。是灸把你体内本来淤积的燥热之气被灸宣泄出来了。再灸，这些燥火就没有了。灸火不伤人。喝水既可。晚上小米粥最养人。

28问 灸时饮食注意什么？

答 宜清淡，忌辛辣。

29问 灸是不是伤阴上火？

答 这种观点是受温病学派的影响，想当然得出的结论。我的患者常常坚持灸关元几个月，没有上火。亲身实践，自有结论。

30手持温灸调理的四穴养生有没有时间讲究或先后次序？

答,随时可灸，因为人体随时在消耗。没有先后次序。怎么方便怎么来。

31问 阴虚能灸吗？

答 认为火证和阴虚不能灸这是个天大的误区。

许多人把中医辨证论治的阳虚，阴虚，燥热和艾灸的纯阳混为一谈了。灸是用火调动人体的气机，调整人体已经出现不平衡的各系统功能，灸是补纯阳的。

元气足，气血阴阳寒热虚实自会调和。

32问 不论寒热虚实都能灸吗？

答《医学入门》说：“虚者灸之，使火气以助元阳也；实者灸之，使实邪随火气而发散也；寒者灸之，使其气复温也；热者灸之，引郁热之气外发，火就燥之义也。”

33问 为什么针药无法治愈的病症灸能治愈？

答是因为针刺是通过调动元气来通经脉的，如果患者元气足，以针通经脉，疗效立竿见影；如果患者元气虚，无足够元气可调，自然疗效不佳。而元气虚弱的人、一般胃功能吸收极差，是很难完全消化吸收药物的，故而称针药所不及，只有灸法，可以不经过肠胃而直接将热力作用于经脉以祛除寒邪，通调经脉。

34 问 关元穴有什么作用？

答关元穴为元阴元阳之气闭藏之门户。是男子藏精，女子藏血之处，是统摄元气之所。灸关元能使命门真火充盛，小肠吸收功能增加，既补气又补血，主诸虚百损。

肾间动气禀受于先天，是维持生命活动的原动力。而此原动力，在人出生后，需要由小肠不断地吸收营养来充养，才能继续发挥作用，这就是灸关元以后天补先天的道理。

只有持续灸关元，才能起到暖丹田、壮元阳、补肾精、益骨髓的疗效。对于肾虚，结肠炎，顽固便秘，失眠，虚胖，贫血，各种慢性妇科病，前列腺疾病胃炎，糖尿病、高血压、低血压，哮喘、气管炎、肺结核、中风、脑梗，脑血栓，心脏病、慢性肾病、类风湿、脊柱炎等对于西医来说的不治之症，甚至癌症，通过重灸关元等，都可以治愈。

35问 灸关元穴会有什么反应？

答 灸法直论说；

当对关元穴施灸二三百壮后，会出现“通窜”的感觉，哪里有病，就“通窜”到哪里。比如：子宫有病，就会“通窜”到子宫；前列腺有病，就会“通窜”到前列腺；大肠有病，就自然“通窜”到大肠，直至病除为止。就好像电脑的“杀毒软件”一样，根本就不需要认为去操控，“杀毒软件”会从头到尾、从里到外的将“病毒”全部搜出并杀灭，全凭真阳元气的自然造化功能，绝对不用“越俎代庖”，其效果真是令人不可思议。

36问 关元穴灸到什么程度？

答灸到丹田暖洋洋。

灸法直论说；

在对患者施灸时，一般不论出现什么情况，都应该坚持灸下去，直至被灸的关元穴不觉疼痛或有温水流动的感觉，直至小腹如热水袋一样温热舒服为止。而且，在此之前所出现的情况都是病邪被化解出去的情况。比如：喉咙干痛、口渴、目赤、头痛等症状，许多古今医生都认为是灸过火了，通过灸足三里就可以引火下行。但我认为大可不必，因为灸关元可以祛除寒邪、增强脏腑功能，有助于恢复“元阴元阳”。

  人体“阴阳”的升降是有其固定的规律的，元气逐渐充足了，“阴阳”就必定按照其规律运行，该升的就自然会升，该降的就自然会降，根本就不必用人为的方法去调动升降。就是说，等寒邪被驱除以后，“上火”的症状就自然会消失，根本就用不着灸足三里来“引火下行”。因为人的身体内部是非常“聪明”的，艾火通过穴位的作用，激发了真元的功能，真元又借助艾火的力量去除寒邪，一旦寒邪被驱净，真元就会恢复“藏而不泄”的功能，将散在外面的热量收回来，根本就不会出现继续上火或或发烧的情况（对物体越加热，物体的温度就会越高，这是自然界的物理现象。而人体则不然，如果寒邪已去，发热的状况就会自动消除。但如果小腹温热以后，依然继续施灸，此时才会出现伤阴过火的现象，会出现超高血压，但也不会发烧）。那些刻意地使用“引火下行”方法的老医学教授们，都是对“阴阳”不甚明了的人。因为，“阴阳”是人体的神灵，是不可思议的，只会比大脑更神奇，绝不会比大脑更愚蠢。若灸至不疼、腹中温暖后继续施灸，才会出现“过火”的现象，才有可能会导致“阴虚阳盛”的“厥阴”证候。若施灸时仍感疼痛，并仍有“通窜”感，此时不论有无“过火”的情况，放胆施灸，一般不会有任何危险。而且，在灸关元的时候，会有热流从“气街”通向腿部，脚上会出汗，脚尖会向外出凉气，这就是阴邪下行外出的表现（这就是治疗风湿、类风湿的原理），用不着灸足三里。只是重灸后，穴位上有强烈的烧灼感，这是热气一时没有散开，睡一夜，烧灼感和“过火”的症状就会全部消失。第二天继续重灸，症状可能又会出现，再睡一夜，又会消失，几天后就不会再出现，就证明在体内造成这种现象的邪气已经被祛除了。如果太阳穴疼痛，是阳气开始生发、寒邪将要祛除的表现，一般睡一觉就能消除。至于其他症状会出现几天，就要看病邪深浅的程度。

37问 灸中脘穴有什么作用？

答 不论胃热胃寒，都可以灸中脘。

灸法直论说；

在灸中脘时，患者哪里有病，艾炷的热量就会主动“通窜”到哪里，一般会首先“通窜”到十二指肠的位置，然后“通窜”到贲门、胃部、幽门，若有肝病的患者，艾炷的热量就会自然“通窜”到肝区（这就是灸中脘可以治疗各种胃病、肝炎或胃癌、肝癌的原因）。此时患者会觉得喉咙异常干痛，这是病邪（寒邪）逐渐外发时的必然症状（病邪被驱赶到哪里，哪里就会出现西医所谓的炎症，此时许多中医专家都会任认为灸过火了，会立即停止治疗，使得功亏一篑），待灸至二三百壮以后，胃部会在忽然间有一股清凉的感觉向下流动，“通窜”感就会在瞬间消失，津液会在同时涌上来，喉咙干痛的感觉也就瞬间消失得无影无踪。而后，患者就会觉得胃部温热舒服，腹中就像有个热水袋一样，或有温水流动的感觉，此时绝对不会感到疼痛。从此，再灸50～100壮巩固一下即可。

38问 怎么用灸法预防或康复脑血栓，脑梗塞？

答中风的内因是脏腑气血亏损，阴阳失调。对于治疗方法来说，补足元气才是治愈疾病根本的治疗方法。元气充足，就很少会出现肝阳上亢的情况，血液也不会粘稠，末稍血管就会有弹性而不会脆裂。

人的元气不足，不能推动血液上升于脑部，导致血液流动缓慢甚至停止流动，致使血液凝固在脑部血管末梢，形成血栓。西医只知道疏通血管，却不知道补充元气；元气不足，必定会使血栓再生，这就是中风患者出院后极易复发的原因。所以，疏通血管是治标，补充元气是治本。

治疗原则应该是先扶其真元，同时兼顾病邪的部位。真阳元气在哪里衰败，内邪外邪就会在哪里发生，若能恢复真元，内外两邪都能灭绝，这就是「不治邪而实际就是以此治邪，不治风而实际就是以此治风」的道理。这就是治疗中风的法要。

若用重灸关元穴的方法，各种中风病症都可以治愈。对于脑溢血患者，灸关元就可以使在头部的虚火下降（吸回原处），头脑清醒，症状缓解，这是关元穴的作用，也是先天元气的自然功能，就像电磁铁一样，电力不足，铁屑就会掉落，电力充足，铁屑就会被吸回。继续施灸，阴邪逐渐化去，正气逐渐恢复，效果如神。对于脑血栓患者，理论和方法也同样如此，如果再加上中脘穴，效果会更加理想。阳气本身就有破瘀的功能。灸法是治疗中风的最佳方法，治疗速度也是最快的，效果也是最彻底的。

  灸时最好同时灸中脘，关元，足三里。

39问，灸法怎么治疗高血压？

答由于肝、脾、肾功能严重衰退，身体内产生的垃圾就不能得到正常和及时的清除，从而造成了血液粘稠，粘稠的血液就会比正常血液的流速要缓慢，尤其对于毛细血管来说，粘稠的血液就更难以通过，处于血管末梢的血液就会出现缺血的现象（大脑供血不足就会导致眩晕，真阳上头破瘀就会导致头痛），末梢神经就会通知中枢神经，而中枢神经就会命令心脏增加泵血压力，以使毛细血管的血压和供血能力恢复正常，这是人体的自然调节功能。距主动脉较近的组织器官必然会出现供血过多的情况.

然而，西医发明的降压药物，是抑制中枢神经的功能，使中枢神经向心脏发出减小泵压的指令，这就是过量服用降压药会使患者变成低血压的原因，而长期服用降压药物，就会使动脉末梢的血管和组织长期处于供血不足状态，毛细血管就会变脆。当患者情绪过分激动时，血压陡然增高，就会导致脑血管破裂而发生脑卒中脑溢血。有人会问：既然血管末梢会脆裂出血，为什么手指脚趾尖的血管和脏腑的毛细血管不会破裂呢？这是因为人在激动的时候血液不会向四肢流动，使得多出来的血液汇聚在躯干和头部，手脚冰冷就是证明。而且，躯干的肌肉也会因为激动而收缩，同时心脏跳动加快，使大量的血液只能向大脑汇聚。由于脑部的毛细血管长期处于缺血状态失去弹性，就必然在血压陡然增大时发生破裂。

现代医学证明了稀释血液的方法，但是，由于患者过去血液粘稠，血管就会因垃圾的淤积而增厚，稀释了血液却不能消除淤积，即便使用了消除瘀血的药物，却没有从根本上消除产生垃圾的因素，不久就会恢复原来的状态，也属于治标不治本的情况。

另外，由于心脑肾对于精血的需求量最大，肾精亏损，就会使得人体自动通过加大血液压力和流量的方法来解决心脑肾对血液能量的需求，而人体的心脏只有一个，满足了心脑肾的供血要求，自然就会使其它脏腑组织的血压增高，这就是血液不粘稠也会患有高血压的原因。这就说明，高血压是人体调节自身功能的正常反应。这也说明，治疗高血压应该以恢复脏腑功能为原则，而不应该用刺激中枢神经来抑制心脏「泵压」的方法进行治疗，不能只重视技术指标而忽视了生命的根本。应以恢复元气和脏腑功能为主，不要以恢复血压值为主。

脾肾两虚才是造成高血压的主要原因。高血压会导致心力衰竭是正确，因为（心脏）长期处于过度劳累和营养不足的不良状态，必然会导致功能衰竭，但是，肾脏疾病（肾精亏损）是导致冠心病和高血压的主要原因。

总而言之，真阳充足，脏腑功能强健，是不会出现高血压病的。哪个脏腑虚弱，都会导致高血压的发生，治疗和保养不当，就的恶性循环，会涉及几个脏腑此时的高血压也就很难完全治愈了。所以，高血压就是虚证。

由于「心主血脉」，血液粘稠与动脉粥样硬化都和心脏有直接关系，而心脏搏动的动力来源于肾，脾肾负责造血，肝肾负责藏血和滤血，所以，血液粘稠的原因主要都在于肾、脾、肝，治疗高血压应该从此处下手，心脏是无辜受害者，不应该在治疗心脏方面下功夫。由于脾肾经气亏损，就会使血液中的营养严重不足，虽然血压升高，血流速加快，依然会表现出供血不足的症状，这就是高血压患者经常出现眩晕的原因。

另外，由于长期服用降压药，使得脏腑组织供血不足，尤其使得血管壁变得没有弹性，一旦真阳鼓动，机体活力增强，人体便通过增加血压的方法使衰弱的组织尽快恢复正常。由于血压增高，脆弱的血管就会因为难以适应比服降压药时期更大的压力而发出疼痛的信号，这就是高血压患者经常出现头痛的原因（与静脉曲张患者也会疼痛的原理是相同的）。

所以，若要治愈高血压，必须补足真阳

若对关元穴和中脘穴施以持续灸配合足三里，，严重的配合涌泉穴。高血压病会痊愈

40问 灸法怎么治疗糖尿病？

答糖尿病所缺少的津液就是人身的真水，真水不会自生，也不是滋阴所能生，而是在真火的作用下生出的。所谓「阴虚」，是指由于真阳不足所导致的「脏腑收敛功能虚弱」，绝对不可以认为是「阴液不足」。

津液是由「气化」才能生出。而气化之源在于命门之火。命门火衰，则津液无所生也！况且，口渴、饥饿，是因为脾不能为胃行其津液，肺不能治理调节，三焦不能通调水道，才形成的「消渴」。

糖尿病，由于阴邪偏胜，致使先天真阳元气不能归于本位，浮游于上而成上消，浮游于中而成中消，浮游于下而成下消。按阳虚症治之，法宜「导龙归海」，将浮游的先天真阳元气引入丹田，糖尿病患者都患有阳痿这一事实，就可以说明这一点）。

治疗糖尿病的最为有效、最为便当的方法就是：重灸关元穴和中脘穴，或重灸膏肓穴，或三大补穴相间施灸。

依照此法治疗糖尿病，病邪只会一天比一天少，患者必定会一天比一天精神，一天比一天强壮有力。

慢性病是不可能在一两天或一两个月内被治愈，脏腑功能只能在元气逐渐得到补充的情况下才会慢慢恢复。常言道：「伤筋动骨一百天。」受伤的筋骨要想恢复正常的功能，起码需要100天乃至更长时间的新陈代谢，才能得到全面的补充和恢复，何况受损伤很严重的脏腑组织呢？没有半年以上的时间，脏腑的虚损和坏死的细胞，是不可能全部被更新的。

糖尿病患者都患有阳痿证，就说明其属于阳虚的证候。而且，糖尿病患者如果受伤，伤口很难愈合，就足以证明糖尿病属于脾肾阳虚证。在中医理论中，脾的功能之一就是「主肌肉」和「主统血」，服用补脾阳和肾阳的药物才算对症，或重灸关元穴和中脘穴，可以很快恢复脾的功能而将糖尿病治愈。

  同时灸关元，中脘，足三里。

41问 长期体质虚弱者怎么才能脱胎换骨？

答 坚持灸关元，中脘，足三里。

42问 自汗盗汗怎么灸？

答自汗、盗汗实际都属于阳虚证，而绝大多数中医却都认为盗汗属于阴虚。盗汗出现在夜间，夜间虽然是阳气潜藏之时，然而夜间却是阴盛之候，阴（邪）盛可以逼阳于外，阳浮外亡，故汗出，曰盗汗。灸关元。

43问 咳嗽怎么灸？

答 治内伤咳嗽，用重灸关元穴或中脘穴的方法，可以完全治愈。若想快速止咳，也可先灸肺俞各5~10壮，不可过多。

现在喉源性咳嗽非常多，根本原因是咽喉局部过敏引起，输液或止咳药效果不佳。特点以咽喉发痒即咳嗽。艾灸大椎肺腧。天突。效果极佳。个人经验，仅供参考。

44问 哮喘，气管炎怎么灸？

答 灸可以根治。

中药，胎盘，冬虫夏草，伏天背部贴膏药等等方法，都是有效，但是无法根治。

手持温灸，灸关元为主，配合中脘，足三里，连续彻底治愈多例，基本上是一个半月显效，三个月左右治愈。还配合灸肺输

45问 感冒怎么灸？

答 用手持温灸灸大椎。绝大部分情况下一次就可以治好感冒。经常感冒者灸关元，中脘，足三里提高免疫力。

46问 鼻炎怎么灸。

答 大椎。肺腧。迎香 上星 太阳 印堂穴。手持温灸效果极佳。治愈率非常高。

47再问 总是不断的感冒怎么灸？

答 平时灸关元，足三里，中脘，提高免疫力。感冒时灸大椎。不论寒感冒还是火感冒，都可以灸大椎。

48问 慢性前列腺炎怎么根治？

答 持续灸关元，八髎。肾腧 直到丹田暖洋洋。配合灸足三里和中脘。

49问 类风湿怎么根治？

答由于阳气虚弱，同时久居湿地（环境），才会造成风湿和类风湿病证。在西方发达国家，类风湿病被称为第二号癌症，西医认为是不治之症，只能用激素来减轻患者的病痛，而用中国的灸法治疗，治愈率非常高。

若用重灸法，对关元穴、中脘穴施以重灸，当灸至200壮以后，热量会通窜到周身四肢的各个关节，未有不愈者，从临床实践的经验和理论来看，灸法是根除类风湿病的最有效方法。

灸的方法，一定可使类风湿因子转为阴性，但严重变形的骨骼极难恢复正常形态.

灸关元，中脘，足三里，以及局部疼痛点。

------------------------------------------------------