나는 개인적으로 기형아 증가가 양약의 오남용에 있다고 생각한다.  또 부분적으로는 현대인들의 식생활에도 약간의 문제가 있다.  환원주의적 기반에 따라 만들어진 양약들은 대부분 심각한 부작용을 갖고 있고, 병의 치료도 언제나 완전하지가 못하다. 이에 따라 인간의 신체가 제대로 기능하지 못하게 되고, 이런 요소들이 태아의 발달을 저해하게 된다.

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 ------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------
태영호 공사가 위험하다
조약돌(조갑제닷컴 회원)
 과거 김정은의 선친인 김정일의 애첩 성혜림과의 관계 등 주석궁의 추문을 공개했다가 북한이 남파한 무장 간첩에 의하여 총격 피살된 이한영 사례처럼 김정은은 태영호 공사를 암살하기 위하여 무장 간첩단을 남파하고 제거하도록 밀명을 내렸을 가능성이 높다.
 그나저나 태 공사가 집필하여 출판된 '3층 서기실의 암호'란 책자에 대한 현 정권 집권층의 시각이 예사롭지가 않아 보인다. 도대체 김정은에 대하여 뭐라고 썼길래 김정은이 태 공사를 능지처참 운운하는지 궁금하고 우리 정부 반응도 예사롭지 않다. 벌써 이런 말 저런 말들이 쏟아져 나오는 것을 보면 뭔가 은밀하게 검토가 이뤄지고 있는지도 모른다. (발췌)
----------------------------------------------------------------

저건 한의학이 아니다.  서구의학적인 환원론적 방법을 통해 한의학의 약물로 약을 만들면, 그건 양약과 다름이 없다. 재료가 천연 식물이라는 점이 다를 뿐이다.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

백문이 불여일견 : 문재인 백마리가 한마리 개새끼만도 못하다.

우문현답 : 멍청한 문재인이 집권한 현정권은 답이없다.

두문불출 : 문재인같은 놈이 두 번 다시 나와선 안된다.

문전성시 : 문재인앞에 주사파새끼들이 드글드글한 모습

전대미문 : 역사상 문재인 같은 놈은 없었다.

동문서답 : 문재인이 동쪽을 가리키면 서쪽이 답이다.

[출처] 웃으며 알아보는 문씨관련 새로운 4자 성어!
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

---> 물가가 오른 것은 정부가 통화를 증발하고 있다는 말이다. 통화를 증발하는 이유는 인위적으로 경기를 부양하기 위한 것이다. 하지만 좌파 정책이 버티고 있는 한 아무리 돈을 퍼부어도 경기는 좀처럼 나아지지 않을 것이다. 그 끝은 끔찍한 인플레이다. 우리 모두 문재앙에 대비해야 한다.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 트럼프 대통령은 이날 백악관에서 문 대통령과의 정상회담 중 취재진에게 질문을 받고

“우리가 원하는 특정한 조건을 얻을 수 없다면 북한과의 정상회담을 갖지 않을 것”이라고 말했다.

 이어 “지금 김정은을 만나지 않는다고 해도 다른 기회에 정상회담을 할 수 있을 것”이라고 했다.

트럼프 대통령은 이와 함께

 “김정은이 두 번째로 시진핑 중국 국가주석과 (중국 다롄에서) 만난 후 김정은의 태도가 좀 변했다”며 “별로 좋은 느낌이 아니다”고 했다.
그러나 문 대통령은  트럼프 대통령이 미북정상회담 무산 가능성을 시사한 뒤에도 여전히

 “북미정상회담 개최에 대한 북한의 의지를 의심할 필요가 없다”며

“북미정상회담이 예정대로 제대로 열릴 것이라고 확신한다”고 딴소리를 했다.

특히 트럼프 대통령이 미북정상회담을 무산시킬 수 있는 ‘특정한 조건(certain conditions)’을 언급하자  청와대는 적잖이 당황하는 분위기였다. 청와대 고위관계자는 이날 미국 워싱턴에 마련한 프레스센터에서 기자들과 만나

 “조건이 무엇인지 정확히 잘 모르겠다”며 “그 조건이 무엇인지를 놓고 두 정상이 이야기를 한 적은 없다”고 했다.

한편 미 백악관은 이날 정례브리핑에서 미북 회담을 위한 전제조건이 무엇인지를 묻는 질문에

 “트럼프 대통령이 보고 싶어하는 것은 북한이 비핵화에 전념하는 것이고 이런 점에는 변화가 없다”고 대답했다.

새라 샌더스 대변인은 “트럼프 대통령이 정확하게 언급했듯 북한이 비핵화에 동의한다면 이들에게 밝은 미래가 있을 수 있다”고 밝혔다.

[출처] 펜엔 마이크) 한미 정상회담에서, 한미 이견폭발

------------------------------------------------------------------

"김대중 비자금 1조 4600억원 미국에 있다"

최종흡 전 국정원 3차장 검찰 진술... 김홍걸씨 "코멘트 가치 없다"

-----------------------------------------

러시아 혁명은 자연의 힘에 의한 것도,  무명의 대중에 의한 것도 아니다. 그것은 자신들의 목적을 추구하는 특정한 사람들에 의해 일어났다.  그것은 의도적인 행동의 결과이므로 가치 판단의 대상이 된다. 역사 기술에서 근원적인 철학적 도덕적 질문은 절대 끝나지 않는다. 우리의 논쟁은 과거에 무엇이 일어났느냐는 것만이 아니라, 미래에 무슨 일이 일어날 것인지에 대한 것이기도 하다.
---> 지난 대통령 탄핵 사건도 특정한 사람들에 의해 주도되었다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes in the Rate of Sea Level Rise

Willis Eschenbach

Here’s my conclusion in all of this. Until we can say why the rate of sea level rise:

• decelerated from the start of the C&W record until 1930

• accelerated rapidly until 1960

• decelerated for the next ten years

• stayed about the same from 1970 to 2000

• and then started accelerating again,

… until that time, I say that making just about any statement about sea level acceleration is premature. However, one thing is clear:

There is no simple relationship between CO2 levels and the rate of sea level rise …  (발췌)

------------------------------------------------------------------

남성 사이의 살인 사건은 여성에 접근하는데 필요한 지위와 명예를 지키기 위한 욕망에서 비롯한다.

-----------------------------------------------------------

중국와 위엔화는 베네수엘라의 미래인가?

베네수엘라가 중국의 위엔화를 채용하면 중국은 남미에 가장 강력한 입지를 마련할 뿐만 아니라, 일대일로 전략에 새로운 동반자를 만들게 되고, 나아가 에너지 시장에서 달러의 주도권에 강력한 도전장을 내밀게 될 것이다.

하지만 중국의 경제 발전은 지속 가능하지 않은, 중앙 정부에 의해 계획된 성장이다.

베네수엘라는 사회주의의 망령에 시달리는 것이지, 한 명의 독재자에 의해 지금의 상태에 이르지 않았다.

 

Is China and the Yuan the Future of Venezuela?

 

•Tho Bishop

 

 

Nicolás Maduro may have received more votes in Venezuela’s recent presidential election, but the record-low voter turnout is widely seen as its own form of protest against his increasingly oppressive socialist regime. So as long as Maduro’s government controls the voting process, his opponents will continue to advocate elections boycotts to try to erode the legitimacy of his government. Once again we see democracy being wielded as a weapon by tyrants, rather than an answer for political victims.

 

The true challenge to Maduro’s regime will not come from elections, but rather the growing threat of a coup. While the political heir to Chavez has managed to keep the military loyal by allowing them to profit from cartelizing vital supplies, the continuing deterioration of the nation’s economy has sparked growing rebellion and desertion among the ranks. As Maduro’s government has continued to doubled-down on the same failed socialist policies that created one of the world’s gravest humanitarian crises, action by the military is increasingly seen as inevitable – including by the leaders of neighboring countries.

 

Of course the destruction of Venezuela is not the result of a single man, and the issues plaguing the country will not simply disappear with his removal. So the question is what options realistically exist for a post-Maduro Venezuela, and what would those ramifications be for both its people and the rest of the world?

 

A few years ago I looked at what Ludwig von Mises would recommend Venezuela do, drawing inspiration from his writings on post-World War I Austria. Policy recommendations included condemning the socialist ideology that destroyed the country, mass-privatization of the economy, abandoning the bolivar, and abandoning all trade restrictions. While these would still be the ideal tonic for what ills the country, even in the face of socialist ruin the intellectual climate of Venezuela is still far from the classical liberalism of Mises.

 

This is demonstrated by the sad reality that the leading opposition parties, including Justice First, Popular Will, Democratic Unity Roundtable, and Democratic Action are a reaction to the violent crackdown and growing unconstitutional authoritarianism of Maduro’s government, rather than socialist ideology itself. In fact, all but Justice First still explicitly make socialist appeals in their political campaigns. The continued appeal of socialism among the public is so great that Henrique Capriles, a leading oppositional figure, called for a socialist-coalition as the best strategy to take down Maduro.

 

So if the public will does not exist to embrace true market reforms, what options exist for the country?

 

The first issue Venezuela faces is transitioning away from the bolivar that has become worth less than World of Warcraft currency thanks to Maduro’s hyperinflationary policies.

 

The best recent example of transitioning away from such monetary chaos is Zimbabwe, which stopped printing its own worthless currency in 2009 and transitioned to using the US dollar at an exchange rate of $1 for Z$35,000,000,000,000,000. It’s possible that Venezuela could make a similar move – especially as US dollars are already circulating in what few markets still function in the country.

 

Unfortunately this may not work quite as well in today’s Venezuela.

 

If the Venezuelan people are not prepared to completely discard the personality cult of the late-Hugo Chavez, a full embrace of the American dollar may face complications – in part due to the US’s militarization of financial markets in recent years. While the pros may still outweigh the cons to formally adopting the dollar, there may be another option with unique appeal to Venezuela: the Chinese yuan.

 

Will China Bailout Venezuela?

 

Even during the peaks of the oil boom, the Venezuela’s socialist economy relied greatly on the Chinese government. China is already Venezuela's biggest lender, and has already been forced to restructure payments with its largest investment in Latin America. Of course Venezuela is going to need more than debt restructuring to stabilize its financial situation. Given its aggressive desire to expand its global economic footprint, China may see potential in a broad Venezuelan bailout package – one that could include the country formally adopting the yuan.

 

In 2015, the Mugabe government of Zimbabwe tried to make a big deal out of adopting the yuan as a legal currency in exchange for debt cancelation. The problem is that the announcement ignored that the yuan had already been legal currency dating back to 2009, and the debt forgiveness package was largely “a mirage.” This is understandable. Zimbabwe is of modest value to China outside of its use in projecting a growing global Chinese influence – with its tobacco industry the most lucrative trade the African nation has with its Eastern benefactor.

 

Venezuela’s oil reserves, on the other hand, have long interested China’s Communist Party – and Maduro’s government already prices it in renminbi as a way to get around the US dollar. What if China offers a bailout package – including perhaps skilled workers to replace those that have fled the government-operated PDVSA – dependent on Venezuela receiving oil payments made in the yuan? Given how vital the oil economy is to Venezuela’s economy – making up 50% of GDP - renminbi would likely begin to quickly circulate through the Venezuelan economy in a way that hasn’t happened in Zimbabwe markets.

 

China would benefit from this arrangement in ways beyond its own energy consumption. A formal adoption of the yuan would give the country its strongest foothold in Latin America to date, a new partner to its “One Belt, One Road” initative, and would offer the most significant challenge yet to the dollars' hegemony in energy markets due to the sheer size of Venezuela’s reserves. Since Chinese officials have made it clear that they want to reduce global dependence on the dollar in the future, this could be a strong power play – particularly given the back and forth on trade we’ve seen between Xi and the Trump Administration (which could possibly see this as a 21st Century violation of the Monroe Doctrine.)

 

Of course Venezuela’s hyperinflation is really a consequence of the country's larger economic evils: the destruction of economic productivity due to the nationalization of industry and an expensive welfare state.

 

The rise of China is itself a testament to what even modest steps to market liberalization can do for a previously socialist economy. If Chinese support comes with stronger property rights than we see under Maduro – whose government recently nationalized a Kellogg’s plant – then this too would represent a positive step forward for Venezuelan citizens, even if it would reduce the country to more of a vassal state of China.

 

China Can’t Save Venezuela

 

While a Chinese bailout of Venezuela could offer desperately needed relief to the country, this third-way approach can’t go on forever – and China itself may end up being an illustration of this. For all the talk of China’s economic strength, the country has been forced to resort to overstating its own economic growth in recent years, and is very likely still doing so today.

 

Even more troubling is China’s own reliance on debt to keep its economy growing. While lacking the massive welfare programs of Chavez and Maduro, China has been indulging in a decade-long debt binge with massive government spending on everything from infrastructure, industry, and island creation. While the strength of China’s government gives it significant power in kicking the can down the road, global officials – such as the Reserve Bank of Australia - are starting to get alarmed.

 

The threat to China stems from the same reason that could make it attractive to a future Venezuelan government: their shared socialist ideology and belief in central planning. While China has long departed from the communist policies in Mao – even if Xi aspires for his degree of power – its continued reliance on government-centric five year plans and bloated state-run firms has created its own form of Keynesian nightmare.

 

In the words of Per Bylund:

 

The Chinese economy obviously relies very heavily on state-sponsored, state-planned projects such as these constructions of buildings. It probably wouldn’t be much of an exaggeration to say that the Chinese economy is a Keynesian jobs project of outrageous scale, which also means that is as removed from real value creation as any Keynesian undertaking....

 

What China teaches us about economics and economic policy is the lesson that is generally not provided in college classrooms: the important distinction within production between value creation and capital consumption. The story of China’s economic development is to a great extent one of unsustainable, centrally planned growth specifically in terms of GDP — but a lack of sustainable value creation, capital accumulation, and entrepreneurship.

 

In conclusion, while my wish is to see the Venezuelan people be rid of the vile Maduro government as quickly as possible, the country is haunted far more by its continued loyalty to socialism than it is the actions of a particular government leader. While the realities of modern Venezuela – combined with the global ambitions of China – could make a deal between the two countries a logical outcome, the Chinese model is not one that will bring prolonged prosperity.

 

True hope for Venezuela, and the rest of Latin America, must come from rejecting the inevitable failures of Marxism and embracing a Misesian understanding of economics and classical liberalism.

 

In other words, Menos Marx, Mas Mises.

 

Tho is an assistant editor for the Mises Wire, and can assist with questions from the press.

 

 

menos: 스페인어 less, fewer의 뜻

mas : more

-----------------------------------------------------

북한 인권 단체들과 탈북청년대학생들을 주축으로 한 

‘탈북 여종업원 북송반대 운동본부’와 전국청년대학생연대 등 인권단체들은 

23일 중국 내 북한식당 탈북 여종업원의 강제 북송 논란과 관련해 

“민변의 탈북민 강제북송 음모를 강력히 규탄한다”고 촉구했다.

이들 단체는 이날 서울 서초구 민변 사무실 건물 앞에서 기자회견을 열고 

“우리는 자유를 찾아 3만리 대륙과 대양을 돌고 돌아 

 목숨 걸고 탈북한 탈북청년대학생들로 

 누구보다도 자유와 민주주의 가치의 소중함과 

 지금도 북송이라는 두려움과 공포에 떨고 있을 

 12명의 여종원들의 심정 또한 잘 알고 있다”고 밝혔다.

특히 “민주주의라는 가면을 쓰고, 

온갖 반역과 죄악을 일삼는 민변에 대해서도 잘 알고 있다”며 

“탈북 여종업원들을 북송하기 위해 갖은 음모와 악행을 다하고 있는 

 민변의 죄악에 대해 더는 지켜보고만 있을 수 없어 

 목숨 걸고 이 자리에 섰다”고 말했다.

이어 “‘민주사회를 위한 변호사모임’이 

지금 자유대한민국에서 목도되고 있는 ‘탈북민 북송’이라는 

괴변의 근원지임을 명백히 밝힌다”며

 “민변은 탈북 여종업원 강제북송을 위한 음모를 당장 중단하라”고 촉구했다.

그러면서 “기획북송 불지피는 평양 살인마들의 부역자 민변은 자수하라”며

 “탈북민들은 자유 대한민국에서 살고 싶다. 보내려면 

민변 너희들이 북한에 가라”고 목소리를 높였다.

[출처] 민변(북변)... 너희들이 북한에 가라”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

정부가 여군보직제한 철폐한다고 한다

여자가 약하다보니 여성징병제도 실시하지 않는 형편인데

여군은 체력등이 약해서 전쟁수행에 부적합하다

여군보직제한 철폐하면 여군도 전쟁에 주구성원이 되는거 아니겠는가

체력이 약해서 징병제도 못하는 여군을 주구성원으로 삼게되면

결국 전투력 약화만 불러온다는 것이다

그리고 여자는 이익없는 징병제는 체력을 이유로 면제받으면서 이익되는 직업군인 임용에는 제한을 두지 않는건 형평성에도 어긋난 처사다

여군보직제한 철폐되면 우리나라 국방력은 약화된다

여군보직제한 철폐 안되게 해야한다
 

[출처] 문재인정부가 여군보직제한 철폐한단다(국방력 약화시키는 문재인)
 ------------------------------------------------------------------