김명수는 법원내 있어선 안될 사조직,
그것도 진보성향 우리법연구회 출신이어서 논란
이와중에 오늘 22일 연합뉴스TV 뉴스포커스에 출연한 서양호,
주로 진보(?)적 발언을 해왔던 인물인데, 이 인물 마저도
오늘 방송에서 충격적 사실을 밝혔다.
검찰이 혐의없음으로 기소를 하지 않았던
자유한국당 '염동렬'과 '김진태'를 선거 관련 당사자가
아닌 법원이 재정신청을 하여서 논란이 되었었는데
그 법원 관련 인물이 이번 김명수 후보라고 밝혔다.
검찰이 혐의없어서 기소하지 않은 자유한국당
염동렬, 김진태 의원을 재정신청하는데 관련된
인물이 김명수가 맞다면, 이런 인간은 정치적 편향성
논란까지 겹쳐져지고, 기수파괴란 법원 안정성까지
해치는 여러모로 부적합한 인사이기에 스스로
거취를 결정하거나 퇴출해야한다고 본다.
[출처] (속보) 서양호, " 김명수 대법원장 후보자, 자유한국당 염동렬과 김진태 의원 재정신청 관련자 " 논란
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
하이에크, 123쪽.
인간 교류의 관습과 관례 중에는 도덕 규범이 가장 중요하다. 이들 관습을 준수함으로써 세상의 질서가 생기고 인간이 생존할 수가 있다.
------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
['복지 시한폭탄' 국가채무] 나랏빚 700조인데...적자국채 25조 찍어 곳간 채우겠다는 정부 , 서울경제
나는 <대한민국, 이렇게 망한다>에서 한국이 복지관료주의로 망한다고 예상했다.
박근혜 대통령의 최대 실정은 복지 정책을 확대한 것이다.
박근혜 대통령의 최대 실정은 복지 정책을 확대한 것이다.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
이회창 씨가 회고록을 통해 이번 탄핵 사태의 책임이 박 대통령에 있으며, 좌파 정책도 국민을 위해 도입해야 된다고 말했다.
착각이거나 헛소리다. 이번 탄핵 사태는 좌파 쿠데타이다. 쿠데타를 제압하지 못한 책임이 있다면 옳지만, 대통령의 실정으로 최순실 사태가 일어났다는 판단은 틀리다. 모든 정부에서 측근의 부정은 있어왔는데, 유독 박 대통령의 경우만은 예외적으로 탄핵을 받아야 할 이유가 없다. 더구나 최순실의 부정은 극히 규모가 작고, 나머지는 거의 조작이다.
그리고 좌파 정책 중에 국가와 국민을 위한 정책이 과연 있기나 한가?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
이회창 씨가 회고록을 통해 이번 탄핵 사태의 책임이 박 대통령에 있으며, 좌파 정책도 국민을 위해 도입해야 된다고 말했다.
착각이거나 헛소리다. 이번 탄핵 사태는 좌파 쿠데타이다. 쿠데타를 제압하지 못한 책임이 있다면 옳지만, 대통령의 실정으로 최순실 사태가 일어났다는 판단은 틀리다. 모든 정부에서 측근의 부정은 있어왔는데, 유독 박 대통령의 경우만은 예외적으로 탄핵을 받아야 할 이유가 없다. 더구나 최순실의 부정은 극히 규모가 작고, 나머지는 거의 조작이다.
그리고 좌파 정책 중에 국가와 국민을 위한 정책이 과연 있기나 한가?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
홍준표가 朴 버리면 나는 洪을 버릴테다 (정규재 칼럼; 8월 21일)
https://youtu.be/z21Na3GSTGg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
최근의 일식이 그리 좋은 징조는 아니다.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
중국 경제의 치명적 약점.
케인즈 모델과 정실주의에 지배되고 있는 중국 경제
The Chinese Economy's Fatal Flaws
•William Hongsong Wang
Dr. Per Bylund’s recently published article poignantly states one of the core problems in the Chinese economy and its the state-manipulated Keynesian foundation. I do agree with his opinion. And if we dig deeper into the exact situation of Chinese economy, we will find that it’s a typical failing of the Keynesian, cronyist system.
By using the perspective of Austrian business cycle theory, lets take a look at China’s real estate industry, which is suffering more and more painfully from artificial credit issued by China’s central bank, the People’s Bank of China (PBC). During the 2008 global economic crisis, China’s central government issued the famous RMB 4 Trillion Stimulus Package Plan (equaling to $586 billion). Since 2009, the Chinese real estate economy has already suffered from three small economic cycles. As it is becoming more difficult for real estate companies to live on artificial prosperity, the duration of every business cycle has become shorter than the previous one. We also see more and more ghost cities because of the economic boom in every sub-economic cycle. There were at least 12 ghost cities founded in 2013, and the number of them jumped to at least 50 in 2017! Bankruptcy is happening more frequently among Chinese real estate enterprises. Since 2016, at least three real estate companies — with a combined debt of at least RMB 763 million — have gone bankrupt. The story of bankruptcy is continuing, with one of the biggest real-estate-driven enterprises, Wanda Group, facing financing problems. If Wanda no longer has access to cheap debt, it might not be able to refinance or roll over all its debt again. If Wanda has to face bankruptcy, it could possibly accelerate an end of the the current Chinese boom.
The data from the Chinese local governments is also not optimistic; their debt levels have reached almost RMB 25 trillion (US$ 4 trillion) at the end of 2014. In 2015, even the PBC admitted in one of its annual reports saying that China’s financial system is facing higher instability and uncertainty.
The above evidence is not a surprise. All these are the consequence of artificial bank credit created by central banking and central planning. In China, the loans are easy to get from the State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) or the businessmen who are the friends of the politicians in the Communist Party. China’s real estate industry is also the ally of the state and only the people who are friends of those in authority can participate in housing programs.
Besides the SOE economic system, what we should worry more about is how the Keynesian and crony system hurts small and private businesses in China, who are driving the economy of this country. Compared with the SOEs, and the businessmen who are the close allies of some influential politicians, it is harder for ordinary entrepreneurs who are running small businesses to get loans. Moreover, the recent market squeeze makes it harder for Chinese small business to survive. These entrepreneurs are not only facing an unfriendly bank credit situation, but also the threat of having to bribe the government to circumvent the massive scale of governmental economic regulations.
Consider the story of a small business boss Li Lang, who is a typical Kirznerian alert businessman in China. Several years ago, he observed a shortage of moving companies in the Southwest Chinese town of Chengdu. He started his business to serve the local people. The business is not easy, not only because it requires hard work, but Li also must bribe and maintain good relations with the local politicians to let them “protect” his business and help him introduce some business opportunities. According to Li, if the local bigwigs in the crony system had already discovered the opportunity of earning a fortune by managing a moving company, it wouldn’t have been possible for him to enter the business. Though now that he has earned a lot of money, he still has to carefully maintain the relationship with the politicians to "protect" his business. His is not an isolated case. In China, the less connections you have with the cronyist system, the less business opportunity you have. And even if you become successful in your business, be careful, the state has eyes on your wealth.
Though we know that the private sector is driving the Chinese economy and has improved the living standard of many Chinese individuals despite state economic manipulation, we still have to emphasize that the nature of the Chinese economic model is dominated by Keynesianism and cronyism. Otherwise, the false prosperity would make us misread what is happening in China
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Climate Change Our Biggest Problem?
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기